The Chiefs suck - Page 57 - The Orange Mane

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Is sheepstud really bringing Jake Plummer smack? That's just sad.

Sad is trying to troll Brady Quinn on Chiefs Planet. Good thing you turned your rep count off slapdick.

Tombstone RJ · 10-31-2012, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Sad is trying to troll Brady Quinn on Chiefs Planet. Good thing you turned your rep count off slapdick.

tell us again how great your team is, tell us again about all the talent it has and how the players love Crennel. We love fairy tales.

Tombstone RJ · 10-31-2012, 08:46 AM

Oh that's right, I forgot. KCStud can't talk about this season because it doesn't exist. He only remembers and/or acknowledges the seasons where kc doesn't suck.

So KCStud, now that this season officially does not exist for you, why are you here?

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

tell us again how great your team is, tell us again about all the talent it has and how the players love Crennel. We love fairy tales.

Tell us again how Manning is gonna win a SB even though he can't beat Tom Brady or the Texans?

I'll be here to remind you of that again since it doesn't seem to compute to you .

10-31-2012, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Tell us again how Manning is gonna win a SB even though he can't beat Tom Brady or the Texans?

I'll be here to remind you of that again since it doesn't seem to compute to you .

Again. Speculating on future games. How do you even know Brady will be healthy come January? You simply cannot predict future games.

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

Again. Speculating on future games. How do you even know Brady will be healthy come January? You simply cannot predict future games.

Brady has been hurt one time in his career because of a play that is now banned. He's one of the most protected players in the league.

mwill07 · 10-31-2012, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Tell us again how Manning is gonna win a SB even though he can't beat Tom Brady or the Texans?

I'll be here to remind you of that again since it doesn't seem to compute to you .

Manning plays against the New England D and/or the Texan D.

New England D is ranked 30th in the league against the pass. Texans D is much better, but they recently lost their team captain, all-pro, star of the defense in Brian Cushing.

Brady and Schaub, on the other hand, will play against the Denver D. in case you haven't noticed, are much improved with Brooking @ MLB. Broncos have given up >220 yards passing only once this year, despite facing Brady, Brees, Schaub, Ryan, and Roethlesburger.

As long as Denver doesn't turn the ball over, they can and will be able to keep up with the cream of the AFC crop. They have in the past, they will do it again. Maybe you have forgotten how Denver was a failed 3rd down stop from beating the Texans (Denver would have had the ball, down by 6 with just over 2 minutes to play...my money's on Manning here). Or, maybe you forgot how Denver was a McGahee dropped pass and a McGahee fumble from beating the Pats in NE.

10-31-2012, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Brady has been hurt one time in his career because of a play that is now banned. He's one of the most protected players in the league.

That means nothing. You have no clue on what outcomes of games not even played will be. You thought chiefs would win at least a couple games so far this year. Maybe even have one lead in them? That's turned out wrong just like predicting a playoff loss could be wrong.

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic

That means nothing. You have no clue on what outcomes of games not even played will be. You thought chiefs would win at least a couple games so far this year. Maybe even have one lead in them? That's turned out wrong just like predicting a playoff loss could be wrong.

Lol I didn't even pick the Chiefs to win the division.

10-31-2012, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Lol I didn't even pick the Chiefs to win the division.

How did you get "win the division" from what I actually said "a couple games"

Br0nc0Buster · 10-31-2012, 09:18 AM

This is the saddest smack I can think of

Essentially it has been reduced to "ha ha you probably won't win the superbowl so ha"

Meanwhile this is coming from the fan of a team that has never held a lead in regulation half way through the season

lol wut

10-31-2012, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

I've been using that before you guys signed PAYton.

Nice try.

Btw-Do you have more evidence on how Joe Montana=Jake Plummer? I'm thrilled to see the evidence.

I wasn't comparing one to the other I was comparing how they both won a playoff game with leadership and defense. Nice try

DBroncos4life · 10-31-2012, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Br0nc0Buster

This is the saddest smack I can think of

Essentially it has been reduced to "ha ha you probably won't win the superbowl so ha"

Meanwhile this is coming from the fan of a team that has never held a lead in regulation half way through the season

lol wut

Nothing better then watching this fool being reduced to hoping other teams will beat us in the future!

broncosteven · 10-31-2012, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

I've been using that before you guys signed PAYton.

Nice try.

Btw-Do you have more evidence on how Joe Montana=Jake Plummer? I'm thrilled to see the evidence.

More proof of STUDLY trying to move the goal posts back 20 years and get a bigger sample size to prove to himself that his team at one time had an above average player at QB and his team does not suck.

kFc SUCKS!

Hell even the Jag's are trying to get better by attempting to trade for Timmy! Meanwhile Romeo is wandering the halls of Analhead mumbling "I don't understand" over and over!

broncosteven · 10-31-2012, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Br0nc0Buster

This is the saddest smack I can think of

Essentially it has been reduced to "ha ha you probably won't win the superbowl so ha"

Meanwhile this is coming from the fan of a team that has never held a lead in regulation half way through the season

lol wut

More proof that kFcDUDLY should just walk away and admit defeat.

Great points!

kFc SUCKS!

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncosteven

More proof of STUDLY trying to move the goal posts back 20 years and get a bigger sample size to prove to himself that his team at one time had an above average player at QB and his team does not suck.

kFc SUCKS!

Hell even the Jag's are trying to get better by attempting to trade for Timmy! Meanwhile Romeo is wandering the halls of Analhead mumbling "I don't understand" over and over!

Did you come up with that on your own or did two girls you met on the street help you out again?

mwill07 · 10-31-2012, 10:43 AM

An incomplete list of teams better than the 2012 Chiefs:

2008 Lions (0-16) - had a halftime lead, week 6.
1982 Colts (0-8-1) - had a halftime lead, week 2.
1976 Buccaneers (0-16)- had a lead in the first quarter in week 3.
1960 cowboys (0-11-1) - lead after Q1, week 1.
1944 Brooklyn Tigers (0-10) - lead after Q1, week 5
1944 cardianls/Seelers (0-10) - led after Q3, week 1.
1943 Cardinals (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 1
1942 Lions (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 3

that's as far back as box scores go....no data readily available prior to 1940. It's possible no team has played 7 games w/ having a lead ever, but that can't be verified.

The 2011 Charlotte Bobcats won game 1...the worst ever NBA team held a lead during game 1, so they are better than the Chiefs.

The worst hockey team of all time, the 1974-75 Washington Capitols, won game 4, so they are better than the Chiefs.

The worst baseball team of all time was the 1899 Cleveland Spiders. They won game 5, so they are better than the Chiefs.

Right now, IMO it's fair to say that the Chiefs are possibly the worst team of all time, in all of sports.

broncosteven · 10-31-2012, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Did you come up with that on your own or did two girls you met on the street help you out again?

Reach...ing...toooooooo...fffaaaaarrrrrrr...ttttto oooooooo........make....................sense..... (last gasp)

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncosteven

Reach...ing...toooooooo...fffaaaaarrrrrrr...ttttto oooooooo........make....................sense..... (last gasp)

Were they brokeback chicks?!?!?!

KCStud · 10-31-2012, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwill07

An incomplete list of teams better than the 2012 Chiefs:

2008 Lions (0-16) - had a halftime lead, week 6.
1982 Colts (0-8-1) - had a halftime lead, week 2.
1976 Buccaneers (0-16)- had a lead in the first quarter in week 3.
1960 cowboys (0-11-1) - lead after Q1, week 1.
1944 Brooklyn Tigers (0-10) - lead after Q1, week 5
1944 cardianls/Seelers (0-10) - led after Q3, week 1.
1943 Cardinals (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 1
1942 Lions (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 3

that's as far back as box scores go....no data readily available prior to 1940. It's possible no team has played 7 games w/ having a lead ever, but that can't be verified.

The 2011 Charlotte Bobcats won game 1...the worst ever NBA team held a lead during game 1, so they are better than the Chiefs.

The worst hockey team of all time, the 1974-75 Washington Capitols, won game 4, so they are better than the Chiefs.

The worst baseball team of all time was the 1899 Cleveland Spiders. They won game 5, so they are better than the Chiefs.

Right now, IMO it's fair to say that the Chiefs are possibly the worst team of all time, in all of sports.

So a team that has won a game is worse than a team that hasn't won a game? Wow you're going full brokeback!

mwill07 · 10-31-2012, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

So a team that has won a game is worse than a team that hasn't won a game? Wow you're going full brokeback!

good point...there are probably some 1-win teams better than the Chiefs too.

broncosteven · 10-31-2012, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

So a team that has won a game is worse than a team that hasn't won a game? Wow you're going full brokeback!

I am happy with this kFc team being the 2nd worst all time and setting records for futility.

DBroncos4life · 10-31-2012, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncosteven

I am happy with this kFc team being the 2nd worst all time and setting records for futility.

Him arguing that KC is the second worst team ever is almost as great as him claiming Denver is only the 4th best team in the AFC.

Irish Stout · 10-31-2012, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Did you come up with that on your own or did two girls you met on the street help you out again?

And you've been using brokeback as an attempted insult for what purpose?

Its always been F*KC or Kansas Sh*tty or KFC... none of those are new or novel concepts, but they make more sense than your reference to gay Wyoming Cowboys... since Denver neither has cowboys or is in Wyoming. At least donkeys is a long standing slander on the mascot and makes sense.

Irish Stout · 10-31-2012, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

So a team that has won a game is worse than a team that hasn't won a game? Wow you're going full brokeback!

So what you're saying is ... that.... Kansas City sucks.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-31-2012, 08:46 AM	#1403
Tombstone RJ Ring of Famer Old School Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: In the Tetons! Posts: 26,135 Adopt-a-Bronco: WorrellWilliams	Oh that's right, I forgot. KCStud can't talk about this season because it doesn't exist. He only remembers and/or acknowledges the seasons where kc doesn't suck. So KCStud, now that this season officially does not exist for you, why are you here?

10-31-2012, 09:18 AM	#1411
Br0nc0Buster You honeydicking? Super Bowl 50 Champs Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Kansas Posts: 7,423	This is the saddest smack I can think of Essentially it has been reduced to "ha ha you probably won't win the superbowl so ha" Meanwhile this is coming from the fan of a team that has never held a lead in regulation half way through the season lol wut

10-31-2012, 10:43 AM	#1417
mwill07 Ring of Famer Lurker Extraordinaire Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: South Carolina Posts: 3,371 Adopt-a-Bronco: VMFM	An incomplete list of teams better than the 2012 Chiefs: 2008 Lions (0-16) - had a halftime lead, week 6. 1982 Colts (0-8-1) - had a halftime lead, week 2. 1976 Buccaneers (0-16)- had a lead in the first quarter in week 3. 1960 cowboys (0-11-1) - lead after Q1, week 1. 1944 Brooklyn Tigers (0-10) - lead after Q1, week 5 1944 cardianls/Seelers (0-10) - led after Q3, week 1. 1943 Cardinals (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 1 1942 Lions (0-10) - had a Q2 lead, week 3 that's as far back as box scores go....no data readily available prior to 1940. It's possible no team has played 7 games w/ having a lead ever, but that can't be verified. The 2011 Charlotte Bobcats won game 1...the worst ever NBA team held a lead during game 1, so they are better than the Chiefs. The worst hockey team of all time, the 1974-75 Washington Capitols, won game 4, so they are better than the Chiefs. The worst baseball team of all time was the 1899 Cleveland Spiders. They won game 5, so they are better than the Chiefs. Right now, IMO it's fair to say that the Chiefs are possibly the worst team of all time, in all of sports.