Should they give Cutler another week, or start Hanie? - Page 5 - The Orange Mane

Irish Stout · 10-19-2009, 10:09 AM

STFU everyone here, we play the Chargers tonight and Cutler is no longer our concern.

TailgateNut · 10-19-2009, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rastaman

Cutler led the Bears in rushing and passing last night!. .

I would tend to think that isn't to difficult considering that he IS THEIR QB.

He also led them in throwing interceptions.

Broncosfreak_56 · 10-19-2009, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irish McStout

STFU everyone here, we play the Chargers tonight and Cutler is no longer our concern.

He does bad, then the bears do bad, which gives us a higher first round draft pick. After this year, I won't give a **** about him.

BroncoBuff · 10-19-2009, 11:40 AM

I'd say Jay is on a short leash ... get Caleb up and loose.

This might be his week

BroncoInferno · 10-19-2009, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rastaman

Cutler led the Bears in rushing and passing last night!. This years Bears O line is so dreadful that not even Kyle Orton would have a winning record at this stage had he been the Bears Qb for the 09 season. Its not so much that the threat of Jays Arm didn't improve the running game as much as it is the Bears O line just isn't getting it done thus far. No excuse for his first half interceptions, however you can't have a Franchise QB perform up to expectations if the O line isn't getting it done.

But you must admit, Cutler had the Bears in position to tie the game up inside the Red Zone, however without any type of running attack to speak of, ATL's defense just had to play and cheat on the pass.

The Beasrs offensive line was poor last season as well. In fact, we were led to believe that it would be improved this season with the addition of Pace at LT and Chris Williams returning from injury to play RT. In other words, Orton had major OL issues to deal with as well (if not worse). He also had to deal with a mediocre running game (Bears finished 24th in rushing last season). He had to deal with the same medicore receiving corps. Trying to pretend Orton did not have the same issues to deal with is ludicrous. You guys told us that Cutler by virtue of his superior physical gift would make the OL look better because of his mobillity and quicker release, plus the improved personnel on OL. Why hasn't that happened? You all said the running game would improve because teams would be afraid of Cutler's arm and would no longer stack the box. The running game is worse. In short, the Bears are not any better with Cutler than they were with Orton despite having largely the same team in place. If Jay were really a franchise QB who is worlds better than Orton, why haven't we seen the kind of improvement you guys predicted?

BroncoBuff · 10-19-2009, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoInferno

The Beasrs offensive line was poor last season as well. In fact, we were led to believe that it would be improved this season with the addition of Pace at LT and Chris Williams returning from injury to play RT. In other words, Orton had major OL issues to deal with as well (if not worse). He also had to deal with a mediocre running game (Bears finished 24th in rushing last season). He had to deal with the same medicore receiving corps. Trying to pretend Orton did not have the same issues to deal with is ludicrous. You guys told us that Cutler by virtue of his superior physical gift would make the OL look better because of his mobillity and quicker release, plus the improved personnel on OL. Why hasn't that happened?

It has happened ... they're 3-2, a razor's edge from 4-1.

Again, yet again - this site is the only place on Earth where this nonsense flies.

BroncoBuff · 10-19-2009, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irish mcstout

stfu everyone here, we play the chargers tonight and cutler is no longer our concern.

Yeah!

BroncoInferno · 10-19-2009, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoMcBuff

It has happened ... they're 3-2, a razor's edge from 4-1.

Again, yet again - this site is the only place on Earth where this nonsense flies.

How are they better than they were last season at 3-2? And the "could be 4-1" nonsense works the other way as well. They could have easily lost to the Steelers and Seahawks and be sitting at 1-4.

gtown · 10-19-2009, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoInferno

They could have easily lost to the Steelers and Seahawks and be sitting at 1-4.

True dat. I have watched each Bears game, and two of their wins came because the opponent beat itself. The only game they have won outright is the game against the Kittens.

rastaman · 10-19-2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TailgateNut

I would tend to think that isn't to difficult considering that he IS THEIR QB.

He also led them in throwing interceptions.

You missed the point entirely! The fact that Cutler led the Bears in rushing with a paltry 34 yards is further indictment and proof that the their O line is not opening holes up for Ike Forte'. Cutler has got to do it All just to keep the Bears in the game.

kamakazi_kal · 10-19-2009, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popps

Tough call...

what .... a .... tool.

Popps · 10-25-2009, 02:27 PM

Uh oh... is Haine going to get his shot today?!?

Lookss like "The Franchise" is having yet another tough day.

Man-Goblin · 10-25-2009, 02:35 PM

My weekly gratuitous shot at Cutler and his knobslobbers:

Franchise QB=QB starting for teams that lose more than they win. I mean, really?

Popps · 10-25-2009, 02:46 PM

Now, my Cutler-math is probably off... but recently we've learned that winning games isn't important. What's important is that in the 2nd half, at some point... Jay brings the team somewhere within striking distance. (After putting them in a ****-hole to begin with.)

So, maybe someone can help me out. It's 31-3 now. How "close" will Jay have to "bring" the Bears to be considered a "win" for him this week?

Williams · 10-25-2009, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popps

Now, my Cutler-math is probably off... but recently we've learned that winning games isn't important. What's important is that in the 2nd half, at some point... Jay brings the team somewhere within striking distance. (After putting them in a ****-hole to begin with.)

So, maybe someone can help me out. It's 31-3 now. How "close" will Jay have to "bring" the Bears to be considered a "win" for him this week?

No, its stats that important in Cutler-math. As long as he throws for 300+... chalk up another W for boy emo.

ColoradoDarin · 10-25-2009, 02:50 PM

Come on guys, it's the Bears' D. Who could hold Cincy to even a single touchdown for an entire game?? The defense also forced Jay to throw into double coverage for a pick... I do think we see a Mopey sighting on the sidelines though

Popps · 10-25-2009, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Williams

No, its stats that important in Cutler-math. As long as he throws for 300+... chalk up another W for boy emo.

Dude, did you see that FG drive he led at the half!

He's "giving his team a chance to win!!"

ColoradoDarin · 10-25-2009, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Popps

Dude, did you see that FG drive he led at the half!

He's "giving his team a chance to win!!"

The announcer for the RedZone channel said that Lovie made the call to get them within 4 TDs

Popps · 10-25-2009, 03:13 PM

Uh oh!! The Franchise just threw another pick!

Broncomutt · 10-25-2009, 03:16 PM

Popps · 10-25-2009, 03:34 PM

Well, there's INT #3.

I'm not seeing the game. Who's fault was that one?

He only needs 99 yards for 300, though!

Popps · 10-25-2009, 03:56 PM

I smell a Haine sighting. Next series?

QB controversy next week in Chicago?

Sodak · 10-25-2009, 04:02 PM

I need a link to a Bears board so I can witness a meltdown in real time.

Man-Goblin · 10-25-2009, 04:03 PM

Hanie in the game!!!!!!

Broncomutt · 10-25-2009, 04:05 PM

10-25-2009, 03:16 PM	#120
Broncomutt Truth is.... Goliath never stood a chance. Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Waxhaw, NC Posts: 1,092	Lol

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-19-2009, 10:09 AM	#101
Irish Stout Ring of Famer Run for it Marty! Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,802 Adopt-a-Bronco: Wesley Woodyard	STFU everyone here, we play the Chargers tonight and Cutler is no longer our concern.

10-19-2009, 11:40 AM	#104
BroncoBuff *************** Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Seattle Posts: 25,433 Adopt-a-Bronco: QUANTERUS SMITH	I'd say Jay is on a short leash ... get Caleb up and loose. This might be his week

10-25-2009, 02:27 PM	#112
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	Uh oh... is Haine going to get his shot today?!? Lookss like "The Franchise" is having yet another tough day.

10-25-2009, 02:35 PM	#113
Man-Goblin Giving You The Business Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Huntersville, NC Posts: 5,588 Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard	My weekly gratuitous shot at Cutler and his knobslobbers: Franchise QB=QB starting for teams that lose more than they win. I mean, really?

10-25-2009, 02:46 PM	#114
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	Now, my Cutler-math is probably off... but recently we've learned that winning games isn't important. What's important is that in the 2nd half, at some point... Jay brings the team somewhere within striking distance. (After putting them in a ****-hole to begin with.) So, maybe someone can help me out. It's 31-3 now. How "close" will Jay have to "bring" the Bears to be considered a "win" for him this week?

10-25-2009, 02:50 PM	#116
ColoradoDarin Ring of Famer AFCW Champs! Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: St Augustine, FL Posts: 5,523 Adopt-a-Bronco: Knowshon's Shoe	Come on guys, it's the Bears' D. Who could hold Cincy to even a single touchdown for an entire game?? The defense also forced Jay to throw into double coverage for a pick... I do think we see a Mopey sighting on the sidelines though

10-25-2009, 03:13 PM	#119
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	Uh oh!! The Franchise just threw another pick!

10-25-2009, 03:34 PM	#121
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	Well, there's INT #3. I'm not seeing the game. Who's fault was that one? He only needs 99 yards for 300, though!

10-25-2009, 03:56 PM	#122
Popps TEAM FIRST. Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 29,785	I smell a Haine sighting. Next series? QB controversy next week in Chicago?

10-25-2009, 04:02 PM	#123
Sodak Clueless... Who stole my avatar? Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Black Hills of Dakota Posts: 3,080	I need a link to a Bears board so I can witness a meltdown in real time.

10-25-2009, 04:03 PM	#124
Man-Goblin Giving You The Business Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Huntersville, NC Posts: 5,588 Adopt-a-Bronco: Woodyard	Hanie in the game!!!!!!

10-25-2009, 04:05 PM	#125
Broncomutt Truth is.... Goliath never stood a chance. Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Waxhaw, NC Posts: 1,092