![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
2012 AFC West Champs
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,427
|
Grimes Bailey and Harris would be a sick trio
Cason might be the better and safer option though I think this means we are focusing on other positions for the draft |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,692
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
They aren't going to sit back with the extra money. They need someone who can stretch the field, Wallace could certainly do that for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Steppin on feet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Carmel Ca
Posts: 6,200
Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang |
I think CB should still be important in the draft. To ignore a good deep talented group would not be very smart
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,692
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
www.PatrickTurley.org
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,969
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Steppin on feet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Carmel Ca
Posts: 6,200
Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
www.PatrickTurley.org
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,969
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Just Drafted
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 334
Adopt-a-Bronco: Chris Harris |
I disagree. Welker is a possession WR who isn't going to stretch the d vertically. The Pats have 2 TEs that can do that--Hernandez is a fine slot WR too. They don't have a vertical threat though. Wallace is one of the elite vertical guys in the league and he's in his prime. Welker is a very good possession slot WR, but he's aging and the Pats have guys who can stretch the d horizontally. Wallace and Welker are apples and oranges at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★☆
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,742
|
Quote:
There's going to be a bidding war for Wallace. Dolphins really want him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,475
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Rotoworld says the broncos are trying to work on re-signing Burton and Vickerson. Which is pretty sweet because Burton is great on special teams and Vickerson is a pretty solid DT for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,692
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
I would like to see Vickerson and Hill/Knighton side by side.. Vickerson and Hill have a similar skill set in that they are both big bodied, pocket disruptive, run stuffers.
We can draft a NT (Brandon Williams) to back up Hill/Knighton and you have Unrein to back up Vickerson. A weakness becomes a strength..relatively cheap too! |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 919
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,475
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
jungle
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,141
|
Scoop Alford up at #58.
As far as Mike Wallace goes, he would be stupid to go to the Patriots considering Bellichick has pretty much ruined (or tried to ruin) the career of every veteran receiver FA who has gone through there. Just like he tried to do early this year with Welker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
jungle
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,141
|
The Broncos could afford to sign either Cason or Grimes ($4M) and Knighton or Hill ($2.5M).
The Broncos could use the money from a Dumervil restructure to sign Adrian Wilson ($3M), then we're good to go until the draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,692
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Not Cason... There are so many better options..
But I like the thought process Price. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Young Buck
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,212
Adopt-a-Bronco: Thunder (RIP) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
RIP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 16,581
Adopt-a-Bronco: Turf |
Sign me up for the plan, but Cason can be improved upon. I'd rather have Quin than Wilson, but he will be more $$. Wilson's age concerns me.
Last edited by Rascal; 03-09-2013 at 01:57 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 83
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Wilson was taken out last year in Nickel situations. No thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
www.PatrickTurley.org
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,969
Adopt-a-Bronco: Mike Shanahan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Born Again HOOLIGAN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,537
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Great thread thanks eddie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
God I love those Broncos
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Broncos Fantasy Land
Posts: 2,017
Adopt-a-Bronco: three amigos |
What would it take to get cribbs here money wise and do you guys think he would be a good fit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
All Ready!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Casper, WY
Posts: 371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,430
|
Cribbs was awesome when Mangini coached the Browns. But they sort of designed a wildcat attack around him. I think some team will find him very useful. For Broncos though i think we should look for a more traditional attack. We don't need gimicks we have manning and 2 really big WR. Broncos should continue to look for size and speed at TE and WR, RB and the offense will be deadly. Cribbs IMO a better fit elsewhere but he is an explosive player. Holliday probably is a good comparison so no reason to sign Cribbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,430
|
I still think our TE mostly did well because we have Manning and DT and Decker outside. If though we added a true stud TE that could beat safetys deep it would really put pressure on a teams back end. Most likely though not a big enough need to worry about this yr.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|