The Chiefs suck - Page 21 - The Orange Mane

canadianbroncosfan · 07-06-2012, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Again, I don't give a **** about KC being terrible in the 70's and 80's. I didn't watch it every year so your point is mute.
And you motioning that KC's SB doesn't matter is laughable.

moot*

canadianbroncosfan · 07-06-2012, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Broncobiv

I tried to type a reply without being a grammar Nazi towards your use of the phrase "your point is mute." I failed. You're an idiot.

On a related point (the point about you being an idiot...see a theme here?), when did I say that the Chiefs Super Bowl didn't matter? I never said that. You were talking about Chiefs/Broncos postseason performances during your lifetime, so I kept my comments to that time-frame. Never mentioned your Super Bowl over 4 decades ago. That was "before your lifetime". Try re-reading my post again. Granted, re-reading it will probably do you no good due to your obvious lack of comprehension regarding the English language. But just for fun, please try agan.

God, I tried so freaking hard as well but I couldn't let it go. I can let bad grammar go most of the time but that is just a pet peeve of mine.

Tombstone RJ · 07-06-2012, 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Never said ignore the 80's. Again you fail to read. Just stop while you're ahead slappy.

I didn't "choose to focus on anything". I didn't watch the Chiefs in the 80's because I wasn't alive or I was too young to understand. What part of that do you not understand? Do I need to draw pictures for you like a small child?

I didn't go through the rough 20 years of never being competitive like morons like you seem to claim. In fact I saw the Chiefs go to the playoffs every year in the beginning.

So this whole concept of you thinking my team has completely sucked like the Royals and never were competitive enough to have a winning season in my lifetime is pure garbage.

Here is what you said moron:

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Again, I don't give a **** about KC being terrible in the 70's and 80's. I didn't watch it every year so your point is mute.
And you motioning that KC's SB doesn't matter is laughable.

What is the difference between choosing not to focus on the 80s teams and ignoring the 80s teams?

Please, explain that to me.

Now you are admiting you weren't alive in the 1980's so this is why you choose to ignore the 1980s and the 1970s, yet you still choose to remember the one SB win and Len Dawson, right?

You're a serious tard.

Kaylore · 07-06-2012, 08:47 AM

Mute point...lol

Ironlung · 07-06-2012, 09:24 AM

KCdud is a reeeeetard. If the roles were reversed, and it was Denver who hasn't won a SB since 69, and KC won two back to back in his lifetime he would be gloating all over the place....but since its kC who is so pathetic, then its no big deal.

DBroncos4life · 07-06-2012, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Again, I don't give a **** about KC being terrible in the 70's and 80's. I didn't watch it every year so your point is mute.
And you motioning that KC's SB doesn't matter is laughable.

So Broncos fans after 1990 don't have to worry about those SB losses?

broncosteven · 07-06-2012, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBroncos4life

So Broncos fans after 1990 don't have to worry about those SB losses?

If you just take 1997-1998 and throw everything else away we would be the greatest Franchise ever to play on the grid-iron.

Back to back SB's, League MVP, 2000 yard rusher, 26 wins, 7 playoff wins ETC...

DBroncos4life · 07-06-2012, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncosteven

If you just take 1997-1998 and throw everything else away we would be the greatest Franchise ever to play on the grid-iron.

Back to back SB's, League MVP, 2000 yard rusher, 26 wins, 7 playoff wins ETC...

I'm going to claim those are the only years I watched so I'm on board with this.

mwill07 · 07-06-2012, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

That's just Cleveland. If you mention Elway, MJ or LBJ you're in trouble.

Is there anyone in the universe that really hates anyone from KC though? KC has never prevented anyone from ever winning anything meaningful, not since 1994, anyways. Before you reference this thread, we are not talking about how we hate KC here... This is more about mocking futility.

Also, what do Elway, MJ, and LBJ all have in common?

broncocalijohn · 07-06-2012, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwill07

Also, what do Elway, MJ, and LBJ all have in common?

They all think KCDud is a complete moron?

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

Here is what you said moron:

What is the difference between choosing not to focus on the 80s teams and ignoring the 80s teams?

Please, explain that to me.

Now you are admiting you weren't alive in the 1980's so this is why you choose to ignore the 1980s and the 1970s, yet you still choose to remember the one SB win and Len Dawson, right?

You're a serious tard.

I said it in the post you moron. I didn't watch the 70's and 80's.
Why focus on those years when I didn't live them or watch the games?

And as I said multiple times, I was alive in the 80's. I was simply too young to understand what football was at the time.

I don't ignore the 70's or 80's. I just didn't live through it. When posters try to pull the "oh your Chiefs have always been a terrible franchise and you know all about suffering" it's hilarious because the Chiefs have actually had more winning seasons than not and I've seen them win playoff games. They aren't the Steelers by any means, but at the same time they aren't the Royals or Browns like this board motions that they are.

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwill07

Is there anyone in the universe that really hates anyone from KC though? KC has never prevented anyone from ever winning anything meaningful, not since 1994, anyways. Before you reference this thread, we are not talking about how we hate KC here... This is more about mocking futility.

Also, what do Elway, MJ, and LBJ all have in common?

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 04:18 PM

Correcting grammar on a message board. This is what life has come to on the Mane. So sad, and yet...pathetic.

Drunken.Broncoholic · 07-06-2012, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Correcting grammar on a message board. This is what life has come to on the Mane. So sad, and yet...pathetic.

Correcting grammar may be considered negative. Having blatant spelling errors when there is an edit feature is downright hilarious.

Tombstone RJ · 07-06-2012, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

I said it in the post you moron. I didn't watch the 70's and 80's.
Why focus on those years when I didn't live them or watch the games?

And as I said multiple times, I was alive in the 80's. I was simply too young to understand what football was at the time.

I don't ignore the 70's or 80's. I just didn't live through it. When posters try to pull the "oh your Chiefs have always been a terrible franchise and you know all about suffering" it's hilarious because the Chiefs have actually had more winning seasons than not and I've seen them win playoff games. They aren't the Steelers by any means, but at the same time they aren't the Royals or Browns like this board motions that they are.

ok fine, whatever. I'm not sure what you are trying to prove by this argument but I'll just file it under "kc chef fan logic." In other words, you have to create a scenario that justifies your fandom and at the same time excuses the pathetic history of the last 40 years.

gotcha.

broncosteven · 07-06-2012, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

I said it in the post you moron. I didn't watch the 70's and 80's.
Why focus on those years when I didn't live them or watch the games?

And as I said multiple times, I was alive in the 80's. I was simply too young to understand what football was at the time.

I don't ignore the 70's or 80's. I just didn't live through it. When posters try to pull the "oh your Chiefs have always been a terrible franchise and you know all about suffering" it's hilarious because the Chiefs have actually had more winning seasons than not and I've seen them win playoff games. They aren't the Steelers by any means, but at the same time they aren't the Royals or Browns like this board motions that they are.

So um what was their record again last year? Were you happy with it?

orangeatheist · 07-06-2012, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

ok fine, whatever. I'm not sure what you are trying to prove by this argument but I'll just file it under "kc chef fan logic." In other words, you have to create a scenario that justifies your fandom and at the same time excuses the pathetic history of the last 40 years.

gotcha.

^This

Reading through this futile exchange with KCDud, the above is really what it boils down to.

And, oh yeah, no matter how you slice it, the Chiefs suck.

Tombstone RJ · 07-06-2012, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broncosteven

So um what was their record again last year? Were you happy with it?

last year? kcdud doesn't count the losing years, he only acknowledges the winning years.

Ironlung · 07-06-2012, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

This is what life has come to on the Mane. So sad, and yet...pathetic.

but is it more pathetic than a chef fan knowing what "life" is like on the mane?

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

ok fine, whatever. I'm not sure what you are trying to prove by this argument but I'll just file it under "kc chef fan logic." In other words, you have to create a scenario that justifies your fandom and at the same time excuses the pathetic history of the last 40 years.

gotcha.

Create a scenario? Not being alive or old enough to understand what's going on is a scenario?

KCStud · 07-06-2012, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

last year? kcdud doesn't count the losing years, he only acknowledges the winning years.

Says a poster of the board that says Tony G isn't better than Shannon Sharpe because of a SB championship, but yet Champ is the best CB to ever play.

broncosteven · 07-06-2012, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Says a poster of the board that says Tony G isn't better than Shannon Sharpe because of a SB championship, but yet Champ is the best CB to ever play.

Funny how KFC gives away their talent and doesn't replace them with equal or better talent!

BTW I would take Sharpe over TG any day. TG Disappears in big games.

Tombstone RJ · 07-06-2012, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Says a poster of the board that says Tony G isn't better than Shannon Sharpe because of a SB championship, but yet Champ is the best CB to ever play.

care to show me that post because I never said that.

Tombstone RJ · 07-06-2012, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCStud

Create a scenario? Not being alive or old enough to understand what's going on is a scenario?

Yah but how does that make sense now? Again, you are refusing to acknowledge parts of history in order to feel good about your team.

This is commonly referred to as denial.

Bronco Rob · 07-06-2012, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canadianbroncosfan

moot*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-06-2012, 08:47 AM	#504
Kaylore 6-37, Raider fans. Yummy birds and snow! Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Ceti Alpha V Posts: 41,077 Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Duke	Mute point...lol

07-06-2012, 09:24 AM	#505
Ironlung Terminator Snake Bitten Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 891	KCdud is a reeeeetard. If the roles were reversed, and it was Denver who hasn't won a SB since 69, and KC won two back to back in his lifetime he would be gloating all over the place....but since its kC who is so pathetic, then its no big deal.

07-06-2012, 04:18 PM	#513
KCStud Ring of Famer AmeriStanzi! Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 4,019 Adopt-a-Bronco: None	Correcting grammar on a message board. This is what life has come to on the Mane. So sad, and yet...pathetic.