2016: Obama's America

[ant1999e]

[barryr]

The liberals have spent far more time investigating any and all republicans than they ever have Obama. The reality is they know the guy is shady, but they don't want to know all about him for fear they will find out things that even they couldn't support, so better to help him hide those things in his past and instead attack any of his opponents. The goal for liberals isn't what is best for the country. It is all about power and keeping it so they can get their warped, nutty agendas passed.

[Rohirrim]

Keep flinging the ****. Some of it is bound to stick.

[Rohirrim]

"Our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost." Dinesh D'Souza

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by Rohirrim

Keep flinging the ****. Some of it is bound to stick.

The irony...

Bet you didn't watch it.

[barryr]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

The irony...

Bet you didn't watch it.

Of course the liberals won't watch it. Truths about Obama are inconvenient and don't fit what they want all of us to believe about him. They have spent more time about Romney's dog and McCain's temper than they ever have Obama's entire life. They believe Obama is so popular yet hard to find an unbiased poll where he even gets 50% approval or support. Yeah, he's been such a uniter as he promised.

[ant1999e]

Originally Posted by barryr

Of course the liberals won't watch it. Truths about Obama are inconvenient and don't fit what they want all of us to believe about him. They have spent more time about Romney's dog and McCain's temper than they ever have Obama's entire life. They believe Obama is so popular yet hard to find an unbiased poll where he even gets 50% approval or support. Yeah, he's been such a uniter as he promised.

The movie has a very good explanation for why they won't ask questions.

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

The irony...

Bet you didn't watch it.

I've seen plenty of D'Souza's schtick. You think anybody on here is going to waste an hour and a half on that nutjob? Even the American Spectator called his bs a "ridiculous conspiracy theory." I did enjoy watching Hitchins take D'Souza apart in a debate, though.

You really believe that bs? A daddy Obama never met rules his life through invisible powers? No wonder this country is so ****ed up. Like the Australian Deputy PM, half the ****ing country has gone whackadoodle.

[W*GS]

Just pure agitprop porno for the Right.

[Jetmeck]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

The irony...

Bet you didn't watch it.

I did...after the fourth or fifth lie and the third assumption of this idiot I puked.

This guy couldn't connect the dots even as a kid........and this applies to the film maker and this turd I quoted.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by barryr

Of course the liberals won't watch it..

Yeah, can you believe that?

After all, it's not like the right has some sort of credibility problem, or something.

/sarcasm

[Kid A]

Lolololol. Remember Focus on the Family's '08 Letter from Obama's America in (dun dun dun) 2012!? Sooo prescient! How did they know!?

http://www.wnd.com/files/Focusletter.pdf

So here is a picture of the changes that are likely or at least very possible if Senator Obama is elected and the far-Left segments of the Democratic Party gain control of the White House...

The Boy Scouts no longer exist as an organization. They chose to disband rather than be forced to obey the Supreme Court decision that they would have to hire homosexual scoutmasters and allow them to sleep in tents with young boys.

There are no more Roman Catholic or evangelical Protestant adoption agencies in the United States.

The Bible can no longer be freely preached over radio or television stations

homosexuals are now given special bonuses for enlisting in military service

Tens of thousands of young churches suddenly had no place to meet when the Supreme Court ruled that public schools in all 50 states had to stop allowing churches to rent their facilities — even on Sundays

the government now funds Medicaid abortions for any reason

television programs at all hours of the day contain explicit portrayals of sexual acts

It is illegal for private citizens to own guns for self defense

Since 2009, terrorist bombs have exploded in two large and two small U.S. cities, killing hundreds, and the entire country is fearful, for no place seems safe.

Iran launched a nuclear bomb that exploded in the middle of Tel Aviv, destroying much of that city. They then demanded that Israel cede huge amounts of territory to the Palestinians, and after an anguished all-night Cabinet meeting, Israel’s prime minister agreed. Israel is reduced to a much smaller country, hardly able to defend itself, and its future remains uncertain.

the U.S. government is the provider of all health care in the United States, following the pattern of nationalized medicine in the United Kingdom and Canada.

people older than 80 have essentially no access to hospitals or surgical procedures

The amount of income subject to Social Security tax has nearly doubled.

Several industries are completely unionized, and prices of goods produced by those industries have shot up as a result.

Conservative talk radio, for all intents and purposes, was shut down by the end of 2010.

Dozens of Bush officials, from the Cabinet level on down, are in jail, and most of them are also bankrupt from legal costs.

[L.A. BRONCOS FAN]

Originally Posted by Kid A

They say that like it's a bad thing.

[nyuk nyuk]

At least this election cycle we aren't deluged with the cult of personality **** again.

[Jetmeck]

Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk

At least this election cycle we aren't deluged with the cult of personality **** again.

What you mean, remmeber a song that went like that ?


You know if you think that finger waggin biatch in your avatar is cool you got a lot more problems than I suspected.

She would not have done that if he was white and if somebody did that to Bush your head would have exploded.

It's disrespectful period and his office deserves respect and you know it.

[nyuk nyuk]

Originally Posted by Jetmeck

What you mean, remmeber a song that went like that ?


You know if you think that finger waggin biatch in your avatar is cool you got a lot more problems than I suspected.

She would not have done that if he was white and if somebody did that to Bush your head would have exploded.

It's disrespectful period and his office deserves respect and you know it.

And the day I listen to a group of people who referred to GW Bush as a chimpanzee his entire tenure in office is the day I listen to manufactured outrage about a woman with a finger in the air. For that one, you can kiss my ass.

Secondly, yes, a song did go like that. During the 2008 campaign I was reminded of that song many times. The clown even hired swooning women for ****'s sake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0

EDIT: This one also reminded me of the Obama campaign:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgvGjAhvIw

[elsid13]

I heard Obama number #1 priority is to make us all wear tiger stripped snuggies, make a mullet the only haircut allowed in the US and replace the The Star-Spangled Banner with Bobby Brown's theme to Ghostbuster's II

[Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk

And the day I listen to a group of people who referred to GW Bush as a chimpanzee his entire tenure in office is the day I listen to manufactured outrage about a woman with a finger in the air. For that one, you can kiss my ass.

An insult to chimps.

[BroncoInferno]

That fact that ant posted this BS proves he's just another fringe right-wing lunatic. D'Souza was long ago proved a fraud. I watched this crap for ****s and giggles a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, Obama's pappy who he barely knew is driving force behind his ideology, despite ZERO evidence to support that belief. Please. There's not a single fact in there, just the same old racist BS rehashed. Lunatic nincompoops like barryr will lap it up, of course.

[barryr]

Originally Posted by BroncoInferno

That fact that ant posted this BS proves he's just another fringe right-wing lunatic. D'Souza was long ago proved a fraud. I watched this crap for ****s and giggles a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, Obama's pappy who he barely knew is driving force behind his ideology, despite ZERO evidence to support that belief. Please. There's not a single fact in there, just the same old racist BS rehashed. Lunatic nincompoops like barryr will lap it up, of course.

, butt hurt as they say apparently. When you have the uncontrolled impulse to constantly follow me around in threads just to post insults then I know you've lost. In an idiot liberals' mind, anything they don't like or agree with is "proven" to be wrong or a fraud. D'Souza dared to try to find out more about Obama while Obama supporters would rather deal with Romney's dog since they are afraid what would be found out about Obama. Obama has been president for almost 4 years and the liberal media still does little to find out about Obama and just takes his word when they rarely do that with anyone else, especially anyone that doesn't have a "d" by their name.

[BroncoInferno]

Originally Posted by barryr

, butt hurt as they say apparently. When you have the uncontrolled impulse to constantly follow me around in threads just to post insults then I know you've lost. In an idiot liberals' mind, anything they don't like or agree with is "proven" to be wrong or a fraud. D'Souza dared to try to find out more about Obama while Obama supporters would rather deal with Romney's dog since they are afraid what would be found out about Obama. Obama has been president for almost 4 years and the liberal media still does little to find out about Obama and just takes his word when they rarely do that with anyone else, especially anyone that doesn't have a "d" by their name.

Do you know what a "fact" is? I'll help:

fact[fakt]
noun
1.
something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact?s=t

D'Souza does not use "facts" in his presentation. He makes assertions about Obama's beliefs based on the history of a father whom he barely knew, and offers little of substance from Obama's own life to support that assertion. You see, when you make assertions that you can't support with facts, that's called "paranoia." That's called being a "conspiracy theorist."

Instead of your usual garbage, why don't you present a case using actual facts that proves D'Souza's assertions? You wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face.

Come to think of it, this is the problem with right-wingers in general. They don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact."

[DBruleU]

Originally Posted by BroncoInferno

Do you know what a "fact" is? I'll help:



http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact?s=t

D'Souza does not use "facts" in his presentation. He makes assertions about Obama's beliefs based on the history of a father whom he barely knew, and offers little of substance from Obama's own life to support that assertion. You see, when you make assertions that you can't support with facts, that's called "paranoia." That's called being a "conspiracy theorist."

Instead of your usual garbage, why don't you present a case using actual facts that proves D'Souza's assertions? You wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face.

Come to think of it, this is the problem with right-wingers in general. They don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact."

You could probably just watch the movie and answer your own questions. To simply say that D'Souza uses nothing in Obamas own life to support questions that D'Souza raises shows clearly you have not seen it. There are plenty of "facts" about Obamas past and present decisions he has made in the documentary.

[BroncoInferno]

Originally Posted by DBruleU

You could probably just watch the movie and answer your own questions. To simply say that D'Souza uses nothing in Obamas own life to support questions that D'Souza raises shows clearly you have not seen it. There are plenty of "facts" about Obamas past and present decisions he has made in the documentary.

No, there are not. Just more of that recycled Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers guilt-by-association crap. A "fact" would be showing an actual policy Obama has championed that fits the profile D'Souza is trying to push. He doesn't do it. Because it isn't there. Like I said, you right-wingers don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact," as you prove yet again.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by ant1999e

Did you just post a pirated copy of a movie?

[houghtam]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Did you just post a pirated copy of a movie?