![]() |
|
|
#4926 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4927 |
|
Steppin on feet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Carmel Ca
Posts: 6,202
Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang |
Difference is belichick would use him in another position. And bring him in near the goal line where Brady isn't good at pushing it in as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4928 | |
|
Opinionated A******
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX (Portland OR)
Posts: 4,660
Adopt-a-Bronco: J. D. Walton |
Quote:
I would think that there must be something he sees, that they are missing, if he calls. In fact if there is even moderate interest by several teams they should think again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4929 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4930 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cali, Colombia
Posts: 2,181
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
This is ridicule... people talking about trading Tebow when we haven't bagged Manning yet. Talking about trading Tebow even if we don't get Manning. Look, none... I mean none of the available FA (that includes A.Smith and T.Hasselbeck incase Manning sign with one of their teams) would be a better starter than Tebow. And that's without going into detail of why Elway or Fox would never trade Tebow if they don't land Manning. It would be like putting a noose around their neck. If you cant add 1 + 1 and get to 2... then go back to school.
If we don't land Manning this FA plan would be an utter failure. We stayed idle while other teams picked the FA that could have filled and improved or holes on the roster. There is no way they trade Tebow with this sort of epic fail! They know it would not fly with the fan base... but more importantly... the rest of the players. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4931 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,315
|
Quote:
Insightful bunch of dudes running the show for the Broncos. Got nothing to worry about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4932 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4933 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,627
Adopt-a-Bronco: Caleb Hanie |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4934 | |
|
Steppin on feet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Carmel Ca
Posts: 6,202
Adopt-a-Bronco: LeLo Lang |
Quote:
This post only relevant assuming you werent being sarcastic. Ha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4935 | |
|
Opinionated A******
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX (Portland OR)
Posts: 4,660
Adopt-a-Bronco: J. D. Walton |
Quote:
This Manning thing is just a ploy to motivate him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4936 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,315
|
Quote:
Warren made $4M last year. he's scheduled to make another $4M this year. Mebane's contract was for an AAV of $5M, but required about double the guaranteed money. Of course it was for 2.5x the length and Mebane was 26 while Warren was 31, but who's counting, right? And Jenkins signed a comparable 5 year, $25M deal (so another $5M AAV) with no signing bonus. He got about the same amount of guaranteed money on a 5 year deal as we promised Warren on a 2 year deal. Bunch of frickin' geniuses running the show in Denver man. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4937 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cali, Colombia
Posts: 2,181
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
Go back to your la la land hating ways. You have no reason in your head apparently. I know Tebow is not highly backed by the FO... but if you see the available talent in the FA... the possible rookie QBs that we could target... and I mean none... none... could be argued to start over Tebow. Just not gonna happen this year. Like it or not... Tebow is a Bronco for 2012 if Manning doesn't sign. Book it!!! Like we are seriously going to trade Tebow and be left with only Weber... like I said... if you cant add 1 + 1... go back to school. *The only way Tebow gets traded is if he asks for the trade... yeah I don't see that happening... Last edited by Heyneck; 03-17-2012 at 05:48 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4938 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 15,037
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4939 | |
|
We need a DE
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,673
Adopt-a-Bronco: Eddie Royal |
Quote:
You crack me up Drek! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4940 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,431
|
I agree that Broncos seem a little cheap lately, but Mebane had said he preferred to stay in Seattle last yr. Not every player can be signed but Broncos obviously not trying all that hard last few years. Sucks because there were some great young FA in this crop.
IMO they might as well just tell Manning the offer is pulled. Let Condon explain to Alex Smith how getting Manning a deal with the niners, while he was supposed to get Smith a deal with the Niners, is good agenting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4941 |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,431
|
And also Mebane had a super avg yr, as did the Seattle defense. What 0 sacks and 40 tackles? watched a few Seattle games cant remember thinking who is that dlineman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4942 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,315
|
Quote:
But Mebane talked openly about his doubts that he would return to Seattle, showing a willingness to consider a move, and then visited Denver last off-season. Multiple sources even said they just viewed Mebane's deal as "too expensive" for them. They didn't lose Mebane because Seattle matched the Bronco's offer at the 11th hour to retain him. The Broncos didn't even match Seattle's offer, so why the hell would he leave his home of the last few years for less money? At this point we don't have enough info to know how exactly they lost out on Soliai, but its a pretty damning sign when for the second year in a row the first established player you want in for a visit is a DT and for the second year in a row that guy returns to his previous team on a pretty reasonable contract. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4943 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,315
|
Was he $1M better than Ty Warren last year? I'd say so. He's also playing in a front that minimizes his ability to make plays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4944 | |
|
A verbis ad verbera
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 32,431
|
Quote:
Be way more pissed we didn't go after Mario Williams, Carl Nicks, etc, you know actual impact players. Warren is better then Mebane when healthy by quite a bit actually. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4945 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Quote:
But I do not see the Broncos feeling that way. What they have done and said tells me at least they do not believe in Tebow and do not think he will develop enough to win or win consistently at least. Who they can get? I have no idea, but I think they will do all they can to find Tebow's replacement, if not this year, then next year. With the way it looks, the Broncos are only going to spend much money if Manning signs, which means if Tebow is the starter next year, I do not think the roster will be that much improved and likely the team doesn't do well and more a reason for them to blame the QB and look for another. I am more a Tebow supporter than most and maybe even you, but I see the writing on the wall. Tebow was told he was the starter going into TC, which is hardly a ringing endorsement since that means if someone else beats him out, then he may not be the starter after TC. But if they sign Manning, Tebow doesn't even make it to TC as the starter. This helps Tebow's confidence? This makes him feel the organization is fully behind him? I don't. You are ok to not believe any of that and believe what you wish, but that's the way I see things going on right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4946 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
Well, I wish they would act like that with Clady among others on the team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4947 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cali, Colombia
Posts: 2,181
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
[QUOTE=barryr;3523758]Good grief, I will explain once again. I am one that would rather the Broncos kept Tebow and started him and not worried about this chasing of Manning, especially as long as it has been going on. I believe if Tebow is given proper coaching and more weapons around him, he can be a legit starter in the NFL and win games.
But I do not see the Broncos feeling that way. What they have done and said tells me at least they do not believe in Tebow and do not think he will develop enough to win or win consistently at least. Who they can get? I have no idea, but I think they will do all they can to find Tebow's replacement, if not this year, then next year. With the way it looks, the Broncos are only going to spend much money if Manning signs, which means if Tebow is the starter next year, I do not think the roster will be that much improved and likely the team doesn't do well and more a reason for them to blame the QB and look for another. I am more a Tebow supporter than most and maybe even you, but I see the writing on the wall. Tebow was told he was the starter going into TC, which is hardly a ringing endorsement since that means if someone else beats him out, then he may not be the starter after TC. But if they sign Manning, Tebow doesn't even make it to TC as the starter. This helps Tebow's confidence? This makes him feel the organization is fully behind him? I don't. You are ok to not believe any of that and believe what you wish, but that's the way I see things going on right now.[/QUOTE] Agree with that part. Good to see you throw "next year" in there. That's my point...I think there is no way they trade him this year unless Peyton sign...or he asks for a trade. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4948 | |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,267
Adopt-a-Bronco: None |
[QUOTE=Heyneck;3523850]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4949 |
|
Ring of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 7,381
|
You know my view on Tebow. I think he is 100% correct asking for a trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4950 |
|
In The Bag
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Meth Alley
Posts: 9,920
Adopt-a-Bronco: MethWolfe |
9ers inked Manningham. This whole gamble is falling apart in the worst way.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|