![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
Or more than 10 billion a quarter. Now there's evidence that big oil as conspired to REDUCE refining capacity in the U.S. to inflate fuel prices, criminal acts IMO.
What should be done with these people? --------------------------------------------------- Exxon's $10B fill-up: Cashing in on crunch By Brett Arends Wednesday, September 7, 2005 - Updated: 04:27 PM EST Oil companies came under new fire yesterday when it emerged that ExxonMobil's profits are likely to soar above $10 billion this quarter on the back of the fuel crisis. That's $110 million a day, and more net income than any company has ever made in a quarter. It's also a stunning 69 percent increase over the same period a year ago and a 34 percent jump from the $7.6 billion Exxon made just last quarter. ``Do you realize President Bush has just given a tax break to ExxonMobil?'' thundered Rep. Ed Markey (D-Malden). ``Of all the companies in the history of the world that needed a tax break, this month, ExxonMobil should be at the bottom of the list.'' The law gives incentives to producers such as Exxon to expand production, such as for drilling for new wells in deeper waters in the Gulf of Mexico. ``It makes me angry,'' agreed Rep. Marty Meehan (D- Lowell), noting rising fuel prices ``are going to have a negative ripple effect throughout the economy.'' http://tinyurl.com/brtmd ----------------------------------------- September 7, 2005 CONTACT: Jamie Court (310) 392-0522 ext 327 or Tim Hamilton (360) 495-4941 Internal Memos Show Oil Companies Intentionally Limited Refining Capacity To Drive Up Gasoline Prices Santa Monica, CA -- The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) today exposed internal oil company memos that show how the industry intentionally reduced domestic refining capacity to drive up profits. The exposure comes in the wake of Hurricane Katrina as the oil industry blames environmental regulation for limiting number of U.S. refineries. The three internal memos from Mobil, Chevron, and Texaco (Click here to read the memos.) show different ways the oil giants closed down refining capacity and drove independent refiners out of business. The confidential memos demonstrate a nationwide effort by American Petroleum Institute, the lobbying and research arm of the oil industry, to encourage the major refiners to close their refineries in the mid-1990s in order to raise the price at the pump. "Large oil companies have for a decade artificially shorted the gasoline market to drive up prices," said FTCR president Jamie Court, who successfully fought" to keep Shell Oil from needlessly closing its Bakersfield, California refinery this year. Oil companies know they can make more money by making less gasoline. Katrina should be a wakeup call to America that the refiners profit widely when they keep the system running on empty." "It's now obvious to most Americans that we have a refinery shortage," said petroleum consultant Tim Hamilton, who authored a recent report about oil company price gouging for FTCR. (Click here to read the report.) "To point to the environmental laws as the cause simply misses the fact that it was the major oil companies, not the environmental groups, that used the regulatory process to create artificial shortages and limit competition." The memos from Mobil, Chevron and Texaco show the following: * An internal 1996 memorandum from Mobil demonstrates the oil company's successful strategies to keep smaller refiner Powerine from reopening its California refinery. The document makes it clear that much of the hardships created by California's regulations governing refineries came at the urging of the major oil companies and not the environmental organizations blamed by the industry. The other alternative plan discussed in the event Powerine did open the refinery was "... buying all their avails and marketing it ourselves" to insure the lower price fuel didn't get into the market. Click here to read the Mobil memo. * An internal Chevron memo states; "A senior energy analyst at the recent API convention warned that if the US petroleum industry doesn't reduce its refining capacity it will never see any substantial increase in refinery margins." It then discussed how major refiners were closing down their refineries. Click here to read the Chevron memo. * The Texaco memo disclosed how the industry believed in the mid-1990s that "the most critical factor facing the refining industry on the West Coast is the surplus of refining capacity, and the surplus gasoline production capacity. (The same situation exists for the entire U.S. refining industry.) Supply significantly exceeds demand year-round. This results in very poor refinery margins and very poor refinery financial results. Significant events need to occur to assist in reducing supplies and/or increasing the demand for gasoline. One example of a significant event would be the elimination of mandates for oxygenate addition to gasoline. Given a choice, oxygenate usage would go down, and gasoline supplies would go down accordingly. (Much effort is being exerted to see this happen in the Pacific Northwest.)" As a result of such pressure, Washington State eliminated the ethanol mandate -- requiring greater quantities of refined supply to fill the gasoline volume occupied by ethanol. Click here to read the Texaco memo. FTCR is nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer group. For more information visit: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/ener...t+Profiteering Last edited by Bronco_Beerslug; 09-09-2005 at 05:11 AM.. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 17,010
|
man that is a lot of money
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
In The Bag
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Meth Alley
Posts: 9,953
Adopt-a-Bronco: MethWolfe |
Buy stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Marginally Continent
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Folsom Prison
Posts: 19,935
Adopt-a-Bronco: David Bowens |
Quote:
I'm of many conflicts on this. The windfall taxes strike me as just unsavory. I mean I could go for it if the proceeds were tied directly to something like the cost of rebuilding, but still ...... Anti-trust. Nobody ever lost money when Standard Oil and ATT were busted up. In fact, the ATT guys got stock in the baby bells, and made a lot of cash. Msft conversely is pretty stuck. I did buy some stock in hope it would be busted up, but sold it. But, higher prices are also a way to conserve and get people to want more efficient cars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 17,010
|
Quote:
that is the only way to fight back against the oil companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Marginally Continent
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Folsom Prison
Posts: 19,935
Adopt-a-Bronco: David Bowens |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
In The Bag
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Meth Alley
Posts: 9,953
Adopt-a-Bronco: MethWolfe |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Marginally Continent
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Folsom Prison
Posts: 19,935
Adopt-a-Bronco: David Bowens |
exactly, cheney finally gives these elitist rich whiny nader wanna be hippies the energy policy they wanted, and he still get's pilloried !!! (-:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
uhhhh
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,550
|
Quote:
exactly! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,950
|
Quote:
More importantly, maybe this will finally get the funding and focus needed to get our best and brightest on to making next generation cars (like hydrodgen fuel cells) a reality ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
giddy-up
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 1,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
![]() Notice how he distorts the facts, e.g., implies that environmentalists are to blame when it's been established that deliberate attempts to limit refining capacity are actually to blame? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
Quote:
Could you post the timeline and benefits for what opening the Artic refuge would do for America? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|