![]() |
|
|
#151 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
Would even be sweeter IF Tebow becomes Jet starting Qb , and takes that team to the Playoffs. Last edited by Raider9175; 07-20-2012 at 07:13 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
The Bronco talent is by far the weakest overall in the division(No I'm not saying they don't have top talent in certain position) Just overall talent. Everyone in the division plays the same schedule. (tough schedule) Just two games are different. Those two games are big. Denver see the Patriot and the Texans. While everyone else get a little better matchup. 10 games will win the AFc West. I think Raiders and chiefs will both make the playoffs in 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
The Broncos have at best the third best rushing attack in the division. 1 Raiders. 2 Chiefs 3 Denver. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
The other Chargers and Denver will be batlling for last place.(not the division) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#155 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
OK got it. I guess all the talent left Indy when Manning went down last year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
JMO It will be a great year for Broncos if they win 8 games in 2012. DJ Williams and Dumberville(probably facing a suspension) missing some games. isn't going to hurt the defense. Last edited by Raider9175; 07-20-2012 at 07:51 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,317
|
Quote:
DJ is solid but unspectacular. He isn't a major loss in any way. As for Manning's weapons: In 2010 the Colts were an elite offense and made it to the Super Bowl. Manning relied heavily on an aging Wayne, two guys everyone agrees lived off of Manning's ability to coach them up (Garcon and Collie), and after losing Dallas Clark early in the season Jacob Tamme emerged as a major target at the TE position. The loss of Clark took away the versatility of his 12 personnel sets as well, Manning's favorite base to work out of. His running backs were the elite tandem of Addai and Brown. Now in Denver he's got the TE he did so well with in 2010 (Tamme) along with a far better #2 (Dreeeeessssseeeeen), and a #3 who has real receiving potential (Julius Thomas). Better TE corps all around than what he actually played within 2010. At WR both Decker and Thomas are more talented than Garcon or Collie. One of them needs to step up and be the reliable weapon that Reggie Wayne has been for Manning, but from a raw tools standpoint Decker is a great comp (excellent short range quickness, tight routes, works great in the short to intermediate area) not to mention bigger and stronger. Thomas gives Manning the first truly elite speed threat he's had since Harrison got done, while Thomas is also another bigger, stronger option than what Manning has ever had before. At RB the Broncos have McGahee, a far more proven and consistent runner than anyone Manning had in Indy since James left. Behind him is Moreno who when healthy had a first two years every bit the equal of Addai's first two, in a far worse offense in nearly every way. Then after that is Ronnie Hillman who has real X factor potential at the RB spot, giving far better depth than Indy ever offered Manning. The OL is obviously better at every position except C over what Manning played with in 2010. The OL is also young and improving year to year even without Manning. Also, Manning isn't changing offenses, he's bringing his offense with him, while Fox and Magazu keep the power running game they built for 12 personnel as the season went on in tact. As for overall team talent, I'd put the Broncos roster up against anyone's in the division. There are a lot of talented players on this roster, and Denver clearly has the divisional market on playmakers on either side of the ball cornered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Tetons!
Posts: 19,299
Adopt-a-Bronco: WorrellWilliams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Tetons!
Posts: 19,299
Adopt-a-Bronco: WorrellWilliams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,814
|
The chefs are going to have a tough defense this year maybe the best unit in the division offense or defense. If Cassel plays well I could see them taking the division, but that won't happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 | |
|
President of the Universe
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Highlands Ranch
Posts: 14,959
Adopt-a-Bronco: Joel Dreesen |
Quote:
Also, work on your subject-verb agreement a little bit, dude. I'm sure most 3rd graders could conclude that the loss of two good players would, in fact, hurt a defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
|
10-6 baby.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,851
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Is there someway to sticky this post or maybe put it in this raider guys sig. Making him see his own post after we are going for title and his team is not... Please mods. This needs to be done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
10-6 baby.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,851
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
Here is the clincher with all that you still only finished 8-8. Peyton Manning isn't improving the WR, the RB, or the Oline that gave up 42 sacks in a team that was all run. Again only team that should be any competition for the Raiders is the chiefs.(two team race for the division). BTw The funniest part the Bronco fans think they have a good defense. It's garbage. The Raiders offense put up over 400 yards on that tough defense(cough cough). That was with a QB just off his couch, didn't know the offense, the plays , and didn't have any timing down with his wr corps.. Now imagine what a guy who more comfortable with the offense and his wr corp can do. Yea that Bronco defense scares me- not. Last edited by Raider9175; 07-20-2012 at 12:02 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
We shall see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#166 | |
|
Seasoned Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
How effective is the hurry up going to be when Peyton manning doesn't have the same chemistry with the Bronco receivers, he had with the Colts wr. Raiders have safeties that can easily take out the Bronco Te's. The Broncos defense is not stopping the Raiders offense . Too much on offense for the Bronco defense to handle. Neither of the Broncos two impact players (Doom and V miller) scare me. Raiders exploit the undersized doom every time in the running game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,061
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Champ Bailey owns Carson Palmer. Absolutely owns him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Famer of Rings
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lake Forest, Orange County, Calif.
Posts: 18,475
Adopt-a-Bronco: Simon Fletcher |
Yeah, what happens when McFadden is sidelined for the umpteenth time, inexperienced TE trying to get open and Heyward-Bey dropping balls left and right? Good luck with the optimism. I wonder what you posted on your Raider sites every year since your SB run. All Super Bowl talk and nothing but 11 or more losses. Then of course comes the excuses. You are a typical, myopic Raiders fan. You bring out the stereotype to a "T". Congratulations.
BTW, not sure when Denver last beat the Faiders in Denver but I do remember Shanahan calling the timout to kicker the druggie and it worked. You b****es cried "He cheated! BS play!" Then you guys pull it off with the same play the very next week and not one peep from the Faider crowd. Last edited by broncocalijohn; 07-20-2012 at 02:03 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,372
|
Quote:
How does that work? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,372
|
Chump Bailey owns nothing... Do you see my avatar? That's Porter IN DENVER and who is that behind him - walking away - sad...
Who is.. Who... Who is that...? CHUMP BAILEY?!?!? Nooooo..... And that's Porter? Who was Porters QB? What...? That fat kid... What was his name? I will say this - Porter sucked - JaSuckass well - look at his name... We have McFadden and the best WR's in the AFC West... We will make Chump Bailey look his tired ass age!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 | |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,061
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
|
6-37, Raider fans.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ceti Alpha V
Posts: 41,061
Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
John Foneco !!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sooner Country
Posts: 20,604
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
10-6 baby.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,851
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
I still cannot see how the faid think they have the best wr in the division.
DHB- stone hands, getting stoned and dui. All he can do is run fast and drop balls. Not good. Denarius Moore- Good WR, fast, can run routes and make catches. Solid Guy here. Jacoby Ford- Another fast guy, small, easy to re-route but can catch. - Another eddie royal. Average to slightly above average. Louis Murphy- I actually really like him, but hes always hurt, possesion wr. Chaz Schillenz- big, strong, similar to marshall but hes always hurt. Does he even play for the raiders anymore? The rest of the guys are all unproven or rookies not worth mentioning. Cheifs have Bowe- who is better than any WR the raiders have and one of the best in the division, possibly a top 20 in the league. Baldwin- Super talented diva. But he has a case of the dropsies. Not nearly as chronic, well actually he is, he is like DHB-fast and drops balls- only better. Devon wylie- this is a rookie who is worthy of praise. Wes Welker type of guy. Breaston-big guy, nothing fancy but solid. Id say close to chaz in terms of production availability Bolts: Meachum- Id take him over DHB anyday, not as fast, but he can catch, which is what a receiver does. He receives the football. He also can break tackles when he runs Royal- Like a jacoby ford only slower, better route runner but also gets re-routed easily. About equal M80- Malcom floyd, big fast explosive...Like DHB only he can catch but imo not all that talented. He is no Denarious but hes not that bad. Broncos: DT- Its between him and Bowe as the best WR in the division. DT is bigger than all of them, faster than most of them and stronger than all. He gets dinged up though and has not shown what he can do with a QB yet. More or less an unknown. Decker- Big, strong, had a few easy drops, but only credited with 4. I know I would, but I am bias, but I have a feeling the other teams (bolts and chefs) would take him over DHB. Id say Decker is equivalent to Denarius Moore. Different type of player obviously, but number wise close. Caldwell- Hes fast, surprised the raiders didnt draft him. I have no clue. As of now, the nod goes to DHB over caldwell. With manning I would not be surprised to see that change. Stokley- old but still quick. Best slot guy in division, but now that age has caught up with him id say no. That would go to royal if hes there or ford, if they put him there Then we have TEs: Bolts- Gates and homandnoulamuanau (best set by far) Chefs- Moeki and boss?- Solid- very solid, and proven. broncos- tamme and dressen- solid and proven- equal to chefs, but below the chargers Raiders- who and who? Myers and assbergers?---NOT a F'ING CHANCE! How exactly do the raiders have the best wr in the division? Someone not an idiot raider fan explain to me, please. PS- Here is the typical raider response....These guys have all the potential in the world, they are bigger than big and faster than fast. They leap tall buildings in a single bound and impregnant women just by looking at them. Yes, we know, all potential means is that you can Not do something. If you could it wouldnt be potential. It would be proven, success, done, something that the raiders know nothing about yet always try to preach. |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | |
|
President of the Universe
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Highlands Ranch
Posts: 14,959
Adopt-a-Bronco: Joel Dreesen |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|