So who are you voting for? (President)

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by Bacchus

So how did Massachusetts do compared with other states? As the Obama campaign has repeatedly noted, Massachusetts ranked 47th out of 50 states over the entirety of Romney’s four years as governor in terms of job creation. By comparison, Massachusetts ranked 37th in job growth under Swift, and it ranked 10th in Patrick’s first term.

By that measure, Romney had the worst record in a decade.


http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/rom...best-or-worst/

Also don't forget the 200 vetoes per year average and the fact that Mass law REQUIRES there to be a balanced budget, just like most states. So Romney is really just bragging about doing 65 in a 65 mph zone.

[ColoradoDarin]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

Obama, because that's the best chance for bi-partisan compromise.

Compare and contrast Clinton and Obama as bipartisan: Barack Obama’s Potemkin Bipartisanship. Bottom line, Clinton was, Obama isn't.

[ColoradoDarin]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

Far right, huh?

Have you polled everyone here on their political leanings? If no, then you have no idea.

Just being online skews younger, thus more liberal than the general population, but a much higher % of libertarians on the mane than I encounter on other non-political boards - and that's a good thing.

[DenverBrit]

In the one State where Romney served, Mass, he's getting trounced by double digits.

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by ColoradoDarin

Compare and contrast Clinton and Obama as bipartisan: Barack Obama’s Potemkin Bipartisanship. Bottom line, Clinton was, Obama isn't.

Clinton isn't running for president. Romney is. Compare Obama to Romney and his 800 vetoes, and yes, Obama IS the best chance for bipartisanship.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by ColoradoDarin

Compare and contrast Clinton and Obama as bipartisan: Barack Obama’s Potemkin Bipartisanship. Bottom line, Clinton was, Obama isn't.

Clinton was so bipartisan, he became a Republican!

[ColoradoDarin]

Originally Posted by houghtam

Clinton isn't running for president. Romney is. Compare Obama to Romney and his 800 vetoes, and yes, Obama IS the best chance for bipartisanship.

Never said Clinton was running, but you didn't read the link... I can tell because you'd have noticed a person there that I didn't point out.

[ColoradoDarin]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Clinton was so bipartisan, he became a Republican!

For the slow:

Clinton - was a bipartisan Democrat president with a Republican congress 2 years into his first term.

Contrasted with:

Obama - not bipartisan Democrat president with a Republican congress 2 years into his first term.

[Garcia Bronco]

Originally Posted by Obushma

If you were a fan of Ron Paul, just remember, a vote for Romney, is a vote against Ron Paul and Liberty.

Ron Paul and his platform aren't in the running under any candidate.



Don't be idiots people. Even if you live in Cally you should vote for who you deem is the best candidate.

[Crushaholic]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

In the one State where Romney served, Mass, he's getting trounced by double digits.

Luckily, for him, Massachusetts is insignificant to the Electoral College count...

[Obushma]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

Ron Paul and his platform aren't in the running under any candidate.

You're right, him and his platform are not. That's why I urge people who support Pauls ideas, to not vote for the man whos lawyers and groupies at the RNC changed the rules forcing out Paul delegates at the last minute.

Write in Paul, vote Johnson, Anderson, Stein, I dont care....but for the love of god, do NOT vote for Romney.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by Obushma

You're right, him and his platform are not. That's why I urge people who support Pauls ideas, to not vote for the man whos lawyers and groupies at the RNC changed the rules forcing out Paul delegates at the last minute.

Write in Paul, vote Johnson, Anderson, Stein, I dont care....but for the love of god, do NOT vote for Romney.

I'm not a Ron Paul backer, but that was pretty nasty what the GOP pulled on him. The rule in the Republican Party: Get in the ranks or get out.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by Crushaholic

Luckily, for him, Massachusetts is insignificant to the Electoral College count...

Lucky for us, the people who know him best are sending us a very clear message.

[nyuk nyuk]

Larry Sinclair is taken by Obama, so I have to go with a Romney/Ryan sandwich.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk

Larry Sinclair is taken by Obama, so I have to go with a Romney/Ryan sandwich.

Let's not bring sex into it.

[Garcia Bronco]

Originally Posted by Obushma

You're right, him and his platform are not. That's why I urge people who support Pauls ideas, to not vote for the man whos lawyers and groupies at the RNC changed the rules forcing out Paul delegates at the last minute.

Write in Paul, vote Johnson, Anderson, Stein, I dont care....but for the love of god, do NOT vote for Romney.

I understand your plight and typically I'd be right there with you because I don't believe in exclusion, but we have to give business owners confidence. I believe, and I could certainly be wrong, that a Romney win will give business owners and investors more confidence.

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Let's not bring sex into it.

Awesome! Now we have it as a matter of record that epicdramallama wants to be the cream to Romney and Ryan's puff.

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

I understand your plight and typically I'd be right there with you because I don't believe in exclusion, but we have to give business owners confidence. I believe, and I could certainly be wrong, that a Romney win will give business owners and investors more confidence.

Confidence actually has been growing since the economy bottomed out as a result of the failed policies of the previous administration.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/157007/sm...ves-level.aspx

It's back to where it was before Obama took over.

[Obushma]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

I understand your plight and typically I'd be right there with you because I don't believe in exclusion, but we have to give business owners confidence. I believe, and I could certainly be wrong, that a Romney win will give business owners and investors more confidence.

Garcia, I'm sorry, but I could give a **** less about the economy under Romney or Obama, it's going to be the same. You're going to have some form of keynesian economy either way, you're still going to have centralized banking, and the FED will run the printing press utill the dollar is little more then fire kindling. More endless wars will be more wasted treasury, more taxpayer dollars to fund hand picked dictators. Doesnt matter D or R, they're both funded by Goldman Sachs.

So spare me the buisness owner bull****, the CEO of overstock.com is voting Johnson, hes pulled his head out of his ass.

[~Crash~]

so I take it the nuts that only post in here made enough faake ID's to oblouma over the top good work fellers..

[Jekyll15Hyde]

Originally Posted by ColoradoDarin

For the slow:

Clinton - was a bipartisan Democrat president with a Republican congress 2 years into his first term.

Contrasted with:

Obama - not bipartisan Democrat president with a Republican congress 2 years into his first term.

McConnell says the goal is to make him a 1 term president and they proceed on the largest scorched earth campaign in modern politics. And you blame for Obama for not being bipartisan? You have no clue.

[DAN_BRONCO_FAN]

Originally Posted by ~Crash~

so I take it the nuts that only post in here made enough faake ID's to oblouma over the top good work fellers..

wel all know the only vote poll that counts is the Om but since the OM is 90% about the Broncos Obama and Romney votes are null and void.
its John Elway and whoever is lucky enough to be asked to be his vp for president

[Arkie]

Its obvious people are voting multiple times. There aren't that many Obamney fans on this forum. 135 votes and only 9 not sure, and there's no option for "other"

[cutthemdown]

Originally Posted by JCMElway

This, along with post #99, crosses the line. Take a week off.

FORUM GUIDELINES:

"If your attacks comes with no substance, are vulgar, or it seems that all you add to the forum is attacks on people who disagree with you, you put yourself at risk for a ban period....."

what a BS ban! make me miss a great week of talking broncos football on the board. In the WPR forum we get extra leeway to rip on one another. What a crappy mod you are.