![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,025
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Looking at the standings and the remaining schedule, it's not just the Raiders who could take the division from us, all four teams have a decent shot at winning the division crown. Here's how the schedule shapes up.
Denver Broncos 7-5 Div record 3-2 conf 6-3 Remaining schedule Chicago New England AT Buffalo Kansas City Having the best conference and division record with 3 out of 4 home games left to play definitely puts us at a strong advantage holding all tie breakers at this point. Facing a mojo-less Bills, a depleted Chicago and the Chiefs at home will help. However we are looking banged up as well. New England is going to be picked by most as a loss and traveling east for a game and then coming back for a division opponent is never easy. We play better on the road, too, so if we went 2-2 it wouldn't surprise me at all, especially if Von can't come back. Oakland Raiders 7-5 Div 2-2 Conf 5-5 Remaining schedule AT Green Bay Detroit AT Kansas City San Diego Oakland looked exposed against a hot Miami team, a team Denver beat, and they still have to play the best team in football on the road and go to Kansas City where they have historically struggled, and in December where the Chiefs are one of the toughest teams to face. Then they come home against Rivers who it seems has finally turned a corner. They do get to face Detroit, who has fallen from grace, though. Still, if they win even three of those games, they can lock up the division. Kansas City Chiefs 5-7 Div 2-2 Conf 3-6 Remaining Schedule AT New York Jets Green Bay Oakland AT Denver KC has the worst conference record of all four teams which will hurt their chances. They also have to face the Packers. This is the game I think the Packers lose, actually. Seriously, I think the Chiefs can beat Green Bay. If they can make a late surge, and Denver and Oakland stumble, KC could win the division, though they would need some help. San Diego Chargers 5-7 Div 2-3 Conf 4-5 Remaining Schedule Buffalo Bills Baltimore Ravens AT Detroit AT Oakland Raiders The Chargers are in a tough spot because of their division record. However if they continue to improve and Rivers stays "normal Rivers," They could definitely win three out of the last four games they have. They could help their cause by beating the Raiders which means they would just need some help to have Denver lose. I honestly think they could win three of their last four and maybe sweep December. I am more worried about San Diego at this point than the Raiders. Bottom line: This is still anyone's division. With four games to play, and only a half game lead on the division, this should go down to the wire and make for some good, meaningful late season games. It should be fun to watch! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
East Coast Bronco
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,203
Adopt-a-Bronco: Joel Dresseen |
Let's go get it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 851
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,648
|
the Broncos need to win the 2 they should win (@BUF and KC) and 1 of the 2 "tough" games on the schedule (CHI and NE) and that should be enough. that's 10-6 overall. i trust the Raiders to drop at least 2 more games (@GB, DET, @KC, SD). people picking the Raiders still are just homers like Howie "Dickface" Long and Broncos haters. Sandy Eggo still scares me, but we're done playing them and as long as the Broncos take care of business (win 3 of the next 4), they control their own destiny IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,271
Adopt-a-Bronco: Aaron Brewer |
If we beat Chicago, KC and Buffalo, we take it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
STOP!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 10,967
Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller |
Quote:
you're right that if we go 3-1, we win it outright. but even if we go 2-2, i think our chances are better than good to still get the division. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 851
|
Quote:
First Tiebreaker Division Record Oakland 2-2 Denver 3-2 Second Tiebreaker Common Games Oakland 4-4. Remaining: GB, Det, KC, SD Denver 5-3. Remaining: Chi, NE, Buffalo, KC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I'm all up in your face
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 12,405
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Wrong. The division goes to Denver. These other teams suck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 851
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Karma
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,928
Adopt-a-Bronco: Elway |
We've got one division game left and 3 conference games...
The raiders just have two division games, both winnables... We need to go 3-1 for us to take the division... Buffalo worries me because it's an east coast game, and we don't play well in Buffalo... Starts with Chicago this weekend for us, as the raiders play Detroit and GB back to back in the next two weeks. Tough for them ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,271
Adopt-a-Bronco: Aaron Brewer |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,830
|
I predict:
Broncos 4-0 Raiders 2-2 KC 1-3 Chargers 1-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,025
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
What needs to happen
Beating Oakland: If they win out, we would need to as well. Assuming they go 3-1 the rest of the way, we would have to beat KC and any two other teams. If they get hot, we'll have to stay hot, and either way, beating KC is critical. Beating the Chargers: Due to conference and division record, any two wins eliminates the Chargers, even if they go 4-0, which would put the Raiders out as they play them. Beating the Chiefs: They win out, which would mean they beat us, we would need to win the three previous games or they would take the division if Oakland lost at least one more game. If they drop one game, winning any two puts us in. So we need at least two games, one being the Chiefs, or beating Buffalo, New England and Chicago puts us in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Karma
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,928
Adopt-a-Bronco: Elway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Just Draughted
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,887
|
We're pretty much a lock to have the tiebreaker over either the Chargers or Raiders, whoever loses their matchup. We're likely to have a tiebreaker on either.
And did someone say Chiefs? ha! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 1,157
Adopt-a-Bronco: Eric Decker |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
John Foneco !!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 20,590
|
I think it will come down to the last game and we should take the division
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Just Draughted
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,887
|
I'd say as long as we beat the Chiefs, 2-2 over the next 4 probably wins the Division.
Chargers would have to win out just to tie us, but we'd still hold the better division record. If this week is any indication, I don't like the Raiders chances against the Chargers, which would mean the Raiders would lose to us on division record as well. Plus that would be at least their second loss (in addition to GB this week) which would make the tiebreaker win the day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
www.PatrickTurley.org
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,984
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Partisan
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,830
|
Quote:
![]() They might (and that's a 'might') beat the Bills, but they'll lose their final three. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 851
|
Quote:
All we have to do is have the same record as Oakland over the next 4 games with one of our wins being against KC and we clinch. Simple as that. If they go 2-2 and we go 2-2 with one of the wins being against KC its over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,648
|
actually, this is all more complicated than it needs to be.
what we REALLY need is for Tyrell Jones to come in here, predict the Raiders to finish 4-0 to take the division while we finish 0-4. that's all it takes for us to lock it up. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Franchise Poster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 15,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Just Draughted
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,887
|
I'd say it's 1/2 credit to SD. The other 1/2 looking at what happened in MIA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
...there ain't no devil
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morrison
Posts: 17,132
Adopt-a-Bronco: Tim Tebow |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AFC is wide open. | 24champ | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 83 | 09-08-2008 07:03 AM |
| AFC West Watch - Week 7 - Quarterback | dragondawg | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 1 | 08-03-2007 07:17 PM |
| Who's the favorite now in the AFC? | elsid13 | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 55 | 10-17-2006 10:13 PM |
| Most successful AFC team since 1985...very long read | Rocket 7 | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 1 | 01-10-2006 02:41 AM |
| Turnovers could be key in explosive AFC West | PatsWin2002 | Orange Mane Central Discussion | 14 | 08-22-2005 01:47 PM |