![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,744
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1012661.html
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 5,980
Adopt-a-Bronco: Money Ball |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
lets go partner
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lakewood,Colo
Posts: 41,221
Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard |
The insurgents officially won it was all for nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
grand pubah
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,950
Adopt-a-Bronco: Bubby Brister |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mr Diplomacy
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Elway was just an arm =MacGruder
Posts: 84,438
Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,423
|
Has to be done because they won't give our troops immunity. It's a dangerous game Iraw playing because they may wish we had stayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,423
|
I agree sort of. It's bad to leave because it allows Iran to increase influence and the insurgents to rise up again. But without immunity for the troops i can't agree with keeping them their. No way we can let them prosecute our troops in Iraqi courts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,744
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
GWB should've thought of that before he went in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,744
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,515
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
The idea of any of these countries having a viable functioning government (sustainable) is a pipe dream. The American Public was duped by a retarded Texan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,764
|
If it sounds too good to be true -- it probably is.
The US has constructed at least a dozen large permanent military bases in Iraq. No chance we pull out BEFORE the oil is gone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
![]() It was "all for nothing" before we spent 4 trillion and counting. Anyone with any with common sense knows this now. And of course, this was understood by some Americans and board members here way back when. Bush socked American taxpayers for over 4-5 trillion dollars before it's all over. How do you Right Wingers feel about that now? Last edited by Bronco_Beerslug; 10-15-2011 at 07:20 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Bleedin' orange!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mile High
Posts: 20,018
Adopt-a-Bronco: Howard Griffith |
Quote:
Made for some great photo-ops for Dumbya. That one on the Aircraft carrier was extra-special. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 5,980
Adopt-a-Bronco: Money Ball |
Like I said, don't hold your breath.
http://news.yahoo.com/no-decision-ye...002648871.html WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration denied a news report on Saturday it had made a final decision to pull almost all U.S. troops out of Iraq by a year-end withdrawal deadline. The White House and Pentagon both denied an Associated Press report citing unnamed U.S. officials saying they completely dropped the idea of possibly keeping a significant contingent in Iraq as trainers for Iraqi security forces beyond 2011. U.S. and Iraqi officials have been negotiating the prospects for up to several thousand U.S. troops staying, but the main sticking point has been an Iraqi refusal to grant the military personnel legal immunity, as Washington has demanded. The issue could be a deal-breaker but it is a sensitive one for Iraqis, who have seen abuses by U.S. troops and contractors through the more than eight years since the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. After ending combat operations last year, the last 44,000 U.S. troops are scheduled to leave Iraq by the end of the year under the terms of a bilateral security pact. But the Obama administration insisted no decision had been reached about the training relationship with Iraq or how many, if any, U.S. troops might stay past the December 31 deadline. The AP report said only about 160 soldiers attached to the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad would stay behind. "President Obama has repeatedly made it clear that we are committed to keeping our agreement with the Iraqi government to remove all of our troops by the end of this year," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said. "At the same time we're building a comprehensive partnership with Iraq under the Strategic Framework Agreement, including a robust security relationship, and discussions with the Iraqis about the nature of that relationship are ongoing." The Defense Department issued an almost identical statement, but spokesman George Little also said, "Suggestions that a final decision has been reached about our training relationship with the Iraqi government are wrong." Editing by Peter Cooney (Washington newsroom) |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Angling in the Deep
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Riviera, Southern Mountains
Posts: 24,281
|
Several 1000 remaining? OK, I'll go with that, considering what we spent in lives and taxpayer money to this point.
Last edited by Bronco_Beerslug; 10-15-2011 at 07:54 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location
Posts: 52,694
|
Quote:
The invasion/occupation of Iraq was anything but "all for nothing" when the right-wing rubes on this board were cheer leading the Dim Son Misadministration. They couldn't invent new justifications fast enough back then. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|