![]() |
|
|
#26 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
10 mil is Clady alone.. if you cut Unrein and Bannan who is going to backup the DL? BTW just because we have cap room does not mean that Pat is going to spend it all either.. He has given John a Budget to stay in.. Pretty sure it is not teh full cap value.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||||||||
|
jungle
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,136
|
Yes
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by pricejj; 12-12-2012 at 09:59 PM.. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Wolfe will play inside with big Vick, we probably resign Silga who will be cheap, I have them drafting a stud DT, Malik Jackson is still on the roster, Garland on PS, and a veteran could be signed. Run stuffers are a dime a dozen, Bannan is playing solid, but he can be upgraded, and people just really like Unrein.. but he's not so good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
Moreno will be back unless they bring in a rookie and somehow is unseated. Which is probably an even Steven money issue after KM residual signing bonus is dealt with so that outs you at about a plus 4.5. If the resign Clady which IMO they will not. Since he is neither elite like some hope he will be nor will the money that he will want and probably get elsewhere fit into that 10 mil cap room you started with. BTW run stuffers are not a dime a dozen, if they had been we would have been able to fix that issue we have had for over a decade. The first true one we brought in was Bunkley and did did not come cheap. So please get over that notion. As for the comment Bannan can be upgraded absolutely but it will cost a lot more to do so, since that's another few mil. You have run out of money without signing any other folks OR the rookies. Oh well back to the drawing boards AGAIN. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 742
|
Clady deserves top 5 money he gave up one sack all year when manning held on the ball too long. You really have a thing for pushing our best players out of town and hoping the under dog succeeds. You once said youre happy with never drafting a WR again and think its best to sign guys off practice squads and UFA . what kind of **** is that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Perennial Pro-bowler
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 865
|
Quote:
My thoughts on your thoughts of my thoughts: 1) I would love another early DT pick. Love it. I don't see it happening. Not with this coaching staff and our scheme. Vickerson, Bannan, and Unrein are 33-50% snap players. Wolfe moves inside and Unrein partners with him on passing downs. Bannan plays on obvious running downs. And Vickerson has been getting squeezed out more and more as our base down penetrating DT as we've been experimenting with Ayers and Dumervil outside, with Wolfe sliding inside. Vickerson only played 16/53 snaps last game. He's just not that important to our scheme even though he's played fine while in the game. Alot of that has to do with the weapons surrounding him though, not his talent level. We also know that long-term, as he gains size, Del Rio wants Wolfe to play DT in four man fronts. So, lets assume Wolfe puts on the 10-15 pounds this offseason to get him around 315-320. He's now the starting LDT. Siliga, Bannan, or whatever NT we have is at RDT. Unrein is going to be the pass rushing DT sub for that NT. Wolfe is not coming out, and he's backed up by Malik Jackson, whom is the same type of player and build. Obviously, Wolfe and Jackson can kick out to 5 tech when we do our 3-3-5 looks with Miller standing up off the edge. There is no need nor room for a DT on our roster. There is going to be a huge need for a Defensive End though for 4 man fronts. We could bring back Jason Hunter and he'd be fine at Left Defensive End, but even if so, Ayers is going to walk, and we'll need a backup for Dumervil at Right Defensive End. I would not be surprised to see two relatively high DEs drafted, a Rush End to back up Dumervil and a well rounded base end that is more effective against the run. From the coaches' comments, that is our long term goal for our defense. So, more than DT, I'm looking extremely hard at the DEs projected to go in the top 4 rounds, thinking we need two. Okafor or Ansah in late 1, Ben Gardner or Datone Jones in the late 2nd, John Simon, Brandon Jenkins, or Tank Carradine in the late 3rd, some mixture of that would make sense. 2. My preference would be to replace McGahee with Moreno next season. You really can't have both as they are very similar players and neither is used on special teams. Moreno was somewhat cheap this year and his signing bonus, which is spread out across the length of his contract, would have been a big hit if he was released this season. We barely kept him, complete with Elway's quote of "I think he probably makes us a better team". Ringing endorsement, that. It's the same deal as it was with Tebow though. They don't like Moreno. They'll use him and applaud him, but as soon as they can ditch him, they will. They don't believe in him regardless of what he does. It's another example of their thought process that we're winning despite Moreno because defenses are gearing up to stop the pass. Also, Eddie Lacy is supposably coming out. He's the exact type of RB John Fox loves, and he's fast enough to play special teams. He's one of the few players I think are in our sights in late round 1. He has to get past Green Bay though. 3. I agree that the Broncos could take an outside WR and view Decker as the future in the slot. 4. DJ Williams looks to be done here. He's playing behind Trevathan since he's been back, and Trevathan has outplayed him to boot. The staff seems to have no desire to try and plug him in at MIKE, which I think would be the best idea. I also think you're way off on Kevin Minter. He's an incredible prospect that hasn't been hyped yet by the media. If he declares, he'll be in the Mid-1st Round discussion as a MIKE LB. He's not that far behind Te'o, and he's well ahead of Ogletree. I think we'd be lucky to land him in the late 1st, and he'd be a 3 down LB for a decade. 5. Jones is a good OG/OC. He's going to grade out behind Warmack and Cooper. His comparison is Max Unger, and he'd be a fine late 1st Round pick if we needed that. I haven't seen anything that suggests Kuper is done. Beadles is well thought of. I don't see any inclination that we would scrap Walton, though that is where I think Jones would be most likely to fit in rather than at OG. So, unless we give up on Walton, I don't see this as a probability. 6. I think the DT draft is potentially extremely deep. Lotulelei and Nix are Top 15 picks. Richardson, Jenkins, and Hankins should all go in the Top 25. Short, the Williams Trio, and Floyd could all go Late 1 to Mid 2. Spence, Logan, and Hill should all go from Late 2 - Mid 3. And if McCullers and Geathers come out, they could go in that range as well. Those two are expected to stay though. You can't trivialize the importance of size to the DT position. Parcells' Planet Theory is a key concept. Especially, if they're talking about eliminating cut blocks. Which would then put the entire onus on size and power in trench play. The fact that so many athletic big men could be available in one draft is a phenomenon, which would make this one of the best DT drafts in history on that factor alone. Last edited by Mat'hir Uth Gan; 12-13-2012 at 07:57 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,522
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
The OLT used to be a premium spot on the team. But with the advent of quick passing game almost no need for him. The DEs have almost zero time to get after the QB. as younsaidmeven the great clady gave up a coverage sack. As for WR I never said or implied getting me from a PS, I have always said pay for one that has proven they are not a head case, can help move the chains, and doe not fumble or drop passes. Most WRs take 3-4 years to get up to speed in the NFL why pay them to learn. Pay them to produce after they are proven. Save that rookie learning curve money and get a real one. Unless you can find a fitzgerald or megatron In the third whcpich we all know those go top ten. Do not waste your time or money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Clady will be resigned, you have been beaten up over this I will take the high road. Run stuffers WHO PUSH the pocked and generate a PASS RUSH are what this team lacks, not having a true MLB doesn't help matters either, watch your games over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
~~~
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth Division
Posts: 19,516
Adopt-a-Bronco: Gilgamesh |
Peyton Manning is here, that is why we don't need a guy like Ryan Clady.
Woops. Guess loneturd forgot Tarik Glenn in Indianapolis when he was a three time All-Pro and a significant contributor to their successes and Super Bowl victory. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
As for your comment about Clady who has beaten me up? John Elway? Until he proves me wrong I stand by my thoughts. Anyone else that thinks they are beating me up well it is only what they think. Since John make that decision if he decides he is worth almost ten % of the budget well I'm ok with that. Frankly I think he has other plans. Even if yoi are correct with your Calculations and gyrations Clady still takes 10 mil plus of your budget. So your going to have to cut more existing guys or UFA. Because we all know that the draft is the future short and LONG term. Forgot yes you are correct we lack a legit DT/NT have for over a decade. But your comment was about run stuffers being a dime a dozen. That is not factual. Last edited by lonestar; 12-13-2012 at 11:52 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
I see dream boi has most likely taken another shot at me.. to bad so sad punk, I do not bother with you any more.. you are irrelevant.. not sure what the need to attack is.. feeling a little inadequate today.. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,522
|
Quote:
As for the run stuffing pass rushing DT you are looking for, that is like a unicorn man. Not going to be cheap or easy to find. I'm a huge fan of Terrance Knighton being signed. He does have limited pass rushing skills but, he did have 4 sacks in 10. Wolfe will go back inside and play DT moving forward. You might not like what he has done this year but, he is doing quite well playing as many snaps as he has played his rookie year. Moving around like he has will only make him better going forward. That is why I want a guy like Hunt in the draft. Beast to play on the other side of Doom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
He doesn't realize the cap isn't going to be a daunting problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,522
|
Quote:
and I wouldn't mind him coming back as long as we bring in other guys too. I've been a huge Hunter fan since he got to Denver but, who knows how well he will be with JDR. I think Ayers is gone after this year. I would like him to comeback but, I think someone will offer him starter money and he goes. Jury is still out on Jackson. I know he is playing more as the season goes along so that is a plus. I want another PASS rusher on the other side. Complete players are nice but, if we can get a pass rushing specialist to play some then I'm all for it. I talked about Eric Martin from the Huskers, I'm a homer so I watch them. Undersized 6'2 250 DE. He reminds me of Robert Mathis in ways. Hard worker and I doubt he is drafted high if at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
why do you think we have 10mil left this year.. it was Pats decision on how much they could spend.. as for creative contract writing the league approves each of them and if your playing games you lose draft picks and get fined.. yes you can create more room this year be deferring money till 3 years from now.. John saw this happening under mikey who never saw a cap that he could not squeeze under.. but Pat put a stop to that crap rewriting contracts giving up front money to the player for incentive to do so.. that is why we always had 5-20 million in dead cap space each year.. the player signed and then got cut or wound up on IR and then a settlement and yet that prorated money came due in the cap each year.. I suspect that Pat gave John the word htat he would not spend more than X make everything fit under that number and not to get creative with contracts.. Did you ever wonder why so many players (UFA) came on board with one year contracts? two reasons it gave them a chance to play with Manning, all the while auditioning for next year.. the other reason was we were at or very near our internal cap number, after giving Manning a whooper.. if Manning was a flop then they moved on to another team if he was like he is their contract demands of next year would be better.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Hey pic Mod!?!?! FU
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The wrong side of right.
Posts: 26,522
|
Lattimore entering the draft changes how I would draft. Before I was all in on Austin, now I'm all for Mosley or the best available D player. Lattimore has to be our 2nd round draft pick. I don't care if he can't play next year. No way shape or form does Denver ever get in a better position to draft an RB of his caliber with Manning as the QB.
Stedman Bailey in the 3rd should he enter would easy the blow for me of not landing Austin. Then go trench heavy the rest of the draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
I don't see a small SDE with our scheme.. I have liked what I have seen from your boy Hunt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
I will not respond to anything you type. You are a Hypocrit! You cry that Req and Rev and others bust your balls and take personnel shots, yet you felt compelled to do that to me, and I have not insulted you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 742
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,691
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 742
|
Yea jr smith is money from the knicks...
But seriously i dont know much about college players i just jump on a few band wagons each year and hope the broncos draft them (ogletree) |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 742
|
Needs in my mind go from mlb wr d-line (dt + rush de) oline ( c / g ) if they can upgrade walton or beadles im all for it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Day One Fan
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 6,213
Adopt-a-Bronco: Decker |
Quote:
As far as dream busting my ball i have the moron on iggy but know he is taking shots at me because i banned him a bunch of times on another forum.. he was a punk then and still is.. I do not share your thought on the win now mentality they had the opportunity to sign a bunch more guys last year, but was not willing to shell out the money.. I do not see the urgency that everyone else does.. I know rich not hat I am, but I know folks like that and yes money does count for them.. they got rich for the most part by being good if not great businessmen so watching how you spend it is important to them.. one of the reasons mikey was fired was because of all his bad personnel decisions so Pat said in an interview at one time he was going to reign in the free spending.. therefore I believe we will not get to the salary cap anytime soon.. Even John at one time made comment about Pat giving him a budget to stay within. now has that changed in the past two years? I guess we will see.. Respond or not I'm sorry if you took it personally.. Overall your posts are pretty good .. I do not agree with all of them but you would not be the first nor the last in that area.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|