Serious question for LABF

[patteeu]

Do you get along with conservatives in real life? Most of my friends are moderate liberals and a few are even pretty radical. I'd imagine that if the radical ones posted on an internet BB, they'd be a lot like you (although maybe not as creative and doggedly determined). I'm curious about whether you are some kind of militant leftist who hates conservatives in real life or whether you just play one on the internet. Are you consumed by politics or do you have other interests in life like surfing or reading history or playing video games or woodworking, etc.? I'm not asking you to divulge details of your personal life. I'm just curious in general terms.

[W*GS]

You won't get a straight answer.

[patteeu]

We'll see. I don't see why he wouldn't answer, I'm not asking for specifics.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by patteeu

We'll see. I don't see why he wouldn't answer, I'm not asking for specifics.

He never gives a straight answer. Besides, an answer would reveal that his life is non-existent outside of hatred for Bush. Rather a shallow existence, IMNSHO.

[mosca]

it's not in his mental capacity to answer.

[ClevelandBronco]

The only way you'll get an answer is if he can dig up a link to one.

[Hotrod]

Let me take a shot at his answer..........

If you think its funny you election stealing blind bushpuppets that America is now moments from complete distruction then go ahead and laugh it up. I being smarter than everyone everywhere am going to be prepared when Bush comes to my house and trys to fry my brain. Those election stealers will have to break down the door to my basement which I re-enforced with tin foil covered legos. Not to mention my mother will be pissed if he tracks mud on her carpet. I will not stand here one more minute and let all you dumb idiots decided who should run my country. Instead I have devised a plan to change peoples minds by spaming sports message boards.

[errand]

The one thing I'm almost positive about him is that he's a miserable person.

[watermock]

LABS is still stewing over his Ovaltine. God forbid he's 18. Maybe he has a gizzard. Here's a pebble....

[Kaylore]

Originally Posted by errand

The one thing I'm almost positive about him is that he's a miserable person.

And a faux Broncos fan. He's never posted about a player he likes or games that he's watched. There's nothing to suggest he even cares about the Broncos at all. I'm convinced that he's got several personas and he spends all his time unemployed trolling political forums on endless websites barfing his garbage on everyone.

[TexanBob]

Ann Coulter b****slaps Olbermann, LABF

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...utcanhecountup

OLBERMANN CAN 'COUNTDOWN,' BUT CAN HE COUNT UP?

On Fox News' "Special Report," Brit Hume raised the nut conspiracy theories circulating on the Web about Republicans stealing the presidential election. The liberals on the panel responded by quickly pointing out that no national Democrats -- not even Terry McAuliffe! -- had suggested that there had been any systematic vote theft. Hume admitted the rumors of vote fraud were limited to nutcases on the Web.

Like most Americans, apparently no one at Fox is watching MSNBC!

In a major report on "Countdown With Keith Olbermann" last Monday, Olbermann revealed that Bush's win in Florida -- and thus the election -- was "attributable largely to largely Democratic districts suddenly switching sides and all voting for Mr. Bush at the same time"! You know Keith Olbermann is heart-attack serious when he starts using "largely" twice in the same sentence.

Somberly reporting that "all this data here is from the office of Florida's secretary of state," Olbermann listed five Florida counties where the registrations are majority Democratic -- and yet (!) the counties went for Bush.

A quick glance at the Congressional Almanac indicates that all five counties in Olbermann's conspiracy theory are in the Florida Panhandle, where most people have been registered as Democrats since their grandfathers registered them to vote shortly after the Civil War. This is in contrast to Broward and Dade Counties, where the vast majority of voters entered their party registrations when they moved to Florida from New York a few years ago.

As if anticipating Olbermann's idiotic conspiracy theory two years ago when he wrote the most recent almanac, Michael Barone specifically notes that these Panhandle counties -- though still majority Democratic in party registrations -- have been voting for Republicans for president for many years. This would include the 2000 presidential election when the three voting districts at the centerpiece of Olbermann's conspiracy theory voted for Bush by 69 percent, 66 percent and 57 percent. The only way Barone could have made this any clearer to the "Countdown" host would have been to begin the chapter, "Dear Keith Olbermann ..."

There's no mystery, no scandal. These are what's known as "Southern Democrats," who have been voting Republican for a very, very, very long time. Most of them probably don't even realize they're registered as Democrats. These people are Democrats like Kevin Phillips is a Republican, like Ashlee Simpson is a singer.

The only scandal is that a purported news program would raise insinuations of vote fraud based on the party registration of Southern Democrats living in the Florida Panhandle -- without anyone at the show checking the Congressional Almanac. (It's especially attractive to be promoting a theory based on a lack of basic information, in the self-righteous, smug manner of Keith Olbermann.)

No election in the United States can be discussed intelligently without reference to Michael Barone's Congressional Almanac. At any half-serious television news station, the Congressional Almanac is as common as a phonebook.

But at MSNBC, Keith Olbermann can go on air with the major breaking story that five conservative Democratic Panhandle counties voted for Bush, without one person on the show: (1) consulting the Congressional Almanac, (2) looking at the results of the 2000 election, or (3) apparently ever having heard of "Southern Democrats." (They're all Republicans now!)

In case you needed more on the genius theories being hatched on MSNBC's "Countdown With Keith Olbermann," even if every one of these counties went unanimously for Kerry -- count them up, Keith! -- that's still, at most, about 50,000 votes. Bush won by 350,000 votes in Florida.

So I guess we can add "math" to Keith's growing "I Don't Do" file, along with "Reading the Congressional Almanac," "Basic Show Prep," "Getting My Attitude in Line With My IQ" ... (By the way, shouldn't Keith Olbermann be avoiding "time is running out" motifs wherever possible?)

One cable news network employs Michael Barone as an analyst; one cable news network does not own a copy of the Congressional Almanac. Guess which one regularly gets seven times the ratings of the other?

In addition to Olbermann peddling the theory that Bush stole the election to his viewer, guess which network employs a correspondent who wasn't sure if the following was a joke?

BUSH AT FIRST PRESS CONFERENCE AFTER WINNING ELECTION: "Now that I have the will of the people at my back, I'm going to start enforcing the one question rule -- that was three questions."

BUSH RESPONDING TO A REPORTER'S FOLLOW-UP QUESTION: "Again, you violated the one question rule right off the bat. Obviously, you didn't listen to the will of the people."

MSNBC correspondent David Shuster replayed this exchange on MSNBC's "Hardball" and then grimly remarked: "It was hard to tell at times whether the president was simply needling reporters, or whether he really planned to clamp down." It wasn't hard to tell for anyone who speaks English.

And yet liberals insist they lost the election because Americans are stupid.


=====================================

They used to be called "Reagan Democrats". They are not a new phenomenom.

[mosca]

olbermann's barking up the wrong tree. i used to live in the panhandle and i'd say it's the most republican-leaning area (regardless of registration stats) that i've ever lived in.

[watermock]

I lived in the panhandle, and the last person they trusted was some dimwit from Massachusetts. They were barking up the wrong tree. The people there were scary conservative. I don't scare easily around whites. They are affulent golfers. They have boats and stuff. I will give you a hint, they hated Kerry.

I will tell you something I didn't know. The panhandle was segregated, and I probably saw 10 blacks the whole time I lived there, all at Wallmart. Jackson Mississippi is another story. But don't kid yourself. The Beach is white, and so are it's tenents. It's just fact.

So when the Panhandle vote comes in, it's going to be conservative. It's not the Miami Vote. It's almost a midwestern vote. I have lived there. Right on the beach. It's not a southern vote at all. The panhandle is conservative white not native white, mostly snow bird white.

[Spider]

cutting and pasting Ann coulter I forgot , tell me again why everyone is pissed off @ LABF ?

[Hercules Rockefeller]

Originally Posted by §Pide®

cutting and pasting Ann coulter I forgot , tell me again why everyone is pissed off @ LABF ?

So do you deny that what she's saying isn't the truth? Those counties have gone Republican for years in federal elections for years. She's pointing out what everyone but LABF and Olberrman seem to realize.

[watermock]

She's a bad ass biatch.

She's on the right, but usually right. I would let her use the strap on. She's one mean biatch.

[Spider]

Originally Posted by Hercules Rockefeller

So do you deny that what she's saying isn't the truth? Those counties have gone Republican for years in federal elections for years. She's pointing out what everyone but LABF and Olberrman seem to realize.

I didnt even read it ........ Nor have I paid attention to Olberman ...... did I read it
Just amazing you didnt make the connection ...... Oh well

[Hercules Rockefeller]

Originally Posted by §Pide®

I didnt even read it ........ Nor have I paid attention to Olberman ...... did I read it

That's right. I forgot you read absolutely nothing linked and are able to form opinions simply by knowing who the author is.

[watermock]

What the idiot didn't understand is it wasn't thrashing a coach after a monday night defeat.

The Commander in Chief can have any idiot simply removed.

Bush said he had capital and intended to use it. What part of that didn't he understand?

[Spider]

Originally Posted by Hercules Rockefeller

That's right. I forgot you read absolutely nothing linked and are able to form opinions simply by knowing who the author is.

No what you forgot was , everyone including yourself is pissed for the cutting and Pasting of Bart cop , and a few other of LABF's links ....... The Irony huh

[Spider]

Originally Posted by watermock

What the idiot didn't understand is it wasn't thrashing a coach after a monday night defeat.

The Commander in Chief can have any idiot simply removed.

Bush said he had capital and intended to use it. What part of that didn't he understand?

Again .......I care why ?
that wasnt my point , I dont realy care of he trashed Bush , Not my concern , i just find it funny everyone including you cried about the cut and Paste , but yet when it is a message you agree with , well thats different, "Look at the message not the messenger" ........ Oh well enough of me pointing this out . you guys know Iam right

[Hercules Rockefeller]

Originally Posted by §Pide®

No what you forgot was , everyone including yourself is pissed for the cutting and Pasting of Bart cop , and a few other of LABF's links ....... The Irony huh

Not really. One Coulter column does not equal his 500 from the loony left fringe, especially when even the MSM is laughing at the people LABF is citing.

Let us know when something from LABF with his vote fraud crusade ends up in the MSM, and they come down on his side.

[watermock]

LABF won't even be able to navigate here. Trust me.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Do you get along with conservatives in real life? Most of my friends are moderate liberals and a few are even pretty radical. I'd imagine that if the radical ones posted on an internet BB, they'd be a lot like you (although maybe not as creative and doggedly determined). I'm curious about whether you are some kind of militant leftist who hates conservatives in real life or whether you just play one on the internet. Are you consumed by politics or do you have other interests in life like surfing or reading history or playing video games or woodworking, etc.? I'm not asking you to divulge details of your personal life. I'm just curious in general terms.

Looks like all your wingnut buddies have already weighed in with their foregone conclusions, eh?

(Sort of like the foregone conclusions inherent in your "questions.")

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by TexanBob

Ann Coulter b****slaps Olbermann, LABF

And then you woke up.

To accept Annthrax Coulter's argument, you have to ignore the exit polls.

In places where paper trails accompanied voting, the polls were accurate.

Conversely, in places where eVoting w/ no paper trail was used, all the exit polls conflicted with the vote count--and in each case the difference favored the frat boy by +5.