critical thinking about September 11, 2001

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

If FEMA resolved the issue of the WTC collapse -- then why did NIST take up the issue again in late 2002 -- just after the FEMA report was released?

You need to admit that you never read either report. You're spewing out of your a-hole.

The only thing worse than a stupid American is a stupid American on steroids (hint: like you, Brit).

MHG

This isn't about DenverBrit, DenverBrit is just the messenger.

You not only didn't read the FEMA report, now it's obvious you didn't read the NIST report either.

Again, are the FEMA conclusions correct.??

[nyuk nyuk]

Originally Posted by orangeatheist

"Stupid American!"

"Bwaaaaaak!"

"Stupid American!"

"Thermite!"

"Twin Towers!"

"Bwaakkkk!"

"Zionist Conspiracy!"

"Mini Nukes!"

"Bwaaaaakkk!"

"Stupid American!"

Wassa matter, Gaffie? Gaffie wanna cracker?

"Stupid American!! Bwaaaaakkkkkk!!!!"

What? He hasn't blamed the Jews?

OH I am seriously disappointed here.

[nyuk nyuk]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

It's all discussed and documented in my book The 9/11 Mystery Plane. Some of it is also covered in my critique of the NIST Report.

I've posted the link here many times.

You gotta understand something, here. I'm not paying for that ****. Link for a free copy? I'll be happy to look at it.

[nyuk nyuk]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Since a GUT doesn't yet exist, the moon is made of cheese. It has to be.

No, I found a gut. In Hawaii. Hanging out with Jeff Saturday.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by Fedaykin

Lone Bolt was a bit sloppy. What he meant to say was "Did this building also suffer major structural damage due to impact with a large commercial jet or from debris from the collapse of another building?"

As has already been discussed in this very thread, WTC7 took major structural damage from the fall of WTC1&2.

Yes but according to NIST the damage to WTC-7 from falling debris played no role in its collapse. This according to NIST's final report on WTC-7 released in 2008.

All the early speculation was wrong.

Not to suggest that I agree with NIST's collapse scenario. It was a scam. NIST used a computer model that remains secret to this day. NIST refuses to share it with other scientists. We have to take them at their word -- since there is no way to verify their work. Hence no accountability.

This is BS - and another reason why the NIST report was a fraud.

MHG

[The Lone Bolt]

Since we're back to the subject of the NIST report, I though I'd take a moment to re-introduce the greatest ass-whoppin' Gaffney ever got on this board.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=89354

Folks, take some time to read through it. It's some solid entertainment!

Oh, and to address Gaff's recent post

Originally Posted by Gaffo

Yes but according to NIST the damage to WTC-7 from falling debris played no role in its collapse. This according to NIST's final report on WTC-7 released in 2008.

I found this

Originally Posted by TomK

No, Mark. NIST did not say that "the damage from the collapses was not a factor".

They said that "the structural damage from the collapses was not the precipitating factor in the collapse".

They also said that the damage from the falling debris started the fires in WTC7. This WAS a factor.

It's that "reading with comprehension" thingy again, Mark.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpos...&postcount=214

As always, Gaff ignores the inconvenient facts no matter how often they are pointed out to him.

(Read the whole post too -- it's a hoot!)

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by The Lone Bolt

Since we're back to the subject of the NIST report, I though I'd take a moment to re-introduce the greatest ass-whoppin' Gaffney ever got on this board.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=89354

Folks, take some time to read through it. It's some solid entertainment!

Oh, and to address Gaff's recent post



I found this



http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpos...&postcount=214

As always, Gaff ignores the inconvenient facts no matter how often they are pointed out to him.

(Read the whole post too -- it's a hoot!)

Your expert seems to have vanished -- I suppose back to that jerk Randi forum where he belongs.

The two hour video by A & E -- backed by 1700 architects and engineers -- has now set the standard for WTC debate. Here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW6mJ...layer_embedded

[mhgaffney]

Brit now on iggy

He has disqualified himself by virtue of his sheer stupidity. He is now in the same bag with W*gs.

If he posts something intelligent (probably by accident) I might respond.

MHG

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Brit now on iggy

He has disqualified himself by virtue of his sheer stupidity. He is now in the same bag with W*gs.

If he posts something intelligent (probably by accident) I might respond.

MHG

Who gives a **** about whom you have on iggy?

Damned if you're not an egotistical prick.

[orangeatheist]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Your expert seems to have vanished...

Jeez, if only you'd take a page from that same book and disappear as well.

By the way, why don't you grow a pair and show up on the Randi forum to peddle your nonsense? It's easy enough to find: http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Brit now on iggy

He has disqualified himself by virtue of his sheer stupidity. He is now in the same bag with W*gs.

If he posts something intelligent (probably by accident) I might respond.

MHG

And how are you going to know if Brit "posts something intelligent" if you've got him on "ignore"? You just can't keep your own lies from leaking out your asscrack, can you?

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Brit now on iggy

He has disqualified himself by virtue of his sheer stupidity. He is now in the same bag with W*gs.

If he posts something intelligent (probably by accident) I might respond.

MHG

DenverBrit is crushed.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by orangeatheist

Jeez, if only you'd take a page from that same book and disappear as well.

By the way, why don't you grow a pair and show up on the Randi forum to peddle your nonsense? It's easy enough to find: http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64



And how are you going to know if Brit "posts something intelligent" if you've got him on "ignore"? You just can't keep your own lies from leaking out your asscrack, can you?

I've been waiting for YOU to post something intelligent.

Did you watch the two hour video by A&E about the WTC collapse?

If not, why not?

[W*GS]

gaffe is in full dazzle-em-with-bull**** mode.

He's a sick ****, fer sure.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

I've been waiting for YOU to post something intelligent.

Did you watch the two hour video by A&E about the WTC collapse?

If not, why not?

You tell 'em, Gaffney, wag that ****ing finger.

You've got a new kind of crazy going on, I could see assisted living in your near future.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by W*GS

gaffe is in full dazzle-em-with-bull**** mode.

He's a sick ****, fer sure.

He's in full 'loony mode' right now, should we call someone, or let the paramedics handle it?.

[SoCalBronco]

Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk

You gotta understand something, here. I'm not paying for that ****. Link for a free copy? I'll be happy to look at it.

Free copy? Lulz. That goes against the very fiber of Gaff's existence. Dude lives to profit from tragedy.

[TDmvp]

Originally Posted by SoCalBronco

Free copy? Lulz. That goes against the very fiber of Gaff's existence. Dude lives to profit from tragedy.

OL ... Thx Socal , I been wanting to drop that in this thread and you saved me a moment lol ...


And well played.

[orangeatheist]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

I've been waiting for YOU to post something intelligent.

Did you watch the two hour video by A&E about the WTC collapse?

If not, why not?

Gaffe, I have absolutely NO interest in your 9/11 claptrap. I'm one of those stupid Americans who is perfectly satisfied with the official report.

Now, VENUS, on the other hand. THAT interests me. When are you going to grow a pair of balls to address that question, huh?

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by orangeatheist

Gaffe, I have absolutely NO interest in your 9/11 claptrap. I'm one of those stupid Americans who is perfectly satisfied with the official report.

Now, VENUS, on the other hand. THAT interests me. When are you going to grow a pair of balls to address that question, huh?

I keep seeing posts about the Venus thing, but didn't catch the original discussion. What's it about?

[orangeatheist]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

I keep seeing posts about the Venus thing, but didn't catch the original discussion. What's it about?

Apparently, Gaffe has implied or suggested that Venus is a rather new addition to our solar system. It isn't a planet formed along with the rest some 4 1/2 billion years ago. I think he's taking his lead from Immanuel Velikovsky or Zecharia Sitchkin or some other such fruit loop.

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

I keep seeing posts about the Venus thing, but didn't catch the original discussion. What's it about?

gaffe apparently believes in Velikovsky, who believed that Venus is in fact a giant comet ejected from Jupiter a few thousands of years ago, and which played pinball around the inner solar system (and was responsible for the events described in Exodus and other parts of the OT) before settling down into its current orbit.

One of Velikovsky's funniest beliefs is that the oil present in the Middle East was shed by Venus on one of its passes by earth, and also that Venus provided the manna that fell from the heavens onto the Israelites. He seems to think that hydrocarbons and carbohydrates are similar.

Sagan did a takedown of Velikovsky in one of this books.

[orangeatheist]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Sagan did a takedown of Velikovsky in one of this books.

Do you happen to remember which one that was?

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by orangeatheist

Do you happen to remember which one that was?

Broca's Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science.

Gotta re-read that someday.

[Requiem]

This thread is like a WWF Royal Rumble. Gaff still going strong.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by Requiem

This thread is like a WWF Royal Rumble. Gaff still going strong.

I have not even begun to fight....