The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2011, 11:19 AM   #1
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
Human Cannonball

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,791
Default Activist Court's New Legislation Not Working Like They Planned.

In the span of a week in September, two independent political committees announced unheard-of fundraising plans for the coming campaign season. The Karl Rove-linked American Crossroads, along with its sister nonprofit, Crossroads GPS, announced a plan to raise and spend $240 million in 2012. Make Us Great Again, a group solely dedicated to electing Texas Gov. Rick Perry the 45th President of the United States, revealed a plan to spend $55 million in the Republican primary alone. Both of these multimillion dollar plans would break all reported records for spending by an independent political committee, and offer a sign of how campaign finance rules have been upended.

The federal system of campaign finance is in the midst of a sea change following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), which undid a host of regulations covering the use of corporate and union money by independent groups in elections. Those independent groups are forming a shadow campaign apparatus fueled by unlimited and often undisclosed contributions, without the same accountability required of political parties or candidates' own political action committees.

American Crossroads and Make Us Great Again represent one of the two new kinds of groups playing in the shadow campaign: super PACs, independent political committees filed with the FEC that can accept unlimited funds from corporations, unions and individuals.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_977699.html

Kennedy wrote that funding under Citizen United would be transparent. Just the opposite is true, actually. Perhaps the court should leave campaign financing legislation to the legislature?

Last edited by Rohirrim; 09-26-2011 at 11:21 AM..
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-26-2011, 11:20 AM   #2
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
Human Cannonball

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,791
Default

By empowering corporations to donate to groups that can sway elections, Potter said, the court has empowered organizations that have very different incentives than actual human beings. "Corporations do not behave in the same way people do. They think about the best way to get an advantage over their competitor, either through the government or the marketplace. The whole country is going to see a situation where corporate interests are going to be electing members of Congress for that purpose."
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2011, 11:24 AM   #3
ghwk
Ring of Famer
 
ghwk's Avatar
 
DOOM BOOM!

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,835

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Von Doomacus
Default

Boy just think of some actual good they could do by donating that money to schools intead of pissing it away on consultants, vote buying etc.
ghwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2011, 11:31 AM   #4
Garcia Bronco
Hokie since 1993
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,987

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Tom Jackson
Default

It's their right under the first Amendment of the Constitution. Get over it. Same goes for Unions too. They have the right.
Garcia Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2011, 11:34 AM   #5
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
Human Cannonball

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
It's their right under the first Amendment of the Constitution. Get over it. Same goes for Unions too. They have the right.
Corporations have no rights. Read the article. Even in practical terms, corporations have different incentives than people. To treat corporations as if they are people is ludicrous. I've worked in corporate law offices. You know what a corporation is? It's a box of paper.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2011, 11:36 AM   #6
Garcia Bronco
Hokie since 1993
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 45,987

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Tom Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Corporations have no rights. Read the article. Even in practical terms, corporations have different incentives than people. To treat corporations as if they are people is ludicrous. I've worked in corporate law offices. You know what a corporation is? It's a box of paper.
Except decisions and donations are made by people in those corporations and those people have the right. Sorry.
Garcia Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2011, 02:03 PM   #7
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
Human Cannonball

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 48,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
Except decisions and donations are made by people in those corporations and those people have the right. Sorry.
Individually. We hold these truths to be self evident, that all MEN are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. Sorry that's such a difficult concept for you to grasp.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Denver Broncos