The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2013, 09:09 AM   #1
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,321

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default GOP Can't Win Honestly; Time to Cheat

But here’s another way you might not have heard: Some Republicans are looking to change the Electoral College system in battleground states that Democrats have won in the last two cycles. As the Washington Post reports, Republicans in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia -- all controlled at the state level (in some form or fashion) by the GOP -- have proposed awarding their Electoral College votes by congressional district instead of the winner-take-all approach used by every state except for two (Maine and Nebraska). “No state is moving quicker than Virginia, where state senators are likely to vote on the plan as soon as next week,” the Post says.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...the-party?lite

I guess the Republicans haven't picked up on the concept of a democracy, where sometimes you lose and have to respond to the will of the people and change your message, and methods, to win elections. The Republicans are just going to bypass all that "democracy" crap and simply figure out a way to steal what they want (just like they control the House not because they won it fair and square in elections, but because they gerrymandered the **** out the country so that nobody else has a chance). Oh, they also refuse to alter the filibuster rules in the Senate.

Why bother even holding elections?
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-25-2013, 09:18 AM   #2
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
But here’s another way you might not have heard: Some Republicans are looking to change the Electoral College system in battleground states that Democrats have won in the last two cycles. As the Washington Post reports, Republicans in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia -- all controlled at the state level (in some form or fashion) by the GOP -- have proposed awarding their Electoral College votes by congressional district instead of the winner-take-all approach used by every state except for two (Maine and Nebraska). “No state is moving quicker than Virginia, where state senators are likely to vote on the plan as soon as next week,” the Post says.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...the-party?lite

I guess the Republicans haven't picked up on the concept of a democracy, where sometimes you lose and have to respond to the will of the people and change your message, and methods, to win elections. The Republicans are just going to bypass all that "democracy" crap and simply figure out a way to steal what they want (just like they control the House not because they won it fair and square in elections, but because they gerrymandered the **** out the country so that nobody else has a chance). Oh, they also refuse to alter the filibuster rules in the Senate.

Why bother even holding elections?
So whether Republicans try to change rules in one case or refuse to alter existing rules in another, they're "cheating" either way.

Who knew?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:26 AM   #3
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,650
Default

If it's illegal or unconstitutional the courts will take care of it. If not then its just political gamesmanship which is only cheating when your on the other side of it.

Oh and Obama just got smacked down by the federal appeals courts. His so called recess appointments bypassing Senate confirmation have been ruled unconstitutional. So does that make him a cheater?
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:27 AM   #4
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,321

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
So whether Republicans try to change rules in one case or refuse to alter existing rules in another, they're "cheating" either way.

Who knew?
Both have the same effect: Giving a minority the power to win what they did not earn and both ignoring the will of the people.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:28 AM   #5
Pony Boy
"Whoa Nellie"
 
Pony Boy's Avatar
 
Omaha !!!

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,616

Adopt-a-Bronco:
mellon head
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
[I]I guess the Republicans haven't picked up on the concept of a democracy, where sometimes you lose and have to respond to the will of the people and change your message, and methods, to win elections. The Republicans are just going to bypass all that "democracy" crap and simply figure out a way to steal what they want (just like they control the House not because they won it fair and square in elections, but because they gerrymandered the **** out the country so that nobody else has a chance). Oh, they also refuse to alter the filibuster rules in the Senate.

Why bother even holding elections?
When did we become a democracy? I think the original framers of the Constitution intended this contry to be a Republic?
Pony Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:29 AM   #6
B-Large
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

No reason to change the message or move to a move Libertarian flavor in the former party of small Government.... to many reasons keep doing what they've been doing. Liberal Media Bias, Liberally Biased Public Education, Liberal Brainwashing Universities, Indonctrination of the "Takers"..... the list goes on and on, its the excuses and accusations that keep the Republicans losing elections.... Its to bad, they continue to lose public support and will back themselves into a corner... sad to see, from a former Republican voter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:37 AM   #7
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,650
Default

I hate the winner take all electoral college anyways. IMO its BS. The 30-40% of calif who make most of the money in this state over ruled by the takers and welfare queens.

CA so ****ed up now. Brown raised taxes so high on millionaires they are leaving the state in droves. Even Phil Mickelson saying he is out of here. It would be smart to change it IMO.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:43 AM   #8
B-Large
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
I hate the winner take all electoral college anyways. IMO its BS. The 30-40% of calif who make most of the money in this state over ruled by the takers and welfare queens.

CA so ****ed up now. Brown raised taxes so high on millionaires they are leaving the state in droves. Even Phil Mickelson saying he is out of here. It would be smart to change it IMO.
Its great- Alot of Californians move to Denver, real estate prices go up and my properties make more money.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:46 AM   #9
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,321

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
I hate the winner take all electoral college anyways. IMO its BS. The 30-40% of calif who make most of the money in this state over ruled by the takers and welfare queens.

CA so ****ed up now. Brown raised taxes so high on millionaires they are leaving the state in droves. Even Phil Mickelson saying he is out of here. It would be smart to change it IMO.
Phil Mickelson makes $50 million a year chasing a little white ball around a park. He should get down on his knees in gratitude every day instead of whining like a selfish little b****.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:49 AM   #10
B-Large
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Phil Mickelson makes $50 million a year chasing a little white ball around a park. He should get down on his knees in gratitude every day instead of whining like a selfish little b****.
yeah, but he has to feed his family
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 09:59 AM   #11
Fedaykin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,932

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony Boy View Post
When did we become a democracy? I think the original framers of the Constitution intended this contry to be a Republic?
Yep, a republic in which the framing document specifies that the chief executive is elected not by the people, but by the states, hence the concept of each state casting all or nothing votes.
Fedaykin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:17 AM   #12
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 20,834
Default

Didja also see how the GOP in Virginia redrew the state senate districts there to make them more favorable to the GOP?

More dirty tricks ****.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:32 AM   #13
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,995

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
If it's illegal or unconstitutional the courts will take care of it. If not then its just political gamesmanship which is only cheating when your on the other side of it.

Oh and Obama just got smacked down by the federal appeals courts. His so called recess appointments bypassing Senate confirmation have been ruled unconstitutional. So does that make him a cheater?
There were some fed courts that ruled against obamacare & how did that turn out.
Rigging an election where the minority is deciding the end result is wrong.
peacepipe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:42 AM   #14
Arkie
Ring of Famer
 
Arkie's Avatar
 
Say 'what' again, I dare you

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,446
Default

All electoral votes should be awarded to districts to more accurately reflect the will of the people.
Arkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:42 AM   #15
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,392

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony Boy View Post
When did we become a democracy? I think the original framers of the Constitution intended this contry to be a Republic?
They did, but like many forms of government, it has 'evolved' into something else.

A Representative Democracy, a Democratic Republic? Republic has been used by many countries, and not necessarily accurately.

People's Republic of China, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the Republic of Texas, Dominican Republic, Kyrgyz Republic, Banana Republic, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Whatever the US has morphed into, it's election process needs an overhaul, as do both houses.

The system is 'broken.'
DenverBrit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:48 AM   #16
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,995

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkie View Post
All electoral votes should be awarded to districts to more accurately reflect the will of the people.
BS,will of the people is decided by the majority,not by a minority simply because they are more spread out.
peacepipe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:52 AM   #17
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Both have the same effect: Giving a minority the power to win what they did not earn and both ignoring the will of the people.
Funny that you've never called it "cheating" in Red Nebraska. But some other reliably blue states start looking into it and now it's a crime against humanity.

I'm not a fan of it myself, but it's a State thing. To each his own.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:55 AM   #18
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Phil Mickelson makes $50 million a year chasing a little white ball around a park. He should get down on his knees in gratitude every day instead of whining like a selfish little b****.
On his knees before his Government. Just like Gaia intended. AMIRITE?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:55 AM   #19
Fedaykin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,932

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkie View Post
All electoral votes should be awarded to districts to more accurately reflect the will of the people.
So, ignore the intent of the founders?
Fedaykin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:59 AM   #20
El Minion
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B-Large View Post
yeah, but he has to feed his family
Latrell "I have a family to feed" Sprewell feels Phil Mickelson pain.

El Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 10:59 AM   #21
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
BS,will of the people is decided by the majority,not by a minority simply because they are more spread out.
Do you know why we have both a Senate and House of Representatives?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:04 AM   #22
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,392

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fedaykin View Post
So, ignore the intent of the founders?
It's a selective process.

'Ignoring' works for 'separation of church and state,' but it is by the book for the second amendment.
DenverBrit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 11:43 AM   #23
Obushma
Ring of Famer
 
Obushma's Avatar
 
Bring your lunch pail

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SLC Utah
Posts: 2,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fedaykin View Post
So, ignore the intent of the founders?
No, i'm sure their intent was to drop bombs on women and children in the Middle East. Oh, they loved the idea of social security, medicare and medicaid as well. They would have definitely approved of NDAA as well, "guilty until proven innocent", the famous words of Washington.

Obushma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 12:01 PM   #24
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,650
Default

Do youthink gerrymandering to maximize votes is cheating?
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 12:05 PM   #25
Pony Boy
"Whoa Nellie"
 
Pony Boy's Avatar
 
Omaha !!!

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,616

Adopt-a-Bronco:
mellon head
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
BS,will of the people is decided by the majority,not by a minority simply because they are more spread out.
In a pure democracy a 51% majority would have total control of the 49% minority. This is why the original framers of the constitution were very careful to define our form of government as a republic, were the minority was still protected by the rule of law. The Constitution does not provide for national ballot initiatives or referendums to be decided by popular vote but are left to the wisdom of our elected representatives. This is where Obama is off base when he says, "the people have spoken" or given him a mandate to carry out his policies. The president must work within the framework of the constitution and through the elected representatives of congress.
Pony Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Denver Broncos