can we beat the raiders with brockO ? - The Orange Mane

CHEF LUIGI · 12-23-2013, 12:00 PM

I know we have some very important personal records to achieve,but...
if those records were not more important than risking our meal ticket QB to injury from a D that has nothing to lose from sending the house...

well, do you think we could beat the raiders if we sat PFM and played os ?

(I know you hate me, no need to express that, MAYBE you could answer the question instead ? )
can the broncos beat the raiders with brock o ?

Pick Six · 12-23-2013, 12:08 PM

I don't think we should risk it. We can still lose our #1 seed...

crowebomber · 12-23-2013, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

I know we have some very important personal records to achieve,but...
if those records were not more important than risking our meal ticket QB to injury from a D that has nothing to lose from sending the house...

well, do you think we could beat the raiders if we sat PFM and played os ?

(I know you hate me, no need to express that, MAYBE you could answer the question instead ? )
can the broncos beat the raiders with brock o ?

Last I checked, the Patriots won and we would still like to get home field advantage throughout.

Pony Boy · 12-23-2013, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

I know we have some very important personal records to achieve,but...
if those records were not more important than risking our meal ticket QB to injury from a D that has nothing to lose from sending the house...

well, do you think we could beat the raiders if we sat PFM and played os ?

(I know you hate me, no need to express that, MAYBE you could answer the question instead ? )
can the broncos beat the raiders with brock o ?

This is a huge game for us are you really that stupid....

B-Large · 12-23-2013, 12:12 PM

I'd lock up that #1 seed, put in Brock if we're up by 14-17 points. But make no mistake, the Raiders will come to play- just like Buffalo wants to **** up New England's seeding next week.

Bring our A game- rest during the bye.

CHEF LUIGI · 12-23-2013, 12:20 PM

I know PFM is gonna play, may question remains , do you think we could win with brock?

broncocalijohn · 12-23-2013, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pony Boy

This is a huge game for us are you really that stupid....

Is that a rhetorical question?

Drunken.Broncoholic2 · 12-23-2013, 12:57 PM

You should really delete this thread. Assuming this game doesn't mean more than records just shows you aren't really there when it comes to evaluating football. NE can still be the 1 seed.

Pony Boy · 12-23-2013, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

I know PFM is gonna play, may question remains , do you think we could win with brock?

Do you think the Patriots could beat Buffalo with Ryan Mallett? In other words WTF does it matter?

bronco militia · 12-23-2013, 01:17 PM

our offense is our best defense, so peanut head has to play

ZONA · 12-23-2013, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B-Large

I'd lock up that #1 seed, put in Brock if we're up by 14-17 points. But make no mistake, the Raiders will come to play- just like Buffalo wants to **** up New England's seeding next week.

Bring our A game- rest during the bye.

up by 14? Yeah, maybe with 2 minutes left in the game. We don't exactly have the Seattle or Arizona defense you know. I'd play PM first 3 quarters, roll out to a nice 34-10 lead or something like that and then play Brock with a heavy dose of running the ball to burn clock.

ZONA · 12-23-2013, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pony Boy

Do you think the Patriots could beat Buffalo with Ryan Mallett? In other words WTF does it matter?

The Patriots could not beat the Bills with Mallet. Buffalo gave them all they can handle early in the season when the Pats were at full strength.

CHEF LUIGI · 12-23-2013, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crushaholic

I don't think we should risk it. We can still lose our #1 seed...

its a hypathetical, of course PFM is going to play...
could we beat the raders with brock?
this is NOT a sit PFM proclamation, I am just curious how bad you think the raiders are, how good you think brock is.
are we totally hopeless without PFM ?

SonOfLe-loLang · 12-23-2013, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

its a hypathetical, of course PFM is going to play...
could we beat the raders with brock?
this is NOT a sit PFM proclamation, I am just curious how bad you think the raiders are, how good you think brock is.
are we totally hopeless without PFM ?

This was thread worthy?

CHEF LUIGI · 12-23-2013, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang

This was thread worthy?

its right up there with high 5 brady and ROMO.

go_broncos · 12-23-2013, 01:40 PM

this game is important..just like the 15 games we played before.
to answer your question..we can't beat raiders with Brock..

ColoradoDarin · 12-23-2013, 01:41 PM

A Brockcember to remember!

I was beginning to think that noone took my Brocklove seriously

OBF1 · 12-23-2013, 01:43 PM

NO way in hell. PFM is our team, our _efense is not good enough to hold the other team from scoring.

The only way we find out is if New England loses before our game starts. If NE wins,Manning and company will start and play until the game has been decided.

Drunken.Broncoholic2 · 12-23-2013, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OBF1

NO way in hell. PFM is our team, our _efense is not good enough to hold the other team from scoring.

The only way we find out is if New England loses before our game starts. If NE wins,Manning and company will start and play until the game has been decided.

They flexed the NE game to the afternoon. Knowing Denver would have to play starters then.

Agamemnon · 12-23-2013, 01:52 PM

God this is a really stupid thread.

BroncoBeavis · 12-23-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZONA

The Patriots could not beat the Bills with Mallet. Buffalo gave them all they can handle early in the season when the Pats were at full strength.

Not really full strength. There was no Gronk then either.

strafen · 12-23-2013, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

I know we have some very important personal records to achieve,but...
if those records were not more important than risking our meal ticket QB to injury from a D that has nothing to lose from sending the house...

well, do you think we could beat the raiders if we sat PFM and played os ?

(I know you hate me, no need to express that, MAYBE you could answer the question instead ? )
can the broncos beat the raiders with brock o ?

WTF dude?!!!
The more I read your posts, the more I know nothing about what to think of you.
Really?!!!
Forget about records, homefield advantage throughout the play-offs is what's at stake!

Pony Boy · 12-23-2013, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZONA

The Patriots could not beat the Bills with Mallet. Buffalo gave them all they can handle early in the season when the Pats were at full strength.

JFC ...... that wasn't the point ... never mind

BroncsCheer · 12-23-2013, 02:20 PM

As a purely academic scenario, I believe that Denver could beat Oakland with the backup QB in the game

that is a direct response to Zam's poorly worded question

it will not happen, though, as the team will start with PMFM behind center, and will win convincingly in the northern california afternoon

SportinOne · 12-23-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHEF LUIGI

its a hypathetical, of course PFM is going to play...
could we beat the raders with brock?
this is NOT a sit PFM proclamation, I am just curious how bad you think the raiders are, how good you think brock is.
are we totally hopeless without PFM ?

You do recall what you wrote for your original post right?

At least part of the theme of that post was that this is a meaningless game and that PFM is only playing to break some more records... which is false. So i'm not sure if you are not forgetting that, or if it was your intention to stir up **** to begin with by saying something stupid and then acting ignorant of it, but this is why people are reacting the way they are.

12-23-2013, 01:40 PM	#16
go_broncos Ring of Famer Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Katy, TX Posts: 6,544 Adopt-a-Bronco: Rod Smith	this game is important..just like the 15 games we played before. to answer your question..we can't beat raiders with Brock.. Last edited by go_broncos; 12-23-2013 at 01:59 PM..

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-23-2013, 12:00 PM	#1
CHEF LUIGI bronco fan: day 1, 1960 cooking up a victory Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: in the kitchen Posts: 7,102	can we beat the raiders with brockO ? I know we have some very important personal records to achieve,but... if those records were not more important than risking our meal ticket QB to injury from a D that has nothing to lose from sending the house... well, do you think we could beat the raiders if we sat PFM and played os ? (I know you hate me, no need to express that, MAYBE you could answer the question instead ? ) can the broncos beat the raiders with brock o ?

12-23-2013, 12:08 PM	#2
Pick Six Armchair Poster Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Topeka, KS Posts: 22,918	I don't think we should risk it. We can still lose our #1 seed...

12-23-2013, 12:12 PM	#5
B-Large Ring of Famer Oily Variety Bohunk Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 6,854	I'd lock up that #1 seed, put in Brock if we're up by 14-17 points. But make no mistake, the Raiders will come to play- just like Buffalo wants to **** up New England's seeding next week. Bring our A game- rest during the bye.

12-23-2013, 12:20 PM	#6
CHEF LUIGI bronco fan: day 1, 1960 cooking up a victory Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: in the kitchen Posts: 7,102	I know PFM is gonna play, may question remains , do you think we could win with brock?

12-23-2013, 12:57 PM	#8
Drunken.Broncoholic2 Pickled in orange & blue OnLyNiNjAsCaNrEaDtHiSQuOtE Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Carmel, Ca Posts: 19,074 Adopt-a-Bronco: Booker	You should really delete this thread. Assuming this game doesn't mean more than records just shows you aren't really there when it comes to evaluating football. NE can still be the 1 seed.

12-23-2013, 01:17 PM	#10
bronco militia made a business decision" Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: 719 Posts: 28,672	our offense is our best defense, so peanut head has to play

12-23-2013, 01:41 PM	#17
ColoradoDarin Busting off 2k Since 1986 Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Wilson, NC Posts: 15,308	A Brockcember to remember! I was beginning to think that noone took my Brocklove seriously

12-23-2013, 01:43 PM	#18
OBF1 Ring of Famer Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Wan Chai, Hong Kong Posts: 16,919 Adopt-a-Bronco: Mr Castro.	NO way in hell. PFM is our team, our _efense is not good enough to hold the other team from scoring. The only way we find out is if New England loses before our game starts. If NE wins,Manning and company will start and play until the game has been decided.

12-23-2013, 01:52 PM	#20
Agamemnon Ring of Famer Resurrected! Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 18,092 Adopt-a-Bronco: CJ Anderson	God this is a really stupid thread.

12-23-2013, 02:20 PM	#24
BroncsCheer Scrappy, cerebral poster There is no dark side on the moon Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Boise Posts: 2,394 Adopt-a-Bronco: Danny T	As a purely academic scenario, I believe that Denver could beat Oakland with the backup QB in the game that is a direct response to Zam's poorly worded question it will not happen, though, as the team will start with PMFM behind center, and will win convincingly in the northern california afternoon