The Chiefs suck

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

This whole thread has to have has to use the Chiefs as an example cause that historical comparison holds water. And you are telling us SB appearances count so much.

My point exactly.

Originally Posted by KCStud

Teams change and that's the point of my post. The Broncos were the same old team until Ratty came and made the changes needed to help Elway win.
Saying a team is going to be the same as they were 30 years ago is foolish.

Bad teams change. They change ownership. They change cities. They change front offices. They change fans. Etc etc. the true elite franchises have all been consistent. I look at the steelers and see their fans FO and aura the same as decades ago. Same goes with other sports franchises who go decades without long slumps.

Originally Posted by KCStud

My point exactly.

I see you changed my words. Not sure why.

[errand]

Originally Posted by KCStud

KC had the most wins of any team in the 90's, but continue to compare them to the Cleveland Browns.

I beg to differ ...SF 49ers had the most wins (113), followed by the Buffalo (103)...then your boys (102)

Again...know your history.

It all boils down to is the Chiefs suck, and KcDud is clueless.

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Bad teams change. They change ownership. They change cities. They change front offices. They change fans. Etc etc. the true elite franchises have all been consistent. I look at the steelers and see their fans FO and aura the same as decades ago. Same goes with other sports franchises who go decades without long slumps.

Yes but not many teams have that kind of stability. That's what makes the Steelers one of the best organizations in sports.

[broncocalijohn]

Originally Posted by Stuck in Cali

If team history means jack ****, you need to pick another sport to follow, maybe darts might suit ya.

I dont know if that is a good idea. He would probably find a dart board that was missing the 12-16 but tell us how awesome his scores are hitting the 11s all day long while forgetting to mention the 17 through 20 and the bullseye has been in place the whole time.

Originally Posted by KCStud

Yes but not many teams have that kind of stability. That's what makes the Steelers one of the best organizations in sports.

And a reason why team history means something.

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by errand

I beg to differ ...SF 49ers had the most wins (113), followed by the Buffalo (103)...then your boys (102)

Again...know your history.

I see the point blew right past you as usual.

[broncosteven]

Originally Posted by KCStud

Good job. Good effort.

The Thread title is KFC Sucks I was just getting it back on topic.

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by KCStud

Team history means jack ****. If it did, the Broncos wouldn't have won a SB in the 90's because they never could 37 years before.

Translation: kc's history for the past 40 years sucks so I chose to ignore it. I'mma here and now kinda guy.

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

And a reason why team history means something.

They've had the same itinerary for years and it's worked great, but teams copy other teams success when they have to do well. The Bears and Raiders have had a similar structure too (though Al's plan sucked), but the Raiders are about to change everything.

Not many teams have the same plan for so many years.

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

Translation: kc's history for the past 40 years sucks so I chose to ignore it. I'mma here and now kinda guy.

More like I wasn't alive (or old enough to know football) in the worst 2 decades in franchise history.

The Broncos pre-97 were the Chiefs in my lifetime. Great teams that couldn't get it done when it mattered.

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by broncosteven

The Thread title is KFC Sucks I was just getting it back on topic.

Well good job kid. Good effort.

Originally Posted by KCStud

More like I wasn't alive (or old enough to know football) in the worst 2 decades in franchise history.

The Broncos pre-97 were the Chiefs in my lifetime. Great teams that couldn't get it done when it mattered.

Not really. Since the broncos pre97 at least went to 4 superbowls, where as the chiefs in your lifetime hasn't gotten there at all.

[UltimateHoboW/Shotgun]

Originally Posted by KCStud

More like I wasn't alive (or old enough to know football) in the worst 2 decades in franchise history.

The Broncos pre-97 were the Chiefs in my lifetime. Great teams that couldn't get it done when it mattered.

If we were the " Great team that couldn't get it done when it mattered." You guys are the " Team the that didn't matter to get anything done."

[Broncobiv]

Originally Posted by KCStud

More like I wasn't alive (or old enough to know football) in the worst 2 decades in franchise history.

The Broncos pre-97 were the Chiefs in my lifetime. Great teams that couldn't get it done when it mattered.

The Broncos pre-97 made it to 4 Super Bowls. Calling them "great teams" is actually pretty accurate. But how many of your Chiefs teams, during your lifetime as you say, made it to the Super Bowl? None? How about just making it to the AFCC game? Once, and you lost it. In fact, during your lifetime (and even farther back - since 1969), the Chiefs have only won 3 playoff games, total. Only made it out of the divisional round one time. Since 1969. Wow.

Holy ****. Your franchise blows. Comparing them to the Broncos is beyond unfair to Denver. It seems that KC couldn't even get it done before it mattered...they never really got close.

[broncosteven]

Originally Posted by KCStud

Well good job kid. Good effort.

Steve Bono

[UltimateHoboW/Shotgun]

Originally Posted by Broncobiv

The Broncos pre-97 made it to 4 Super Bowls. Calling them "great teams" is actually pretty accurate. But how many of your Chiefs teams, during your lifetime as you say, made it to the Super Bowl? None? How about just making it to the AFCC game? Once, and you lost it. In fact, during your lifetime (and even farther back - since 1969), the Chiefs have only won 3 playoff games, total. Only made it out of the divisional round one time. Since 1969. Wow.

Holy ****. Your franchise blows. Comparing them to the Broncos is beyond unfair to Denver. It seems that KC couldn't even get it done before it mattered...they never really got close.

Here's the messed thing from all of that. Somehow there are more chefs in the HOF. WTF!

[Anikai]

Originally Posted by UltimateHoboW/Shotgun

Here's the messed thing from all of that. Somehow there are more chefs in the HOF. WTF!

Technically yes, but 1 John Elway is equal to 4 Queef HOFers

[Anikai]

Look at all these youtube videos I found of chiefs playoff wins:











And don't forget this one:







Good memories KFC

[Anikai]

Originally Posted by errand

Fixed it for you.....

No they don't exist at all. Im starting to wonder who is populating the earth with these morons.. Sources say that there's one fat queen-ant style mother Chief, deep in a trailer somewhere in Missouri pumping out hundreds of Ricky Stanzi fans a day..

[errand]

Originally Posted by KCStud

I see the point blew right past you as usual.

You said the chiefs was the winningest team of the '90s.... What other point was there?

[KCStud]

Originally Posted by Broncobiv

The Broncos pre-97 made it to 4 Super Bowls. Calling them "great teams" is actually pretty accurate. But how many of your Chiefs teams, during your lifetime as you say, made it to the Super Bowl? None? How about just making it to the AFCC game? Once, and you lost it. In fact, during your lifetime (and even farther back - since 1969), the Chiefs have only won 3 playoff games, total. Only made it out of the divisional round one time. Since 1969. Wow.

Holy ****. Your franchise blows. Comparing them to the Broncos is beyond unfair to Denver. It seems that KC couldn't even get it done before it mattered...they never really got close.

Again, I don't give a **** about KC being terrible in the 70's and 80's. I didn't watch it every year so your point is mute.
And you motioning that KC's SB doesn't matter is laughable.

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by KCStud

Again, I don't give a **** about KC being terrible in the 70's and 80's. I didn't watch it every year so your point is mute.
And you motioning that KC's SB doesn't matter is laughable.

Translation: I have a selective memory.