The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2012, 09:01 PM   #1
ghwk
Ring of Famer
 
ghwk's Avatar
 
Survivor survivor!

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,811

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton's C3-C5
Default Radar Defense? What the Heck is it?

So Pat Kirwan on Sirius' NFL network referred to Nolan's defense as the radar defense and said other teams will be using it. So what is it and did Manning have invisibility cloak in the second half to defeat it?
ghwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-18-2012, 09:11 PM   #2
SoDak Bronco
Lace em' up and lets go!!
 
SoDak Bronco's Avatar
 
Von Miller aka QB Killa

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 4,226

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Robert Ayers
Default

Yeah I heard Pat talking about it as well. Radar defense is basically not lining up presnap and having the front seven all around the LOS but not showing who is rushing/dropping into coverage.
SoDak Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:15 PM   #3
Missouribronc
Ring of Famer
 
Missouribronc's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,653

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Fancy name for disguising coverages.

Atlanta did a great job of it last night. Changed up coverages on nearly every play. Confused Mannng early, confused the wide receivers later.
Missouribronc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:18 PM   #4
ghwk
Ring of Famer
 
ghwk's Avatar
 
Survivor survivor!

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,811

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton's C3-C5
Default

Gotta be some way to exploit that.
ghwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:19 PM   #5
Bronco Rob
Ring of Famer
 
Bronco Rob's Avatar
 
The Alpha & The Omega

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,774

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Kush & Irsay
Default

Props to Nolan (Thanks to McHoodie for chasing him off we had a top 10 defense) good luck fooling Peyton twice.
Bronco Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:21 PM   #6
bpc
"Nemo Me Impune Lacessit"
 
bpc's Avatar
 
1 sword keeps another in the sheath

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,064

Adopt-a-Bronco:
TJ Ward
Default

Basically you have two guys in a stance and then a myriad of guys float around in back 9, often around the LOS, and they move around a lot. It's supposed to cause confusion and mess up blocking schemes.

The way to beat it is power run the football right down the field. Low man wins and when you have 9 guys standing up, it's hard to anchor and hold point.
bpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:21 PM   #7
Mogulseeker
Formerly mightysmurf
 
Mogulseeker's Avatar
 
Eat greedy

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boulder... Vail when it snoooows
Posts: 16,794

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Lamin Barrow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghwk View Post
Gotta be some way to exploit that.
I'm thinking that because of all the movement, this defense would be terrible against a power run game.
Mogulseeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:21 PM   #8
Mogulseeker
Formerly mightysmurf
 
Mogulseeker's Avatar
 
Eat greedy

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Boulder... Vail when it snoooows
Posts: 16,794

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Lamin Barrow
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpc View Post
Basically you have two guys in a stance and then a myriad of guys float around in back 9, often around the LOS, and they move around a lot. It's supposed to cause confusion and mess up blocking schemes.

The way to beat it is power run the football right down the field. Low man wins and when you have 9 guys standing up, it's hard to anchor and hold point.
Exactly.
Mogulseeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:26 PM   #9
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 36,709

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

This has also been referred to as the "Psycho" type of front, where there is a ton of shifting and movement pre-snap with no clear indication of down lineman vs. stand-up backers etc.

Chris Brown at his great Smart Football blog wrote a very nice blog post about this style of defense awhile back and the types of things that can be done to combat it.

See here: http://smartfootball.com/gameplannin...efensive-looks

The suggestion of slide protection is a good idea for pass pro, that way you aren't locked into trying to block (and chase) a specific man in the front. The idea about focusing on the perimeter is also a good one.

I would add a few things to his thoughts: He suggests generally running the ball at it, but I would also note try to run the ball on "first sound". What I mean by that is don't let them start moving and shifting and wait till the third or fourth "hut" to snap the ball. Don't give them the time to start running all that stuff. Snap it on the first sound before they start playing that game. They're either immediately in position or not. I would also add that while he recommends the Trap, I think a Draw might be a good idea as well. That way you don't worry about the pre-snap stuff. You have your lineman think only about giving the look of pass protection for a count or two after the snap and by the time they are ready to get upfield, it will be clear which defenders will be in which lanes, since you have to expose what you are truly doing post-snap.

I would also suggest going 4 wide and having HUGE splits between the offensive tackle and the slot reciever. Reason? It will force the defense to reveal their structure and contour honestly. Either the OLB is going to stay in the front, "split the difference" or cover down on the slot reciever. He cannot go from covering down to going back into the front and out of it. If the splits are really big, he has to declare himself. If he's going to stay in the front and they cover down with the safety instead, then I don't really care what's going on in the front. It's cosmetic. We know there is 1 safety high and there are only a limited amount of coverages that you can run from that look. By contrast, if the OLB has to cover down, then he can't play these games in the front and you also have favorable box numbers for the run game. Force the OLB's to declare their position. If they stay in the front and or "split the difference" with just a half field safety above the slot reciever, then we can work some of the bubble screens and stuff that Brown discusses. IMO, its very important to have really wide splits between the OT and the inside WR against this look to horizontally stretch the defense out.



In any event, Denver adjusted well after awhile to what Atlanta is doing, we got the no-huddle going eventually. I thought it was especially interesting when it was noted early in the game that when we were running plays with a huddle, we had completed 7 out of our first 8 throws (and were 0 for 3 in no-huddle to start), so the suggestion that we were solely befuddled by this wrinkle is not accurate. We were trying to force feed something that wasn't fully clicking immediately and when we were running our base offense at a normal rhthym, we were doing fine.........regardless of what the defense was doing.
__________________
Its a Hockey Night in Pittsburgh!


Last edited by SoCalBronco; 09-18-2012 at 09:39 PM..
SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:37 PM   #10
NFLBRONCO
Ring of Famer
 
NFLBRONCO's Avatar
 
Go Nuggets Go Lakers

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 8,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
This has also been referred to as the "Psycho" type of front, where there is a ton of shifting and movement pre-snap with no clear indication of down lineman vs. stand-up backers etc.

Chris Brown at his great Smart Football blog wrote a very nice blog post about this style of defense awhile back and the types of things that can be done to combat it.

See here: http://smartfootball.com/gameplannin...efensive-looks

The suggestion of slide protection is a good idea for pass pro, that way you aren't locked into trying to block (and chase) a specific man in the front. The idea about focusing on the perimeter is also a good one.

I would add a few things to his thoughts: He suggests generally running the ball at it, but I would also note try to run the ball on "first sound". What I mean by that is don't let them start moving and shifting and wait till the third or fourth "hut" to snap the ball. Don't give them the time to start running all that stuff. Snap it on the first sound before they start playing that game. They're either immediately in position or not. I would also add that while he recommends the Trap, I think a Draw might be a good idea as well. That way you don't worry about the pre-snap stuff. You have your lineman think only about giving the look of pass protection for a count or two after the snap and by the time they are ready to get upfield, it will be clear which defenders will be in which lanes, since you have to expose what you are truly doing post-snap.

I would also suggest going 4 wide and having HUGE splits between the offensive tackle and the slot reciever. Reason? It will force the defense to reveal their structure and contour honestly. Either the OLB is going to stay in the front, "split the difference" or cover down on the slot reciever. He cannot go from covering down to going back into the front and out of it. If the splits are really big, he has to declare himself. If he's going to stay in the front and they cover down with the safety instead, then I don't really care what's going on in the front. It's cosmetic. We know there is 1 safety high and there are only a limited amount of coverages that you can run from that look. By contrast, if the OLB has to cover down, then he can't play these games in the front and you also have favorable box numbers for the run game. Force the OLB's to declare their position.

In any event, Denver adjusted well after awhile to what Atlanta is doing, we got the no-huddle going eventually. I thought it was especially interesting when it was noted early in the game that when we were running plays with a huddle, we had completed 7 out of our first 8 throws (and were 0 for 3 in no-huddle to start), so the suggestion that we were solely befuddled by this wrinkle is not accurate. We were trying to force feed something that wasn't fully clicking immediately and when we were running our base offense at a normal rhthym, we were doing fine.........regardless of what the defense was doing.
I think if Manning just dumped to the check down in 1st qtr this hoopla of this D never would have happened. I think he tried too hard to impress and forced things early. I think deep down he's trying too hard to prove he's back instead of just playing. I think the more games we play the less he'll think about health and wing it,

Last edited by NFLBRONCO; 09-18-2012 at 09:42 PM..
NFLBRONCO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:48 PM   #11
Cmac821
Harden by loss
 
Cmac821's Avatar
 
Can't wait for next year

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southern Los Angeles
Posts: 1,174

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Fox Mulder
Default

sounds like the 1-5-5 prowl on madden, fun for zone blitzes
Cmac821 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:50 PM   #12
Missouribronc
Ring of Famer
 
Missouribronc's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,653

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

I didn't see that defense from Atlanta.

They were playing a pretty straight forward 4-3 at the snap and then modifying it from there. The "psycho" defense wasn't employed last night as far as I could tell.

Atlanta just disguised coverages well and mixed coverages up.
Missouribronc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:14 PM   #13
Vegas_Bronco
Ring of Famer
 
Vegas_Bronco's Avatar
 
Fear is a lack of preparation.

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Now 64 Yards Out
Posts: 5,297

Adopt-a-Bronco:
1 Elam 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO View Post
I think if Manning just dumped to the check down in 1st qtr this hoopla of this D never would have happened. I think he tried too hard to impress and forced things early. I think deep down he's trying too hard to prove he's back instead of just playing. I think the more games we play the less he'll think about health and wing it,
This.
Vegas_Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:17 PM   #14
SoCalBronco
Nixonite
 
SoCalBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arcadia, CA
Posts: 36,709

Adopt-a-Bronco:
D.J. Williams
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missouribronc View Post
I didn't see that defense from Atlanta.

They were playing a pretty straight forward 4-3 at the snap and then modifying it from there. The "psycho" defense wasn't employed last night as far as I could tell.

Atlanta just disguised coverages well and mixed coverages up.
There was secondary coverage disguise as well, including having the S in the box and then at the snap morphing into a four deep zone on one of the INT's, but they did psycho stuff as well, especially in the beginning of the game with movement in the front.
__________________
Its a Hockey Night in Pittsburgh!

SoCalBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:20 PM   #15
SonOfLe-loLang
Young Buck
 
SonOfLe-loLang's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 20,452

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Thunder (RIP)
Default

Why not quick snap while they are dancing around all tarded.
SonOfLe-loLang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:45 PM   #16
Xenos
Who got Bunny Ears?
 
Xenos's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,225

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghwk View Post
So Pat Kirwan on Sirius' NFL network referred to Nolan's defense as the radar defense and said other teams will be using it. So what is it and did Manning have invisibility cloak in the second half to defeat it?
I wonder if it's the same type of defense that SD used against Peyton whenever they play him. Look at the 2007 game as an example where Peyton also threw 3 interceptions in the first quarter. The main difference I suppose is that Stephen Cooper was essentially the Peyton of the defense, and he would also audible whenever Peyton audible in order to cause confusion for the latter. Didn't get a chance to see if Weatherspoon did the same thing.
Xenos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:48 PM   #17
TD4HOF
Perennial Pro-bowler
 
TD4HOF's Avatar
 
He's Better Than MJ!!!!

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sonoran Desert
Posts: 948

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Bowlen’s Legacy
Default

Gregg Easterbrook has been referring to this as the "Times Square" defense for awhile now.
TD4HOF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 11:26 PM   #18
boltaneer
17
 
boltaneer's Avatar
 
ATTA BABY!

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 4,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenos View Post
I wonder if it's the same type of defense that SD used against Peyton whenever they play him. Look at the 2007 game as an example where Peyton also threw 3 interceptions in the first quarter. The main difference I suppose is that Stephen Cooper was essentially the Peyton of the defense, and he would also audible whenever Peyton audible in order to cause confusion for the latter. Didn't get a chance to see if Weatherspoon did the same thing.
It seems similar to what the Chargers have been doing to Peyton over the years. Basically, you show one look early and after Peyton starts barking out an audible in response to what he sees, you shift to the real formation. I don't know why Peyton always continued to play that game with the Chargers. If he started quick snapping it, he would have caught the defense in the wrong position.

Anyway, I did notice their LB doing some audibles here and there but nothing like what Cooper always did.

BTW, Cooper said that a lot of the times, he was just barking out fake audibles in an attempt to confuse Manning. Guess it worked pretty good.
boltaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 06:49 AM   #19
Raider Bill
........
 
Raider Bill's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern New Joisey
Posts: 4,240
Default

With my Pop Warner team we will run a wedge play on first sound until they stop dancing around. My Qb will try and time the first sound to when they are out of position or moving backwards.
Raider Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 06:58 AM   #20
TheReverend
Permanent Facepalm
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 37,542

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Radar defense is 2 point stance in gaps, ftr and not what people in this thread are claiming it to be

It has no more to do with disguising coverages than a traditional 4-3.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 07:10 AM   #21
55CrushEm
Dynamic Duo
 
55CrushEm's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North of Boston, MA
Posts: 6,214

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Quanterus Smith
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang View Post
Why not quick snap...
This.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang View Post
... while they are dancing around all tarded.
55CrushEm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 08:38 AM   #22
milehighJC
Solid Starter
 
milehighJC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBronco View Post
This has also been referred to as the "Psycho" type of front, where there is a ton of shifting and movement pre-snap with no clear indication of down lineman vs. stand-up backers etc.

Chris Brown at his great Smart Football blog wrote a very nice blog post about this style of defense awhile back and the types of things that can be done to combat it.

See here: http://smartfootball.com/gameplannin...efensive-looks

The suggestion of slide protection is a good idea for pass pro, that way you aren't locked into trying to block (and chase) a specific man in the front. The idea about focusing on the perimeter is also a good one.

I would add a few things to his thoughts: He suggests generally running the ball at it, but I would also note try to run the ball on "first sound". What I mean by that is don't let them start moving and shifting and wait till the third or fourth "hut" to snap the ball. Don't give them the time to start running all that stuff. Snap it on the first sound before they start playing that game. They're either immediately in position or not. I would also add that while he recommends the Trap, I think a Draw might be a good idea as well. That way you don't worry about the pre-snap stuff. You have your lineman think only about giving the look of pass protection for a count or two after the snap and by the time they are ready to get upfield, it will be clear which defenders will be in which lanes, since you have to expose what you are truly doing post-snap.

I would also suggest going 4 wide and having HUGE splits between the offensive tackle and the slot reciever. Reason? It will force the defense to reveal their structure and contour honestly. Either the OLB is going to stay in the front, "split the difference" or cover down on the slot reciever. He cannot go from covering down to going back into the front and out of it. If the splits are really big, he has to declare himself. If he's going to stay in the front and they cover down with the safety instead, then I don't really care what's going on in the front. It's cosmetic. We know there is 1 safety high and there are only a limited amount of coverages that you can run from that look. By contrast, if the OLB has to cover down, then he can't play these games in the front and you also have favorable box numbers for the run game. Force the OLB's to declare their position. If they stay in the front and or "split the difference" with just a half field safety above the slot reciever, then we can work some of the bubble screens and stuff that Brown discusses. IMO, its very important to have really wide splits between the OT and the inside WR against this look to horizontally stretch the defense out.



In any event, Denver adjusted well after awhile to what Atlanta is doing, we got the no-huddle going eventually. I thought it was especially interesting when it was noted early in the game that when we were running plays with a huddle, we had completed 7 out of our first 8 throws (and were 0 for 3 in no-huddle to start), so the suggestion that we were solely befuddled by this wrinkle is not accurate. We were trying to force feed something that wasn't fully clicking immediately and when we were running our base offense at a normal rhthym, we were doing fine.........regardless of what the defense was doing.
Nice read... Will be interesting to see if other teams try this against us now that Atlanta had so much success with it in the 1st Q, but as pointed out, the Broncos did adjust well later in the game. One of the suggested strategies was screens... I would have to go back and look at the game again, but seems to me that screens were working well as the game wore on.

I give a lot of credit to ATL - the came out with a good wrinkle, and it worked at least for a while. I originally thought we would see a lot more of the "Psycho", but the more I think about it, the less likely I think that is. Dont think the Broncos will get fooled again.
milehighJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 08:54 AM   #23
Bmore Manning
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boltaneer View Post
It seems similar to what the Chargers have been doing to Peyton over the years. Basically, you show one look early and after Peyton starts barking out an audible in response to what he sees, you shift to the real formation. I don't know why Peyton always continued to play that game with the Chargers. If he started quick snapping it, he would have caught the defense in the wrong position.

Anyway, I did notice their LB doing some audibles here and there but nothing like what Cooper always did.

BTW, Cooper said that a lot of the times, he was just barking out fake audibles in an attempt to confuse Manning. Guess it worked pretty good.
I guess it hasn't worked to well for your Super Bowl aspirations huh?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 09:35 AM   #24
boltaneer
17
 
boltaneer's Avatar
 
ATTA BABY!

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 4,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmore Manning View Post
I guess it hasn't worked to well for your Super Bowl aspirations huh?
Are you the new KCStud?

Check Peyton Manning's lifetime stats and record against the Chargers. That's all I'm saying.

Also, relevant to the upcoming game, Wade Phillips was the DC who first had success against Manning here in SD.
boltaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 12:20 PM   #25
Agamemnon
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

There's nothing special about this kind of defense. It exists specifically to combat QB's who are pre-snap masters. I'm sure Manning has seen that kind of thing many, many times. Spread formations and runs off of quick snaps usually counter it fine. It's not why we struggled.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Denver Broncos