Do you support President Bush and The war on Terrorism?

[Ratboy]

Vote.

[Bronco_Beerslug]

No his war and not him. I do support our military personnel he has sacrificed for his grudge match against Iraq. And I do support our operations in Afghanistan trying to find the people who actually attacked us.

[TheDave]

cute how you threw "The Troops" in there...

GWB = NO
Troops = YES
The War = NO

2 out of 3 gotta go with NO

[Ratboy]

No, You cannot support the troops without supporting their mission.

[Ratboy]

it will come together.

Rigs and TheDave don't support the troops and their mission.

[TheDave]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

No, You cannot support the troops without supporting their mission.

With that binary brain of yours, thats probably true... the rest of us more evolved human beings are able to make distinctions.

[clarker]

Originally Posted by TheDave

With that binary brain of yours, thats probably true... the rest of us more evolved human beings are able to make distinctions.

I agree with you on this. I support both their mission and the troops, but just because you do not support their mission, that does not mean you don't support them.

How does that add up? What about in Kosovo in 1993. There were Republicans who disagreed with Clintons decision to use force, but that doesn't mean they didn't hope they were successful or that they at least came home safely. BTW I broke ranks in with my Republican friends and thought Clinton, because I thought it was the right thing to do. Caught all sorts of hell for it.

[Ratboy]

Originally Posted by clarker

I
How does that add up? What about in Kosovo in 1993. There were Republicans who disagreed with Clintons decision to use force, but that doesn't mean they didn't hope they were successful or that they at least came home safely..

Liberals don't want this mission to be successful, if it was successful than that means President Bush would get praises on how good of a president he was, The liberals would die before admitting Bush was right to go into iraq.

[El Guapo]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

Liberals don't want this mission to be successful, if it was successful than that means President Bush would get praises on how good of a president he was, The liberals would die before admitting Bush was right to go into iraq.

I agree.. but you have to understand that you made this poll on a forum whose team resides in Colorado. Colorado is VERY liberal my friend, best of luck with your poll.

[TheDave]

Originally Posted by Maverick_7

I agree.. but you have to understand that you made this poll on a forum whose team resides in Colorado. Colorado is VERY liberal my friend, best of luck with your poll.

Didn't Bush win colorado both times?

[Ratboy]

Originally Posted by Maverick_7

I agree.. but you have to understand that you made this poll on a forum whose team resides in Colorado. Colorado is VERY liberal my friend, best of luck with your poll.

I don't know for a fact, but i'd say 80% of the posters live outside of colorado.

[Ratboy]

Originally Posted by TheDave

Didn't Bush win colorado both times?

Dole won it in 96' also

[TheDave]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

Dole won it in 96' also

Guess were not as liberal as Mav thinks.

[clarker]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

Liberals don't want this mission to be successful, if it was successful than that means President Bush would get praises on how good of a president he was, The liberals would die before admitting Bush was right to go into iraq.

I don't buy that(well except for maybe LABF).

1. Even if at the end of the day it is a success, the libs could still be right about Bush missleading the public to support the war. You should watch that CNN special "Dead Wrong" that Beerslug posted a link about. I never bought the Downing Street Memos because they are opinions or theories that British intelligence agents had about what they thought the U.S. was doing with the intelligence on Iraq/WMD. But this special interviewed several former Bush admistration memember and CIA people. It was a compelling argument.

2. Even my doubts about Bush and how he presented the evidence of WMD is growing, I still believe that the war was worth it. I still believe Saddam intened to get WMD's and so did Clinton going into the war. He may not have had them, but he wanted them and he would have used them if he ever got them.

3. I still believe that at the end of the day Iraq has been freed to make it's own laws, choose it's own leaders and defend it's self, the war will be worth it.

4. Libs may disagree with Bush, hate his policy and so on. But that doesn't mean they want the troops to fail. That would mean more of them die and I don't believe they want that.

5. I have never read any post by any lib or anyone who disagrees with the war insult the troops in any way. To say you disagree with the mission is not an insult to the troops. They are are doing what they are ordered to do.

[gunns]

Originally Posted by Bronco_Beerslug

No his war and not him. I do support our military personnel he has sacrificed for his grudge match against Iraq. And I do support our operations in Afghanistan trying to find the people who actually attacked us.

Exactly. Loved the way troops were put in that poll. Like we can't support them if we don't support George and his war. People who are for the war love to put words in peoples mouths. Any attempt to make their opinions appear right.

[Ratboy]

Originally Posted by gunns

Exactly. Loved the way troops were put in that poll. Like we can't support them if we don't support George and his war. People who are for the war love to put words in peoples mouths. Any attempt to make their opinions appear right.

1 Liberal says it's "the worlds war"

another says It's George W. Bush's war.

Lets not point fingers at Bill Clinton though, He did have the power to avoid 9/11.

[Ratboy]

But so far, You idiots can't read..

I did say "War on Terrorism"

I didn't just say The war in Iraq.

I'm sure you liberals HAVE to support war on terrorism, or do you not care if terrorists are stopped?

[Crushaholic]

I support the war against terrorism. Not only are we fighting the terrorists on their soil (instead of ours), we are positioning ourselves to have a centralized ally that could help us take care of other Middle East countries that decide they want to harbor terrorists.

[Rigs11]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

it will come together.

Rigs and TheDave don't support the troops and their mission.

Yeah in that wacky brainwashed mind of yours you can't support the troops and yet be against the flawed and unjust war based on lies in which they are dying daily.

[Rigs11]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

Liberals don't want this mission to be successful, if it was successful than that means President Bush would get praises on how good of a president he was, The liberals would die before admitting Bush was right to go into iraq.

That is the biggest copout around these boards, that if Dubya actually did the things that he was supposed to we would not praise him so it's somehow ok that he doesn't do those things.Sit down junior.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by TheDave

With that binary brain of yours, thats probably true... the rest of us more evolved human beings are able to make distinctions.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Crushaholic

I support the war against terrorism. Not only are we fighting the terrorists on their soil (instead of ours)

As long as it's not you or your kids doing the fighting, eh?

BTW, your premise is a half-truth insofar as Bush's policies are creating three new terrorists for every terrorist killed and eliciting hatred of Americans among ordinary Muslims throughout the world.

Bush is a better recruiter for al Qaeda than Bin Laden could have ever imagined in his wildest wet dreams.

Originally Posted by Crushaholic

...we are positioning ourselves to have a centralized ally that could help us take care of other Middle East countries that decide they want to harbor terrorists.

Pure fantasy.

All the facts indicate that just the opposite is taking place in Iraq.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by gunns

Exactly. Loved the way troops were put in that poll. Like we can't support them if we don't support George and his war. People who are for the war love to put words in peoples mouths. Any attempt to make their opinions appear right.

Don't you just love the way Rat Turd is working the same old, tired "if you don't support GeeDubya and his illegal war then you don't support the troops" con job (as though we hadn't heard it a million times already?)

Oh well, what more can we expect from a moron who needs to post a poll like this one to ascertain that the majority of OM members are repubs/conservatives/chimp supporters?

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Ratboy

I'm sure you liberals HAVE to support war on terrorism, or do you not care if terrorists are stopped?

#1. Terrorism is a tactic. You can't fight a war against a tactic.

#2. According to your own CIA and Pentagon, the arrogant punk in the WH is creating more terrorists than he's killing with his idiotic cowboy policies and his illegal war against a country that was no threat to us and never attacked us.

But if you don't believe the CIA and the Pentagon then just ask the people of London.

#3. Liberals want to see terrorists stopped. We also know the moron you support is recruiting more terrorists than he is stopping.

[Play2win]

I think somebody needs to go take a Logic Course at his local Community College, but, of course, first he would have to pass his G.E.D.