Well, There Might As Well Be A Plummer Thread... - The Orange Mane

RhymesayersDU · 09-18-2005, 07:18 PM

Stats Today:
J. Plummer 23/37 248 0 TD 1 INT 1 Fumble, Not Lost

So what's the word around the 'Mane?

Atlas · 09-18-2005, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhymesayersDU

Stats Today:
J. Plummer 23/37 248 0 TD 1 INT 1 Fumble, Not Lost

So what's the word around the 'Mane?

He still throws a hard ball to catch. He puts a lot of pressure on his WRs. Almost all of his passes are a little behind, a little ahead, a little high or a little low. If the WRs keep making the catches Jake is effective. That being said Props to Charlie Adams. he did well.

Candy Cigarettes · 09-18-2005, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhymesayersDU

Stats Today:
J. Plummer 23/37 248 0 TD 1 INT 1 Fumble, Not Lost

So what's the word around the 'Mane?

Word is Plummer's amphibious....
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?...0&postcount=10

RhymesayersDU · 09-18-2005, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Candy Cigarettes

Word is Plummer's amphibious....
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?...0&postcount=10

Yeah yeah, I saw that thread.

I should have said "Well, There Might As Well Be An Intelligent Plummer Thread..."

RhymesayersDU · 09-18-2005, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

He still throws a hard ball to catch. He puts a lot of pressure on his WRs. Almost all of his passes are a little behind, a little ahead, a little high or a little low. If the WRs keep making the catches Jake is effective. That being said Props to Charlie Adams. he did well.

Good take. I thought he played pretty damn well today. He played smart, he was finding guys, etc. He didn't force things, and I know it frustrates people when it's 3rd & 10 and we make a 5 yard pass, but he took what the D gave him, and didn't force things downfield. Only 1 INT on a tipped ball.

The fumble was ****ty, as it basically killed that drive, and missing the wide open Adams wasn't good, but overall I thought he played well today.

Atlas · 09-18-2005, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhymesayersDU

Good take. I thought he played pretty damn well today. He played smart, he was finding guys, etc. He didn't force things, and I know it frustrates people when it's 3rd & 10 and we make a 5 yard pass, but he took what the D gave him, and didn't force things downfield. Only 1 INT on a tipped ball.

The fumble was ****ty, as it basically killed that drive, and missing the wide open Adams wasn't good, but overall I thought he played well today.

It wasn't even a tipped ball the hit the Dlineman in the helmet!!

That's the problem with a 6' QB.

RhymesayersDU · 09-18-2005, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

It wasn't even a tipped ball the hit the Dlineman in the helmet!!

That's the problem with a 6' QB.

So, just so I know what bandwagon to jump on... How tall is Leinart?

Atlas · 09-18-2005, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhymesayersDU

So, just so I know what bandwagon to jump on... How tall is Leinart?

6'5" 225 lbs

He is bigger than Gold...

DomCasual · 09-18-2005, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

He still throws a hard ball to catch. He puts a lot of pressure on his WRs. Almost all of his passes are a little behind, a little ahead, a little high or a little low. If the WRs keep making the catches Jake is effective. That being said Props to Charlie Adams. he did well.

Agreed on Charlie Adams. As much as I am disappointed in what seems to be Darius Watts' regression, much of it is offset by the fact that we finally seem to have a viable Number 3 wideout threat in Adams. He seems to get open, and catch the balls that are thrown to him. And you have to think he will only get better as the season goes - what does he have, eight career receptions prior to this year?

I mean, he's not Travis McGriff - but who is?

RhymesayersDU · 09-18-2005, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

6'5" 225 lbs

He is bigger than Gold...

rofl @ taller than Gold.

errand · 09-18-2005, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

It wasn't even a tipped ball the hit the Dlineman in the helmet!!

That's the problem with a 6' QB.

He's 6'2"....which while not prototypical is about the average height for an NFL QB.

errand · 09-18-2005, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

6'5" 225 lbs

He is bigger than Gold...

I recall an old saying...

"Tis' not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but more the size of the fight in the dog"

Denver Crush · 09-18-2005, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by errand

I recall an old saying...

"Tis' not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but more the size of the fight in the dog"

tell that to doug flutie

elsid13 · 09-18-2005, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by errand

I recall an old saying...

"Tis' not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but more the size of the fight in the dog"

Unless it a beagle against a pit bull, then it doesn’t matter how much fight there in the beagle it pretty ugly.

CBF1 · 09-18-2005, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Candy Cigarettes

Word is Plummer's amphibious....
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?...0&postcount=10

LMAO REP

Atlas · 09-18-2005, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by errand

I recall an old saying...

"Tis' not the size of the dog in the fight that matters, but more the size of the fight in the dog"

That is so true but the dog needs to be able to see over the line to throw the ball.... It doesn't help that this dog also has a somewhat of a sidearm deliver.

broncosteven · 09-18-2005, 07:58 PM

I got Jakes autograph tonight & I thought I was looking down on him & I am only 5"11.

That said the Oline was getting beat all day & he had to throw quickly. I thought he did well, wish we ran more motion moving the FB & HB into & out of slot, keeps the defense off guard a bit & tends to show their play calls early.

I don't like the 2 TE set with out motion. we cannot beat strong Dlines straight up.

Taco John · 09-18-2005, 08:02 PM

What about the size of the dog that you trip on? Is there a saying for that?

errand · 09-19-2005, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

What about the size of the dog that you trip on? Is there a saying for that?

Yes...

"Tripping over your dog will bring about a one way ticket out of town"

Rock Chalk · 09-19-2005, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

6'5" 225 lbs

He is bigger than Gold...

My dick is bigger than Ian Gold.

SoCalBronco · 09-19-2005, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlecRaenos

My dick is bigger than Ian Gold.

This post is literally "Gold". rofl

Bob's your Information Minister · 09-19-2005, 09:48 PM

Yes, but can your dick blitz off the edge and cover the tight end?

I watched the game and I thought Plummer played well. The passing game looked a bit dumbed down (alot of short routes and quick passes), but Plummer did a fine job without much of a running game.

Blueflame · 09-19-2005, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by errand

Yes...

"Tripping over your dog will bring about a one way ticket out of town"

Ah, but what are the consequences of being injured by one's sofa?

Clockwork Orange · 09-19-2005, 11:32 PM

I'm still wondering where the designed roll outs and play action bootlegs are. Just about every single passing play the Broncos have run this season has been from the pocket where it's well known and statistically proven that Plummer is far less effective.

I can't understand for the life of me why they aren't playing to their strengths but it might have a little something to do with the offensive struggles we've seen the first two weeks. Just a thought.

Hulamau · 09-19-2005, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlas

He still throws a hard ball to catch. He puts a lot of pressure on his WRs. Almost all of his passes are a little behind, a little ahead, a little high or a little low. If the WRs keep making the catches Jake is effective. That being said Props to Charlie Adams. he did well.

Thats about the size of it.

09-18-2005, 07:18 PM	#1
RhymesayersDU Go Broncos, Nuggets, Rox GANGNAM STYLE Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Back In The 303! Posts: 14,812 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ty Lawson	Well, There Might As Well Be A Plummer Thread... Stats Today: J. Plummer 23/37 248 0 TD 1 INT 1 Fumble, Not Lost So what's the word around the 'Mane?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Change in air for Plummer	SoCalBronco	Orange Mane Central Discussion	36	08-20-2005 03:20 PM

09-18-2005, 07:58 PM	#17
broncosteven The Kranz Dictum MWA: Flight Director Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Tranquility Base Posts: 29,018 Adopt-a-Bronco: MONEYBALL #38	I got Jakes autograph tonight & I thought I was looking down on him & I am only 5"11. That said the Oline was getting beat all day & he had to throw quickly. I thought he did well, wish we ran more motion moving the FB & HB into & out of slot, keeps the defense off guard a bit & tends to show their play calls early. I don't like the 2 TE set with out motion. we cannot beat strong Dlines straight up.

09-18-2005, 08:02 PM	#18
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,697 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	What about the size of the dog that you trip on? Is there a saying for that?

09-19-2005, 09:48 PM	#22
Bob's your Information Minister Chiefs > Broncos Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 25,918 Adopt-a-Bronco: CHRIS KUPER!!!	Yes, but can your dick blitz off the edge and cover the tight end? I watched the game and I thought Plummer played well. The passing game looked a bit dumbed down (alot of short routes and quick passes), but Plummer did a fine job without much of a running game.

09-19-2005, 11:32 PM	#24
Clockwork Orange Persona Non Grata I seen him! Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,438	I'm still wondering where the designed roll outs and play action bootlegs are. Just about every single passing play the Broncos have run this season has been from the pocket where it's well known and statistically proven that Plummer is far less effective. I can't understand for the life of me why they aren't playing to their strengths but it might have a little something to do with the offensive struggles we've seen the first two weeks. Just a thought.