The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2012, 12:27 AM   #1
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,244

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default It's not just about having a great QB

For anybody who thinks you need a great QB to win a Superbowl, here we are yet again with several elite QB's, as well as elite offenses, knocked out of the playoffs and what you have now is some very solid ALL AROUND TEAMS.

This is exactly why I hate those media losers who want to already proclaim Tebow will never win a Superbowl. I don't know how people arise to that conclusion for a player who in his 1st year of starting, while taking over an offense that was hurting bad and a team that was staring the 1st overall pick in the draft right in the face.

We all know Tebow has the leadership and intangibles. A player who's work ethic already has vets praising how hard he works. How can you possibly think he will not improve going into next season. This offense, while having some injuries and practically thrown together in week 5, still managed to knock the Steelers out of the playoffs. Did this team struggle at times, oh yeah they did. Did they play great when it mattered most, quite often I would say.

But more to the point - I think it still makes sense to give Tebow the chance next year while adding more talent around him and on the defense. You can win in this league with a good all around team. We're seeing it now. Alex Smith is no QB legend. Flacco is not considered a top 5 QB. Heck, I imagine some people barely have him in the top 10. Eli as well has had many ups and downs in his career. Again, his name hardly ever mentioned among the best in the game.

What you're seeing with these teams is great coaching, getting hot at the right time and playing mostly mistake free football. I can easily see an improved Tebow (who I don't think ever has to be considered one of the best) taking this team to the Superbowl one of these days. But the TEAM overall has to be much better. You have 2 ELITE QB's sitting at home right now (Brees, Rogers) because their teams were not great all around. If Brady and the Pats lose next week to the Ravens, you'll have the best 3 QB's in the game not going to the Superbowl.

I think that says alot about how to build your team. Yeah sure, it's nice to have an elite QB but I think it's more important to have a more well rounded and versatile team then it is to have an elite QB who can pass for 350 yards every game. Keep adding playmakers on both sides of the ball. We've got some nice pieces in place, let's hope we can hit on some good picks coming up in a few months as well as adding some nice FA's. Go from there.
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-17-2012, 12:33 AM   #2
myMind
splinters reality until
 
myMind's Avatar
 
We Grok

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,593

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

I like to **** without climaxing.
myMind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:39 AM   #3
Agamemnon
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

And you also don't generally develop a great QB without giving him time to learn and grow and some decent players to help him out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:40 AM   #4
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,244

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fixedMind View Post
I like to **** without climaxing.
okay, sounds like a personal problem to me, but whatever floats your boat. lol
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:42 AM   #5
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,244

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agamemnon View Post
And you also don't generally develop a great QB without giving him time to learn and grow and some decent players to help him out.
True. Tebow was under heat all day long. The coverage was great on alot of those plays as well as great pressure from the Pats. Hard to get anything going when you're running for your life. I don't think Brady would have played all that well if it was him under center for the Broncos that day. With a running game that was shut down and coverages so tight and with people flying at you from the left and right. You can't lay that game on Tebow alone. I'll say it again, he didn't play great but as you pointed out, how can you expect somebody to play great when the other parts are not working. It's like asking an archer to go mix it up with some swordsmen. Well damn, if all you're giving him is a bow and arrow and the rest of the guys have chainmail, shields and swords, what do you think is going to happen to your archer......hahaha.

Last edited by ZONA; 01-17-2012 at 12:46 AM..
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:44 AM   #6
Dexter
Pro Bowler
 
Dexter's Avatar
 
Bay Harbor Butcher

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 647

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Great post, pretty much sums up how I feel. There are a lot of holes on this team to just be obsessed over one position. We're not one player away from the Superbowl, nor do we have easy access to a top talent in the draft. Both RG3 and Luck will be gone in the top 5. After that, who do you like? Ryan Tannenhill? Even then he might go higher than 25.

Let your draft picks develop. What an interesting concept huh?
Dexter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:44 AM   #7
myMind
splinters reality until
 
myMind's Avatar
 
We Grok

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,593

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZONA View Post
okay, sounds like a personal problem to me, but whatever floats your boat. lol
bucolic buoyancy and carbonated soda...no caramel.
myMind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:57 AM   #8
Archer81
Optimum Homo
 
Archer81's Avatar
 
Tactical Neck.

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22,372
Default

I do think its interesting that only one team with a high flying offense left is New England. A Ravens-49ers Superbowl might actually worry Goodell. A 17-13 score? Embarassing...

Archer81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 01:08 AM   #9
Agamemnon
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirhcyennek81 View Post
I do think its interesting that only one team with a high flying offense left is New England. A Ravens-49ers Superbowl might actually worry Goodell. A 17-13 score? Embarassing...

When you look at the Saints and Packers on defense it really shouldn't be that much of a surprise. A great offense can cover for a mediocre defense, but it's a lot harder to hide genuinely bad defenses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 05:32 AM   #10
riiiiick
Solid Starter
 
riiiiick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 238
Default

We led the league in drops, that would be a nice place to start. One full off season/camp with tebow taking all the 1st team reps should help.
riiiiick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 05:39 AM   #11
CEH
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Default

IMO Houston would have destroyed BALT with Shaub at the helm. Only reason why Balt won was turnovers and a 3rd string QB,

Shaub would have made the Pro Bowl this year had he not been injured.

Manning, Shaub,Brady and Alex Smith.

Not sure I'm buying the premise. Look at the QBs of the last 6-8 Super Bowls.

Brees, Rodgers, Brady, Rotherlisberger, Manning(s)

But I believe this is a QB league and you need one to consistently be in the running. You can always have the outlier but the common theme is great QBs

After Sunday and the last 4 games, Eli is right up there.
CEH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 06:41 AM   #12
Peoples Champ
Ring of Famer
 
Peoples Champ's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 3,435

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Champ Bailey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZONA View Post
For anybody who thinks you need a great QB to win a Superbowl, here we are yet again with several elite QB's, as well as elite offenses, knocked out of the playoffs and what you have now is some very solid ALL AROUND TEAMS.

This is exactly why I hate those media losers who want to already proclaim Tebow will never win a Superbowl. I don't know how people arise to that conclusion for a player who in his 1st year of starting, while taking over an offense that was hurting bad and a team that was staring the 1st overall pick in the draft right in the face.

We all know Tebow has the leadership and intangibles. A player who's work ethic already has vets praising how hard he works. How can you possibly think he will not improve going into next season. This offense, while having some injuries and practically thrown together in week 5, still managed to knock the Steelers out of the playoffs. Did this team struggle at times, oh yeah they did. Did they play great when it mattered most, quite often I would say.

But more to the point - I think it still makes sense to give Tebow the chance next year while adding more talent around him and on the defense. You can win in this league with a good all around team. We're seeing it now. Alex Smith is no QB legend. Flacco is not considered a top 5 QB. Heck, I imagine some people barely have him in the top 10. Eli as well has had many ups and downs in his career. Again, his name hardly ever mentioned among the best in the game.

What you're seeing with these teams is great coaching, getting hot at the right time and playing mostly mistake free football. I can easily see an improved Tebow (who I don't think ever has to be considered one of the best) taking this team to the Superbowl one of these days. But the TEAM overall has to be much better. You have 2 ELITE QB's sitting at home right now (Brees, Rogers) because their teams were not great all around. If Brady and the Pats lose next week to the Ravens, you'll have the best 3 QB's in the game not going to the Superbowl.

I think that says alot about how to build your team. Yeah sure, it's nice to have an elite QB but I think it's more important to have a more well rounded and versatile team then it is to have an elite QB who can pass for 350 yards every game. Keep adding playmakers on both sides of the ball. We've got some nice pieces in place, let's hope we can hit on some good picks coming up in a few months as well as adding some nice FA's. Go from there.
I agree with you, and I am a pro Tebow guy, but i think Tebow does have to get better which I think he can. Lets stack the defense and grab another WR threat or maybe a huge TE threat, and see what the kid can do. Its not like we are in the whole for 10 years if Timmy doesnt get better in the next year or two. If he declines for the next 2 years we can scrap him with no loss, unlike the chiefs that are paying a declining cassell huge Brady type money.
Peoples Champ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 06:45 AM   #13
oubronco
John Foneco !!
 
oubronco's Avatar
 
Mile High Magic

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 19,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riiiiick View Post
We led the league in drops, that would be a nice place to start. One full off season/camp with tebow taking all the 1st team reps should help.
Where is the link?
oubronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 06:56 AM   #14
CEH
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Default

Top 5 passing team 4 were in the playoffs 58-22
SD being the outlier based on a 3 level tiebreaker

Top 5 rushing teams 36-44 2 in the playoffs. NO and DEN
CEH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 07:02 AM   #15
LonghornBronco
Ring of Famer
 
Hook'em Horns

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,415

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Rahim Moore
Default

Can anyone explain to me why the spread option was not a major portion of the offense. IMO it would have helped Tebows passing tremendously. Fox/McCoy seemed to fall in love with the 2 TE power sets.
LonghornBronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 07:11 AM   #16
alkemical
Guerrilla Ontologist
 
alkemical's Avatar
 
rorrim|mirror

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Future
Posts: 43,061

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Prima Materia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornBronco View Post
Can anyone explain to me why the spread option was not a major portion of the offense. IMO it would have helped Tebows passing tremendously. Fox/McCoy seemed to fall in love with the 2 TE power sets.
The OL play probably had some to do with that.
alkemical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 07:48 AM   #17
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 35,565
Default

What we have left is solid all around teams huh? Nope the Pats would go south in a hurry right now without Brady. They would win 0 playoff games. Gronk and Hernandez are great players, but Brady makes them gods of the TE spot. Those RBS? give me a break in Denver they would be crushed into the turf just like Moreno.

Those WR? DT better then any WR on NE. Sure the oline is solid but the defense only has 4 or so players on it that are good NFL players. Our defense probably better, just we don't have Brady scoring 30 points a game.

Ravens are all running game and defense. The passing attack stinks. If they had a great QB they would win it easy. The Texans were probably the best team, they lost the QB and couldn't get it done, QB is the most important spot on the field.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 07:52 AM   #18
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 35,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornBronco View Post
Can anyone explain to me why the spread option was not a major portion of the offense. IMO it would have helped Tebows passing tremendously. Fox/McCoy seemed to fall in love with the 2 TE power sets.
I'll give it a shot.

1-Broncos coaches didn't really think 8-8 or 7-9 would get them into playoffs. So when they went to Tebow they traded the one top line proven WR because he wasn't going to resign, and wasn't happy, and was in last yr of deal. Lloyd gone.

2-Gaffney gone

3-Marshall gone

4- So we have DT coming off a bad injury, and Eric Decker, Willis, Royal, then a bunch of scrubs.

Coaches want the best football players on the field and most likely felt Fells, Rosario, Mcgahee, Ball were better then the 3rd 4th 5th wr.

If you spread the field with scrubs you don't get a whole lot out of it and you lose the blocking you need to run your ground game. Plus without TE it opens Tebow up to more hits.

They were trying to make it workable in the NFL, it burns me out the fans around here aren't more in tune to that.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 08:16 AM   #19
Chris
Millenium Scrooge McDuck
 
Chris's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,584

Adopt-a-Bronco:
OrlandoFranklin
Default

I would say you need to be great at OL, DL, QB, WR and good everywhere else but one or two positions.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:13 PM   #20
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,244

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
What we have left is solid all around teams huh? Nope the Pats would go south in a hurry right now without Brady. They would win 0 playoff games. Gronk and Hernandez are great players, but Brady makes them gods of the TE spot. Those RBS? give me a break in Denver they would be crushed into the turf just like Moreno.

Those WR? DT better then any WR on NE. Sure the oline is solid but the defense only has 4 or so players on it that are good NFL players. Our defense probably better, just we don't have Brady scoring 30 points a game.

Ravens are all running game and defense. The passing attack stinks. If they had a great QB they would win it easy. The Texans were probably the best team, they lost the QB and couldn't get it done, QB is the most important spot on the field.
Well a few things come to mind. 1st, Brady was barely even breathed on in that game. I can think of quite a few QB's who if they had pockets like he had and the time he had, could have carved up the Broncos D that day. So yes, obviously a great QB is a luxury but if you don't have Oline integrity I say that great QB now becomes closer to average. If you look at the Giants, them getting excellent pressure with only 4 rushers is what makes them go. They can put the extra guys into coverage (flats, middle, deep) and it really does take away some things these great QB's like to do. They have to get rid of the ball earlier then they want and it's not always in that perfect spot, such was the case with Rogers that last game. The Giants and Eli scored well but some of that was due to them getting some turnover and having excellent field position. In my opinion, your chances of out scoring a Rogers, Brees, Peyton or Brady is going to be very hard to do unless your defense, and in particular, your front 4, is really good. Much easier to find a few good DL then it is to find the next Brees or Brady. I think the Broncos see this and that's really the only way we can move forward right now. Build a better team around Tebow and hopefully Tebow himself can improve with this offense in the offseason. We're not going to get us a Brady or Rogers anytime soon.
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:19 PM   #21
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 36,401

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZONA View Post
here we are yet again
"Yet again"?

How many non-elite QBs have won the superbowl over the last 20 years...?

Oh and fyi, despite having dramatically the worst defense left in the playoffs, the Patriots (the only team left with an elite QB) are heavy Vegas favorites to win it all. It's almost even money taking them.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:21 PM   #22
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 35,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZONA View Post
Well a few things come to mind. 1st, Brady was barely even breathed on in that game. I can think of quite a few QB's who if they had pockets like he had and the time he had, could have carved up the Broncos D that day. So yes, obviously a great QB is a luxury but if you don't have Oline integrity I say that great QB now becomes closer to average. If you look at the Giants, them getting excellent pressure with only 4 rushers is what makes them go. They can put the extra guys into coverage (flats, middle, deep) and it really does take away some things these great QB's like to do. They have to get rid of the ball earlier then they want and it's not always in that perfect spot, such was the case with Rogers that last game. The Giants and Eli scored well but some of that was due to them getting some turnover and having excellent field position. In my opinion, your chances of out scoring a Rogers, Brees, Peyton or Brady is going to be very hard to do unless your defense, and in particular, your front 4, is really good. Much easier to find a few good DL then it is to find the next Brees or Brady. I think the Broncos see this and that's really the only way we can move forward right now. Build a better team around Tebow and hopefully Tebow himself can improve with this offense in the offseason. We're not going to get us a Brady or Rogers anytime soon.
Tebow had plenty of time to throw the ball.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:23 PM   #23
KO5K
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Tebow had plenty of time to throw the ball.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:23 PM   #24
BroncoBen
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoBen's Avatar
 
Go Broncos !!

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornBronco View Post
Can anyone explain to me why the spread option was not a major portion of the offense. IMO it would have helped Tebows passing tremendously. Fox/McCoy seemed to fall in love with the 2 TE power sets.
Well it worked against the Steelers.. the Broncos wanted to get bigger along the line and push the ball. Now running a spread works if Tebow can get rid of ball in under 2 seconds when the Defense comes with a blitz. That right now is Tebow's achilles heal.
BroncoBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:26 PM   #25
ZONA
Ring of Famer
 
ZONA's Avatar
 
Fun at the range MAR 2014

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 9,244

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Chris Harris
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Tebow had plenty of time to throw the ball.
Um, I remember the dude was running for his life on MANY plays. And most of the plays where he did have some time were because the pocket collapsed and he got outside to buy him more time. Then there weren't really many times when our WR's were open. A few times he may have missed an open guy but it wasn't a consistent theme in the game. Don't try and spin this like we had great pocket integrity and he had all day back there. That simply was not the case.
ZONA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Denver Broncos