The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2014, 06:06 PM   #1
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default Stephen Hawking: "I was wrong about black holes."

Hawking finally saw the light. He now says black holes do not exist. It's refreshing to hear a scientist admit a mistake like this.
MHG

http://starburstfound.org/hawking-fi...k-holes-exist/
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-10-2014, 06:16 PM   #2
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

When you gonna admit error, gaffe?

You've got about a billion.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:23 PM   #3
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:25 PM   #4
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

Check out this 2011 paper by Dr Paul LaViolette, who found evidence the Pleistocene extinction event in North America was caused by a solar storm.

This extinction has baffled science for many years.
MHG

http://digitalcommons.arizona.edu/ob...6-40c42f0ced1b
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:55 PM   #5
The Lone Bolt
Ring of Famer
 
The Lone Bolt's Avatar
 
GO CHARGERS!!!!

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 3,212
Default

Quote:
Hawking finally saw the light. He now says black holes do not exist. It's refreshing to hear a scientist admit a mistake like this.
MHG
Quote:
I've acknowledged errors many times on this board.

Quote:
To be clear, Hawking was not claiming that black holes don’t exist. Astronomers have been observing black holes for decades, said Joseph Polchinski, theoretical physicist at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

What Hawking did was propose an explanation to one of the most puzzling problems in theoretical physics. How can black holes exist when they seem to break two fundamental laws of physics — Einstein’s laws of relativity and quantum mechanics? We’ll explain.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/...t-black-holes/
The Lone Bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 06:59 PM   #6
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

total b.s.

Typical lone dolt post.

"Observing black holes?" Exactly what does that mean?
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 07:02 PM   #7
The Lone Bolt
Ring of Famer
 
The Lone Bolt's Avatar
 
GO CHARGERS!!!!

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Boredom Capital of the Universe (Everett, WA)
Posts: 3,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
total b.s.

Typical lone dolt post.

"Observing black holes?" Exactly what does that mean?
Quote:
Scientists can't directly observe black holes with telescopes that detect x-rays, light, or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. We can, however, infer the presence of black holes and study them by detecting their effect on other matter nearby.
http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics...s/black-holes/
The Lone Bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2014, 07:29 PM   #8
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.
So, you admit that the damage caused by the plane impacts and the resulting fires brought down WTC 1 and WTC on 9/11?

That Venus is a planet?

That's two big errors you still cling to.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 07:44 AM   #9
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,384

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
I've acknowledged errors many times on this board. Screw you, jerk.
Errors?? You flat out lie and have yet to admit you do so.
DenverBrit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 08:08 AM   #10
kappys
Ring of Famer
 
kappys's Avatar
 
“It will be of little avail to the

Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
Errors?? You flat out lie and have yet to admit you do so.
An error implies that you thought something was true that was later shown to be false.

A lie is when you'll say any idiotic and patently false thing you can to sell your book.
kappys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:02 PM   #11
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
So, you admit that the damage caused by the plane impacts and the resulting fires brought down WTC 1 and WTC on 9/11?

That Venus is a planet?

That's two big errors you still cling to.
Wags pretends to be a scientist, but refuses even to read the seismic analysis I posted recently by Dr. Andre Rousseau (a geophysicist) showing that the seismic evidence from 9/11 supports the use of explosives to bring down the WTC.

MHG
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:03 PM   #12
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Bolt View Post
You would do well to study Dr Paul LaViolette's work. He's one of the smartest people on the planet. I posted a link to his site.
MHG
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:24 PM   #13
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
Wags pretends to be a scientist, but refuses even to read the seismic analysis I posted recently by Dr. Andre Rousseau (a geophysicist) showing that the seismic evidence from 9/11 supports the use of explosives to bring down the WTC.
I already posted a debunking of his crap.

You ignored it.

You're simply a ****ing moron shyte-fer-brains troll.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:36 PM   #14
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

W*gs, admit you're not a scientist.
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 04:41 PM   #15
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
W*gs, admit you're not a scientist.
I've never said I was, dickhead.

But I know a hell of a lot more about genuine science than you do - almost everything you post is utter bullshart.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 12:03 AM   #16
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,641
Default

I thought this was another Micheal Sam thread! HA HA HA get it wrong about black holes?
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 07:00 AM   #17
ghwk
Ring of Famer
 
ghwk's Avatar
 
Survivor survivor!

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,641

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton's C3-C5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
total b.s.

Typical lone dolt post.

"Observing black holes?" Exactly what does that mean?
Physicists are studying your brain I'm pretty sure is what it means.
ghwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 08:55 AM   #18
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,384

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghwk View Post
Physicists are studying your brain I'm pretty sure is what it means.
And the early results are back.

DenverBrit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 10:08 AM   #19
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

So is "genuine science" an improved version of science?

Hilarious.
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 10:35 AM   #20
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
So is "genuine science" an improved version of science?

Hilarious.
No. Genuine science is based on the scientific method. Your crap is based on nonsense.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:29 PM   #21
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
No. Genuine science is based on the scientific method. Your crap is based on nonsense.
You mean like how the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) limited the scope of its WTC investigation from day one to preclude the truth about the collapses from being known.

Or, how NIST neglected to test for explosives residues at the WTC, even though this is standard protocol in building fires,

Or, how the FBI and the 9/11 Commission swept the 10:06 AM seismic signal at Shanksville under the carpet, as if it didn't exist -- instead of investigating to determine what caused it (we now know, BTW).

There are a hundred other examples. MHG
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:35 PM   #22
Requiem
~~~
 
Requiem's Avatar
 
~ ~ ~

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 23,278

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Princes of Tara
Default

I wonder if Stephen Hawking jams out in his robot chair to Soundgarden's Black Hole Sun.
Requiem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:39 PM   #23
elsid13
Lost In Space
 
elsid13's Avatar
 
Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 19,744
Default

MacGaffe believes in red mercury and mini-nukes but refuse to believe in black holes?
elsid13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:41 PM   #24
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,282

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
I thought this was another Micheal Sam thread! HA HA HA get it wrong about black holes?
You seem to have an intense fixation on Sam. Hmmmm
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 05:10 PM   #25
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
You mean like how the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) limited the scope of its WTC investigation from day one to preclude the truth about the collapses from being known.

Or, how NIST neglected to test for explosives residues at the WTC, even though this is standard protocol in building fires,

Or, how the FBI and the 9/11 Commission swept the 10:06 AM seismic signal at Shanksville under the carpet, as if it didn't exist -- instead of investigating to determine what caused it (we now know, BTW).

There are a hundred other examples.
Bullshyte.

Remember how you thought NIST was just peachy when they verified a few numbers on the "hat truss" that you had, which you then claimed meant that they supported your ****?

You must think we all have the same memory problems you do.

We do not.

We remember your lines of ****. They were **** then, they're still **** now.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Denver Broncos