![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
KKKAAAAAHHHNNNNN!!!!!!!!!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gensis Planet
Posts: 4,263
|
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-...tone-amendment
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,479
|
No one project will ever make or break our energy supply. Whatever Obama got some stiff wind from some greeny's that got organized and caved. The repubs will use it as an issue but all the oil hits the market someday whether it goes through to the pacific or cuts down to the gulf. So any notion it means that oil wont get burnt is a joke.
Obama will take some heat from the union guys who would have worked and it could hurt the voter turnout for those small areas affected. But overall not a huge issue IMO. What r the big issues in FLA, COLO I think those would be more interesting to focus. I have no idea really. I hear people on the news etc talk about how important the Latino vote is in those states. But not really what latinos, or other people in those states see as the big issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I'm gay for the Broncos!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,588
Adopt-a-Bronco: All @ same time |
Keystone XL pipeline would raise gas prices and destroy the environment. Period.
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/globallab..._Reportpdf.pdf ^ That's what an independent, peer-reviewed study looks like. Note that none exist that verify claims made by the oil industry. Last edited by Blart; 03-10-2012 at 02:07 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
KKKAAAAAHHHNNNNN!!!!!!!!!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gensis Planet
Posts: 4,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
Quote:
It looks like America is seeing through the party of "No" these days as Obama continues to rise in ratings and the rabel the Right is trying to run against him sink lower and lower. -------------------------------------------------------------------- LETTER: Keep Keystone Pipeline oil in America Curtis Hallman Moundville Published: Friday, February 24, 2012 at 3:30 a.m. Last Modified: Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 8:54 p.m. Dear Editor: The Republicans in Congress just voted to build the Keystone Oil Pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast. But as I predicted a few months ago, they also voted to allow the energy products from this pipeline to be sold overseas. You hear the Republicans and the talking heads on the Fox propaganda channel saying we need this pipeline for America’s energy future. So why allow the oil and gas to go overseas? If you do not believe what I am saying, please read page 3B of The Tuscaloosa News’s Feb. 20 edition. The Republicans also voted to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. They also voted to nearly triple offshore drilling in federal waters, and to open more federal land to drilling. All this oil will be sold on the open market. I have no problem with opening these areas to drilling. I would like to see America become more energy independent. But oil and gas from federal land and waters are almost free for the oil companies. They pay no royalties to the government and the taxpayers subsidize a lot of the cost of drilling. Our Congresswoman Terri Sewell voted to stop this oil from going overseas. But all of Alabama’s other Congressmen and Sen. Richard Shelby voted to allow this oil to go overseas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lost In Space
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 19,087
|
To much politics and very little economic,environmentally or real business analysis being done on this proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,842
|
Keystone is nothing more than another subsidy to the oil companies at our expense.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|