The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2005, 06:19 AM   #1
azbroncfan
Ring of Famer
 
azbroncfan's Avatar
 
Angry guntoting,meateating AMERICAN

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 8,669

Adopt-a-Bronco:
TEBOW
Default Our D schemes?

This is the same D we have put on the field last couple years. I'm not the biggest Coyer fan. His blitzing packages are predictable and we still cannot get pressure. Coyer is all talk and no show on the field. He always has sayings and motto's but the D never lives up to hype. This could be another career year for QB;s playing against denver broncos.
azbroncfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-12-2005, 06:27 AM   #2
Broncoman13
Broncoholic
 
Broncoman13's Avatar
 
JT #80

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,961

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Orange Julius
Default

His schems (blitz's) suck b/c he drops a DL into coverage in order to blitz a LB. The concept of overload his completely lost!
Broncoman13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:37 AM   #3
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

You know what? It was 6 - 3 at half time. Brown had something like 9 rushing yards at half time.

I can't even begin to pick on the defense until I manage to get through all the problems on offense, which may take all week. The defense did just about everything we wanted them to do. They got turnovers. They stiffened in the redzone. They kept us in the game until midway through the 3rd quarter. They kept us in the game with a safety playing corner.

The only thing they didn't do well was pressure the QB, but that was in large part because Miami didn't let us. They through a ton of short routes early in the game to neutralize our aggressiveness.

No complaints here about the D, at least not yet.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:40 AM   #4
Broncoman13
Broncoholic
 
Broncoman13's Avatar
 
JT #80

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,961

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Orange Julius
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday
You know what? It was 6 - 3 at half time. Brown had something like 9 rushing yards at half time.

I can't even begin to pick on the defense until I manage to get through all the problems on offense, which may take all week. The defense did just about everything we wanted them to do. They got turnovers. They stiffened in the redzone. They kept us in the game until midway through the 3rd quarter. They kept us in the game with a safety playing corner.

The only thing they didn't do well was pressure the QB, but that was in large part because Miami didn't let us. They through a ton of short routes early in the game to neutralize our aggressiveness.

No complaints here about the D, at least not yet.

All good points and I agree, but I'm still frustrated with the psuedo blitzes.
Broncoman13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:42 AM   #5
x123z
old Fan
 
old fan

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 254
Default

A lot of the D's problems stem from having to play most of the game. I hate Ray Lewis, but I wish we had someone to fire up our players like he does.
x123z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:43 AM   #6
Mastermind2002
Ring of Famer
 
BRONCOS ARE 5-1!

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday
The only thing they didn't do well was pressure the QB, but that was in large part because Miami didn't let us. They through a ton of short routes early in the game to neutralize our aggressiveness.
Any reasons for why we couldn't do the same against them?
Mastermind2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:47 AM   #7
Mastermind2002
Ring of Famer
 
BRONCOS ARE 5-1!

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x123z
A lot of the D's problems stem from having to play most of the game. I hate Ray Lewis, but I wish we had someone to fire up our players like he does.
It doesn't matter if you bring in Ray Lewis or not. If the D is on the field too long, it's going to get worn out. The Ravens have a better D than the Broncos and they got worn out as the Colts eventually picked them apart. You can't give Manning that many chances to score and NOT score yourselves.
Mastermind2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:58 AM   #8
jayman_37
Seasoned Veteran
 
jayman_37's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 420
Default

we weren't able to even go into nickel package in the second half at times. So some times we had Ian Gold trying to matchup with their slot receiver. That's not exactly a favorable matchup for us. Lenny Walls couldn't run with Marty Booker at all because of his cramps. This game is just something that happens to everyone. Even the mighty Patriots lost to Miami last year.
jayman_37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:59 AM   #9
Mediator12
OM analyst
 
REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!!

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: INDY
Posts: 9,701

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azbroncfan
This is the same D we have put on the field last couple years. I'm not the biggest Coyer fan. His blitzing packages are predictable and we still cannot get pressure. Coyer is all talk and no show on the field. He always has sayings and motto's but the D never lives up to hype. This could be another career year for QB;s playing against denver broncos.
Again, what the hell are you talking about? Miami had a TON of Max protection schemes and ONLY really started taking advantage of the game when Champ, Lenny, and Darrent were all sitting on the sidelines! There was one Big Play where Lenny Walls should not have been in the game, and Lynch was caught off guard by the snap count. That's it.

If you think this was the defenses fault you need to check your self. They held Miami down until 5 Min left in the third Q, then the Flood gates opened when Jake reverted to his poor decision making self and Ernster KO'd out of bounds.
Mediator12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:00 AM   #10
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastermind2002
Any reasons for why we couldn't do the same against them?
Damn good question. I think primarily because A) it wasn't our game plan and we clearly can't adjust and B) I'm not sure we have the personnel to execute it. Honestly I think Miami has a better corp of receivers (across the board) than we do (Boston, Booker, and Chambers). McMichael is no slouch either. In the past our OL seems to really struggle with that kind of play and we end up with a lot of balls that are tipped and intercepted. I think Miami plays their DBs closer to the line of scrimmage as well. I was a bit surprised at how far off the line our Corners played. They probably had a lot respect for Miami's WR.

But that approach certainly would have been a good one to try.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:02 AM   #11
Mile High Shack
Ring of Famer
 
Mile High Shack's Avatar
 
Cock-a-doodle-do

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 17,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastermind2002
Any reasons for why we couldn't do the same against them?
Jake Plummer
Mile High Shack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:02 AM   #12
noom
Me > You
 
noom's Avatar
 
Feels like an Arby's night

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 70
Default

We have schemes?
noom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:04 AM   #13
Mediator12
OM analyst
 
REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!!

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: INDY
Posts: 9,701

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday
Damn good question. I think primarily because A) it wasn't our game plan and we clearly can't adjust and B) I'm not sure we have the personnel to execute it. Honestly I think Miami has a better corp of receivers (across the board) than we do (Boston, Booker, and Chambers). McMichael is no slouch either. In the past our OL seems to really struggle with that kind of play and we end up with a lot of balls that are tipped and intercepted. I think Miami plays their DBs closer to the line of scrimmage as well. I was a bit surprised at how far off the line our Corners played. They probably had a lot respect for Miami's WR.

But that approach certainly would have been a good one to try.
Actually, the Lack of Shanahan to use ANY form Of Max Protection to get the ball Downfield constantly or just to complete any THIRD Down would be a crime. He consistently want to send 5 into patterns and I think it makes Jake read a too Much. Miami did a great job of Clogging the Middle on Blitzes and using TE's and RB's to pick up the edge blitzers.
Mediator12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:09 AM   #14
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mediator12
Actually, the Lack of Shanahan to use ANY form Of Max Protection to get the ball Downfield constantly or just to complete any THIRD Down would be a crime. He consistently want to send 5 into patterns and I think it makes Jake read a too Much. Miami did a great job of Clogging the Middle on Blitzes and using TE's and RB's to pick up the edge blitzers.
I just don't understand why a coaching staff with as much experience and talent as our could not adjust. It reminded me of Fonzie as the headcoach in the Water Boy.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:18 AM   #15
Mastermind2002
Ring of Famer
 
BRONCOS ARE 5-1!

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodsunday
Damn good question. I think primarily because A) it wasn't our game plan and we clearly can't adjust and B) I'm not sure we have the personnel to execute it. Honestly I think Miami has a better corp of receivers (across the board) than we do (Boston, Booker, and Chambers). McMichael is no slouch either. In the past our OL seems to really struggle with that kind of play and we end up with a lot of balls that are tipped and intercepted. I think Miami plays their DBs closer to the line of scrimmage as well. I was a bit surprised at how far off the line our Corners played. They probably had a lot respect for Miami's WR.

But that approach certainly would have been a good one to try.
I'm starting to believe that Shanahan has lost his ability to adjust to what the opponent does on D.
Mastermind2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:22 AM   #16
bloodsunday
Ring of Famer
 
Nothing lasts forever.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dove Valley
Posts: 5,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Spencer Larsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mastermind2002
I'm starting to believe that Shanahan has lost his ability to adjust to what the opponent does on D.
What's worse, I think he believes that his schemes are infallible. Our offense has been leaking oil for a while now, despite the top-10 yardage honor. We are horrid in the redzone and third down. We have not been able to dominate or take control of any game where the opposing defense has an even mediocre defense. The only thing this offense has going for it is that it puts up a lot of yards. The problem is that points are all that matters. No one cares how many yards you put up.

That's why I say that I am very disappointed about Shanahan's inability (or unwillingness) to adapt and change. This has been apparent from both a personnel and game plan perspective.
bloodsunday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:40 AM   #17
Broncoman13
Broncoholic
 
Broncoman13's Avatar
 
JT #80

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,961

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Orange Julius
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mediator12
Again, what the hell are you talking about? Miami had a TON of Max protection schemes and ONLY really started taking advantage of the game when Champ, Lenny, and Darrent were all sitting on the sidelines! There was one Big Play where Lenny Walls should not have been in the game, and Lynch was caught off guard by the snap count. That's it.

If you think this was the defenses fault you need to check your self. They held Miami down until 5 Min left in the third Q, then the Flood gates opened when Jake reverted to his poor decision making self and Ernster KO'd out of bounds.

Excellent points. This team isn't nearly as bad as they showed yesterday. You can't say for sure, but if Bailey doesn't get hurt (field related) and Walls and DWill don't miss time b/c of fatigue/cramps/heat we probably stay in that game until the end. The max protection is another good point... but what exactly is the point of sending a LB on a blitz so that you can drop a DE into coverage. Again, the concept of overload has been missed by Coyer!
Broncoman13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:49 AM   #18
broncosteven
The Kranz Dictum
 
broncosteven's Avatar
 
MWA: Flight Director

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tranquility Base
Posts: 29,015

Adopt-a-Bronco:
MONEYBALL #38
Default

I didn't like that Coyer kept bringing the Blitz & it kept getting picked up. Coyer obviously thought that he could pressure Gus into mistakes & take him out of the game. He did not have a backup plan to use when it was apparent that fins were able to not only pickup blitz but execute on quick timing routes for 8,10,12 yds consistently.

I blame Defense Coordinator for not adjusting & getting any stops, we got the score down to 10 points & really needed a stop & fins OC calls the right play that ends the game. Coyer got his ass kicked as much as the players.

I also blame Kubs for a vanallia O gameplan. but that is another thread.
broncosteven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:10 AM   #19
Mediator12
OM analyst
 
REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!!

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: INDY
Posts: 9,701

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by broncosteven
I didn't like that Coyer kept bringing the Blitz & it kept getting picked up. Coyer obviously thought that he could pressure Gus into mistakes & take him out of the game. He did not have a backup plan to use when it was apparent that fins were able to not only pickup blitz but execute on quick timing routes for 8,10,12 yds consistently.

I blame Defense Coordinator for not adjusting & getting any stops, we got the score down to 10 points & really needed a stop & fins OC calls the right play that ends the game. Coyer got his ass kicked as much as the players.

I also blame Kubs for a vanallia O gameplan. but that is another thread.
Now you are showing some pure speculation that has no basis. Lenny Walls was hobbling against Booker and should have not been in the game. Coyer held them to 6 points for almost three Quarters and the offense had 7 drives of 5 plays or Less during that time.

The defense was on the field 70% of the TOP at the point where the Dolphins score their first TD. It is hard to get stops with A saftey playing CB too in 100 Degree heat.
Mediator12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:14 AM   #20
Broncoman13
Broncoholic
 
Broncoman13's Avatar
 
JT #80

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 16,961

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Orange Julius
Default

Any word on Champs status yet?
Broncoman13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:18 AM   #21
Traveler
Traveling Man!
 
Traveler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,408

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ryan Clady
Default

DId anyone else notice during the jumbo package near the goal line that Carswell, Warren, and Alexander were in the game and we still couldn't punch it in? That's pathetic!
Traveler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:22 AM   #22
kent156
King of the Ants
 
kent156's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Paradise lost
Posts: 685
Default

i'll hold off judgement and see how the season turns out, but one thing if the broncos can't get pressure on the QB and this fins oline is suppose to be so bad it's going to be a long season.
kent156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:24 AM   #23
kent156
King of the Ants
 
kent156's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Paradise lost
Posts: 685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papi728
DId anyone else notice during the jumbo package near the goal line that Carswell, Warren, and Alexander were in the game and we still couldn't punch it in? That's pathetic!
the sad thing is the same package next week probably will work for a TD, this team is too inconsistent
kent156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:30 AM   #24
Mediator12
OM analyst
 
REAL Front Seven Bandwagon !!!

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: INDY
Posts: 9,701

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kent156
i'll hold off judgement and see how the season turns out, but one thing if the broncos can't get pressure on the QB and this fins oline is suppose to be so bad it's going to be a long season.
The fins had a very good passing strategy with keeping a Back or TE in to protect on almost every single Passing play. Also something we did not account. However, the sloppy coverages were just that, SLOPPY!

I hope we play more Press coverage than we did today in the future. Almost every single play they completed a pass on was with the CB's 7-10 yards off the ball. I know Walls and Bailey are not great technicians on the Jams, but when you blitz, you have to cover the Hot routes Aggressively.

I was stunned to see CB's allowing that much seperation on third down's and giving up simple catches. Make them beat you deep. Make them earn it. They never did but allowed a ten yard catch to go 60 Yards with poor technique on the jam by an injured Walls.
Mediator12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 08:37 AM   #25
epa86b@netzero
Seasoned Veteran
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mediator12
However, the sloppy coverages were just that, SLOPPY!

I was stunned to see CB's allowing that much seperation on third down's and giving up simple catches. They never did but allowed a ten yard catch to go 60 Yards with poor technique on the jam by an injured Walls.
This has been the story for the last couple of years. Sloppy coverage and missed assignments are becoming a staples on defense.

We need to play straight up defensive and forget the ineffective blitzs. Against a bad offense, the more plays they have to make the more likely they are to make a mistake. Instead, we give up cheap yardage on poor play calling.

Bottomline: These performances are becoming far too routine.
epa86b@netzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Well At least the Chiefs got Gunther ...... Spider Orange Mane Central Discussion 223 09-11-2007 09:14 PM
ESPN Insider El Guapo Orange Mane Central Discussion 5 07-27-2005 10:56 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Denver Broncos