|View Poll Results: Do we need to have signatures?|
|Yes, if the mods can have them, we should.||24||42.86%|
|No, but the mods shouldn't have them either.||10||17.86%|
|Yes, and SoCal should be the only one who doesn't get one.||20||35.71%|
|This poll is worse than the Disney princess poll.||18||32.14%|
|This thread is worse than the testosterone one, but better than the classic rock "list".||15||26.79%|
|OP needs to die in a fire.||10||17.86%|
|Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|04-30-2014, 09:53 AM||#1|
Shall we begin?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Is it fair that mods get signatures and we don't
Signatures are pretty awesome. They're basically bumper stickers of the internet only more acceptable for someone over the age of 20 who isn't a political demagogue. SoCal rubs our faces in his signature privileges. This is an outrage.