The Chiefs suck - Page 22 - The Orange Mane

Bronco Rob · 07-06-2012, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Yes, memories. Indeed.

I was at that game sitting in the north stand second row from the top. Funny how history forgets that the Broncos had the 28th ranked defense that year. They had to coax Dennis Smith and Karl Mecklenburg out of retirement. Elway didn't lose that game Randy Hilliard did when he blew the one assignment he had by letting let Fumble Anders get out of bounds on that last drive.

It helps when you know what you're talking about.

UltimateHoboW/Shotgun · 07-06-2012, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore

Mute point...lol

Burn.

Bronco Rob · 07-06-2012, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

The talent on the Elways teams was clearly enough to make it to the SB, so quit crying about it. Elway couldn't get it done in the big game until his 15th season.
Montana was clutch for 2 teams. He beat Elway at his own game as a Niner and as a Chief.
And he had 2 come from behind wins in the playoffs as a Chief. He's the most clutch QB ever.

Hanna Montana was so clutch that Bill Walsh traded for Steve Young in 1987. He was so clutch that they dumped his ass like trash and stole a first round draft pick from kansas city in the process. Mean while the 9ers go on to win another ring sans Hanna Montana Steve Young breaking all his single game records.

Hanna takes over a chefs team that made the playoffs the season prior at (10-6) goes 8-3 in eleven starts the chefs finish (11-5). The biggest offseason acquisition wasn't Hanna, it was the player voted the teams MVP who scored more touchdowns than montana..His name?

Marcus Allen.

WTG Hanna you led the chefs to one more victory than Dave Krieg!

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bronco Rob

Hanna Montana was so clutch that Bill Walsh traded for Steve Young in 1987. He was so clutch that they dumped his ass like trash and stole a first round draft pick from kansas city in the process. Mean while the 9ers go on to win another ring sans Hanna Montana Steve Young breaking all his single game records.

Hanna takes over a chefs team that made the playoffs the season prior at (10-6) goes 8-3 in eleven starts the chefs finish (11-5). The biggest offseason acquisition wasn't Hanna, it was the player voted the teams MVP who scored more touchdowns than montana..His name?

Marcus Allen.

WTG Hanna you led the chefs to one more victory than Dave Krieg!

Trying to make fun of Joe Montana is hilarious. What's even more hilarious is you trying so hard to do it.

Never lost a SB and was as clutch as clutch can be. And it's likely Manning won't do much more than Tebow did with the Broncos. Not with his daddy (Bill Belicheck) around.

cutthemdown · 07-06-2012, 09:46 PM

Montana one of the best QBS of all time. To say otherwise a joke. Who cares he had a great team he was simply put amazing. Just shows what a QB can mean. Chiefs got him on tail end of career and still almost got to the Superbowl with him. What Chiefs have at QB IMO is one big group of average signal callers. They will shuffle them in an out probably again this yr hoping for a spark that never comes.

mwill07 · 07-06-2012, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Lol... "not since 1994, anyways"... between 1994 and now, StL has won 4 pennants and 2 world series...Royals have done neither (not to mention a Superbowl win and an additional Superbowl appearance for the Rams).

I could be wrong, but I really doubt folks in StL are still bitter about a 27 year old loss the same way Browns fans are.

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwill07

Lol... "not since 1994, anyways"... between 1994 and now, StL has won 4 pennants and 2 world series...Royals have done neither (not to mention a Superbowl win and an additional Superbowl appearance for the Rams).

I could be wrong, but I really doubt folks in StL are still bitter about a 27 year old loss the same way Browns fans are.

Um yes. Cardinals fans are very bitter and never let it go, especially when they play the Royals.

And this is coming from a Cardinals fan.

Bronco Rob · 07-06-2012, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutthemdown

Montana one of the best QBS of all time. To say otherwise a joke. Who cares he had a great team he was simply put amazing. Just shows what a QB can mean. Chiefs got him on tail end of career and still almost got to the Superbowl with him. What Chiefs have at QB IMO is one big group of average signal callers. They will shuffle them in an out probably again this yr hoping for a spark that never comes.

Bradshaw one of the best QBS of all time. To say otherwise a joke. Who cares he had a great team he was simply put amazing. Just shows what a QB can mean.

Stuck in Cali · 07-06-2012, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Um yes. Cardinals fans are very bitter and never let it go, especially when they play the Royals.

And this is coming from a Cardinals fan.

But history doesn't mean jack ****.

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuck in Cali

But history doesn't mean jack ****.

Your attempt at being funny is a fail.
Your twisted usage of my posts is an even bigger fail.

Stuck in Cali · 07-06-2012, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Your attempt at being funny is a fail.
Your twisted usage of my posts is an even bigger fail.

Only thing that is fail, is the team your a fan of.

KCStud · 07-07-2012, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuck in Cali

Only thing that is fail, is the team your a fan of.

And who won the last time our two teams played? Oh that's right....

Stuck in Cali · 07-07-2012, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

And who won the last time our two teams played? Oh that's right....

, now that's pretty funny. Seriously though make up your mind if history matters or not.

crazyhorse · 07-07-2012, 02:24 AM

I cant believe you're comparing historical value of the team that invented the SB to a team that took 37 years to win one only after cheating.

Not only did we play in the 1st SB, we won the 4th. The very trophy you play for to win the AFC Championship has Lamar Hunts name on it for god sake.

Whats Bowlens history in comparison? A cheater and a drunk.

You guys really have a distorted view of what you really have in Denver. The rest of the league and the casual orangemane fan see things in a different way on many levels.

Same for the casual chiefs fans. But to come off like you invented football is a hard sell to someone thinking clearly.

I have enjoyed the thread as much as anyone. But lets not get stoopit.

DENVERDUI55 · 07-07-2012, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

And who won the last time our two teams played? Oh that's right....

Only a KC fan would use a season split and an ugly 7 to 3 win as ammo. What did that win land you? Combine warrior Poe?

CEH · 07-07-2012, 06:43 AM

Yea I'm not much for comparing history. What still sticks in my mind about the present day Chiefs was the epsiode on hard knocks where Peterson tells the team they are playing for the Lamar Hunt trohphy

That is all I need to know about the KC Chiefs. The AFC Championship is good enough for us

Drunken.Broncoholic · 07-07-2012, 08:44 AM

KCstud over the last 5 or so pages you have contradicted yourself several times. Quit talking about Joe Montana when you've littered this thread with posts saying history dont mean sh**

broncocalijohn · 07-07-2012, 09:48 AM

KCDud and now Crazyhorse need to come to the conclusion from the first page; Chiefs suck! We are not talking about 1 game or 1 season. We are talking about the entire franchise from almost the very beginning! Now maybe sucks is a little harsh but we are comparing the Chiefs to the Broncos and the feelings of the whole league. THEY HAVE NOT WON A PLAYOFF GAME SINCE 1993! Add they have not been to the Super Bowl in 40 years! 40 years!!!! Teams that joined the league after their last SB appearance have been in the SB. Seattle and Carolina to name 2.
Not too hard to do more of it before this thread but you guys are a joke. More so than your Chiefs team. I understand you want to stick up for the **** they call KC Chiefs but you are doing it wrong. By that I mean you open your mouth, you are wrong. This thread would have died if you didnt play a defensive lawyer.....that has failed. Judge and jury has seen the evidence. Chiefs are GUILTY of being the sucks and you have failed trying to convince Broncos fans otherwise.

Drunken.Broncoholic · 07-07-2012, 09:55 AM

LMAO broncocalijohn.

errand · 07-07-2012, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

And who won the last time our two teams played? Oh that's right....

Well, to be fair, we've kind of gotten use to reading "Orton causes Broncos loss vs. KC..." in the sports headlines

errand · 07-07-2012, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncocalijohn

THEY HAVE NOT WON A PLAYOFF GAME SINCE 1993! Add they have not been to the Super Bowl in 40 years! 40 years!!!! Teams that joined the league after their last SB appearance have been in the SB. Seattle and Carolina to name 2.
.

Tampa Bay is another....just saying. And when you take into consideration that several teams have played in or won numerous SB's too....well their suckage has reached epic proportions

WolfpackGuy · 07-07-2012, 10:55 AM

Before the Cheaps run of playoff appearances in the 90's, they only had two other playoff seasons as an NFL team.

1971 and 1986.

Talk about a drought.

Ouch.

sirhcyennek81 · 07-07-2012, 11:03 AM

I can tell football season is around the corner.

Chiefs fans are optimistic.

KCStud · 07-07-2012, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncocalijohn

KCDud and now Crazyhorse need to come to the conclusion from the first page; Chiefs suck! We are not talking about 1 game or 1 season. We are talking about the entire franchise from almost the very beginning! Now maybe sucks is a little harsh but we are comparing the Chiefs to the Broncos and the feelings of the whole league. THEY HAVE NOT WON A PLAYOFF GAME SINCE 1993! Add they have not been to the Super Bowl in 40 years! 40 years!!!! Teams that joined the league after their last SB appearance have been in the SB. Seattle and Carolina to name 2.
Not too hard to do more of it before this thread but you guys are a joke. More so than your Chiefs team. I understand you want to stick up for the **** they call KC Chiefs but you are doing it wrong. By that I mean you open your mouth, you are wrong. This thread would have died if you didnt play a defensive lawyer.....that has failed. Judge and jury has seen the evidence. Chiefs are GUILTY of being the sucks and you have failed trying to convince Broncos fans otherwise.

In the end, people care about one thing: how many SB's are in your trophy case.

Right now, you have 1 more. Enjoy it.

KCStud · 07-07-2012, 12:40 PM

How about we make a Bengals suck, Vikings suck, Browns suck, Chargers suck, Jets suck, Lions suck threads?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-06-2012, 09:46 PM	#530
cutthemdown A verbis ad verbera Zimm to HOF Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Long Beach Posts: 32,887	Montana one of the best QBS of all time. To say otherwise a joke. Who cares he had a great team he was simply put amazing. Just shows what a QB can mean. Chiefs got him on tail end of career and still almost got to the Superbowl with him. What Chiefs have at QB IMO is one big group of average signal callers. They will shuffle them in an out probably again this yr hoping for a spark that never comes.

07-07-2012, 02:24 AM	#539
crazyhorse All Motor!! You can only hope to contain me Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 7,338	I cant believe you're comparing historical value of the team that invented the SB to a team that took 37 years to win one only after cheating. Not only did we play in the 1st SB, we won the 4th. The very trophy you play for to win the AFC Championship has Lamar Hunts name on it for god sake. Whats Bowlens history in comparison? A cheater and a drunk. You guys really have a distorted view of what you really have in Denver. The rest of the league and the casual orangemane fan see things in a different way on many levels. Same for the casual chiefs fans. But to come off like you invented football is a hard sell to someone thinking clearly. I have enjoyed the thread as much as anyone. But lets not get stoopit.

07-07-2012, 06:43 AM	#541
CEH Ring of Famer Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,232	Yea I'm not much for comparing history. What still sticks in my mind about the present day Chiefs was the epsiode on hard knocks where Peterson tells the team they are playing for the Lamar Hunt trohphy That is all I need to know about the KC Chiefs. The AFC Championship is good enough for us

07-07-2012, 08:44 AM	#542
Drunken.Broncoholic Steppin on feet Pickled in Orange and Blue Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Carmel Ca Posts: 6,609 Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang	KCstud over the last 5 or so pages you have contradicted yourself several times. Quit talking about Joe Montana when you've littered this thread with posts saying history dont mean sh**

07-07-2012, 09:48 AM	#543
broncocalijohn Famer of Rings My Dog Richard Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Lake Forest, Orange County, Calif. Posts: 18,618 Adopt-a-Bronco: Simon Fletcher	KCDud and now Crazyhorse need to come to the conclusion from the first page; Chiefs suck! We are not talking about 1 game or 1 season. We are talking about the entire franchise from almost the very beginning! Now maybe sucks is a little harsh but we are comparing the Chiefs to the Broncos and the feelings of the whole league. THEY HAVE NOT WON A PLAYOFF GAME SINCE 1993! Add they have not been to the Super Bowl in 40 years! 40 years!!!! Teams that joined the league after their last SB appearance have been in the SB. Seattle and Carolina to name 2. Not too hard to do more of it before this thread but you guys are a joke. More so than your Chiefs team. I understand you want to stick up for the **** they call KC Chiefs but you are doing it wrong. By that I mean you open your mouth, you are wrong. This thread would have died if you didnt play a defensive lawyer.....that has failed. Judge and jury has seen the evidence. Chiefs are GUILTY of being the sucks and you have failed trying to convince Broncos fans otherwise.

07-07-2012, 09:55 AM	#544
Drunken.Broncoholic Steppin on feet Pickled in Orange and Blue Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Carmel Ca Posts: 6,609 Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang	LMAO broncocalijohn.

07-07-2012, 10:55 AM	#547
WolfpackGuy Call me, "Maybe" Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Delaware Posts: 5,694	Before the Cheaps run of playoff appearances in the 90's, they only had two other playoff seasons as an NFL team. 1971 and 1986. Talk about a drought. Ouch.

07-07-2012, 11:03 AM	#548
sirhcyennek81 Yes...swooping is bad... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Florence, Colorado Posts: 20,772 Adopt-a-Bronco: All of them.	I can tell football season is around the corner. Chiefs fans are optimistic.

07-07-2012, 12:40 PM	#550
KCStud Ring of Famer AmeriStanzi! Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 4,138 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	How about we make a Bengals suck, Vikings suck, Browns suck, Chargers suck, Jets suck, Lions suck threads?