US embassy in Libya in flames, ambassador dead

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Hey, all I asked was if you knew which terror group staged the attack.

It seemed like a simple question.

The answer is: "I don't know."

Of course I don't. But why did you change your response?

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by barryr

Apparently that embassy was warned well ahead of time of a possible attack, but not much was done to prepare for it, if anything. If this was Bush, the media in a frenzy. It's Obama, so time to change the subject.

its bushes fault yeah that always work or evil republicans fault its not obamas fault

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by DAN_BRONCO_FAN

its bushes fault yeah that always work or evil republicans fault its not obamas fault move along now nothing to see here

If we listen to people like you, Bush was never at fault for anything.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Of course I don't. But why did you change your response?

What was my original response?

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

If we listen to people like you, Bush was never at fault for anything.

again its time to stop blaming bush for everything its been 4 years he spent alont obama took over and threw the lever into overdrive mode so think its time to stop makin scapegoats and man up man up to fast and furious screw up that got a boarder agent killed man up to lack of security that got men killed in the embassy in Libya

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by DAN_BRONCO_FAN

again its time to stop blaming bush for everything its been 4 years he spent alont obama took over and threw the lever into overdrive mode so think its time to stop makin scapegoats and man up man up to fast and furious screw up that got a boarder agent killed man up to lack of security that got men killed in the embassy in Libya

Still giving your hero GeeDubya a pass for his total evisceration of the U.S. economy, eh?

Speaking of which, it took Clinton two terms to fix the mess he inherited from Saint Ron and Poppy, and the mess Bill inherited was small potatoes by comparison.

And still peddling that "fast and furious" disinfo? For shame!

In any event, you're clearly just another barely-literate sheep who gets his "facts" from Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, so I'll take anything you might have to say with several large grains of salt.

[ant1999e]

You guys keep talking about bullshyt...

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by Smiling Assassin27

i lean toward the conservative side but I DO NOT LIKE AUTO PLAY ADS DAMMIT i was goin thru my pc tryin to find that anoying bug that kept doin that crap turns out its you sneaky b-tard not amused

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Still giving your hero GeeDubya a pass for his total evisceration of the U.S. economy, eh?

Speaking of which, it took Clinton two terms to fix the mess he inherited from Saint Ron and Poppy, and the mess Bill inherited was small potatoes by comparison.

And still peddling that "fast and furious" disinfo? For shame!

In any event, you're clearly just another barely-literate sheep who gets his "facts" from Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, so I'll take anything you might have to say with several large grains of salt.

so fast and furious was bushes fault or is it all just a dream just a dream

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by DAN_BRONCO_FAN

i lean toward the conservative side but I DO NOT LIKE AUTO PLAY ADS DAMMIT i was goin thru my pc tryin to find that anoying bug that kept doin that crap turns out its you sneaky b-tard not amused

This, the shyt is pissing me off.

[mhgaffney]

As usual PCR's latest is on target.

I do not own a TV -- but if he's right that the press is reporting that the ongoing anti US protests were caused by a Hollywood movie -- then truly we have entered Never Never Land.

MHG

Libya: 'Death to America'

By Paul Craig Roberts

September 17, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - September Try to imagine more deluded reporting than this by America’s Presstitute "free press." For 11 years Washington in pursuit of its rightful hegemony has been sending troops, bombers, jet fighters, helicopter gunships, drones, and assassination teams into seven Muslim countries. Two of the Muslim countries, Iraq and Libya, and perhaps more depending on how you see it, have been overthrown by Washington and left in chaos.

Washington’s assaults on seven countries have blown up weddings, funerals, kids’ soccer games, farm houses, hospitals, aid workers, schools, people walking along the streets, village elders, but the Muslims don’t mind! They understand that the well-meaning Americans who love them and are committed to their human rights, are bringing them democracy and women’s rights. The million or more dead, maimed, and displaced Muslims are a low price to be paid for liberation by Washington.

The Muslims understand that liberation has costs and were content with Washington’s liberating violence until some idiot in California produced an anti-Islamic film. This film, and not Washington’s predations, set the Muslim world alive with "hate America."

On the symbolic date of September 11, the US ambassador to Libya and some other Washington representatives were assassinated in Libya. According to the Presstitute media, the assassins did not kill the Americans because Washington destroyed their country and left them in chaos. The assassins killed the Americans because of an anti-Islamic film for which the murdered American representatives were not responsible.

This is the way Washington works and thinks. It is not Washington’s slaughter of Muslims and control over their societies and political life that produces blowback. It is independent film-makers in California!

Deluded politicians in Washington, both Republicans and Democrats and, of course, the bought-and-paid-for "experts," brought these forceful rejections of America upon us all. Washington has not only attacked Muslim countries on the basis of concocted lies – weapons of mass destruction, al Qaeda connections, brutal dictators – but also destroyed the secular governments who held the Islamists in check, and prevented their attacks on US representatives and institutions.

In Egypt, long an American puppet states, the US Embassy was stormed and the US flag was torn apart. If only this was all. Washington could again purchase the Egyptian government, as it has since Anwar Sadat’s assassination. But the ongoing news is that Anti-American protests are not only spreading across the Middle East but erupting throughout the world: Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, Gaza, Bangladesh, Lebanon, London, and even into Israel.

The Obama administration is blaming al Qaeda, an Islamist group that the administration is currently supporting in its efforts to overthrow the secular Assad government in Syria and the group that the Obama administration used to overthrow the Libyan government, thus leaving a power vacuum in its place. Having destroyed the protection from Islamist attacks that secular Arab rulers provided Washington, Obama, in a show of force, has sent drones, aircraft carriers, Marines, and Tomahawk missile ships to Libya, raising the prospect that more schools and children's soccer games will be mistaken for jihadi encampments and blown up.

Attempting to politicize the turmoil, Presidential candidate Mitt Romney declared that the US needed him in the White House and as president he would provide "…the leadership that America respects and will keep us admired throughout the world."

What admiration is Romney talking about? Who are the admirers? In Egypt Muslims marching to the beat of "death to America," have not been deterred by police after three days of protests. CBS reports that "Police continue to fire tear gas in hopes it will deplete the strength of the demonstrators but they [the demonstrators] are proving relentless."

Kings Good, Dictators Bad! Unlike the Washington-supported Saudi royal family that absorbs most of their nation’s oil income, Qaddafi allocated the oil money to Libyans. In Cynthia McKinney’s excellent book, The Illegal War On Libya, Stephen Lendman writes that Qaddafi "wanted Libyans to share in the country’s oil wealth, a notion foreign to America and other Western societies. Under his 1999 Decision No. 111, all Libyans received free healthcare, education, electricity, water, training, rehabilitation, housing assistance, disability, old-age benefits, interest-free state loans, as well as generous subsidies to study abroad, buy a new car, help when they marry, practically free gasoline, and more."

Why did such a relatively wealthy and egalitarian country need to be "liberated" by Washington and its NATO war criminal puppet state?

What was achieved by overthrowing a government that provided for its people in better ways than do Western governments for the people they govern?

The US is the new Rome, and Europe, the UK, Canada, Japan, and Australia are its tributary dominions along with the oil kingdoms.

In his book, Rubicon, Tom Holland describes what it is like to be a dominion of a powerful and ruthless military state:

"Prior to the cataclysms of B.C. 146, there had been some confusion as to the precise definition of ‘freedom.’ When the Romans claimed to be guaranteeing it, what did this mean? ... Roman and Greek interpretations of ‘freedom’ diverged. To the Romans … freedom meant an opportunity for the city states to follow rules laid down by Roman commissioners."

This is the "freedom" that Washington imposes on the world. Washington is the übermensch. The rest of the world is Washington’s playground. Ruling as Rome did, Washington installs puppets and relies on their obeisance.

In the end, empire destroys itself. Washington’s hubris and arrogance is turning the world against America. Thanks to The Clintons, the Bushes, Cheney, Obama and the neoconservatives, America, instead of being loved or even respected, is hated with a rising passion. The widespread attacks on the imperial power’s embassies are only the beginning.

As Gerald Celente had forecast, "The 1st Great War of the 21st Century" has begun.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. www.paulcraigroberts.org/

This article was originally posted at Trends Journal

Via LewRockwell.com

[barryr]

And Obama stated the world would see America in a different light and like us more with him as president. Yeah, sure looks like it. More like they see America as weak and this admin. continues to give mixed messages to our once solid allies.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by barryr

And Obama stated the world would see America in a different light and like us more with him as president. Yeah, sure looks like it. More like they see America as weak and this admin. continues to give mixed messages to our once solid allies.

Yeah, because, as a Bush cheerleader, you have SO much credibility on presidents and how they influence world opinion re: America.

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by barryr

And Obama stated the world would see America in a different light and like us more with him as president. Yeah, sure looks like it. More like they see America as weak and this admin. continues to give mixed messages to our once solid allies.

yep it was HOPE and change alright..

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by barryr

And Obama stated the world would see America in a different light and like us more with him as president. Yeah, sure looks like it. More like they see America as weak and this admin. continues to give mixed messages to our once solid allies.

Which speech??

As for 'weak,' based upon what? Who did we refuse to invade this time??

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by lonestar

yep it was HOPE and change alright..

Yeah. Bush was so much better!

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Kid? No, I kid you not.

Was the question too difficult?

If it was a terrorist organization, which one?? I'm interested.

Al Qaeda...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...terror-attack/

Intelligence sources tell Fox News they are convinced the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was directly tied to Al Qaeda -- with a former Guantanamo detainee involved.
That revelation comes on the same day a top Obama administration official called last week's deadly assault a "terrorist attack" -- the first time the attack has been described that way by the administration after claims it had been a "spontaneous" act.
"Yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said during a Senate hearing Wednesday. cont...

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

[ant1999e]

Not even worth a response LABF. Your pathetic.

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Not even worth a response LABF. Your pathetic.

put the moron in IGGY and you never have to see his pathetic cartoons again..

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Not even worth a response LABF. Your pathetic.

Thanks for letting me know the message was right on target.

Right-wing hypocrites like you look to fault Obama's handling of foreign policy issues while clamoring to replace him with a seasoned, foreign policy genius like Romney...? L0L!

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by lonestar

put the moron in IGGY and you never have to see his pathetic cartoons again..but I still go on reading and responding to his posts anyway...I just can't help myself.....you might say I'm obsessed!

Fixed.

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Al Qaeda...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...terror-attack/

Intelligence sources tell Fox News they are convinced the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was directly tied to Al Qaeda -- with a former Guantanamo detainee involved.
That revelation comes on the same day a top Obama administration official called last week's deadly assault a "terrorist attack" -- the first time the attack has been described that way by the administration after claims it had been a "spontaneous" act.
"Yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy," Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said during a Senate hearing Wednesday. cont...

Nothing from the peanut gallery? Al Qaeda attacked our embassy and nobody has anything to say?

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Nothing from the peanut gallery? Al Qaeda attacked our embassy and nobody has anything to say?

I imagine everyone who is following the story has read the headlines and their suspicions confirmed.

Now that a group with affiliations to Al Qaeda is suspected, we can expect more details.

What else is there to say that hasn't been said? Think drones?

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

but obama is president why jobs keep going there ? why does Hollywood film most of its shows and outside scenes in Canada ?
4 years jobs are going over seas why is that.
can the president control who sends jobs where ?
why cant the president go oh hey if you keep your jobs in the us ill cut you a break in taxes?
if you hire more people ill cut you another break.
see im not the president and yet i just solved the problem
also why wont unions stop donating to politicians ?
why did the us gov allow guns to be sold to Mexican drug lords or whoever ?
i would take hillary at this point matter of fact if the democrats want to really make shure they would win switch obama with hillary at the last minute.