![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
An already horrendous situation was made much worse two years ago this month when the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. the Federal Elections Commission that multinational corporations have a constitutional right to spend whatever they want to influence election outcomes. A bare 5-4 majority lowered the floodgates on unchecked, unlimited, unaccountable corporate cash in political campaigns. Corporations were equated with people. A century of laws regulating business spending on elections were upended. In one fell swoop, five justices fantasized for corporations a right never conceived by the founders whose preamble to our Constitution begins with the words, "We the people..."
The ruling not only poisoned our political process. It contaminated the legislative process. It cast a permanent chill over all policymaking. Will the merits or the money tip the balance when an issue comes before Congress? What do you think? If the question is on breaking up huge banks, for example, every member of the Senate and the House, in the back of their minds, will ask themselves what the personal price would be for taking on Wall Street. Am I going to be punished? Will a huge amount of money be unleashed in my state? They're going to think twice about how to cast that vote. Not to put too fine a point on it, you will see politicians being adopted by corporations and becoming wholly owned subsidiaries of corporate entities. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-be...b_1219573.html |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
If you think we can take on Wall Street and the banks and the energy companies without taking care of Citizens United first, all I can say is, you're drinking the Koolaid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,846
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
signed it,but i'm extremely pessimistic that it will ever happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I'm gay for the Broncos!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,588
Adopt-a-Bronco: All @ same time |
Really? The year of the protest has given me hope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
I would much rather save the Republic -- Democracy is the wrong term, if they can get that simple fact right, what else do they not understand?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
you have to remember that the huffiington post is so far to the left that anything they print or for that matter anyone that reads it and believes it is a mental midget..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Quote:
SOP for the right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
Quote:
I've always wondered why you rightards take such issue with the concept of "representative democracy." This has been argued before on here. For some reason, you troglodytes really hate the idea that the government of this country is a democracy. You just hate the word, don't you? Says a lot about you. I think, in your minds, if you keep saying over and over to yourselves that this republic is not a democracy, you can convince yourselves that anybody who doesn't agree with your fascist dogma can rightfully be eliminated from representation. After all, that's what your right wing representatives in Congress are doing day after day, by stopping all the processes of government that don't pass their dogmatic agenda. This also explains why the Right Wing in America has no respect for the outcome of elections. If you can't fix the election (as with Bush in Florida and Ohio) and your candidate loses, then you expend all your energies to ensure that the government of your opponent fails. After all, it's pretty clear what your agenda is: The implementation of an ideologically rigid, dogmatic, right wing state. A one religion, socially restrictive police state governed by corporations and the military. One need only watch your primaries to get a whiff of where you want to take this country. After all, Citizens United was a major victory for your side, wasn't it? The natural enemy of such a state is democracy. I can see why you despise even the mention of the word. Go ahead and give me a history lesson. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,697
|
Bill Moyers: How ordinary people can fight ‘Citizens United’
Ask Bill: How can ordinary people help to overturn or nullify the Citizen United Decision? from BillMoyers.com on Vimeo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
I am aware of that, but its still a pet peeve, and another example of changing our history and traditions, that progressives are so fond of attempting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
I guarantee you, you've never gone there, never read it, never even seen it, but still mouth off (if you had, you'd know it's only a collection of articles and essays from all over the place). Why? Because you're a right wing parrot. A puppet. You have no interest in anything that is not already rattling around in your little peanut head. The only places you go for information are places that agree with what you already believe and reinforce the unexamined ideas, even if they are completely wrong, that you already hold. You are a golem. A creature of animated mud. A troglodyte. Incurious. Oafish. Dull witted. Living a thoroughly unexamined life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Fan of the home team
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 12,107
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mark Schlereth |
If you are concerned about the collapse of the middle class, you should be concerned about how American campaigns are financed. If you wonder why the United States is the only country in the industrialized world not to have a national health care program, if you're asking why we pay the highest price in the world for prescription drugs, or why we spend more money on the military than the rest of the world combined, you are talking about campaign finance. You are talking about the unbelievable power that big-money interests have over every legislative decision.
An already horrendous situation was made much worse two years ago this month when the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. the Federal Elections Commission that multinational corporations have a constitutional right to spend whatever they want to influence election outcomes. A bare 5-4 majority lowered the floodgates on unchecked, unlimited, unaccountable corporate cash in political campaigns. Corporations were equated with people. A century of laws regulating business spending on elections were upended. In one fell swoop, five justices fantasized for corporations a right never conceived by the founders whose preamble to our Constitution begins with the words, "We the people..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
In this case, it may be more accurate to cite Lincoln, Just because fools call a dog's tail, his fifth leg doesnt make it correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
But your wrong I have been there and read the crap they publish. . I find it ironic that one of the richest women in the USA would be so wrong about almost everything. Guess it must have been all that money she got rom her ex that went to her head. I suspect had she actually earned it she would have a much better perspective. I'm so glad there are morons out there that think that she is Gods answer to their prayers. Go with God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,879
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
A republic IS a democracy. The terms are not mutually exclusive. One is a specific type of another, not a completely different beast. All republics (that is, governments that are actually structured as a republic not various governments that call themselves republics) are democracies , though not all democracies are republics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 49,113
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,879
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
What could possibly go wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,330
|
Quote:
For someone who gets bent out of shape when I suggest Obama might be Marxist leaning, you sure like to call others names...ones's that are more personal in nature. Is it you are attempting (feebly) to shut others up? That would not be very Democratic of you. One might begin to think that you also lean toward controling what others say and think. If so, it would also explain why Obama's choice to head the FCC (Mark Lloyd) would never create a concern for you. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|