The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2008, 02:51 AM   #1
dragondawg
All Pro
 
dragondawg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,009
Default Is John Elway the GREATEST QB of all time?

The debate over who is the greatest QB of all time will go on forever…and with good reason. There are so many factors that go into who is the BEST at anything. And then when you consider that comparing generations is almost impossible to do, the idea of saying without a doubt who is the best is really difficult.

But here is our case for John Elway being the greatest QB of all time. Of course the Montana, Marino, Brady, and Steve Young supporters will disagree, but I think we can make a pretty compelling case for Elway being the best.

First let’s start out with pure physical talent. There have not been many, if any, QB’s that had the total physical package that John Elway had, especially in the first 10 years of his career. He had an incredible arm, probably the best of all time. Not just an arm for throwing the ball a long ways…lots of QB’s can do that. But Elway could make throws that most other QB’s could only dream about.

He was a very gifted scrambler and runner. Not in the Steve Young mode, but he could move, elude people, and at times outrun most of the defensive players on the field. He was also very physically tough…which is a good thing when you consider some of the offensive lines he played behind.

So when it comes to pure physical ability as far as the combination of arm strength and mobility…he was a bit of a freak.

But physical prowess is not the only thing that makes QB’s great. Look at Joe Montana, he was a skinny, wimpy looking guy that looked like he belonged behind a desk crunching numbers and we all know how good he was.

Elway had the toughness, the drive, and cool to be great and he showed it on a regular basis. At the time of his retirement here is where he stood among the all time NFL greats:

1. 148 wins as a starting QB- NFL Record
2. 47 game winning or game tying fourth quarter drives- NFL Record
3. The only QB to take a team to FIVE Super Bowls- NFL Record
4. 50,000 career passing yards and 3000 career rushing yards- NFL Record
5. Seven consecutive 3000 yards passing and 200 yards rushing- NFL Record
6. Nine time Pro Bowl selection
7. Three time All Pro selection
8. NFL MVP in 1987
9. Super Bowl 33 MVP

And of course he was a first ballot Hall of Famer. Needless to say those stats are amazing and put Elway in the argument of greatest QB of all time right off the bat. But stats don’t make you great and win championships. Look at Dan Marino for the best example of that.

What Elway did was WIN. He willed his teams to win. He made plays at crucial moments that would have most NFL QB’s wanting to run off the field and hide. He was the BEST when the chips were down…and here is the key, HE DID IT WITH AVERAGE TALENT AROUND HIM.

He did not have Jerry Rice, John Taylor, Brent Jones, Roger Craig, real good offensive lines, and good defenses to help him out. He did NOT play in a system that allowed him to take full advantage of his incredible talents.

What John Elway did with AVERAGE, to slightly above talent, was just amazing. Take a look at the teams he beat to go to the first three Super Bowls. Those teams had more talent….except at one position. Dan Marino did not play with great talent most of his career but he surely played with better coaching and he surely had as much talent around him as Elway had…but Elway is the one that went to FIVE Super Bowls, not Marino. Marino went to ONE.

Why? Because when the chips were down and a play needed to be made Elway usually made it. Most NFL fans know of The Drive. Quite possibly the GREATEST AFC Championship drive of all time. This is the type of thing Elway did on a regular basis…he made plays!

If you had put Joe Montana behind those Denver Bronco offensive lines he would have gotten killed. Let’s see how great Montana would have been in the Dan Reeves system throwing to Vance Johnson, Ricky Nattiel, and Mark Jackson. Let’s see how great Montana would have been handing the ball of to Gerald Wilhite, Steve Sewell, and the rest of the mediocre Denver RB’s.

If you had put John Elway on the 49′ers from the beginning he would probably have won four to six Super Bowls. What would Elway have been like throwing to guys like Jerry Rice, John Taylor, and Brent Jones. What would Elway have been like if he had a good running game to support him? Well we know the answer to that…Denver developed a running game with Terrel Davis and look at what happened. They won two straight Super Bowls.

What would Elway have been like in a system that made it pretty easy to find open receivers like the West Coast offense the 49′ers ran? He would have been totally unstoppable. He could make every throw Montana could make and then about 20 others.

Montana, Marino, and Steve Young were great. But John Elway is in a class by himself. It is a shame that Elway had to play his first 10 years in a system that almost made no sense. Is it a coincidence that AFTER Dan Reeves left that John Elway’s numbers greatly improved and he won two Super Bowls? We don’t think so.

The bottom line in all sports is winning. And no one did it better than Elway, and again the key is that he did it with a supporting cast that is not much to talk about. True, Elway did not win Super Bowls until he got a good supporting cast…but he took THREE teams to Super Bowls that probably had no business being there, and no other QB can say that.

As far as the present day QB’s. Yes, you have to look at Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and the incredibly bizarre Brett Farve. Brady is GREAT. Manning is GREAT. And Brett Farve has been great at times. Brett Farve has gone to two Super Bowls and won one. Manning has gone to one Super Bowl and won it. He has had some AMAZING offensive talent around him. Tom Brady has gone to four Super Bowls, winning three.

Out of all of the GREAT QB’s Brady has probably been closest to Elway when you consider the talent he has played with. Brady has NOT had great offensive talent around him for most of his career. That changed last year…but didn’t get Brady the Super Bowl win. The Patriots won each of those Super Bowls by three points. Not taking anything away from Brady for being great but he can thank a lot of that success to Adam Vinitiere.

One final point…comparing passing stats is useless. The game has changed. The passing game is so much more wide open now than when Marino, Montana, and Elway played. What you have to consider is winning and getting your team to the Super Bowl and you have to consider the talent around the QB.

If you take those things into consideration we think John Elway should receive the title…The GREATEST QB OF ALL TIME. It is really hard to argue against him.


http://denver-bronco-news.com/is-joh...qb-of-all-time
dragondawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-14-2008, 02:57 AM   #2
BroncosinDC
Now Live From Baltimore!
 
True Men have Facial Hair

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 530

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Kyle Orton
Default

I concur and my dog Elway say's "No ****".
BroncosinDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 02:58 AM   #3
Killericon
YES A DT!!!!!!
 
Killericon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: From Calgary, in Halifax for School
Posts: 7,730

Adopt-a-Bronco:
watermock
Default

Quote:
He did not have Jerry Rice, John Taylor, Brent Jones, Roger Craig, real good offensive lines, and good defenses to help him out.
Did he just say "John Elway ddn't have Roger Craig or Brent Jones!" as if it's an argument in his favour?



Killericon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 03:12 AM   #4
Atwater His Ass
Ring of Famer
 
Atwater His Ass's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,360

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

It's in reference to the eightes and early nineties.
Atwater His Ass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 03:52 AM   #5
Play2win
Ring of Famer
 
Play2win's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,610

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Duke
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncosinDC View Post
I concur and my dog Elway say's "No ****".
I think when I get a pup, I'll name him "DUKE"...
Play2win is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2008, 04:17 AM   #6
Blueflame
Miss Congeniality
 
Blueflame's Avatar
 
Welcome to Peyton's Place

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in my cups... lol
Posts: 33,036

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Randy Gradishar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killericon View Post
Did he just say "John Elway ddn't have Roger Craig or Brent Jones!" as if it's an argument in his favour?



He could have stopped after "Jerry Rice" and the remark would still have been true....having the "greatest of all-time" WR to throw to can positively affect the perception of a QB's success.
Blueflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 06:35 AM   #7
The Moops
Old School Dude
 
The Moops's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 1,115

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Yup, John's the best.

What kind of argument are you going to get on a Broncos fan site
The Moops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 08:18 AM   #8
montrose
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 6,095

Adopt-a-Bronco:
VP John Elway
Default

Yes.

In addition to the far superior talent Montana worked with, lets not forget he had a coach ahead of his time in Walsh running a west coast system that team's simply had no answer for at that point in time. It's of no fault of Montana's, but I tend to believe that had Elway (or Marino for that matter) been in that system with those weapons - this wouldn't even be a discussion.

On a side note, I actually think Steve Young is the best QB in 49ers history - but that's just me.
montrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 08:59 AM   #9
NaptownChief
Donkeys Nightmare
 
NaptownChief's Avatar
 
Football Pimp

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,490
Default

I would say after Montana, Manning, Marino, Unitas, Favre, Brady, Avellini and Young that Elway is probably the best.
NaptownChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:00 AM   #10
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,963

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaptownChief View Post
I would say after Montana, Manning, Marino, Unitas, Favre, Brady, Avellini and Young that Elway is probably the best.
Then I would say you're biased or stupid!
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:05 AM   #11
socalorado
Ring of Famer
 
socalorado's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
Then I would say you're biased or stupid!
BOTH.
socalorado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:15 AM   #12
backup qb
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Shelbyville,Il
Posts: 1,244
Default

Rick Reilly said it best, if Montana had played behing Elway's lines he would have been out of football and selling insurance at 28. Of course Elway's the greatest.
backup qb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:17 AM   #13
NaptownChief
Donkeys Nightmare
 
NaptownChief's Avatar
 
Football Pimp

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,490
Default

You boys are about as quick as Fridge Perry after a 15,000 calorie breakfast.
NaptownChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:19 AM   #14
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,963

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaptownChief View Post
You boys are about as quick as Fridge Perry after a 15,000 calorie breakfast.
Rumbling in for a TD in the superbowl?
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:22 AM   #15
NaptownChief
Donkeys Nightmare
 
NaptownChief's Avatar
 
Football Pimp

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
Rumbling in for a TD in the superbowl?


Nah the, 45 year old, 500lb version.
NaptownChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:22 AM   #16
Irish Stout
Ring of Famer
 
Irish Stout's Avatar
 
Run for it Marty!

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,802

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Wesley Woodyard
Default

I saw this story back in 2005 and can't forget it. Basically for their time, the only guys Elway could realistically be compared to are Marino and Montana and those who came before. This is the time honored Montana v. Elway debate... most people acknowledge John over Marino since Marino never got lucky after the big dance

Elway v. Montana - The Definitive Answer

John Elway
By Jason Looney
Broncos Update Columnist
Posted Nov 11, 2005



Who was better? The Denver Broncos' John Elway or the San Franciso 49ers' Joe Montana. Broncos Update Columnist Jason Looney settles the argument once and for all.

On the list of the 100 greatest football players our world has ever known (maintained by a prestigious sports publication), Joe Montana is ranked 3rd. John Elway, meanwhile, is 16th.
On the list of the 100 greatest athletes of the last century (maintained by the world's largest sports television network), Joe Montana is ranked 25th. John Elway, meanwhile… isn't listed??
Wait a second. This can't be right, can it? You mean to tell me Elway's not even on the list??
John Elway is not on the list. He's not listed. At all. Dan "World Champion" Marino made the list, but Elway didn't. Greg Louganis has a spot, but Elway doesn't. Two different jockeys made the list. As did three horses. Yes, horses.
Just to be clear: This list had room for non-human entities that we gamble on, but not for John Elway.
This leaves us with two options. On the one hand, we could leave town right now and strangle, to death, everyone who has ever worked for the company that made this list. Or, we could stay in our seats and perform our own analysis of the situation.
While we shouldn't be too hasty in ruling out the first option, I suppose we should spend a bit of time on the second. (At least for now...)
Comparing athletes is a dodgy undertaking because, really, how do we do it? In my opinion, the fairest way is to ask, "If we could step outside of time to assemble a Field of Dreams intramural squad, who should we pick?" This makes more sense to me than asking, "Who had a better career statistically?" which seems to be the only concern of these brainless and spineless (and soon to be oxygen-less) list makers.
So let's resolve this Elway v. Montana debate, once and for all. This type of discussion can, at times, resemble a religious war, so let's break it up as best we can into reasonable and objective categories. And let's keep score in units of seven and three, naturally, since God prefers these numbers.
Here we go:
Bias
Disclaimer: I was born in Colorado, I live in Colorado, and I've been known to drink ketchup on gameday so that even my urine is Denver Broncos Orange. While I doubt this will affect my judgment in this matter, we should probably spot Montana a couple of scores right off the bat. You know, in the name of fairness.
Score: Montana 10, Elway 0
Statistics
Joe Montana had a brilliant career. He led his team to four Super Bowl victories, including the trouncing of Elway's Broncos in 1990. He was named the MVP in all but one of those games, and in that contest he led a 92–yard drive late in the fourth quarter to win the championship. He retired with a quarterback rating of 92.3 and, while he threw his fair share of interceptions in the playoffs, Joe Montana threw exactly zero interceptions in four Super Bowls.
Elway's numbers are impressive, but less so. He was the only quarterback to start five Super Bowls, including two victories and one MVP award, but he lost the other three contests badly and, as such, is on the wrong end of many Super Bowl records. His career quarterback rating was an unimpressive 79.9, although he did end up being more durable than Joe. He retired with more completions, yards, touchdowns, and wins, despite the fact that he did more scrambling and took more punishment. In fact, he is ranked either first, second, or third in all major passing categories, while Montana is eighth and ninth.
But Montana's efficiency — especially in big games — was incredible. Enough so that I think he deserves another touchdown.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 0
Coaching
This is where the analysis gets more… nuanced. While statistics are indeed important, professional football is a game with 22 players on the field and several dozen other players (and countless coaches) on the sidelines. When trying to decide which quarterback to pick for our intramural team in the sky, we need to look behind the numbers. We need to ask things like, "What if this guy had played for another team?" And, "How did his coaches do with other players in his position?" And, "Hasn't history shown that Dan Reeves knew more about licking footballs than coaching football?"
Which brings me to: Bill Walsh vs. Dan Reeves. Walsh was the father of the modern offense; Reeves was hawking blood pressure medication while still "coaching" an NFL team. Bill Walsh is revered to this day; Reeves is but a bad taste in the mouths of numerous teams. Admittedly, Walsh probably gets more credit than he deserves for the so-called west coast offense, but it's hard to deny that his offensive schemes were vastly superior to Reeves' who, inexplicably, never structured his offense around Elway. Instead he would run his famous "four yards and a cloud of dust" offense for 58 minutes, then turn it over to John for the last two.
How bad can a coach be for a player? With Reeves at the helm, John Elway's quarterback rating averaged 72.9. Post-Reeves, it averaged 89.1 — a sixteen point swing. The improvement came practically overnight. The first year after Reeves, Elway threw for over 4000 yards (something Montana never did), 25 touchdowns, and a rating of 92.8.
The recent tailspin of Denver's current coach, Mike Shanahan, is also telling. During the 1996–1998 seasons Shanahan was considered a mastermind who always kept one step ahead of the competition. Since Elway left, however, he's had Brian Griese posting a 100+ QB rating, scrubs and rookies putting up 1500-yard rushing seasons, defensive units ranked second/third in the league, Clinton Portis looking like the love child of Barry Sanders and Walter Payton, and… zero playoff victories.
So, Elway made it to three Super Bowls with horrible coaching and won two Super Bowls with decent coaching. Montana had the advantage of spending the majority of his career within a brilliant offensive scheme.
Touchdown, John.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 7
Supporting Cast
On the first list I mentioned above, Jerry Rice is ranked as the 2nd greatest player in the history of football. On the ESPN list, he's just two spots behind Montana. Rice has proven himself time and again with numerous quarterbacks, and seemingly everyone regards him as the best receiver to ever play the game.
In 1989 (the season Montana and Elway met in the Super Bowl), San Francisco's roster also included:
* Ronnie Lott
* Roger Craig
* John Taylor
* Steve Young
* Charles Haley
* Bill Romanowski
* Brent Jones
* Matt Millen
* Tom Rathman
* Bubba Paris

Meanwhile, John Elway had:
* Steve Atwater
* Karl Mecklenberg
* Dennis Smith
* Ricky… Somebody
* A guy named Vance, I think? (Or was it Steve?)
* Hey, was Bobby Humphrey the guy who married Whitney Houston?
* Is the Super Bowl XXIV blowout starting to make more sense to ANYONE
So Montana played with a handful of future Hall-of-Famers, including the greatest wide receiver to have walked our planet. John Elway played with guys like the "Three Amigos," all three of whom were out of football within a year or two of leaving the Broncos for other teams.
Field goal, John.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 10
Head-to-Head Competition
Off the top of my head, I can remember two big games featuring the quarterbacks. The first was the lopsided Super Bowl, the second was the infamous "whoever gets the ball last is going to win this thing" Monday night game. Montana won both match-ups.
While this is certainly a worthwhile category, I don't think we can place too much emphasis on it since there are obvious "Coaching" and "Supporting Cast" elements that come into play. Also, I haven't been able to find a comprehensive list of their meetings, so we should probably stick with a field goal on this one.
Score: Montana 20, Elway 10
Name
'John Elway' is a pretty tough name — it brings to mind John Wayne and all — but 'Joe Montana' takes the cake. (Especially if you have never seen his mamma's-boy face.)
Score: Montana 23, Elway 10
Number
As we discussed earlier, God likes the number 7. A lot. So if you've somehow made it outside of time to pick an intramural football team, you might want to take this into consideration. Montana's numbers (16 and 19) might have been shout-outs to guys like Blanda and Unitas, but it's important to keep in mind that neither of these people is God.
But, leaving God's feelings out of this for a moment, let me ask: Which is a cooler number for a quarterback? 7, or 16? Which number inspires more fear in opposing defenses? 7, or 19? Do you think it's coincidence that "seven" sounds like "heaven" and "sixteen" sounds like "sissy?" I don't.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 13
Arm
Do I really need to say anything here?
Of the two quarterbacks, only one had receivers spending their off-seasons with machines rifling footballs at 100 miles-per-hour. This same player threw a football 65 yards on the fly, in high school, and was drafted by the New York Yankees coming out of college. (Hint: It's not the player whose name rhymes with Dough Bontana.)
Look, John Elway could make any throw on the field, even if he was falling down or running against the grain. When plays broke down, his receivers were instructed to go long. According to Rick Reilly, players from other teams would beg him to throw them a 40–yard out during Pro Bowl week, just so they could experience catching it. Pat Summerall called him "the master of the inconceivable pass thrown to the unreachable spot." And I'm pretty sure Pat said that before he went senile.
Let's move on.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 20
Legs and Athleticism
We probably shouldn't weigh it too heavily but, all other things being equal, I would take the more mobile of any two quarterbacks. Joe Montana had decent feet, but Elway was the master of the escape. At times, other teams were afraid to blitz him since he did his best work when he was running for his life. While he never reached the same level as The Player Formerly Known as Ron Mexico, he was definitely a better runner than Montana.
Field goal, John.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 23
Leadership
Well, it's all come down to this. The score is tied and we've saved one of the most important categories for last.
When discussing the relative merits of quarterbacks, leadership ability is, obviously, critical. A good leader will make everyone on their team better, and both Elway and Montana had this quality in spades. A good leader will inspire confidence in their teammates and fans -- both players did this, too.
But John Elway was a better team leader than anyone. He would stomp the sidelines and goad members of the defense. He would chastise receivers in the huddle when they dropped his passes. He would exhort his offensive line to play this down harder than they'd played any down in their lives. And he backed it all up by engineering more comeback victories than any quarterback in NFL history, including several in the postseason.
In Cleveland, he's known for "The Drive." In Houston, he's known for his fourth down heroics. In Super Bowl lore, he's known for his helicopter dive on third down. And in Marty Schottenheimer's therapist's office, he's known as "The One About Whom We Do Not Speak."
Joe Montana was a cool-headed field general, for sure, but it's hard to look back at the 49ers dynasty and say that none of it would have happened without him. In fact, Montana played his last few years in Kansas City because San Francisco figured they were better off with Steve Young, who went on to win a Super Bowl of his own.
Elway, on the other hand, WAS the Denver Broncos. His sheer willpower and determination led his teams — and the entire state of Colorado — to heights they would have otherwise never reached.
In summary, these two guys are arguably the best quarterbacks to ever play the game. Each ended their career with an impressive list of records and statistical achievements. Both undeniably, were champions. But Elway was better. Final Score: Montana 23, Elway 26
Irish Stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:23 AM   #17
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,963

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaptownChief View Post
Nah the, 45 year old, 500lb version.
...and this is why I like you.

You're still completely wrong, though.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:27 AM   #18
NaptownChief
Donkeys Nightmare
 
NaptownChief's Avatar
 
Football Pimp

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
...and this is why I like you.

You're still completely wrong, though.

You might want to go back and read my post again. If you read it really slow and careful I think you might pick up on something.
NaptownChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:30 AM   #19
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,963

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaptownChief View Post
You might want to go back and read my post again. If you read it really slow and careful I think you might pick up on something.
I'm definitely missing this one then... Avellini sarcasm?
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:35 AM   #20
NaptownChief
Donkeys Nightmare
 
NaptownChief's Avatar
 
Football Pimp

Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReverend View Post
I'm definitely missing this one then... Avellini sarcasm?


Ok, so you aren't quite as slow as the 45 year old Fridge Perry, but maybe Michael Dean.
NaptownChief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:38 AM   #21
TheReverend
www.PatrickTurley.org
 
TheReverend's Avatar
 
^ buy this... twice

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 32,963

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mike Shanahan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaptownChief View Post
Ok, so you aren't quite as slow as the 45 year old Fridge Perry, but maybe Michael Dean.
Now I just can't help but picturing you wearing some McMahon sun-glasses with a Payton jersey on and doing the superbowl shuffle.
TheReverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:40 AM   #22
socalorado
Ring of Famer
 
socalorado's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Stout View Post
I saw this story back in 2005 and can't forget it. Basically for their time, the only guys Elway could realistically be compared to are Marino and Montana and those who came before. This is the time honored Montana v. Elway debate... most people acknowledge John over Marino since Marino never got lucky after the big dance

Elway v. Montana - The Definitive Answer

John Elway
By Jason Looney
Broncos Update Columnist
Posted Nov 11, 2005



Who was better? The Denver Broncos' John Elway or the San Franciso 49ers' Joe Montana. Broncos Update Columnist Jason Looney settles the argument once and for all.

On the list of the 100 greatest football players our world has ever known (maintained by a prestigious sports publication), Joe Montana is ranked 3rd. John Elway, meanwhile, is 16th.
On the list of the 100 greatest athletes of the last century (maintained by the world's largest sports television network), Joe Montana is ranked 25th. John Elway, meanwhile… isn't listed??
Wait a second. This can't be right, can it? You mean to tell me Elway's not even on the list??
John Elway is not on the list. He's not listed. At all. Dan "World Champion" Marino made the list, but Elway didn't. Greg Louganis has a spot, but Elway doesn't. Two different jockeys made the list. As did three horses. Yes, horses.
Just to be clear: This list had room for non-human entities that we gamble on, but not for John Elway.
This leaves us with two options. On the one hand, we could leave town right now and strangle, to death, everyone who has ever worked for the company that made this list. Or, we could stay in our seats and perform our own analysis of the situation.
While we shouldn't be too hasty in ruling out the first option, I suppose we should spend a bit of time on the second. (At least for now...)
Comparing athletes is a dodgy undertaking because, really, how do we do it? In my opinion, the fairest way is to ask, "If we could step outside of time to assemble a Field of Dreams intramural squad, who should we pick?" This makes more sense to me than asking, "Who had a better career statistically?" which seems to be the only concern of these brainless and spineless (and soon to be oxygen-less) list makers.
So let's resolve this Elway v. Montana debate, once and for all. This type of discussion can, at times, resemble a religious war, so let's break it up as best we can into reasonable and objective categories. And let's keep score in units of seven and three, naturally, since God prefers these numbers.
Here we go:
Bias
Disclaimer: I was born in Colorado, I live in Colorado, and I've been known to drink ketchup on gameday so that even my urine is Denver Broncos Orange. While I doubt this will affect my judgment in this matter, we should probably spot Montana a couple of scores right off the bat. You know, in the name of fairness.
Score: Montana 10, Elway 0
Statistics
Joe Montana had a brilliant career. He led his team to four Super Bowl victories, including the trouncing of Elway's Broncos in 1990. He was named the MVP in all but one of those games, and in that contest he led a 92–yard drive late in the fourth quarter to win the championship. He retired with a quarterback rating of 92.3 and, while he threw his fair share of interceptions in the playoffs, Joe Montana threw exactly zero interceptions in four Super Bowls.
Elway's numbers are impressive, but less so. He was the only quarterback to start five Super Bowls, including two victories and one MVP award, but he lost the other three contests badly and, as such, is on the wrong end of many Super Bowl records. His career quarterback rating was an unimpressive 79.9, although he did end up being more durable than Joe. He retired with more completions, yards, touchdowns, and wins, despite the fact that he did more scrambling and took more punishment. In fact, he is ranked either first, second, or third in all major passing categories, while Montana is eighth and ninth.
But Montana's efficiency — especially in big games — was incredible. Enough so that I think he deserves another touchdown.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 0
Coaching
This is where the analysis gets more… nuanced. While statistics are indeed important, professional football is a game with 22 players on the field and several dozen other players (and countless coaches) on the sidelines. When trying to decide which quarterback to pick for our intramural team in the sky, we need to look behind the numbers. We need to ask things like, "What if this guy had played for another team?" And, "How did his coaches do with other players in his position?" And, "Hasn't history shown that Dan Reeves knew more about licking footballs than coaching football?"
Which brings me to: Bill Walsh vs. Dan Reeves. Walsh was the father of the modern offense; Reeves was hawking blood pressure medication while still "coaching" an NFL team. Bill Walsh is revered to this day; Reeves is but a bad taste in the mouths of numerous teams. Admittedly, Walsh probably gets more credit than he deserves for the so-called west coast offense, but it's hard to deny that his offensive schemes were vastly superior to Reeves' who, inexplicably, never structured his offense around Elway. Instead he would run his famous "four yards and a cloud of dust" offense for 58 minutes, then turn it over to John for the last two.
How bad can a coach be for a player? With Reeves at the helm, John Elway's quarterback rating averaged 72.9. Post-Reeves, it averaged 89.1 — a sixteen point swing. The improvement came practically overnight. The first year after Reeves, Elway threw for over 4000 yards (something Montana never did), 25 touchdowns, and a rating of 92.8.
The recent tailspin of Denver's current coach, Mike Shanahan, is also telling. During the 1996–1998 seasons Shanahan was considered a mastermind who always kept one step ahead of the competition. Since Elway left, however, he's had Brian Griese posting a 100+ QB rating, scrubs and rookies putting up 1500-yard rushing seasons, defensive units ranked second/third in the league, Clinton Portis looking like the love child of Barry Sanders and Walter Payton, and… zero playoff victories.
So, Elway made it to three Super Bowls with horrible coaching and won two Super Bowls with decent coaching. Montana had the advantage of spending the majority of his career within a brilliant offensive scheme.
Touchdown, John.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 7
Supporting Cast
On the first list I mentioned above, Jerry Rice is ranked as the 2nd greatest player in the history of football. On the ESPN list, he's just two spots behind Montana. Rice has proven himself time and again with numerous quarterbacks, and seemingly everyone regards him as the best receiver to ever play the game.
In 1989 (the season Montana and Elway met in the Super Bowl), San Francisco's roster also included:
* Ronnie Lott
* Roger Craig
* John Taylor
* Steve Young
* Charles Haley
* Bill Romanowski
* Brent Jones
* Matt Millen
* Tom Rathman
* Bubba Paris

Meanwhile, John Elway had:
* Steve Atwater
* Karl Mecklenberg
* Dennis Smith
* Ricky… Somebody
* A guy named Vance, I think? (Or was it Steve?)
* Hey, was Bobby Humphrey the guy who married Whitney Houston?
* Is the Super Bowl XXIV blowout starting to make more sense to ANYONE
So Montana played with a handful of future Hall-of-Famers, including the greatest wide receiver to have walked our planet. John Elway played with guys like the "Three Amigos," all three of whom were out of football within a year or two of leaving the Broncos for other teams.
Field goal, John.
Score: Montana 17, Elway 10
Head-to-Head Competition
Off the top of my head, I can remember two big games featuring the quarterbacks. The first was the lopsided Super Bowl, the second was the infamous "whoever gets the ball last is going to win this thing" Monday night game. Montana won both match-ups.
While this is certainly a worthwhile category, I don't think we can place too much emphasis on it since there are obvious "Coaching" and "Supporting Cast" elements that come into play. Also, I haven't been able to find a comprehensive list of their meetings, so we should probably stick with a field goal on this one.
Score: Montana 20, Elway 10
Name
'John Elway' is a pretty tough name — it brings to mind John Wayne and all — but 'Joe Montana' takes the cake. (Especially if you have never seen his mamma's-boy face.)
Score: Montana 23, Elway 10
Number
As we discussed earlier, God likes the number 7. A lot. So if you've somehow made it outside of time to pick an intramural football team, you might want to take this into consideration. Montana's numbers (16 and 19) might have been shout-outs to guys like Blanda and Unitas, but it's important to keep in mind that neither of these people is God.
But, leaving God's feelings out of this for a moment, let me ask: Which is a cooler number for a quarterback? 7, or 16? Which number inspires more fear in opposing defenses? 7, or 19? Do you think it's coincidence that "seven" sounds like "heaven" and "sixteen" sounds like "sissy?" I don't.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 13
Arm
Do I really need to say anything here?
Of the two quarterbacks, only one had receivers spending their off-seasons with machines rifling footballs at 100 miles-per-hour. This same player threw a football 65 yards on the fly, in high school, and was drafted by the New York Yankees coming out of college. (Hint: It's not the player whose name rhymes with Dough Bontana.)
Look, John Elway could make any throw on the field, even if he was falling down or running against the grain. When plays broke down, his receivers were instructed to go long. According to Rick Reilly, players from other teams would beg him to throw them a 40–yard out during Pro Bowl week, just so they could experience catching it. Pat Summerall called him "the master of the inconceivable pass thrown to the unreachable spot." And I'm pretty sure Pat said that before he went senile.
Let's move on.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 20
Legs and Athleticism
We probably shouldn't weigh it too heavily but, all other things being equal, I would take the more mobile of any two quarterbacks. Joe Montana had decent feet, but Elway was the master of the escape. At times, other teams were afraid to blitz him since he did his best work when he was running for his life. While he never reached the same level as The Player Formerly Known as Ron Mexico, he was definitely a better runner than Montana.
Field goal, John.
Score: Montana 23, Elway 23
Leadership
Well, it's all come down to this. The score is tied and we've saved one of the most important categories for last.
When discussing the relative merits of quarterbacks, leadership ability is, obviously, critical. A good leader will make everyone on their team better, and both Elway and Montana had this quality in spades. A good leader will inspire confidence in their teammates and fans -- both players did this, too.
But John Elway was a better team leader than anyone. He would stomp the sidelines and goad members of the defense. He would chastise receivers in the huddle when they dropped his passes. He would exhort his offensive line to play this down harder than they'd played any down in their lives. And he backed it all up by engineering more comeback victories than any quarterback in NFL history, including several in the postseason.
In Cleveland, he's known for "The Drive." In Houston, he's known for his fourth down heroics. In Super Bowl lore, he's known for his helicopter dive on third down. And in Marty Schottenheimer's therapist's office, he's known as "The One About Whom We Do Not Speak."
Joe Montana was a cool-headed field general, for sure, but it's hard to look back at the 49ers dynasty and say that none of it would have happened without him. In fact, Montana played his last few years in Kansas City because San Francisco figured they were better off with Steve Young, who went on to win a Super Bowl of his own.
Elway, on the other hand, WAS the Denver Broncos. His sheer willpower and determination led his teams — and the entire state of Colorado — to heights they would have otherwise never reached.
In summary, these two guys are arguably the best quarterbacks to ever play the game. Each ended their career with an impressive list of records and statistical achievements. Both undeniably, were champions. But Elway was better. Final Score: Montana 23, Elway 26
In summary
So far in Elway’s career, his offensive linemen and wide receivers have been voted to the Pro Bowl a combined seven times. In Dan Marino’s 15 seasons, Miami Dolphins offensive linemen and wide receivers have been selected to the Pro Bowl 30 times. … Though usually surrounded by a human rummage sale, Elway has won more games as a starter than any other quarterback in NFL history (138). It’s the equivalent of carving Mount Rushmore with a spoon or composing Beethoven’s Ninth on a kazoo.
But Elway’s career has been about more than just winning. It has been about escaping defeat a half page from the end of the novel, leaping over pits of fire with the microdot hidden in his cigarette lighter. On first down Elway was ‘pretty average,’ his Stanford coach Paul Wiggin once said. But when the elementary school kids are being held hostage and the detonator reads 00:03, who would you rather have clipping the wires than Elway? He may be the only quarterback in history who could stand on his own two-yard line, trailing by five with less than two minutes to play, no timeouts left, windchill –5, and cause the opposing coach to mutter, ‘We’re in trouble.’” --Rick Reilly, Sports Illustrated, qtd. in Austin Murphy’s The Super Bowl: Sports Greatest Championship
socalorado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:41 AM   #23
Pat Bowlen
President/Chief Executive
 
Pat Bowlen's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,691
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Moops View Post
Yup, John's the best.

What kind of argument are you going to get on a Broncos fan site
Exactly. You're preaching to the choir here, dude.
Pat Bowlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 09:42 AM   #24
Northman
The Enigma Prognosis
 
Northman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,925

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Bryci
Default

Not even close for me. But im biased.
Northman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2008, 11:12 AM   #25
GoHAM
Ring of Famer
 
GoHAM's Avatar
 
The Defense is Back!

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: County 5
Posts: 1,177

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Mitch Unrein
Default

It's a rhetorical question.
GoHAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Denver Broncos