Three New Likely Voter Polls

[Jetmeck]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Romney is a liar, a huckster, and a flim flam man. That doesn't mean he can't attract voters, however.

Actually and unfortunately that says a lot about the people in this country. They have short memories of which party and what policies put us in this situation and they are very uninformed.

[Jetmeck]

Originally Posted by Mecklomaniac

Just using the only state polls published since the debate..... Cherry picking would be going back and using old polls just because the old data looks better for Obama....

Election is a lot closer than you leftists think. Think you will be shocked by the only poll that counts in Nov.

You want to be hard headed and ass to boot.

He means what you know he means but being a dumbass righty you don't want to admit to picking only certain polls that are right leaning to begin with.

Take all the polls and average and you will see the truth. Your still ****ed..........................

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by Jetmeck

Actually and unfortunately that says a lot about the people in this country. They have short memories of which party and what policies put us in this situation and they are very uninformed.

I imagine the majority of Americans couldn't even tell you what happened.

[Mecklomaniac]

Originally Posted by Requiem

And interestingly enough those who follow polling and their methodologies seriously know that Rasmussen, Gravis and We Ask America are the most well-known establishments from Republican leaning bias. Just like the PPP is biased towards Democrats. This is something you conveniently ignore.

Speaking of left wing biased PPP. New post debate poll from them today. Wisconsin is down to a 2 point Obama lead. Just two weeks ago PPP had Obama +7

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/m...wisconsin.html

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Romney is a liar, a huckster, and a flim flam man. That doesn't mean he can't attract voters, however.

might be taking a hint from nobamas 08 campaign.. it seemed to work then..

hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change

and you morons bought it..

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by lonestar

might be taking a hint from nobamas 08 campaign.. it seemed to work then..

hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change
hope and change

and you morons bought it..

I guess Obama didn't plan on having to deal with the worst Congress in history. And I'm not just making that up. A group of historians say this one wins the title. I wish we had a fourth estate left in this country that could point this out to the people, but we don't. Obama is an average president following the worst president in our history. Extremism just doesn't work in a republic. I guess we just have to suffer through it until the Right figures that out and stops putting these little whacked out zealots in office.

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

I guess Obama didn't plan on having to deal with the worst Congress in history. And I'm not just making that up. A group of Democratic historians say this one wins the title. I wish we had a fourth estate left in this country that could point this out to the people, but we don't. Obama is an average president following the worst president in our history. Extremism just doesn't work in a republic. I guess we just have to suffer through it until the Right figures that out and stops putting these little whacked out zealots in office.

fixed that for you. Iirc he had both the house and senate from his own party the first two years.

Should have been able to change a lot more.

But go ahead and believe your fellow progressives about what they believe.

I do not care.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by lonestar

fixed that for you. Iirc he had both the house and senate from his own party the first two years.

Should have been able to change a lot more.

But go ahead and believe your fellow progressives about what they believe.

I do not care.

Let's keep things real here:

You are a POS who supports TRAITORS who destroyed the U.S. economy and subsequently, for entirely political reasons, used all means at their disposal to obstruct recovery efforts.

Therefore, your status here is lower than whale sh*t, and your credibility is null and void.

Your best play right now would be to just STFU and go away.

[lonestar]

let me guess another cartoon for the cartoon dilrod..

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by lonestar

let me guess another cartoon for the cartoon dilrod..

You put people on ignore so you can try to guess what they're saying every time they post, and I'm the "dilrod?"

Like so many of your Fox News lemming friends, you're too mentally handicapped to even realize you have a handicap.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by lonestar

fixed that for you. Iirc he had both the house and senate from his own party the first two years.

Should have been able to change a lot more.

But go ahead and believe your fellow progressives about what they believe.

I do not care.

You obviously don't know how Congress works. For one thing, you need a super majority if you want to bulldoze the opposition (or end a filibuster, or cloture debate). Of course, if you do that, you pay down the road. Like George Washington said, the whole operating principle behind our government is "accommodation." Bulldozing opponents breeds enemies, although it doesn't appear that McConnell or Boehner give a damn about the old manners.

Obama only had a supermajority in the Senate for seven weeks, from the time Franken was sworn in to the time Ted Kennedy died. And since Kennedy couldn't even participate the last few months of his life, that supermajority was only on paper. I think Byrd was also unable to show up during that period of time. He never had a supermajority in the House. You need a percentage of 67. Obama never had better than 59.

Romney goes around the country claiming Obama had "...a supermajority for two years and didn't get anything done." It's just another of his flat-out lies.

[Requiem]

Lonestar doesn't know much of anything.

[lonestar]

I see mr 47% has most likely jerked off another fellow liberal.

[barryr]

The liberals need those that won't vote for Obama to stay home and not vote, plus make sure like they are trying right now to see the overseas military vote won't count, and make sure as few states as possible have laws that limit people to only voting once.

[lonestar]

Originally Posted by barryr

The liberals need those that won't vote for Obama to stay home and not vote, plus make sure like they are trying right now to see the overseas military vote won't count, and make sure as few states as possible have laws that limit people to only voting once.

for that matter that those dead voters do not show up and vote straight/stiff dumocrat ticket..

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Requiem

Lonestar doesn't know much of anything.

Including the fact that he doesn't know much of anything - which is what makes him such an embarrassment.

[TonyR]

Over the next few days, post-debate polls could show Romney taking a narrow lead in states like Virginia, Colorado, or Florida. But to know whether Romney has upset the president's Electoral College advantage, follow the polls in Ohio, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Iowa. If Obama retains his lead in Wisconsin and Ohio, then Romney needs to win both Nevada and Iowa to win the presidency. If Romney can fight back in Ohio, then Obama leads in Nevada and Iowa would allow him to prevail with any additional state, like Ohio, Colorado, or Virginia, where the polls will probably still show an extremely tight race. But if Obama retains a clear edge in Ohio, Nevada, and Iowa, then the Romney campaign still has much more work to do.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate/...conceding-ohio

[DBruleU]

Of the 4 tracking polls today, Romney gained in 3/4 of them. RCP avg. now Romney +1.5%

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

[Requiem]

If I ever have a chance to fart on Mitt Romney, I will. A hard queef.

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by Requiem

If I ever have a chance to fart on Mitt Romney, I will. A hard queef.

I always figured you had a vagina.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

I always figured you had a vagina.

That would explain your animosity toward him.

[BroncoInferno]

The new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll shows Romney made some gains in Virginia and Ohio. He's up 1% in VA, a three point swing from the previous poll (kind of a modest gain here since this poll and the previous are within the margin of error). In Ohio, he's still down 6 points (2 point improvement), though there's some statistical variariation in the poll that the article explains. It could be a couple of points closer there. Florida is basically the same. Obama still up one point there:

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2...ite&ocid=msnhp

[TonyR]

Mr. Romney continues to rocket forward in our projections. The forecast model now gives him about a one-in-three chance of winning the Electoral College (more specifically, a 32.1 percent chance), his highest figure since Aug. 22 and more than double his chances from before the debate. Mr. Romney may have increased his chances of becoming president by 15 or 20 percent based on one night in Denver.

The more troubling sign for Mr. Romney, however, is that although he’s made gains, he does not seem to have taken the lead in very many state polls. That trend, if anything, has become more entrenched.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...ing-right-now/

[Old Dude]

I didn't bother watching the debate, but whatever Romney did, he sure gained a lot of momentum. It's like watching someone convert on a third and fifteen in the final 5 minutes of the game.