![]() |
|
|
#176 | ||
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 806
|
Quote:
There was more to it than that but i just said the jist of it. And i wasnt taking anything away from Marshall, just going off of somebody's statement and using Welkers numbers to counter., to be brief. But yes, Marshall is a wideout while Welker is mostly a slot/possesion WR so he wont put up as many yards or YPC. He gets many short passes from Brady. Quote:
Agree on Tamme, but i do think Peyton makes him look better than he is. Thats what great QB's do and i have to give props to Peyton as much a i can for what he did this year coming off injury and at his age to boot. Rivers will be fine once they get him some damn protection and he can stop trying to be superman out there and making dumb mistakes. He stopped doing that the last 5 games and only had 1 INT and that one was a throw on a last drive of a game. Last edited by Boltjolt; 01-03-2013 at 09:14 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Who cares
Posts: 3,757
Adopt-a-Bronco: Jacob Tamme |
Quote:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...eceiver-in-nfl I know, I know. You know better than he does. He's an idiot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,491
|
Welker is nowhere near the players on that list. He's great because he plays with Brady but he can't physically match what players like C Johnson, Larry Fitz, D Thomas, Marshall etc etc. He's a great NFL player that easily falls into the top 10, but not the top 5 NFL studs.
Welker is a great player though, but made much much better by the team he plays on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,491
|
BOLT JOLT my biggest problem was how you really thought Meachum would offset Vincent Jackson. He's so far below him talent wise its hard to believe you really thought that. I could see if the players were closer in ability but its so obvious they aren't.
I think once again people forgot how good Brees is and that its not the WR in NO outside of Colston who is really a stud when healthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,491
|
I can go along with DT isn't a star yet outside of Denver because he hasn't done it enough years in a row to get the media attention for that. But on ability and how he looks I bet almost any scout in the NFL would label him most likely of the young WR to join the Brandon Marshall/Calvin Johnson type club. I love it it means the Broncos not only are really good right now, but really young also.
The playmakers on defense, on offense, outside of Bailey and Manning are all young. Hell those 2 old dudes may play 3 more yrs after this in Denver and still be going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#181 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 806
|
Quote:
![]() It isnt worth a discussion imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#182 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 806
|
Quote:
Last edited by Boltjolt; 01-03-2013 at 09:41 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#183 | |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,491
|
Quote:
Sure he can if you have Brown become as good as Colston, Mathews start playing like Sproles, and gates get back to his old self. Then maybe he would get deep once every other game or so for a big play. Meachum was a desperation move. I think its fair to say both DT and Decker would start on SD right now. Brown maybe gets there but Floyd and Meachum are roll players IMO. Not true NFL starters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 | |
|
Drunk on Arrival!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,177
Adopt-a-Bronco: Montee Ball |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|