So who are you voting for? (President)

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by 24champ

It's moderate.

You just spend too much time obsessing over LABF and Roh's posts.

I do not even see one of the morons you listed the other well read about half of them..

but if you do not think this forum is way left then I guess your one of them..

and do not understand the word moderate..

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by Bacchus

I voted for Romney just to skew the poll.

do you really think folks voted correctly?

If so then I have some Ocean front property down the street from my house for sale..

PM me for the info..

The defense rests ..

How many others out there did the same thing..

At least he was honest about it..

[pricejj]

Originally Posted by baja

Actually "flat line" would be an improvement over what exists now.

This is why I say Mittens won the debate last night because he's cute. It's almost come down to that .


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy

I waited for all my adult life to vote for a candidate like Ron Paul. Every single election since 1996 I have voted for 'other'...this was to be my big year. Alas, Ron Paul couldn't sniff the ballot.

In any fight, it is most important to fend off that threat which presents the biggest danger first. In a fight for freedom in the U.S., that threat would be further enslavement in the form of Obamacare and skyrocketing debt.

Does Romney make a difference, in the end? That remains to be seen. However, we have all seen what Obama stands for, which is a big departure from the ideals that the U.S. was founded on.

[Bronco Yoda]

Originally Posted by BroncoMan4ever

Unless this is the Palin you are talking about

Perhaps I need to give her a second look... and a third... fourth. She's looking better all the time now

[orinjkrush]

already voted. couldn't gag myself enough to vote R or D.

voted every independent candidate I could choose.

except for one. Skrew the Repug corrupt nominating process, I wrote in for Ron Paul because, damn it , he is the best one out there. by far.

[sisterhellfyre]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

I've got to see that movie.

Me too. I just added it to my Netflix list expressly so I can watch it on election night.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Obama is leading the poll - on a far-right-leaning football board.

Interesting.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

I've got to see that movie.

It's definitely a must-see.

[IHaveALight]

Originally Posted by baja

We are bankrupt. The only think keeping us afloat is the dollar for oil policy and our military backing that up. You don't think we went into Iraq for humanitarian or WMD reasons do you?

Any other entity on the planet in the financial position the US government is in would be in receivership.

Bingo and that's why Syria and Iran are next.

[24champ]

Originally Posted by lonestar

I do not even see one of the morons you listed the other well read about half of them..

but if you do not think this forum is way left then I guess your one of them..

and do not understand the word moderate..

You guessed wrong but then again you are a far right wing moonbat, everyone is to the left of you.

[Cito Pelon]

Obama, because that's the best chance for bi-partisan compromise.

[Cito Pelon]

I figure both sides have valid points and both sides have to make some compromises. I'm seeing the GOP as the obstructionists to any kind of compromise, even when some of their leaders really want compromise.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by 24champ

You guessed wrong but then again you are a far right wing moonbat, everyone is to the left of you.

QFT.

[Play2win]

Originally Posted by TonyR

I'm always glad to see that some other people get it. Sadly, there aren't enough who do. Obama has been a disappointment, and we're not happy with him. But the alternative is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

co-sign.

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by Cito Pelon

Obama, because that's the best chance for bi-partisan compromise.

So they guy with a terrible track record working across the aisle is better than the guy who worked with successfully a Democratic legislature as Gov. of MA?

Got it.

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

Obama is leading the poll - on a far-right-leaning football board.

Interesting.

Far right, huh?

Have you polled everyone here on their political leanings? If no, then you have no idea.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

Far right, huh?

Have you polled everyone here on their political leanings? If no, then you have no idea.

No polling required - 10 years of reading their posts is more than enough evidence.

[Cito Pelon]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

So they guy with a terrible track record working across the aisle is better than the guy who worked with successfully a Democratic legislature as Gov. of MA?

Got it.

Please.

[Obushma]

If you were a fan of Ron Paul, just remember, a vote for Romney, is a vote against Ron Paul and Liberty.

[Drek]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

So they guy with a terrible track record working across the aisle is better than the guy who worked with successfully a Democratic legislature as Gov. of MA?

Got it.

Over 800 vetoes issued, over 700 over them overruled by the state senate and house.

He put through one piece of bipartisan legislature, a healthcare bill that the GOP now demonizes as the single biggest act of socialism ever on the national level. Other than that he was an ineffective governor who repeatedly tried to dictate terms to a democratic majority and got rebuffed repeatedly.

[barryr]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

So they guy with a terrible track record working across the aisle is better than the guy who worked with successfully a Democratic legislature as Gov. of MA?

Got it.

Romney has a track record of balancing budgets while Obama given 4 years, still hasn't much less ever did before becoming president. The bottom line is Obama has shown a serious lack of knowledge of history, especially about the military, and clueless about the economy. And his advisers to such matters know even less. This is the most under-qualified admin. in modern history and the results show it.

[SoCalBronco]

Since I live in a deep blue state, I can just vote as I want to (Huntsman write-in). If I lived in a true purple state, I would have a very tough decision to make. Thankfully, I don't have to make it.

[Harvitz81]

Originally Posted by SoCalBronco

Since I live in a deep blue state, I can just vote as I want to (Huntsman write-in). If I lived in a true purple state, I would have a very tough decision to make. Thankfully, I don't have to make it.

This is how my vote ultimately was decided. I live in Cali too and just filled out my ballot today voting for Johnson. If I lived in a swing state I more than likely would have voted Obama.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

[Bacchus]

Originally Posted by barryr

Romney has a track record of balancing budgets while Obama given 4 years, still hasn't much less ever did before becoming president. The bottom line is Obama has shown a serious lack of knowledge of history, especially about the military, and clueless about the economy. And his advisers to such matters know even less. This is the most under-qualified admin. in modern history and the results show it.

So how did Massachusetts do compared with other states? As the Obama campaign has repeatedly noted, Massachusetts ranked 47th out of 50 states over the entirety of Romney’s four years as governor in terms of job creation. By comparison, Massachusetts ranked 37th in job growth under Swift, and it ranked 10th in Patrick’s first term.

By that measure, Romney had the worst record in a decade.


http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/rom...best-or-worst/