The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2012, 04:38 PM   #76
Fedaykin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestar View Post
Once again y'all confuse me with someone that cares what Y'all think about me.
The toleration of cognitive dissonance required to have such a high opinion of yourself and such a low standard of integrity is quite impressive.
Fedaykin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 11:09 PM   #77
lonestar
Day One Fan
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Decker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fedaykin View Post
The toleration of cognitive dissonance required to have such a high opinion of yourself and such a low standard of integrity is quite impressive.
I'll put it this way.

Less about me and just the very low standard of integrity of the far left, which includes YOU.

We can agree to disagree.
lonestar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 04:04 AM   #78
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,502
Default

funny how Fed tells someone they only call people names then proceeds to use idiot, moron etc lol. You just misunderstood what i was saying was that since the Brady bill expired gun deaths haven't gone up that much. You went back and put a graph that supposedly shows it did drop after the brady bill was enacted. My response to that would be there could have been a lot of other factors. The end of the LA gang wars for one. The brady bill had nothing to do with any of the major reductions in crimes that many cities went through in the late 80's. Whatever though its funny hearing you complain about name calling because you call people names all the time. i admit though when I made the comment FED I was thinking how I had heard our gun murder rate was lower then it used to be and it is. I didn't know however that there was such a drop right after the brady bill. I won't conceede though that is the reason, your graph doesn't prove that was the driving force.

Last edited by cutthemdown; 12-30-2012 at 04:13 AM..
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 07:14 AM   #79
houghtam
WHAT IS YOUR PROFESSION
 
houghtam's Avatar
 
MethWolfeAlliance Member #11001001

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 5,029

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Demon Eagles
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestar View Post
Wow all of that because I posted. I'm faltered, you libs act like I care what you think. And before dream from peanut gallery chlimes in about my post not being Christain enough for him.

There is turning the other check and there is just being stupid.

I have at worst used the word libs to describe those in the far right

One would think those that are would wear it as a badge of honor. Instead of running from it.

Once again y'all confuse me with someone that cares what Y'all think about me.
"No, Jesus, I didn't turn the cheek like you said. But I didn't do anything any worse than they did. Am I doing the heaven thing right?"



Jesus is not impressed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg not impressed.jpg (26.9 KB, 14 views)
houghtam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 08:31 AM   #80
lonestar
Day One Fan
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Decker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by houghtam View Post
"No, Jesus, I didn't turn the cheek like you said. But I didn't do anything any worse than they did. Am I doing the heaven thing right?"



Jesus is not impressed.
Nor am I worried about approval from you or any of your lib buddies.

Frankly I do not care if y'all like my posts or ideas.

I'm pretty happy with my choices in life and current lifestyle, conversely disapprove of the lib thought process. I will always speak my mind and whether y'all think making fun of it is your happy place I could care less.

Go broncos.

Getting back to the topic.
Let me add that blaming firearms for murders is beyond dumb.
lonestar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 11:12 AM   #81
Fedaykin
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,839

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
funny how Fed tells someone they only call people names then proceeds to use idiot, moron etc lol.
I don't only call you and idiot and a moron. I point out exactly WHY you qualify for the terms. There's a big difference there.

Quote:
You just misunderstood what I was saying was that since the Brady bill expired gun deaths haven't gone up that much.
YOU LYING SACK OF ****. Here's your post again:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LYING SACK OF ****
Hell gun death crimes were higher when we have the assault weapons ban in place Fed. That proves gun violence does not ebb or flow with assault rifles.
That very clearly says: gun deaths went up during the assault weapons ban.
Also the Brady Bill is NOT the same thing as the Assault Weapons Ban, so you're just lying again. The Brady Bill was about background checks for handguns.

You also haven't bothered to correct yourself for several posts, so I'm not inclined to believe you meant something else.

Usually someone with as much practice lying as you have has at least learned do to it with some competency (not that competency at lying is a good thing, mind you).

Quote:
You went back and put a graph that supposedly shows it did drop after the brady bill was enacted. My response to that would be there could have been a lot of other factors.
As I've said at least twice, the only purpose of the graph (a graph, mind you, created by a gun rights advocate) was to show you were full of **** saying the AWB correlated with an increase in gun deaths.

Quote:
The end of the LA gang wars for one. The brady bill had nothing to do with any of the major reductions in crimes that many cities went through in the late 80's.
Oh look, another bald assertion! Do you have the integrity necessary to actually try to back that up? My guess is no. You'd prefer to just spout that which conforms to your ideology.

Quote:
Whatever though its funny hearing you complain about name calling because you call people names all the time.
Couldn't care less about naming calling. It's when name calling is the only thing going on, and no substance, that I point out the miscreant. The latter happens to be against official board policy, but of course it's not enforced. *shrug*

Don't do things that earn you the monkier "lying sack of ****" and "idjit" and "vapid moron" and you won't hear such things from me.

Quote:
i admit though when I made the comment FED I was thinking how I had heard our gun murder rate was lower then it used to be and it is. I didn't know however that there was such a drop right after the brady bill.
Ahh, interesting strategy here bub:

1.) Pull **** out of your ass
2.) Get called on it
3.) In the same post, LIE about having pulled said **** out of your ass (claim you said something else) and then CONFIRM the lie in the last part of a post!.

You're a real piece of work.

Quote:
I won't conceede though that is the reason, your graph doesn't prove that was the driving force.
Well, given that I never made *any* claim based on the data other than it shows you're full of **** saying gun deaths went up after the AWB (and now the Brady Bill) you're wasting your breath.
Fedaykin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 11:31 AM   #82
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 19,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lonestar View Post
Frankly I do not care if y'all like my posts or ideas.
Yep, a self-admitted spammer.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Denver Broncos