Put it in writing - Chiefs

[Drunken.Broncoholic2]

Originally Posted by Shox

Because the Bills Oline is about 5X times better than the Donkies right now.

Ya cause the bills Oline can keep their QBs healthy. Bills have given up like 31 sacks. Broncos 13.

Who's Oline is better again?

[SoCalBronco]

Broncos 26 Chiefs 14

[Shox]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Bronco: An unbroken or imperfectly broken range horse of western No. America

Donkey: Descendant of the African wild ass that has been used as a beast of burden since 4000BC.

Jackass: Someone who doesn't know the difference.

That was a good one.

But, I like your dog.

[ak1971]

52- 3

Screw the chefs and their fat ****, backwoods, methhead fans.

[Peoples Champ]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

Ya cause the bills Oline can keep their QBs healthy. Bills have given up like 31 sacks. Broncos 13.

Who's Oline is better again?

Burned. Shox has no chance. Its over.

[Shox]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

Then how come they haven't sacked **** for the last couple games? They couldn't even sack Tuel

By the way we had two sacks in that game.

[cmhargrove]

Originally Posted by Shox

Not wishing. Just know you can't block Hali, Houston, and Poe + Peyton is old, brittle and already hurting.

Very, very bad combo for your boy.

Please,

Please,

Please. Have the balls to come back and post in this thread Monday morning. Chiefs are going down unless we lose Manning. I'll eat my crow if we lose, but you need to come back here if/when we feed Fat Andy his first loss...

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Shox

Because the Bills Oline is about 5X times better than the Donkies right now.

OK, so right now, if you had to choose between manning and alex smith .... youd take alex smith?

[Shox]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

Then how come they haven't sacked **** for the last couple games? They couldn't even sack Tuel

Oh and 6 in the game before that.

[Harvitz81]

31 - 13

Moreno goes off for 150 and 2 TDs. Welker has the other 2 killing them underneath all day long.

Alex Smith leads two drives settling for 2 FGs. Chiefs D gets TD on a turnover.

Bonus - halftime score is 7-6 us giving the mullet heads thoughts that they are in it.

[Shox]

Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang

OK, so right now, if you had to choose between manning and alex smith .... youd take alex smith?

No. Who said anything about that.

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

Ya cause the bills Oline can keep their QBs healthy. Bills have given up like 31 sacks. Broncos 13.

Who's Oline is better again?

Don't you know Shox is an expert in offensive line play? My guess is he's barely seen the broncos play this year and, if he has, he certainly has not been paying attention to the line

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Shox

No. Who said anything about that.

Well, he's brittle and **** according to you.

[Shox]

Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang

Well, he's brittle and **** according to you.

what is ****.

Can you read SonOfLe-loLang?

[B-Large]

24-9, Broncos win

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Shox

what is ****.

Can you read SonOfLe-loLang?

I assume you have the IQ of a rat, so ill just quote you:

"Peyton is old, brittle and already hurting." Yet you'd still take him 100 times out of a 100 over your QB.

[Drunken.Broncoholic2]

Originally Posted by Shox

By the way we had two sacks in that game.

You need to learn how to read a box score stupid. Bills had 2 sacks. Chiefs ZERO

[Shox]

Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang

Don't you know Shox is an expert in offensive line play? My guess is he's barely seen the broncos play this year and, if he has, he certainly has not been paying attention to the line

You would guess wrong. I've watch more than 1/2 their games this year.

Watched the Charges sack him 4 times last night, and hit him pretty hard several more. Did you miss it? You should watch, but I must warn you. It is kind of painful to watch.

[Drunken.Broncoholic2]

Originally Posted by Shox

Oh and 6 in the game before that.

Ummm browns had 6 sacks.


Man you're showing your stupidity.

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

You need to learn how to read a box score stupid. Bills had 2 sacks. Chiefs ZERO

HAHAH

[Shox]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

You need to learn how to read a box score stupid. Bills had 2 sacks. Chiefs ZERO

You've been drinking again haven't you?

[Drunken.Broncoholic2]

Originally Posted by Shox

You would guess wrong. I've watch more than 1/2 their games this year.

Watched the Charges sack him 4 times last night, and hit him pretty hard several more. Did you miss it? You should watch, but I must warn you. It is kind of painful to watch.

Might want to pay attention to your own team. Cause thinking chiefs had 6 sacks in the browns game just means you don't watch the games.

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by Shox

You would guess wrong. I've watch more than 1/2 their games this year.

Watched the Charges sack him 4 times last night, and hit him pretty hard several more. Did you miss it? You should watch, but I must warn you. It is kind of painful to watch.

LEARN HOW TO READ A BOX SCORE.

Manning was sacked TWICE yesterday. The broncos had 4. You're such a close watcher.

[Harvitz81]

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2

Ummm browns had 6 sacks.


Man you're showing your stupidity.

Edit: Meant to quote dumbass chiefs fan.



http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=331027012

Might want to scroll down to individual stats on the Browns side. Wow truly epic stupidity here.

[Drunken.Broncoholic2]

Originally Posted by Shox

You've been drinking again haven't you?

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/box-...-buffalo-bills


****ing kid can't even read a box score.