5,000+ posts and 200+ pages later & Peyton Manning is a Bronco | Thanks for the fun in this thread.

[McDman]

Why wouldn't we want him? No one better to teahc Tebow.

[bendog]

Beavis, no one says tebow can pass for **** ... no one. And McCoy made the short list for coaching jobs, but then you know more than most nfl GMs.

Originally Posted by bendog

Beavis, no one says tebow can pass for **** ... no one. And McCoy made the short list for coaching jobs, but then you know more than most nfl GMs.

And how many offered him one?

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Maybe the passing plays don't work in practice? Lovers and haters can agree that tebow didn't look good in practice. That's why the preseason unfolded like it did. So if it doesn't look good in practice why would they use it in a game?

Even accepting your flawed premise then that's double incompetence on game planning... "We're not going to throw when the defense thinks we might run. We'll run when they expect run. Then when we get behind and they know we're going to pass, let's not just pass a little more. Let's air it out like Warren F'ing Moon Baby!"

[Dedhed]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Maybe the passing plays don't work in practice? Lovers and haters can agree that tebow didn't look good in practice. That's why the preseason unfolded like it did. So if it doesn't look good in practice why would they use it in a game?

Hes got an offseason to improve and we will see what happens. I hardly think manning will be a bronco. But saying "starter going into camp", bringing in 2 QBs, and being one of the first in line to kick mannings tires is a sign they are not sold.

So, just to clarify, completion % only counts when it works for your argument?

[jhns]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

It matters when you throw 25-30 times a game. Not basing it on 4 damn throws.

Sure it does. Nice spin raider boy.

1-4 without Tebow. The team clearly carried him...

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis

To be expected after icing a rookie QB with 4 attempts the first half, going down multiple scores, then coming out the second half flipping the desperation shootout switch and hurling the ball around at a 50-attempts-per-game pace.

One of the worst game plans ever devised.

Now tell me how this unstoppable Broncos juggernaut managed to be down multiple scores while Tebow was 75% with 0 turnovers?

I was so concentrated on the 4 attempts I didnt even notice the "rookie" description. How is he a rookie?

[jhns]

Originally Posted by bendog

Beavis, no one says tebow can pass for **** ... no one. And McCoy made the short list for coaching jobs, but then you know more than most nfl GMs.

Actually, a lot do.

@ McCoy... What, he got one interview? That is most NFL GMs?

You are an idiot.

[gunns]

Originally Posted by Shananahan

This will never, ever happen.

I can only hope.

[broncosteven]

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis

Thing is, I hear media divas, Dilferholes and hatas saying that sort of crap. I don't hear many premier QB coaches saying anything of the sort.

Think of it this way Beavis, you have Lady Edith on your team, sure she has a nice rack but when the AFC Championship is on the line she gets beat down by Lady Mary like a rented mule.

You are a rich barron, you drive Lady Edith around, have some fun rubbing up against her on horseless carriage rides but at the end of the day you leave her the minute you meet some hot new chick at a formal dinner.

Or your face gets blown off, you try to pawn yourself off as the heir of Downton Abby but you realize you would have to bone Lady Edith and run away screaming after one episode.

Everyone wants to marry Lady Mary, no one wants Lady Edith, unless your a drunken farmer from Jacksonville.

Originally Posted by Dedhed

So, just to clarify, completion % only counts when it works for your argument?

Completion percentage is relevant on a minimum number of attempts. What's better a QB who goes 3-3 for 100% or a QB who goes 20-20 100%?

It's simple math.

[Archer81]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Completion percentage is relevant on a minimum number of attempts. What's better a QB who goes 3-3 for 100% or a QB who goes 20-20 100%?

It's simple math.

Depends on who wins, yes?

[jhns]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Completion percentage is relevant on a minimum number of attempts. What's better a QB who goes 3-3 for 100% or a QB who goes 20-20 100%?

It's simple math.

Only simple for a moron.

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis

Even accepting your flawed premise then that's double incompetence on game planning... "We're not going to throw when the defense thinks we might run. We'll run when they expect run. Then when we get behind and they know we're going to pass, let's not just pass a little more. Let's air it out like Warren F'ing Moon Baby!"

Well that's exactly what happened. 10 in the box and they still ran. No audible.

[IHaveALight]

I don't see Peyton wanting to play for Fox and McCoy. If the Broncos wanted Peyton they should have went after Jim Caldwell for OC.

[bronco militia]

Originally Posted by broncosteven

Think of it this way Beavis, you have Lady Edith on your team, sure she has a nice rack but when the AFC Championship is on the line she gets beat down by Lady Mary like a rented mule.

You are a rich barron, you drive Lady Edith around, have some fun rubbing up against her on horseless carriage rides but at the end of the day you leave her the minute you meet some hot new chick at a formal dinner.

Or your face gets blown off, you try to pawn yourself off as the heir of Downton Abby but you realize you would have to bone Lady Edith and run away screaming after one episode.

Everyone wants to marry Lady Mary, no one wants Lady Edith, unless your a drunken farmer from Jacksonville.

I think you covered everything... epic!

[RepentWalpurgis]

Big Al is celebrating like he knows something about this, and dbag is crying like a little b****. Awesome.

Originally Posted by sirhcyennek81

Depends on who wins, yes?

Sure. Buffalo did.

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

I was so concentrated on the 4 attempts I didnt even notice the "rookie" description. How is he a rookie?

Who had more NFL games and/or offseason 1st team practice reps by the end of this season?

Cam Newton or Tim Tebow?

[jhns]

Originally Posted by sirhcyennek81

Depends on who wins, yes?

20/20 for 20 yards and 0 TDs > 3/3 for 160 yards and 2 TDs

Math ftw!

[jhns]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Sure. Buffalo did.

Buffalo went 20/20 passing? How did I miss that?

Originally Posted by KevinJames

We have the cap room, we have talent, and if we add a player at the QB position of Manning's caliber we can be SB contenders.

This is downright absurd.

I know it's hard to remain realistic in this wild and crazy times, but come on.

[Archer81]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Sure. Buffalo did.

Buffalo went 20/20? When?

Well, this thread sure exploded since I last refreshed.

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis

Who had more NFL games and/or offseason 1st team practice reps by the end of this season?

Cam Newton or Tim Tebow?

That's just absurd logic. Tebow was on his 2nd year cam 1. The definition of a rookie is Zero experience at being a professional, regardless if youre sitting the bench or playing.