MAX Protection - The Orange Mane

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 03:42 PM

Is it me or did the Qweefs copy a picture out of the Redskin book and go max protect against us?!?

And how are we going to solve this?

Taco John · 12-05-2005, 03:43 PM

I'm already working on it with Shanahan. Kubiak is late with our coffee...

BigPlayShay · 12-05-2005, 03:45 PM

Isn't the term max protection? Is Mass some kind of variation off max protection (tackles rather than tight ends)?

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I'm already working on it with Shanahan. Kubiak is late with our coffee...

Way to be there for the "Team"

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigPlayShay

Isn't the term max protection? Is Mass some kind of variation off max protection (tackles rather than tight ends)?

OH, just KILL ME FOR LIVING...

BigPlayShay · 12-05-2005, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Play2Win

OH, just KILL ME FOR LIVING...

Not busting on you, I was asking a real question...

Mediator12 · 12-05-2005, 04:03 PM

Great point Play2win. They did just that and shut down the front four all game. LC better figure it out right quick.

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:07 PM

You don't have to "MASS" protect when the refs are letting you tackle Pryce and Brown...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Play2Win

OH, just KILL ME FOR LIVING...

We would, but they got laws against that...

orinjkrush · 12-05-2005, 04:08 PM

our D line ( all 8 of em) disappeared. why? were they held all game long?

orinjkrush · 12-05-2005, 04:10 PM

i'm startin to think the Queefs were right: punch the donks in the mouth and they will fold.

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigPlayShay

Not busting on you, I was asking a real question...

No, you're right its MAX...

I've got to take my lumps on that one...

broncofan2438 · 12-05-2005, 04:12 PM

No pressure on the Quaterback, ya, thats goona do a lot of good against peyton!!!!!!!!!!!!!

broncofan2438 · 12-05-2005, 04:14 PM

Stupid question, but how do you guys get those pictures next to your names?

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncofan2438

No pressure on the Quaterback, ya, thats goona do a lot of good against PAY-ME-A-TON!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There I fixed it for you...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orinjkrush

our D line ( all 8 of em) disappeared. why? were they held all game long?

Are you blind...Wabbit said he went back over the game on Tivo and the holding was unreal...our line just dissapear because KC wanted them to...the refs were totally biased yesterday...letting their OL push LJ thru the line was outrageous...as a matter of fact, it happened several time they tried to push the pile...it's a penalty that is rarely called...but the Lynch fiasco was simply over the top and I'm considering calling the NFL front office...It just plain wasn't a penalty, and they even threw some icing on the cake for another `15...it was ludicrous to change the game in that magnitude at a critial phase...there is NO QUESTION that changed the game's outcome...

We had them stopped and they gift wrapped them 30 yards...now lynch should of kept his mouth shut, but he allready had the PF...they just got trigger happy...sometimes refs need to stay out of deciding games...

I can even handle the OL holding like thieves, because all teams hold, but not to that extent...the call on Lynch was over the top...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:20 PM

It's also completely obvious the NFL wants INDY to make history...talk about a poster boy...I can't wait to see how the biased refs call that game...maybe we will get an honest crew, but I doubt it....still got to get there tho...

orinjkrush · 12-05-2005, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

Are you blind...Wabbit said he went back over the game on Tivo and the holding was unreal...our line just dissapear because KC wanted them to...the refs were totally biased yesterday...letting their OL push LJ thru the line was outrageous...as a matter of fact, it happened several time they tried to push the pile...it's a penalty that is rarely called...but the Lynch fiasco was simply over the top and I'm considering calling the NFL front office...It just plain wasn't a penalty, and they even threw some icing on the cake for another `15...it was ludicrous to change the game in that magnitude at a critial phase...there is NO QUESTION that changed the game's outcome...

We had them stopped and they gift wrapped them 30 yards...now lynch should of kept his mouth shut, but he allready had the PF...they just got trigger happy...sometimes refs need to stay out of deciding games...

I can even handle the OL holding like thieves, because all teams hold, but not to that extent...the call on Lynch was over the top...

not blind, looked like a biased game from my set in DC. the call on Lynch was total BS...but hey he knows he's being watched.

still....they disappeared. all of em. where the hell was engleberger? not one friggin pressure let alone a sack.that suggests to me the D being called.

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:43 PM

There was blatant holding all game...KC's line is good, but not that good...we have not gotten tons of sacks, but always bring pressure...Engleberger wasn't even active last week...how was he a factor? He just got held is all...I can't believe this is an issue...it was OBVIOUS even to a 12 year old neophyte fan...

orinjkrush · 12-05-2005, 04:47 PM

mock....calm down dude. the holding wasn't all THAT obvious. why would the NFL allow that? we all know there is a home field ref-ing bias. the DL just got dominated by the schemes. hard to swallow but it must be true.

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:49 PM

Dude, Wabbit said there were at least 10 non calls on OL holding, and he watched it on Tivo, and Wabbit is a corrospondent...I don't always agree with him on everything, but the holding was OBVIOUS...

Play2win · 12-05-2005, 04:51 PM

I've come to the realization were are going to have to PLAY THROUGH the holding. Many times its not going to get called, but we need to be PHYSICAL ENOUGH that it doesn't matter...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:52 PM

Quote:

the holding wasn't all THAT obvious. why would the NFL allow that?

Why does the NFL do alot of crap? If you don't think some crews are biased your insane...that game was horribly reffed...I'm not saying we didn't blow it, but the game was poorly called...

I'll start talking about Kubiak being a moronic playcaller...3rd and 2 with the game on the line...let's pass it...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Play2Win

I've come to the realization were are going to have to PLAY THROUGH the holding. Many times its not going to get called, but we need to be PHYSICAL ENOUGH that it doesn't matter...

You can't really play thru holding, but you can bull rush thru it...I think the cold might of weakened the DL, and KC has a fine line excellent at disguising holds, but we have gotten push every game before....enough b****ing about the refs, lynch and holding...

I'm turning my wrath on Lelie and the playcalling...

watermock · 12-05-2005, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Play2Win

I've come to the realization were are going to have to PLAY THROUGH the holding. Many times its not going to get called, but we need to be PHYSICAL ENOUGH that it doesn't matter...

You can't really play thru holding, but you can bull rush thru it...I think the cold might of weakened the DL, and KC has a fine line excellent at disguising holds, but we have gotten push every game before....enough b****ing about the refs, lynch and holding...

I'm turning my wrath on Lelie and the playcalling...

12-05-2005, 03:42 PM	#1
Play2win Ring of Famer Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 9,610 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Duke	MAX Protection Is it me or did the Qweefs copy a picture out of the Redskin book and go max protect against us?!? And how are we going to solve this? Last edited by Play2win; 12-05-2005 at 04:13 PM..

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-05-2005, 03:43 PM	#2
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,706 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	I'm already working on it with Shanahan. Kubiak is late with our coffee...

12-05-2005, 03:45 PM	#3
BigPlayShay Ring of Famer Novaking Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denver, CO Posts: 4,238 Adopt-a-Bronco: Got Cut	Isn't the term max protection? Is Mass some kind of variation off max protection (tackles rather than tight ends)?

12-05-2005, 04:03 PM	#7
Mediator12 OM analyst REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: INDY Posts: 9,701 Adopt-a-Bronco: Malik Jackson	Great point Play2win. They did just that and shut down the front four all game. LC better figure it out right quick.

12-05-2005, 04:07 PM	#8
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	You don't have to "MASS" protect when the refs are letting you tackle Pryce and Brown...

12-05-2005, 04:08 PM	#10
orinjkrush ... Prospects for the future... Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DistrictOfCorruption Posts: 4,914 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ben Garland	our D line ( all 8 of em) disappeared. why? were they held all game long?

12-05-2005, 04:10 PM	#11
orinjkrush ... Prospects for the future... Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DistrictOfCorruption Posts: 4,914 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ben Garland	i'm startin to think the Queefs were right: punch the donks in the mouth and they will fold.

12-05-2005, 04:12 PM	#13
broncofan2438 Faneco this... LETS TAKE BACK THE AFC WEST Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: California Posts: 6,302 Adopt-a-Bronco: ERIC DECKER	No pressure on the Quaterback, ya, thats goona do a lot of good against peyton!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12-05-2005, 04:14 PM	#14
broncofan2438 Faneco this... LETS TAKE BACK THE AFC WEST Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: California Posts: 6,302 Adopt-a-Bronco: ERIC DECKER	Stupid question, but how do you guys get those pictures next to your names?

12-05-2005, 04:20 PM	#17
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	It's also completely obvious the NFL wants INDY to make history...talk about a poster boy...I can't wait to see how the biased refs call that game...maybe we will get an honest crew, but I doubt it....still got to get there tho...

12-05-2005, 04:43 PM	#19
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	There was blatant holding all game...KC's line is good, but not that good...we have not gotten tons of sacks, but always bring pressure...Engleberger wasn't even active last week...how was he a factor? He just got held is all...I can't believe this is an issue...it was OBVIOUS even to a 12 year old neophyte fan...

12-05-2005, 04:47 PM	#20
orinjkrush ... Prospects for the future... Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DistrictOfCorruption Posts: 4,914 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ben Garland	mock....calm down dude. the holding wasn't all THAT obvious. why would the NFL allow that? we all know there is a home field ref-ing bias. the DL just got dominated by the schemes. hard to swallow but it must be true.

12-05-2005, 04:49 PM	#21
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Dude, Wabbit said there were at least 10 non calls on OL holding, and he watched it on Tivo, and Wabbit is a corrospondent...I don't always agree with him on everything, but the holding was OBVIOUS...

12-05-2005, 04:51 PM	#22
Play2win Ring of Famer Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 9,610 Adopt-a-Bronco: The Duke	I've come to the realization were are going to have to PLAY THROUGH the holding. Many times its not going to get called, but we need to be PHYSICAL ENOUGH that it doesn't matter...