The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2012, 05:54 AM   #2376
winstoncup bronco
Crew Chief
 
winstoncup bronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NEW YORK CITY, USA
Posts: 5,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
As opposed to not signing Manning, keeping Tebow, and drafting "talent".....and if we don't win it all in next 3 years, what will the excuse be?
The same thing every other team does - continue to build and get better. And as an added bonus, we're not blowing up the team of overpriced vets signed to win now.

If you want to know what the Broncos will look like the year after Manning, look at this years Colts team.
winstoncup bronco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 05:58 AM   #2377
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateHoboW/Shotgun View Post
I think there are like 10-12 TE in this years draft. So I don't think that we're going after TE this year. Also just because Tebow didn't throw to the TE a lot this year doesn't mean they suck. I agree with you that this team has a lot of holes, but going through FA to fix all of them is a mistake also, look at the Eagles.
How about when they were replaced by OLinemen because they can't block. Did that make them suck?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 05:59 AM   #2378
TonyR
Franchise Poster
 
TonyR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 18,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaiderH8r View Post
SB win or the move is failure.
Such a silly perspective. Takes not only being good to win a championship, but you also need some luck. You have to be able to compete in the playoffs to have a chance at a championship. With a healthy Manning and some other improvements that's what this team should be able to do.
TonyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 06:10 AM   #2379
BroncoInferno
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
Such a silly perspective. Takes not only being good to win a championship, but you also need some luck. You have to be able to compete in the playoffs to have a chance at a championship. With a healthy Manning and some other improvements that's what this team should be able to do.
Yeah, the idea that you HAVE to win the Super Bowl or it's a failure is nonsense. What if we trade Tebow to Jacksonville, and he totally flames out? Then, if nothing else, we would have saved ourselves at least one wasted season with Tebow and given ourselves the best chance possible to compete. There are any number of scenarios that will determine whether or not this was a worthwhile move. The move could prove to be a bad one. But to say the only acceptable outcome is a Super Bowl win or it's a failure independent of other factors is incredibly myopic and, as you said, silly.

Last edited by BroncoInferno; 03-13-2012 at 06:13 AM..
BroncoInferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 06:22 AM   #2380
TonyR
Franchise Poster
 
TonyR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 18,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoInferno View Post
Yeah, the idea that you HAVE to win the Super Bowl or it's a failure is nonsense.
Yup, as if going 10-6 with Manning and winning a playoff game would be a "failure", but going 6-10 with Tebow would somehow be a "success". Superior logic at work.
TonyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 06:28 AM   #2381
winstoncup bronco
Crew Chief
 
winstoncup bronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NEW YORK CITY, USA
Posts: 5,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
Such a silly perspective. Takes not only being good to win a championship, but you also need some luck. You have to be able to compete in the playoffs to have a chance at a championship. With a healthy Manning and some other improvements that's what this team should be able to do.
No, that's EXACTLY why this is being done, isn't it? Why are we bringing him in then? Because he gives us a better chance? Sorry, not worth it if that's the case.

If you're going to trade a young QB, start signing free agents and go in win now mode, you better win now. I can see where this is heading though.
winstoncup bronco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 06:31 AM   #2382
winstoncup bronco
Crew Chief
 
winstoncup bronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NEW YORK CITY, USA
Posts: 5,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
Yup, as if going 10-6 with Manning and winning a playoff game would be a "failure", but going 6-10 with Tebow would somehow be a "success". Superior logic at work.
Right, because signing a 36 year old QB with an injury history to a team full of holes, discarding your own philosophy of building through the draft, spending on FA to win now, it would be a huge success to go 10-6 and win a playoff game.

We won a playoff game last year and people can't stop apologizing for it. Why should it be considered better if Manning does it?
winstoncup bronco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 06:43 AM   #2383
Drek
Ring of Famer
 
Drek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
Yup, as if going 10-6 with Manning and winning a playoff game would be a "failure", but going 6-10 with Tebow would somehow be a "success". Superior logic at work.
I don't think anyone would consider 6-10 with Tebow "success". But if we're mortgaging the future for Manning (which getting rid of Tebow is in fact doing just that) then you expect some tangible benefits in return.

Tebow led the team to 8-8 and a playoff win last year with only 11 regular season starts. I won't consider his 2012 campaign a success unless we still win the division (so likely going at least 9-7 or 10-6, since 8-8 barely did it on a tie breaker last year) and have at least a competitive outing in the playoffs. Maybe we lose round one but we shouldn't be getting smoked anymore like New England did last year. From there the expectations keep building and within three years we should consider ourselves within reach (i.e. getting some breaks) of the SB.

With Manning we need to do better than 9-7/10-6 and we need to start winning playoff games quickly because the window of being an elite team is far smaller. If the whole point is to speed up the team's growth towards being a top tier competitor at the expense of long term viability then it makes complete sense to have two different standards for the short term.
Drek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:06 AM   #2384
The Joker
Ring of Famer
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,275

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

We should be expected to be a realistic contender for a Superbowl with Manning.

If he plays here three years and we make the playoffs three times, lose in the Superbowl once and lose a couple of divisional round games then you can't criticise the move because it put us in there with a shot.

Lots of good teams in the NFL every year, only one trophy to go round. They aren't easy to win.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:09 AM   #2385
Gutless Drunk
Ring of Famer
 
Gutless Drunk's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,887

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

http://www.1043thefan.com/channels/t...spx?ID=1669047

Alfred Williams interview with Brandon Stokley
Gutless Drunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:25 AM   #2386
Broncos4tw
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,445
Default

The tangible benefits include increasing our chances of winning a SB, and possibly drawing in some superior talent (compared to what we have). There is no sure thing in the NFL, and it's unrealistic to expect a SB win with Manning. Increased odds is all you can shoot for. And I think most, except idiots like Mcgruder, realize that Manning is a huge boost for the offense, as long as he stays healthy.
Broncos4tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:32 AM   #2387
TheReverend
Permanent Facepalm
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 36,970

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

11-5 to match Tim's % last season... And a playoff win. Likely with a worse team (saying this years would more than likely be far superior in talent)

...That's just to MATCH mind you...
TheReverend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:35 AM   #2388
CEH
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutless Drunk View Post
http://www.1043thefan.com/channels/t...spx?ID=1669047

Alfred Williams interview with Brandon Stokley
Gee his "one job" was to get Manning to throw. Awesome job by the front office.

I'm bummed out first football game with Stoke is this week not last week
CEH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:36 AM   #2389
TonyR
Franchise Poster
 
TonyR's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 18,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broncos4tw View Post
The tangible benefits include increasing our chances of winning a SB, and possibly drawing in some superior talent (compared to what we have). There is no sure thing in the NFL, and it's unrealistic to expect a SB win with Manning. Increased odds is all you can shoot for.
^ Perfectly stated. They're putting more bullets in the gun, but there's not guarantee of hitting the target. Just more chances.
TonyR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:47 AM   #2390
barryr
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,706

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

The Broncos are only a realistic Super Bowl if with Manning as long as they fix the other problem areas on the team. OL, more depth at RB and WR, a pass catching TE, as well as DT, MLB, probably OLB, CB, and likely another safety. If they can fix those with genuine talent and not just recycled crap like has been tried in the past, then I can see the possibilities.
barryr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:53 AM   #2391
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
Yup, as if going 10-6 with Manning and winning a playoff game would be a "failure", but going 6-10 with Tebow would somehow be a "success". Superior logic at work.
Yes, because blowing the wad on the full cast of ex-Colt Citrucel All-Stars and then doing essentially the same thing we did this year...success.

Don't argue with superior logic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:54 AM   #2392
BroncoInferno
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
11-5 to match Tim's % last season... And a playoff win. Likely with a worse team (saying this years would more than likely be far superior in talent)

...That's just to MATCH mind you...
It would really depend on what happened with Tim. If, for instance, he got traded to Jacksonville and played poorly, then most people would probably regard his 2011 success as a fluke, and it could be safely assumed that whatever result achieved with Manning would be better than any that would have been had with Tebow. Of course, if Tim established himself as an elite QB, or even a really good one, that would increase what we would need to achieve with Manning in order for it to be regarded as a success. On the other hand, if we actually keep Tebow, I don't see where there is much downside. To me, it all would center on what happens with Tebow.
BroncoInferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:54 AM   #2393
TheReverend
Permanent Facepalm
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 36,970

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyR View Post
^ Perfectly stated. They're putting more bullets in the gun, but there's not guarantee of hitting the target. Just more chances.
Actually less chances. Just potentially more accurate shots.
TheReverend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:55 AM   #2394
ScottXray
Opinionated A******
 
ScottXray's Avatar
 
We will NOT lose!

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX (Portland OR)
Posts: 5,408

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Off. CENTER
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoInferno View Post
Yeah, the idea that you HAVE to win the Super Bowl or it's a failure is nonsense. What if we trade Tebow to Jacksonville, and he totally flames out? Then, if nothing else, we would have saved ourselves at least one wasted season with Tebow and given ourselves the best chance possible to compete. There are any number of scenarios that will determine whether or not this was a worthwhile move. The move could prove to be a bad one. But to say the only acceptable outcome is a Super Bowl win or it's a failure independent of other factors is incredibly myopic and, as you said, silly.
It is super bowl, or its a failure, because Denver is scrapping the supposed "build through the Draft" plan to contending that Elway said he would follow.

Manning will only come here if he thinks he can go to and WIN a superbowl in the next few years. Elway is telling him that "I've been there...done that, and at the same age. I can get you there and will get you what you need!"

That means bringing in a lot of FA pickups in areas where we are not at strength. Manning isn't an idiot...he is a coach on the field and has looked at film of last years Broncos. He probably will give Elway a list of positions that he needs to see better players at to come here, and Elway and co have to promise him they'll get them.

It scraps our current plan and puts a premium on win now! We won't have 2-3 years to develope draft picks. That is why its super bowl or FAIL.

And if we don't get there, and then Manning retires or is hurt, we have Mannings team, which may be better...or may not since he has a unique skill set that requires a QB like him to take advantage of.

How many top draft picks did Indy use at QB while PM was there and playing? How many will he let Elway use to bring in his eventual replacement?

This is handing the Team to PM. When he is gone we will be facing the same thing Indy did this year.
ScottXray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:56 AM   #2395
StugotsIII
O-H
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,535

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Your Mom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
11-5 to match Tim's % last season... And a playoff win. Likely with a worse team (saying this years would more than likely be far superior in talent)

...That's just to MATCH mind you...
Oh….it's "Tim's" winning percentage and not the teams winning percentage.


Got it.
StugotsIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:57 AM   #2396
TheReverend
Permanent Facepalm
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 36,970

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoInferno View Post
It would really depend on what happened with Tim. If, for instance, he got traded to Jacksonville and played poorly, then most people would probably regard his 2011 success as a fluke, and it could be safely assumed that whatever result achieved with Manning would be better than any that would have been had with Tebow. Of course, if Tim established himself as an elite QB, or even a really good one, that would increase what we would need to achieve with Manning in order for it to be regarded as a success. On the other hand, if we actually keep Tebow, I don't see where there is much downside. To me, it all would center on what happens with Tebow.
Tim's winning % last year is higher than Peyton's 2010, and he won a playoff game against the defending AFC Champs, whereas Peyton lost in the WC round. And that's each with an equally poor supporting cast judging by their records without them (And Orton's > Painter)
TheReverend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:58 AM   #2397
TheReverend
Permanent Facepalm
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
Not. Too. Shabby.

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 36,970

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StugotsIII View Post
Oh….it's "Tim's" winning percentage and not the teams winning percentage.


Got it.
...1-4 without him? ...And off the worst season in Broncos history?

Did you miss those games? Because it spanned like 2 years lol
TheReverend is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 08:01 AM   #2398
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottXray View Post
It is super bowl, or its a failure, because Denver is scrapping the supposed "build through the Draft" plan to contending that Elway said he would follow.

Manning will only come here if he thinks he can go to and WIN a superbowl in the next few years. Elway is telling him that "I've been there...done that, and at the same age. I can get you there and will get you what you need!"

That means bringing in a lot of FA pickups in areas where we are not at strength. Manning isn't an idiot...he is a coach on the field and has looked at film of last years Broncos. He probably will give Elway a list of positions that he needs to see better players at to come here, and Elway and co have to promise him they'll get them.

It scraps our current plan and puts a premium on win now! We won't have 2-3 years to develope draft picks. That is why its super bowl or FAIL.

And if we don't get there, and then Manning retires or is hurt, we have Mannings team, which may be better...or may not since he has a unique skill set that requires a QB like him to take advantage of.

How many top draft picks did Indy use at QB while PM was there and playing? How many will he let Elway use to bring in his evetual replacement?

Thsi is handing the Team to PM. When he is gone we will be facing the same thing Indy did this year.
Psssht. Pfffft.

Selling your soul for a 2 year playoff window doesn't mean you should actually deliver in that window, fool. Only that you should bet the farm and then give it the good ol' college try.

At least an AFC Championship or this would be looked at universally as an abject failure. Although I personally wouldn't trade our current youth and cap space for one Lamar Hunt trophy.

Football is entertainment first and foremost. People who would trade a potential for say 8 years of exciting football for 1 2nd place trophy are beyond my ability to rationalize.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 08:02 AM   #2399
BroncoInferno
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottXray View Post
It is super bowl, or its a failure, because Denver is scrapping the supposed "build through the Draft" plan to contending that Elway said he would follow.

Manning will only come here if he thinks he can go to and WIN a superbowl in the next few years. Elway is telling him that "I've been there...done that, and at the same age. I can get you there and will get you what you need!"

That means bringing in a lot of FA pickups in areas where we are not at strength. Manning isn't an idiot...he is a coach on the field and has looked at film of last years Broncos. He probably will give Elway a list of positions that he needs to see better players at to come here, and Elway and co have to promise him they'll get them.

It scraps our current plan and puts a premium on win now! We won't have 2-3 years to develope draft picks. That is why its super bowl or FAIL.

And if we don't get there, and then Manning retires or is hurt, we have Mannings team, which may be better...or may not since he has a unique skill set that requires a QB like him to take advantage of.

How many top draft picks did Indy use at QB while PM was there and playing? How many will he let Elway use to bring in his eventual replacement?

This is handing the Team to PM. When he is gone we will be facing the same thing Indy did this year.
Who says that we can't still build through the draft if we sign Manning? The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. If we go out and sign a bunch of guys over 30 and trade away draft picks along with signing Manning, then you will have a point. But what if we sign productive but younger free agents (i.e. Ben Grubbs, Mike Tolbert, Pierre Garcon, just for a few examples of the younger, quality players available) and keep all of our draft picks? Assuming that the overall building plan will be abandoned if we sign Manning is not at all a certainity.
BroncoInferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 08:03 AM   #2400
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
...1-4 without him? ...And off the worst season in Broncos history?

Did you miss those games? Because it spanned like 2 years lol
From the same people who keep saying "Look how the Colts fell apart when Peyton didn't play!!!"

It's pretty rich.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Denver Broncos