The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-11-2013, 12:51 PM   #14
Eppure si scalda
W*GS's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 33,890

Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
It's impossible to deny that publicized advocacy and/or financial interest weigh heavily against any "scientist's" ability to remain objective.
What does "objective" mean, to you?

Was it wrong for the M.D.'s who studied the effect of smoking on health to advocate for restrictions on cigarettes? Why?

What "financial interest"? Do you really believe climate science is chock-full of corrupt scientists, getting rich while spreading lies for money? I know that's what Limbaugh and the other trogs tell you, but they're simply full of crap.

If you doubt that, just reference your second to last post. You're basically making that very same argument.
So, you support the idea that scientists should only talk about their science, and anything else they state is mere advocacy and suspect, so they should just STFU.
W*GS is online now   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Denver Broncos