The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2013, 08:32 PM   #276
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
So if some nut jobs decide to become domestic terrorists,our military should ignore the president.
And what if the domestic enemy is our own government that is trying to destroy the Constitutional rights of it's citizens?

As for domestic terrorists, you do realize the clown in the White House was mentored by one named William Ayers right?
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:33 PM   #277
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
You, personally, are more likely to shoot yourself in the foot or the dick with your insouciant regard for guns.

I'm sure you would too....if you had a dick.
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:35 PM   #278
Dr. Broncenstein
Ring of Famer
 
Dr. Broncenstein's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sterile Fields
Posts: 13,949

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Trey Gowdy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
I'm sure you would too....if you had a dick.
Oh snap.
Dr. Broncenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:36 PM   #279
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,338

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
No, but when laws clearly violate the US Constitution, I have a problem with a select few allowing it.
Who are you to decide what is and isn't constitutional. Scotus doesn't allow anything,they have the power to decide what is or isn't constitutional,which was given to them by our founding fathers. You're going off the cliff on your anti-america rhetoric.

Last edited by peacepipe; 04-09-2013 at 08:40 PM..
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:38 PM   #280
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,338

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
And what if the domestic enemy is our own government that is trying to destroy the Constitutional rights of it's citizens?

As for domestic terrorists, you do realize the clown in the White House was mentored by one named William Ayers right?
Not that you had any credibility, but whatever credibility you did have you lost. You're ****ing retarded.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:39 PM   #281
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
Well then there's nothing to worry about.
I'm not worried about passing a background check, I've passed them every time I've had one for gun purchases, conceal carry, etc.....not sure what a "comprehensive" background check is going to find that a normal one would not, but whatever....

I'm worried that our government is incrementally trying to restrict or completely stop all lawful gun purchases by it's citizens, why you're not is beyond me.

I am curious how these measures will prevent another mass shooting, because I'm of the belief that criminals won't submit to these regulations you seem to want so badly.

Last edited by errand; 04-09-2013 at 08:47 PM..
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:41 PM   #282
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
I'm sure you would too....if you had a dick.
Yours does all your "thinking" for you.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:46 PM   #283
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
Who are you to decide what is and isn't constitutional. Scotus doesn't allow anything,they have the power to decide what is or isn't constitutional,which was given to them by our founding fathers. You're going off the cliff on your anti-america rhetoric.
Tell me where in the constitution where it says the kind of "arms" we're not allowed to "keep and bear"?

It doesn't say we cannot own certain arms.....why? Because the Constitution puts limits on government, not we the people.
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:48 PM   #284
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
Yours does all your "thinking" for you.

Well, yeah....because I'm a man. You aren't......it's not your fault though, there haven't been any liberals with balls or a dick in centuries.....well, perhaps liberal women do, but whatever.

Last edited by errand; 04-09-2013 at 09:00 PM..
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 08:59 PM   #285
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
Not that you had any credibility, but whatever credibility you did have you lost. You're ****ing retarded.

Yeah, I'm just some nut job right? It could never happen in 2013 or later, despite history saying it happened a mere 67 years ago in this very nation.



the Battle of Athens (McMinn Co., TN)
The GIs came home to find that a political machine had taken over their Tennessee county. What they did about it astounded the nation.

http://www.americanheritage.com/content/battle-athens

Battle of Athens
Date August 12, 1946
Location Athens, Tennessee, United States

Belligerents
Local World War II veterans and other citizens vs. McMinn County Sheriff's Department

Strength
Dozens of men armed with 3 M1 Garand rifles, 5 M1911 pistols, 24 M1917 Enfield rifles and a few sticks of Dynamite versus 100+ deputies armed with 1 Thompson sub-machine gun (an actual assault weapon for you clown liberals) and their standard Issued pistols

Result
McMinn County government forced to disband, replaced by new government
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:06 PM   #286
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
Tell me where in the constitution where it says the kind of "arms" we're not allowed to "keep and bear"?
Where in the Constitution does it say we're not allowed to create/distribute kiddie porn? "Congress shall make no law" is clear and final.

I want one of these:

SADM
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:11 PM   #287
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
Yeah, I'm just some nut job right? It could never happen in 2013 or later, despite history saying it happened a mere 67 years ago in this very nation.
And right after the War for Independence, with evenly-matched arms:

The Whiskey Rebellion (western Pennsylvania)

Whiskey Rebellion
Dates: 1791-1794
Location: western Pennsylvania

Belligerents
Farmers and others who refused to pay an excise tax, vs. the US government

Strength
500 armed men vs. 13,000 militia provided by the governors of Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, headed by President Washington.

Result
The rebels all went home.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:21 PM   #288
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
Where in the Constitution does it say we're not allowed to create/distribute kiddie porn? "Congress shall make no law" is clear and final.

I want one of these:

SADM
It doesn't.....although like the favorite liberal argument for regulating guns like the AR-15, I'm sure kiddie porn wasn't around when the 1st amendment was written, right?

But are you seriously trying to say lawful gun ownership by responsible adults = creating/distributing/watching kiddie porn?

I don't watch/create, or distribute kiddie porn, I would suggest you stop if you are....it's illegal and down right creepy dude.

You do realize that the 2nd amendment is what defends the rest of them right?

as for wanting a SADM....a nuke in the hands of a responsible sane person is safe, as I've stated, my gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car...Now put one in the hands of a murderous thug or a clown like you who doesn't know **** about a gun, let alone a nuke? Not so much....
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:31 PM   #289
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
But are you seriously trying to say lawful gun ownership by responsible adults = creating/distributing/watching kiddie porn?
The First Amendment is very clear. What about "no", as in "Congress shall make no law", isn't obvious? But things like kiddie porn, libel, slander, noise ordinances, and so on, violate that "no", do they not?

The First is neither absolute nor unlimited.

Neither is the Second.

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand
You do realize that the 2nd amendment is what defends the rest of them right?
All of our democratic institutions - the three branches of our federal government, our state governments, and our duties and responsibilities as citizens are what protect our rights.

What makes you believe that all the above are so weak, so ineffectual, such shams, that your popguns are what really matters?

Why do you hate our 200+ years of ever-growing ever-better democracy so much, that you think it's on the brink of collapse?

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand
as for wanting a SADM....a nuke in the hands of a responsible sane person is safe, as I've stated, my gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car...Now put one in the hands of a murderous thug or a clown like you who doesn't know **** about a gun, let alone a nuke? Not so much....
Define "responsible person". Was Nancy Lanza "responsible"?
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:59 PM   #290
Jetmeck
Not a Chief's board
 
Jetmeck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
Defending the US Constitution is their main objective...without it, there is no United States of America.

And any military person will tell you they're not required to follow unlawful orders, not even those of the president.....particularly those that go against the Constitution.

If you don't like the scotus decsions take up guns and kill them ?

Is that what your saying ?

Law officers are sworn to UPHOLD THE LAW...........

YOUR AN IDIOT
Jetmeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:01 PM   #291
Dr. Broncenstein
Ring of Famer
 
Dr. Broncenstein's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sterile Fields
Posts: 13,949

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Trey Gowdy
Default

"YOUR AN IDIOT"

Lol
Dr. Broncenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:02 PM   #292
Jetmeck
Not a Chief's board
 
Jetmeck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
The First Amendment is very clear. What about "no", as in "Congress shall make no law", isn't obvious? But things like kiddie porn, libel, slander, noise ordinances, and so on, violate that "no", do they not?

The First is neither absolute nor unlimited.

Neither is the Second.



All of our democratic institutions - the three branches of our federal government, our state governments, and our duties and responsibilities as citizens are what protect our rights.

What makes you believe that all the above are so weak, so ineffectual, such shams, that your popguns are what really matters?

Why do you hate our 200+ years of ever-growing ever-better democracy so much, that you think it's on the brink of collapse?



Define "responsible person". Was Nancy Lanza "responsible"?


errand is in a bunker somewhere waiting for the government takeover.............wackjob


RI is about to pass gun control measures tomorrow......the fifth to move forward on these issues.............the right's pitifully excuses for being against common sense gun safety is NOT WORKING.

Eat IT
Jetmeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:04 PM   #293
Jetmeck
Not a Chief's board
 
Jetmeck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Broncenstein View Post
"YOUR AN IDIOT"

Lol

dON'T TEXT MUCH DO YA FOOL ?
Jetmeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:09 PM   #294
Jetmeck
Not a Chief's board
 
Jetmeck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,378
Default

yOUR LOSING................just like in November
Jetmeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:44 PM   #295
nyuk nyuk
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
The First Amendment is very clear. What about "no", as in "Congress shall make no law", isn't obvious? But things like kiddie porn, libel, slander, noise ordinances, and so on, violate that "no", do they not?

The First is neither absolute nor unlimited.

Neither is the Second.
No the 2nd isn't absolute, either, which is why people are allowed to have semiautomatic rifles and not fully automatic true assault weapons which can fire up to 6,000 rounds per minute.

I'm sorry but if anyone thinks a semiauto varmint rifle = assault weapon, their head is somewhere it shouldn't be.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:45 PM   #296
nyuk nyuk
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetmeck View Post
dON'T TEXT MUCH DO YA FOOL ?
You're not texting, your spelling is always this poor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:47 PM   #297
nyuk nyuk
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
It doesn't.....although like the favorite liberal argument for regulating guns like the AR-15
It's already regulated - they're not sold with select fire. The public gets the extremely watered-down version which is not suitable for military use.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:22 PM   #298
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,227
Default

Out of the new laws Obama wants what ones will help the most to stem gun violence? I day none of them and its all a wag the dog because that what Obama is best at.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 04:50 PM   #299
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,777
Default

errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 05:45 PM   #300
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,338

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
Out of the new laws Obama wants what ones will help the most to stem gun violence? I day none of them and its all a wag the dog because that what Obama is best at.
Nothing new for the most part,BG checks are just being expanded to include gun shows & online sales.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Denver Broncos