Uh oh, Bob is planning his excuse for the loss today. - The Orange Mane

Northman · 12-11-2005, 09:28 PM

He had someone request this off CP.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=131052

Bronx33 · 12-11-2005, 09:52 PM

10,001

TD4HOF · 12-11-2005, 09:58 PM

I have to go against my instincts and back Booberoo up here...I saw that hold on Hicks the play before the fated holding call. Just a terrible, terrible no-call. Hicks blew past him and the Cowboy lineman just flat out mugged him from behind.

Now you know how it feels, Chef fans. Burns, doesn't it?

Clockwork Orange · 12-11-2005, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TD4HOF

I have to go against my instincts and back Booberoo up here...I saw that hold on Hicks the play before the fated holding call. Just a terrible, terrible no-call. Hicks blew past him and the Cowboy lineman just flat out mugged him from behind.

Now you know how it feels, Chef fans. Burns, doesn't it?

The game didn't end on that play. They had their chances and blew it.

But I'm sure that won't stop Bob from going Sally Struthers on us about it.

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:03 PM

I think everybody in the world saw that call. It was a flat out tackle. Funny thing is... they're crying like a bunch of little biatches. Sad thing is, if that penalty gets called... like it should have they win. Too bad, so sad!

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...9&page=2&pp=15

ludo21 · 12-11-2005, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TD4HOF

I have to go against my instincts and back Booberoo up here...I saw that hold on Hicks the play before the fated holding call. Just a terrible, terrible no-call. Hicks blew past him and the Cowboy lineman just flat out mugged him from behind.

Now you know how it feels, Chef fans. Burns, doesn't it?

happens to us every week.

Also, with the QB touching rules so ticky tacky, the refs usually have their eyes on him and not on the play.

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clockwork Orange

The game didn't end on that play. They had their chances and blew it.

But I'm sure that won't stop Bob from going Sally Struthers on us about it.

Dude, it would have made it 4th and goal from the 20 yard line or so... No, it's not game over, but there's a big difference there!!!

sirhcyennek81 · 12-11-2005, 10:09 PM

Bob's excuse...his mother's penis got stuck in the vacuum, so he couldnt rub the ass of his trent green doll. There ya go.

Clockwork Orange · 12-11-2005, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OSKIE

Dude, it would have made it 4th and goal from the 20 yard line or so... No, it's not game over, but there's a big difference there!!!

So? They could have stopped them from scoring the winning TD. Or Lin Tynes could have made his field goal to send it to OT. Any way you slice it, the game did not end on any call or non-call.

Chef fans so love calling Bronco fans whiners, but as soon as a call doesn't go their way they immediatly start screaming about how the league hates them or that the officials screwed them.

I'll just give them the same that they gave us after the two blatant blocks in the back on Dainty Hall's punt return two years ago. Get over it, stop whining, sore losers, quit crying, etc.

SoCalBronco · 12-11-2005, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sirhcyennek81

Bob's excuse...his mother's penis got stuck in the vacuum, so he couldnt rub the ass of his trent green doll. There ya go.

That's actually a more legitimate excuse than the type of excuses (and whining) that im seeing on ChiefsPlanet right now.

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:16 PM

I know exactly what you're saying... guess it makes you feel good to act like Chef fan? I'm merely pointing out that the No-call cost them dearly. That close to the end of the game and that obvious... plain and simple, it was more obvious than the holding call on Johnson. IMO, both of them should have been called. BTW, lets not confuse my comments with the fact that I'm happier than shiat that they lost... don't care how, just care that they did!!!

Clockwork Orange · 12-11-2005, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCalBronco

That's actually a more legitimate excuse than the type of excuses (and whining) that im seeing on ChiefsPlanet right now.

Mediator12 · 12-11-2005, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OSKIE

Dude, it would have made it 4th and goal from the 20 yard line or so... No, it's not game over, but there's a big difference there!!!

Third and goal from the fourteen if they accepted the penalty. I would have declined it and not given them two chances. Still does not mean that Johnson did not HOLD Witten on the next play. That would have been an automatic FD as well.

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCalBronco

That's actually a more legitimate excuse than the type of excuses (and whining) that im seeing on ChiefsPlanet right now.

Did you see the one about the Bengals were going to come in and let the Queefs win b/c Cincy would rather play KC than Pitt in the playoffs?

How 'bout the one about them running the table now and controlling their own destiny... or the one about having a tougher schedule than SD... the list goes on and on! It's like reading a joke book!

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mediator12

Third and goal from the fourteen if they accepted the penalty. I would have declined it and not given them two chances. Still does not mean that Johnson did not HOLD Witten on the next play. That would have been an automatic FD as well.

I think it would have been further than that as the penalty happened at about the 12 (Bledsoe was rolling right). You're right though, it would have been 3rd down and they would have 2 chances. B/c it's more difficult defensing from the 5 as opposed to the 20 they may well have refused the penalty. But you obviously saw the same thing and know damn well that it was indeed a penalty!

Clockwork Orange · 12-11-2005, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mediator12

Third and goal from the fourteen if they accepted the penalty. I would have declined it and not given them two chances. Still does not mean that Johnson did not HOLD Witten on the next play. That would have been an automatic FD as well.

He did hold him, hell he spun him around.

With the referees calling any and everything against defenses these days (especially in passing situations) they should have expected it. Offenses get away with murder.

A prime example was today against Baltimore. Champ was headed straight for the ball and an INT when a Ratbird receiver just put two hands on him and shoved him out of the way of the ball. Now if a DB does that to a WR, you'll see a flag hit the ground before you can blink.

Mediator12 · 12-11-2005, 10:25 PM

I saw the last part of the Broncos game and was too worked up to study for awhile. Saw the ending of the Dallas/KC game because of that. Definitely a hold on Pettiti and definitely a Hold by Johnson on Witten.

Mediator12 · 12-11-2005, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clockwork Orange

He did hold him, hell he spun him around.

With the referees calling any and everything against defenses these days (especially in passing situations) they should have expected it. Offenses get away with murder.

A prime example was today against Baltimore. Champ was headed straight for the ball and an INT when a Ratbird receiver just put two hands on him and shoved him out of the way of the ball. Now if a DB does that to a WR, you'll see a flag hit the ground before you can blink.

I was agreeing that Johnson HELD Witten. Sorry that was not more clear.

Mediator12 · 12-11-2005, 10:26 PM

Yikes here comes Bob!

TD4HOF · 12-11-2005, 10:29 PM

Ahh, who cares! They lost! AAH HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Broncoman13 · 12-11-2005, 10:30 PM

I agree that both were holds. Both should have been called, but only one was called. Like I said earlier though, I'm not complaining... I'll sleep better tonight knowing that the Chefs got screwed, even if it was only a minor screwing. I think we should all open our arms to Chef fan tomorrow and tell them how they got screwed and the no-call was BS... then laugh at them crying about the no-call and ask them "How you like them apples!!!"

Bob's your Information Minister · 12-11-2005, 10:34 PM

No excuses. We had opportunities and blew it.

For me the game turned on two plays.

Trent Green's fumble.

And Surtains dropped interception.

If we win those two plays, we probably get 10 points and they probably lose 7.

Thank god the Jags and SD lost. We need to beat the Giants now.

ludo21 · 12-11-2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob's your Information Minister

No excuses. We had opportunities and blew it.

For me the game turned on two plays.

Trent Green's fumble.

And Surtains dropped interception.

If we win those two plays, we probably get 10 points and they probably lose 7.

Thank god the Jags and SD lost. We need to beat the Giants now.

i think the Gnats will win, at least i hope so. They have a lot of weapons and are a tough team to attack. May be a shootout.

Chiefs had their chances, but dropped the ball, now we need them to do it one more time and the division will be ours!

Mediator12 · 12-11-2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob's your Information Minister

No excuses. We had opportunities and blew it.

For me the game turned on two plays.

Trent Green's fumble.

And Surtains dropped interception.

If we win those two plays, we probably get 10 points and they probably lose 7.

Thank god the Jags and SD lost. We need to beat the Giants now.

That was the same play Champ Read and took to the house BTW. Surtain cost you 14 points with that Drop.

Bob's your Information Minister · 12-11-2005, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mediator12

That was the same play Champ Read and took to the house BTW. Surtain cost you 14 points wiht that Drop.

He's dropped a quite few this year.

12-11-2005, 09:28 PM	#1
Northman The Enigma Prognosis Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Maryland Posts: 17,925 Adopt-a-Bronco: Bryci	Uh oh, Bob is planning his excuse for the loss today. He had someone request this off CP. http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=131052

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-11-2005, 09:52 PM	#2
Bronx33 lets go partner Rumpson Rocks Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Lakewood,Colo Posts: 41,221 Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard	10,001

12-11-2005, 09:58 PM	#3
TD4HOF Rehabbed Lurker He's Better Than MJ!!!! Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ATX Posts: 441 Adopt-a-Bronco: Special Teams	I have to go against my instincts and back Booberoo up here...I saw that hold on Hicks the play before the fated holding call. Just a terrible, terrible no-call. Hicks blew past him and the Cowboy lineman just flat out mugged him from behind. Now you know how it feels, Chef fans. Burns, doesn't it?

12-11-2005, 10:03 PM	#5
Broncoman13 Broncoholic JT #80 Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 16,962 Adopt-a-Bronco: Orange Julius	I think everybody in the world saw that call. It was a flat out tackle. Funny thing is... they're crying like a bunch of little biatches. Sad thing is, if that penalty gets called... like it should have they win. Too bad, so sad! http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...9&page=2&pp=15

12-11-2005, 10:09 PM	#8
sirhcyennek81 Yes...swooping is bad... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Florence, Colorado Posts: 20,768 Adopt-a-Bronco: All of them.	Bob's excuse...his mother's penis got stuck in the vacuum, so he couldnt rub the ass of his trent green doll. There ya go.

12-11-2005, 10:16 PM	#11
Broncoman13 Broncoholic JT #80 Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 16,962 Adopt-a-Bronco: Orange Julius	I know exactly what you're saying... guess it makes you feel good to act like Chef fan? I'm merely pointing out that the No-call cost them dearly. That close to the end of the game and that obvious... plain and simple, it was more obvious than the holding call on Johnson. IMO, both of them should have been called. BTW, lets not confuse my comments with the fact that I'm happier than shiat that they lost... don't care how, just care that they did!!!

12-11-2005, 10:25 PM	#17
Mediator12 OM analyst REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: INDY Posts: 9,703 Adopt-a-Bronco: Malik Jackson	I saw the last part of the Broncos game and was too worked up to study for awhile. Saw the ending of the Dallas/KC game because of that. Definitely a hold on Pettiti and definitely a Hold by Johnson on Witten.

12-11-2005, 10:26 PM	#19
Mediator12 OM analyst REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: INDY Posts: 9,703 Adopt-a-Bronco: Malik Jackson	Yikes here comes Bob!

12-11-2005, 10:29 PM	#20
TD4HOF Rehabbed Lurker He's Better Than MJ!!!! Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ATX Posts: 441 Adopt-a-Bronco: Special Teams	Ahh, who cares! They lost! AAH HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

12-11-2005, 10:30 PM	#21
Broncoman13 Broncoholic JT #80 Join Date: May 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 16,962 Adopt-a-Bronco: Orange Julius	I agree that both were holds. Both should have been called, but only one was called. Like I said earlier though, I'm not complaining... I'll sleep better tonight knowing that the Chefs got screwed, even if it was only a minor screwing. I think we should all open our arms to Chef fan tomorrow and tell them how they got screwed and the no-call was BS... then laugh at them crying about the no-call and ask them "How you like them apples!!!"

12-11-2005, 10:34 PM	#22
Bob's your Information Minister Chiefs > Broncos Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 25,931 Adopt-a-Bronco: CHRIS KUPER!!!	No excuses. We had opportunities and blew it. For me the game turned on two plays. Trent Green's fumble. And Surtains dropped interception. If we win those two plays, we probably get 10 points and they probably lose 7. Thank god the Jags and SD lost. We need to beat the Giants now.