Put's the knife in and twists.

[LetsGoBroncos]

Originally Posted by Crushaholic

We had :31 seconds to do something, in regulation. What did we do? Take a knee? We hadn't been able to stop them, all game. Why take a chance, in overtime? THAT is the play that will haunt me, forever (not the Rahim Moore play)...

Yet we did stop them in overtime several times...so your point is wrong

[LetsGoBroncos]

Originally Posted by ThirtyDegrees

Yes. The game was only that close because of two kick returns for a touchdown. Those will always be flukes, you cannot rely upon them.

The Ravens were the better team for five quarters and played the better game and anyone that disputes this is delusional.

You're an idiot. We had tons of horrible calls go against us that helped the score for the ravens which can be seen here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVXIDNFaiLc

We didn't play that great and still led by 7 late in the game. They were not the better team that day. They hung around thanks to bad calls and average play from us and got lucky in the end.

[SonOfLe-loLang]

Originally Posted by LetsGoBroncos

Yet we did stop them in overtime several times...so your point is wrong

We actually stopped them for the entire second half save for a short field TD and a prayer bomb.

He's just an a-hole.

[ThirtyDegrees]

Originally Posted by LetsGoBroncos

You're an idiot. We had tons of horrible calls go against us that helped the score for the ravens which can be seen here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVXIDNFaiLc

We didn't play that great and still led by 7 late in the game. They were not the better team that day. They hung around thanks to bad calls and average play from us and got lucky in the end.

Excuses, excuses, excuses.

[Crushaholic]

Originally Posted by LetsGoBroncos

Yet we did stop them in overtime several times...so your point is wrong

Yes, we made them sweat, in overtime. My point still stands. If you have time for a killshot, you take it. Maybe it WAS against a cold wind. Then, it becomes how badly they wanted it. I saw the look on the Ravens players. They looked like they had all the momentum...

[Quoydogs]

Originally Posted by ThirtyDegrees

Bull****.

This team got to the same place it did last year.

It went 13-3 beating up on ****ty teams. The Broncos won two games against teams with winning records all season.

As true as this statement is, it's complete bull****.


We could have won anyone of the first three losses

[Requiem]

If Moore was white, 98 Degrees would be all over him. Racist!

[bronco militia]

Originally Posted by ThirtyDegrees

Bull****.

This team got to the same place it did last year.

It went 13-3 beating up on ****ty teams. The Broncos won two games against teams with winning records all season.

the broncos were 3-3 vs winning teams in 2012.

The Broncos will head into 2013 as superbowl favorites along with the 49ers and Patriots.

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/2/5...-broncos-49ers

[ThirtyDegrees]

Originally Posted by bronco militia

the broncos were 3-3 vs winning teams in 2012.

The Broncos will head into 2013 as superbowl favorites along with the 49ers and Patriots.

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/2/5...-broncos-49ers

I hear that being offseason Super Bowl favorites means something.

[ThirtyDegrees]

Do you think Bowlen will have a ring ceremony for the 2013 Philadelphia Eagles/Washington Redskins/New York Jets Offseason Super Bowl Hype Memorial Trophy?

[chickennob2]

From the title, I definitely thought this was a Ray Lewis thread.

[DENVERDUI55]

Originally Posted by ThirtyDegrees

Let's also all recognize the fact that Rahim Moore's play didn't lose the game.

Manning's interception in overtime did.

Well if you want to get technical it was Tucker's FG that won the game for Baltimore and lost it for Denver.

[DENVERDUI55]

Originally Posted by TonyR

It's amazing how many times the Ravens were successful in these playoffs either throwing the ball up seemingly for grabs, or going deep and having DB's misplay it. Happened at least a few times against Indy, and obviously happened to us. I couldn't bring myself to watch the game against NE so I don't know if it happened in that game. And then they did it again against the Niners. And they were doing it strategically, not as a fluke.

Moore's play was a fluke. Even Flacco said it in the post game. I want someone to show me or the board one time where a WR got behind a safety in a situation like that in prevent D.

[DENVERDUI55]

Originally Posted by 2KBack

Was the Jacoby Jones TD in the superbowl man coverage? Because they looked awfully similar.

The Niners safety bit on an underneath route. As far as being similar not even close because Moore's f-up was his only responsibility don't get beat deep in prevent D up by 7 with 30 seconds left.

[hades]

Originally Posted by DENVERDUI55

The Niners safety bit on an underneath route. As far as being similar not even close because Moore's f-up was his only responsibility don't get beat deep in prevent D up by 7 with 30 seconds left.

Moore had 2 choices. He chose plan B. Now we know why Elway only had Plan A. Stick with the plan, and it woulda worked out!

[TonyR]

Originally Posted by DENVERDUI55

Moore's play was a fluke.

Yes, agree it was something of a fluke. I wasn't suggesting that play specifically was strategic, only that many/most of their longer passes and "up for grabs" type plays seemed to be in the playoffs.

[bronco militia]

Originally Posted by ThirtyDegrees

I hear that being offseason Super Bowl favorites means something.

sure....the broncos, patriots and 49ers had a pretty good seasons in 2012

[FrankieTwoThumbs]

Originally Posted by broncocalijohn

IS this Armchair Bronco? It has nothing to do with famous or not. Moore had one simple job, Bailey's job wasn't as easy as "Don't let the receiver get behind you." How hard is that?

Why are we arguing over the simplicity of their job? Either way they didn't do it. Bailey is paid well to have a more complicated job, and more is expected of him.

[gunns]

I only read the first page of this thread and I have to wonder why any of you respond to 30 degrees. He's obviously a MacGruder clone that has little to no football knowledge and sole purpose on this board is to put down players that any one with football knowlege would know is/are very good player(s) merely to get a rise out of many of you. Personally I find him humorous in his endeavors to spark a fire with such clueless posts.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by gunns

I only read the first page of this thread and I have to wonder why any of you respond to 30 degrees. He's obviously a MacGruder clone that has little to no football knowledge and sole purpose on this board is to put down players that any one with football knowlege would know is/are very good player(s) merely to get a rise out of many of you. Personally I find him humorous in his endeavors to spark a fire with such clueless posts.

Sounds like another Bob the Human Failure persona to me.

[Mediator12]

Originally Posted by gunns

I only read the first page of this thread and I have to wonder why any of you respond to 30 degrees. He's obviously a MacGruder clone that has little to no football knowledge and sole purpose on this board is to put down players that any one with football knowlege would know is/are very good player(s) merely to get a rise out of many of you. Personally I find him humorous in his endeavors to spark a fire with such clueless posts.

I understand gunns, we have seen it for years on this board

There are maybe 5 or 6 people on this board who can take you through what happens on a given play and then tell you why it happened and what mistakes were actually made from watching the film. These guys are not them!

However, we have a ton of armchair QB's who want you to believe that anything but that one play was the most damaging to the team that day. Not worth replying. They are way more interested in being right than understanding what happened.

[Requiem]

Originally Posted by Mediator12

I understand gunns, we have seen it for years on this board

There are maybe 5 or 6 people on this board who can take you through what happens on a given play and then tell you why it happened and what mistakes were actually made from watching the film. These guys are not them!

However, we have a ton of armchair QB's who want you to believe that anything but that one play was the most damaging to the team that day. Not worth replying. They are way more interested in being right than understanding what happened.

To be fair, nobody, including you didn't seem to grasp what was going on with the coverages there until getting a second look -- but most people here agreed that Moore absolutely blew it.

[FrankieTwoThumbs]

Originally Posted by Mediator12

I understand gunns, we have seen it for years on this board

There are maybe 5 or 6 people on this board who can take you through what happens on a given play and then tell you why it happened and what mistakes were actually made from watching the film. These guys are not them!

However, we have a ton of armchair QB's who want you to believe that anything but that one play was the most damaging to the team that day. Not worth replying. They are way more interested in being right than understanding what happened.

Help me understand, real life QB. Did Bailey not make mistakes, or did his mistakes cost us less the the 7 points Moore did?

[Rock Chalk]

ThirtyDegrees seems like a solid poster.

/sarcasm

[Rabb]

Originally Posted by Rock Chalk

ThirtyDegrees seems like a solid poster.

/sarcasm

he's the OM Rahim Moore