Tim Tebow # 19 on all time NFL any Era team (ahead of Peyton Manning) - The Orange Mane

Peoples Champ · 01-24-2012, 12:07 PM

Tim Tebow is number 19 on the NFL any era team. Meaning he would be good in any Era in the NFL. Its always good to see Tebow on a list with Ed Reed. Dont think Cutler would be on this list:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/74...s-qb-tim-tebow

Peoples Champ · 01-24-2012, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peoples Champ

Tim Tebow is number 19 on the NFL any era team. Meaning he would be good in any Era in the NFL. Its always good to see Tebow on a list with Ed Reed. Dont think Cutler would be on this list:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/74...s-qb-tim-tebow

im guessing he is above Peyton Manning because of his rushing ability

bendog · 01-24-2012, 12:18 PM

Jesus weeps

Bronco Rob · 01-24-2012, 12:22 PM

JAMES LOFTON: He's totally a throwback. When you talk about guys who could play in any era, he could play in any era. It may not be quarterback. He might have been a linebacker, a running back. He might have been a tight end. He's big enough that, if you take him back to the '50s, he could have been an offensive lineman. His physical skill set is something you want in a football player in any era. He's big, he's fast, he's tough, he'll take a hit, he'll deliver punishment. Tim Tebow, maybe he's not a quarterback in the '60s, maybe he's a defensive tackle. But Tim Tebow's going to come out, and he's going to be a winner. And I think that's what people are drawn to.

FLOYD LITTLE: He might not be the greatest quarterback, but he could play at any position you want him to play at. He's a guy I'd like to play with if I was still playing. He's a winner, he's mobile, strong, and gets the job done regardless, whether he's blocking, throwing, running or just fooling you. He finds a way to win, and people need to recognize that. A 'W' is a 'W' and it doesn't matter how you get it. If you win ugly, it's still a 'W.' Mechanics don't play the game, people do.

LARRY CSONKA: I'm picking Tim Tebow, who's a controversial choice. But that kid, a lot of people say he's not a pure passing QB. But neither was Fran Tarkenton. You can take Tebow and compare him to a lot of quarterbacks over the years, great QBs who could roll out and be a threat. When it comes down to it, I think he can throw the long ball, maybe not consistently, but consistently enough to win. And in the final analysis, isn't that what matters? He's not going to statistically pass Dan Marino, but he may end up in a Super Bowl. ... He has a combination of things that come down to winning.

MIKE DITKA: When we won the 1963 championship with the Bears, our heaviest lineman was 255. Tebow is an athlete. It starts there and it may end up there, but he'll improve in the things you do as a quarterback. But if you're saying for a guy who purely loves to go out there and play the game of football, he loves it and he plays as good as he can. Some weeks it may not be good enough, but that's what he does. And the will is a powerful thing.

Boobs McGee · 01-24-2012, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bronco Rob

JAMES LOFTON: He's totally a throwback. When you talk about guys who could play in any era, he could play in any era. It may not be quarterback. He might have been a linebacker, a running back. He might have been a tight end. He's big enough that, if you take him back to the '50s, he could have been an offensive lineman. His physical skill set is something you want in a football player in any era. He's big, he's fast, he's tough, he'll take a hit, he'll deliver punishment. Tim Tebow, maybe he's not a quarterback in the '60s, maybe he's a defensive tackle. But Tim Tebow's going to come out, and he's going to be a winner. And I think that's what people are drawn to.

FLOYD LITTLE: He might not be the greatest quarterback, but he could play at any position you want him to play at. He's a guy I'd like to play with if I was still playing. He's a winner, he's mobile, strong, and gets the job done regardless, whether he's blocking, throwing, running or just fooling you. He finds a way to win, and people need to recognize that. A 'W' is a 'W' and it doesn't matter how you get it. If you win ugly, it's still a 'W.' Mechanics don't play the game, people do.

LARRY CSONKA: I'm picking Tim Tebow, who's a controversial choice. But that kid, a lot of people say he's not a pure passing QB. But neither was Fran Tarkenton. You can take Tebow and compare him to a lot of quarterbacks over the years, great QBs who could roll out and be a threat. When it comes down to it, I think he can throw the long ball, maybe not consistently, but consistently enough to win. And in the final analysis, isn't that what matters? He's not going to statistically pass Dan Marino, but he may end up in a Super Bowl. ... He has a combination of things that come down to winning.

MIKE DITKA: When we won the 1963 championship with the Bears, our heaviest lineman was 255. Tebow is an athlete. It starts there and it may end up there, but he'll improve in the things you do as a quarterback. But if you're saying for a guy who purely loves to go out there and play the game of football, he loves it and he plays as good as he can. Some weeks it may not be good enough, but that's what he does. And the will is a powerful thing.

lol ummm what?

g00fyfoot · 01-24-2012, 12:38 PM

Used to have a poster of James Lofton on my bedroom wall when I was a kid.

ColoradoDarin · 01-24-2012, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boobs McGee

lol ummm what?

Those are the guys talking about Tebow.

Armchair Bronco · 01-24-2012, 03:37 PM

Love the "Old School" feedback.

Turd_Ferguson · 01-24-2012, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peoples Champ

Tim Tebow is number 19 on the NFL any era team. Meaning he would be good in any Era in the NFL. Its always good to see Tebow on a list with Ed Reed. Dont think Cutler would be on this list:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/74...s-qb-tim-tebow

Yea poor Cutler wouldn't have been good in the 50s... He is so unlucky to have a strong throwing arm and the ability to play QB in the modern era. We are so lucky to have traded him for a QB that is best equipped to play alongside the Four Horsemen under Knute Rockne.

Peoples Champ · 01-25-2012, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peoples Champ

im guessing he is above Peyton Manning because of his rushing ability

that is correct

Spider · 01-25-2012, 06:52 AM

#19 ? I can go with that , but ahead of Peyton ? thats utter bullshiat , Peyton could play in any era

Peoples Champ · 01-25-2012, 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spider

#19 ? I can go with that , but ahead of Peyton ? thats utter bullshiat , Peyton could play in any era

nah, Peyton needs a dome, his division has 2 domes and 2 warm weather cities. He would have choked in the Icebowls of the 50's

Spider · 01-25-2012, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peoples Champ

nah, Peyton needs a dome, his division has 2 domes and 2 warm weather cities. He would have choked in the Icebowls of the 50's

Yeah ok ........

bfoflcommish · 01-25-2012, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peoples Champ

nah, Peyton needs a dome, his division has 2 domes and 2 warm weather cities. He would have choked in the Icebowls of the 50's

you know he beat us here in bad snow games right? he has won plenty of bad weather non dome games.

Peoples Champ · 01-25-2012, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bfoflcommish

you know he beat us here in bad snow games right? he has won plenty of bad weather non dome games.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSe2bslASf0

bombquixote · 01-25-2012, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turd_Ferguson

Yea poor Cutler wouldn't have been good in the 50s... He is so unlucky to have a strong throwing arm and the ability to play QB in the modern era. We are so lucky to have traded him for a QB that is best equipped to play alongside the Four Horsemen under Knute Rockne.

I usually don't even log in here anymore. But this, sir, needed repping.

Carry on.

TonyR · 01-25-2012, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bombquixote

But this, sir, needed repping.

Pos or neg?

bombquixote · 01-25-2012, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyR

Pos or neg?

Pos, definitely.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-24-2012, 12:07 PM	#1
Peoples Champ Ring of Famer New to the Forum Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Orange County Posts: 3,100 Adopt-a-Bronco: Champ Bailey	Tim Tebow # 19 on all time NFL any Era team (ahead of Peyton Manning) Tim Tebow is number 19 on the NFL any era team. Meaning he would be good in any Era in the NFL. Its always good to see Tebow on a list with Ed Reed. Dont think Cutler would be on this list: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/74...s-qb-tim-tebow

01-24-2012, 12:18 PM	#3
bendog Marginally Continent David Bowens, he'd be an upgrade Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Folsom Prison Posts: 19,935 Adopt-a-Bronco: David Bowens	Jesus weeps

01-24-2012, 12:22 PM	#4
Bronco Rob Ring of Famer There's A New Sheriff In Town Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 4,587 Adopt-a-Bronco: Bill Vinovich	JAMES LOFTON: He's totally a throwback. When you talk about guys who could play in any era, he could play in any era. It may not be quarterback. He might have been a linebacker, a running back. He might have been a tight end. He's big enough that, if you take him back to the '50s, he could have been an offensive lineman. His physical skill set is something you want in a football player in any era. He's big, he's fast, he's tough, he'll take a hit, he'll deliver punishment. Tim Tebow, maybe he's not a quarterback in the '60s, maybe he's a defensive tackle. But Tim Tebow's going to come out, and he's going to be a winner. And I think that's what people are drawn to. FLOYD LITTLE: He might not be the greatest quarterback, but he could play at any position you want him to play at. He's a guy I'd like to play with if I was still playing. He's a winner, he's mobile, strong, and gets the job done regardless, whether he's blocking, throwing, running or just fooling you. He finds a way to win, and people need to recognize that. A 'W' is a 'W' and it doesn't matter how you get it. If you win ugly, it's still a 'W.' Mechanics don't play the game, people do. LARRY CSONKA: I'm picking Tim Tebow, who's a controversial choice. But that kid, a lot of people say he's not a pure passing QB. But neither was Fran Tarkenton. You can take Tebow and compare him to a lot of quarterbacks over the years, great QBs who could roll out and be a threat. When it comes down to it, I think he can throw the long ball, maybe not consistently, but consistently enough to win. And in the final analysis, isn't that what matters? He's not going to statistically pass Dan Marino, but he may end up in a Super Bowl. ... He has a combination of things that come down to winning. MIKE DITKA: When we won the 1963 championship with the Bears, our heaviest lineman was 255. Tebow is an athlete. It starts there and it may end up there, but he'll improve in the things you do as a quarterback. But if you're saying for a guy who purely loves to go out there and play the game of football, he loves it and he plays as good as he can. Some weeks it may not be good enough, but that's what he does. And the will is a powerful thing.

01-24-2012, 12:38 PM	#6
g00fyfoot Seasoned Veteran Join Date: May 2006 Location: 5280' Posts: 357	Used to have a poster of James Lofton on my bedroom wall when I was a kid.

01-24-2012, 03:37 PM	#8
Armchair Bronco Ring of Famer Call me "Old School"... Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,604 Adopt-a-Bronco: Darrien Gordon	Love the "Old School" feedback.

01-25-2012, 06:52 AM	#11
Spider Mr Diplomacy I survived Tebow Mania at the Mane Join Date: May 2001 Location: Elway was just an arm =MacGruder Posts: 84,438 Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller	#19 ? I can go with that , but ahead of Peyton ? thats utter bullshiat , Peyton could play in any era