Good job numbers tomorrow.............

[Mecklomaniac]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

In DBruleU's weird logical world, the proposition "2+2=4" is suspect if it's posted on a site he doesn't like.

LABF responds to LABF on open mindedness

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

They don't have the special Fox glasses like you and the rest of the right-wing brain trust.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

^

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Come back when you have some corroborating evidence, e.g., credible witnesses who actually heard Biden utter those exact words.

Until then, give the Glenn Beck circle jerk a rest!

He said this when responding to a video that had a first person account from the father of former Navy Seal Tyrone Wood who was killed in Libya. Words came straight from the mouth of the father that Biden asked him at the ceremony returning his sons body "Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls."

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Because the DP endorses Obama, the paper isn't credible "at all?"

L0L!

You people really take party/brand loyalty to a pathological extreme.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

^

The Weekly Standard?

L0L!

Thanks man - that really made me chuckle.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

The spam with which you regularly inundate this forum is all the evidence anyone needs that you march in lock step with Limbaugh, Beck, Malkin, Coulter, and any number of other right-wing moonbats.

Considering the stuff cartoon boi contributes, that right there is funny.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

It may seem cruel to pick on Philip Klein, who is, after all, simply one of many minor hacks in the right-wing media machine controlled by billionaires like Anshutz and the Koch brothers. But it is worth reading the right’s propaganda now and then, just to find out how it is that so many of our conservative fellow citizens can have been so deceived.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

That would be a vast improvement over the make-it-up-as-you-go-along, fairy tale nonsense you've been posting here.

BTW, what does your CATO propaganda have to do with Clinton's speech, anyway?

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Same Rush Limbaugh propaganda, different day.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Gotta chuckle at ditto monkeys crying about "propaganda" - as if the GOP ticket is so flawless that the "liberal" media has to resort to making sh*t up in order to find fault.
Too funny!

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Defend Obama against what?

Some BS propaganda piece someone posted from the Moonie Times?

You crack me up!

LABF's cute name for the Washington times..

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

It's especially ironic when you consider that the NY Times and the WA Post have served as propaganda ministries for every illegal war the Bush Crime Family has ever started - from Panama to Gulf War II.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

I notice you didn't include a link to a source for the ditto head propaganda piece you posted.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

The Daily Caller? L0L!

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

nyuk nyuk "Beats the Daily Kos and HuffPost combined."
LABF "You're the last person on earth who's qualified to make such assessments."

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

L0L!

Just the opposite is true.

Breitbart has a history of publishing lies and BS.

In fact, their latest piece about Obama's Ohio lawsuit was just exposed as a pack of lies.

You must have missed it.

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

DBruleU "Did you check Smirkingchimp.com? I hear they are great.

Or maybe see if Rightoffacliff's Facebook page."

LABF "At least those sites cite legit sources in their articles.

You should spend some time at The Chimp, BTW. You might actually learn something."

So there you go... If you want a credible news source you have to go to Facebook or the Smirkingchimp

[Fedaykin]

Originally Posted by Smiling Assassin27

The problem lies in what you fools define as 'good'. For you, creating 8 jobs is 'good'. Hint: it takes at least 150k jobs to keep up with population growth alone. Of course, you're undoubtedly gonna close your eyes when the 'revision' from BLS comes out for September and they revise it down, right?

You're all so desperate for ANY good news out of this administration that you're willing to lower your standards to nothing to get it. ADP already revised last month down to 88k jobs. UE rate will come in around 7.7% due to even more Americans not being counted in that figure, and then the BLS statisticians can be reunited with their families.

Obama has achieved a positive swing of around 1,000,000 jobs/month over 3.5 years. I call that at least 'decent' performance. We all want better, but very few righties ever acknowledge that Obama took over an economy in a tail spin and has had effectively 0 support & cooperation from congress for most of his term.

If you can at least acknowledge the above, perhaps we could have a real conversation.

[Vegas_Bronco]

Originally Posted by Mecklomaniac

LABF responds to LABF on open mindedness









He said this when responding to a video that had a first person account from the father of former Navy Seal Tyrone Wood who was killed in Libya. Words came straight from the mouth of the father that Biden asked him at the ceremony returning his sons body "Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls."









Considering the stuff cartoon boi contributes, that right there is funny.











LABF's cute name for the Washington times..














So there you go... If you want a credible news source you have to go to Facebook or the Smirkingchimp

I've been in this room less than 1 week and I can see the wheel is spinning but the hamster is long dead. RIP LABF

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Vegas_Bronco

I've been in this room less than 1 week and I can see the wheel is spinning but the hamster is long dead. RIP LABF

That's because you and the rest of the right-wing brain trust don't get the "boy who cried wolf" parable.

The sources your BF mentioned above all have major credibility problems - thanks to their histories of lying, conning, and generally getting things wrong over time.

Eventually people stop listening to them.

Well....people whose IQs are greater than their shoe sizes, anyway.

[Mecklomaniac]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

That's because you and the rest of the right-wing brain trust don't get the "boy who cried wolf" parable.

The sources your BF mentioned above all have major credibility problems - thanks to their histories of lying, conning, and generally getting things wrong over time.

Eventually people stop listening to them.

Well....people whose IQs are greater than their shoe sizes, anyway.

spin soros monkey spin.

[cutthemdown]

Originally Posted by Fedaykin

Obama has achieved a positive swing of around 1,000,000 jobs/month over 3.5 years. I call that at least 'decent' performance. We all want better, but very few righties ever acknowledge that Obama took over an economy in a tail spin and has had effectively 0 support & cooperation from congress for most of his term.

If you can at least acknowledge the above, perhaps we could have a real conversation.

The fact he came in at such a low point just means his growth should have been easier.

[Kaylore]

This thread is hilarious. Unemployment goes up!

[cutthemdown]

Originally Posted by Kaylore

This thread is hilarious. Unemployment goes up!

Unemployment just never went down. The .1% last month was just correcting. We basically just add enough each month to break even. Right around the 150 thousand it takes to tread water.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Mecklomaniac

spin soros monkey spin.

I knew I could count on a willfully ignorant chimp like you to NOT dispute what I said about the aforementioned sources.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

They don't seem to appreciate the irony of their statements...

[Fedaykin]

Originally Posted by cutthemdown

The fact he came in at such a low point just means his growth should have been easier.

Interesting logic.

Say you make $50,000/yr -- pretty decent in a lot of places

Then you have a major medical issue that costs $1,000,000. By your "logic" above it should be easier to be out of debt because of the huge sum of loss.

The fact is the number of jobs has grown by a decent amount under Obama (the only growth at all since Clinton, Bush ended his term with a net loss)-- it just so happens that the damage done by previous administration was even bigger.

Try again bud.

[cutthemdown]

Originally Posted by Fedaykin

Interesting logic.

Say you make $50,000/yr -- pretty decent in a lot of places

Then you have a major medical issue that costs $1,000,000. By your "logic" above it should be easier to be out of debt because of the huge sum of loss.

The fact is the number of jobs has grown by a decent amount under Obama (the only growth at all since Clinton, Bush ended his term with a net loss)-- it just so happens that the damage done by previous administration was even bigger.

Try again bud.

I'm not buying your analogy. Compared to other recessions this is a really slow recovery, if a recovery at all. Even Obama said he would be at under 6 right now because he looked at other recessions and took a guess. Everyone knows the further an economy shrinks the more room there is for growth after it stops shrinking. Using an analogy comparing it to paying out medical bills and going into debt doesn't fly straight.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

They don't seem to appreciate the irony of their statements...

That is so true!

[Mecklomaniac]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

That is so true!

Except that it isn't. Fed government does not directly create jobs, but they can create a climate where job creation is possible. Of course they, as Obama has shown, can also create a climate were job creation is nearly impossible.

They over spend, over tax, over regulate, practice crony capitalism, make threats and then act surprised on why there is fear and risk avoidance in the private sector.

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by Mecklomaniac

Except that it isn't. Fed government does not directly create jobs, but they can create a climate were job creation is possible. Of course they, as Obama has shown, can also create a climate were job creation is nearly impossible.

They over spend, over tax, over regulate, practice crony capitalism, make threats and then act surprised on why there is fear and risk avoidance in the private sector.

You're a clueless oaf.

If Obama's administration created "a climate where job creation is nearly impossible" while creating private sector jobs for 30+ months, what kind of climate did Bush create when we were hemorrhaging jobs at a rate of hundreds of thousands per month?

Talk about "spin"...

[Mecklomaniac]

Originally Posted by houghtam

-

You're a clueless oaf.

If Obama's administration created "a climate where job creation is nearly impossible" while creating private sector jobs for 30+ months, what kind of climate did Bush create when we were hemorrhaging jobs at a rate of hundreds of thousands per month?

Talk about "spin"...

And you are a mindless automaton if you believe that this is a healthy economy. It is funny in 2003/2004 unemployment improved from 6.2% to 5.6% and every article was about Bush's jobless recovery. Now unemployment is stagnant around 8% (over 10% if you include people who have stopped looking for work) and you claim Obama is some great job creator.

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by Mecklomaniac

And you are a mindless automaton if you believe that this is a healthy economy. It is funny in 2003/2004 unemployment improved from 6.2% to 5.6% and every article was about Bush's jobless recovery. Now unemployment is stagnant around 8% (over 10% if you include people who have stopped looking for work) and you claim Obama is some great job creator.

Please, quote for me where I claimed this was a healthy economy or that Obama was a great job creator.

Comparing Obama's job creation to most other periods in history shows a lack of basic understanding of economics. Not understanding the significance of the STATED POLICY of the Republican congress shows a complete lack of intelligence with regard to politics. Not factoring in that the economic climate he stepped into was created by the policies of his predecessor simply shows ignorance or stupidity. Take your pick, but I wouldn't be proud of either one...

[ant1999e]

It's always someone else's fault.

[cutthemdown]

so now liberals want to say that the President not responsible for creating jobs because conservatives say the public sector should create them. What a joke, give the public sector a chance and they will. Grind them into the ground with red tape and tax and they won't. One guess which theory Obama is using!

[barryr]

So "Bush lost job", but Obama is a victim of circumstance? The liberal "logic" on display.

[Kaylore]

Obama in 2008: "I'll create millions of new jobs. We'll have unemployment at 5%"

Obama in 2012: "It's not my fault. We need to keep doing the things that didn't work the last four years and make class sizes smaller...or something..."

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Obama in 2008: "I'll create millions of new jobs. We'll have unemployment at 5%"

Obama in 2012: "It's not my fault. We need to keep doing the things that didn't work the last four years and make class sizes smaller...or something..."

Wow! Now even Khan is slipping into the partisan hack category? Like the experts say, it wouldn't matter who was president. You don't come out of a financial systems collapse in three years, four years, or even eight years. They estimate ten years of conservative, slow growth before we really climb out of it. And then, only if we make the right decisions. Obama, like most of the country, was getting bad info and bad advice four years ago. We know better what we face now.

The picture of four more years of Obama's incrementalism may not be very attractive, but the idea of following Romney back to the Bush economic policies is suicide. The American people need to do some growing up. And this partisan hackery isn't doing anybody any favors.

[BroncoBeavis]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Wow! Now even Khan is slipping into the partisan hack category? Like the experts say, it wouldn't matter who was president. You don't come out of a financial systems collapse in three years, four years, or even eight years. They estimate ten years of conservative, slow growth before we really climb out of it. And then, only if we make the right decisions. Obama, like most of the country, was getting bad info and bad advice four years ago. We know better what we face now.

The picture of four more years of Obama's incrementalism may not be very attractive, but the idea of following Romney back to the Bush economic policies is suicide. The American people need to do some growing up. And this partisan hackery isn't doing anybody any favors.

So in other words you want us to reelect the guy who promised things that were far beyond his power to deliver. And you call anyone who disagrees a hack.

Some people believe that someone so disconnected from economic reality does more harm than good.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis

So in other words you want us to reelect the guy who promised things that were far beyond his power to deliver. And you call anyone who disagrees a hack.

I just prefer to live in the reality based world.