![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,363
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
Tied with Oakland at 7-5. We have a better division record by 1 game and only 1 division game left. Oakland has 2 division games left so if we ended up with the same record, and the same amount of division wins. We have 1 more conference win and still have 3 conference games left while Oakland only has 2.
So, doesn't that mean we DO control our own destiny? If we win out and Oakland wins out, we would go to the playoffs. Is that correct? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
splinters reality until
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,370
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
If we can beat the Bears next week, and assuming the Pack will keep rolling. If those both happen then I say we do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Tebowing the long haul
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 37,072
Adopt-a-Bronco: Champ Bailey |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,049
|
Pretty sure we do now ... We are in 1st atm and even if we slip out of the Div. lead we have wins over the Benglas and Jets who we would be in a battle with for the last wild card spot...
But I think we control our own fate and can win the Div. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,363
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
Mmmm, I think we do right now. Let's say both teams win every game left, it would go to the 2nd tie breaker. Records the same, division wins the same. The tiebreak then becomes conference games. Being up 1 game already in the conference, and having 3 more to play while Oakland only has 2, we would have the better conference record and win the tiebreaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,049
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Famer of Rings
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lake Forest, Orange County, Calif.
Posts: 18,459
Adopt-a-Bronco: Simon Fletcher |
at some of you stating the Raiders will win out. Just stop. If we win out, we are 11-5 and I don't see how we don't make the playoffs with our tiebreaker against the Jets. We should be good with one more loss. Come on, Raiders winning out! Puhleeeeeaze. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
splinters reality until
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,370
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
I can't see the fade beating GB, and could totally see SD playing spoiler for them at the end. If we beat the the Bears Ill be a lot more hopeful for a playoff berth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Tebowing the long haul
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 37,072
Adopt-a-Bronco: Champ Bailey |
Even more incredible than the fact that the Broncos are in the drivers seat for the division is that they have also positioned themselves as the front runner for the wild card spot that either the Steelers or Ravens don't get.
Where this team has come over a short span of time against some pretty heavy odds is incredible. This hasn't been an easy run. It has been a massive road trip against mostly playoff contenders and/or division rivals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,049
|
Quote:
http://www.nfl.com/playoffs/playoff-picture Both those teams will get in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Tebowing the long haul
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 37,072
Adopt-a-Bronco: Champ Bailey |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 5,980
Adopt-a-Bronco: Money Ball |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,049
|
My bad , read it wrong ... I've been up way to long ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Tebowing the long haul
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 37,072
Adopt-a-Bronco: Champ Bailey |
To atone for your mistake, you must pry open your eyes and read a 100-page thread where "TheReverend" and "MacGruber" slap fight and argue and get back to us with a synoposis with accompanying sociological analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
golden knife winner
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: colorado springs area
Posts: 2,822
Adopt-a-Bronco: ray lewis knife |
and wow Kubes Texans are 9-3 amazing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,430
|
Quote:
Raiders going into some dark days until Mark Davis realizes he should sell the team to someone really rich. He simply doesn't have the money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,363
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
Yup. Now all we need (besides our winning) is for the Titans to a few more and most importantly, their last game to the Texans. They're still in the hunt for that last wildcard spot also. They need some division wins but they do play the Colts and Jagwads coming up. We need them to lose that last division game to Houston.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Yes...swooping is bad...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florence, Colorado
Posts: 20,668
Adopt-a-Bronco: All of them. |
Win out. Problem solved, and who will give a fook about Oakland then?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10,426
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Yes...swooping is bad...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florence, Colorado
Posts: 20,668
Adopt-a-Bronco: All of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10,426
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
DERP DERP DERP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Broncos Country
Posts: 4,874
|
A key game for us is that last game vs. Kansas City. We need to win it to go 4-2 in the division.
The rest of the way for both of us, how I see it: Denver: Chicago - W, Forte and Cutler out, yeah, our D should win this for us, 8-5 NE - L, Pats too much for us, 8-6 @Buffalo - A wildcard here, but I think we fight our way to a win barely, 9-6 KC - W, 10-6 Oakland: @GB - L, I don't see anyway possible they could win this game, 7-6 Detroit - Could be a tough game for Oakland, but I think they pull off the win, 8-6 @KC - W, 9-7 San Diego - W, 10-6 Head to head tiebreaker: 1-1 Division: both 4-2 Conference games: Denver - 8-4 Oakland - 7-5 Denver wins division. That KC game is going to be HUGE and we have to win it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 680
|
Yes, it is highly unlikely. But the initial question was, do we currently control our own destiny? I.E. if we win out, do we get a play-off birth regardless of any other mathematically possible scenario playing out in the NFL. So, to answer that question, you have to consider any scenario, even the highly unlikely ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Opinionated A******
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX (Portland OR)
Posts: 4,660
Adopt-a-Bronco: J. D. Walton |
Quote:
Assuming we lose one and Oakland loses one we still own the division. The next two weeks will be our toughest tests, although KC is playing very good defense and is trying to get back in the hunt. The Buffalo game is a possible trap game if we win the next 2. If we go 3-1 I think we are a lock as long as Oakland loses one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 687
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Pats Texans Steelers Ravens |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|