Depth at QB - Help me figgur owt wich is a biggur nomber? 2 or 3? - The Orange Mane

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:01 AM

Would you say the Chiefs have better depth?

Or would you say the Broncos have more depth at QB?

Personally, I'm not sure Jake Plummer would count as a starter. Jay Cutler has the potential to be the starter (so I hear), but has yet to beat out Plummer.

That said, it would be difficult to pose a logical arguement that the Chiefs aren't in better shape at the QB position than the Broncos. Without a doubt, the Chiefs can plug either of thier two QBs in and win.

Master___Pain · 11-09-2006, 08:07 AM

Nanananananana..........Fishing!!!

fontaine · 11-09-2006, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

Would you say the Chiefs have better depth?

Or would you say the Broncos have more depth at QB?

Does it hurt when you try to think?

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=48571

BroncoFanCam · 11-09-2006, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

Would you say the Chiefs have better depth?

Or would you say the Broncos have more depth at QB?

Personally, I'm not sure Jake Plummer would count as a starter. Jay Cutler has the potential to be the starter (so I hear), but has yet to beat out Plummer.

That said, it would be difficult to pose a logical arguement that the Chiefs aren't in better shape at the QB position than the Broncos. Without a doubt, the Chiefs can plug either of thier two QBs in and win.

Jay hasn't "beat out" Jake because there hasn't officially been a contreversy.

It's not as if every week teh position is up for grabs, and the coaches are letting the two "duke it out", Jake has had their support and been the man. The position is fixed.

And it isn't as though Huard "beat out" Trent either, had Trent not gotten his skull crushed, Huard will still be a great unknown journeyman, riding the pine.

And get your head out of the red-haze, Jake would be a starter on plenty of teams in this league, the only reason there was any doubt this year is because we have an exceptional talent behind him for once. If BVP were still back there, the fans wouldn't have been half as hard on Jake as they have been (including myself).

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master___Pain

Nanananananana..........Fishing!!!

That's what you folks always say. The question is legit. Is there a point in my arguement that you disagree with?

It is bait in that it's used to solicit a response. Yours is a strong indicator that though you don't have the knowledge to dispute the thread, you let everyone know it by posting an empty response on said thread.

Nice work.

Don't be afraid.

It's just a football question.

Smiling Assassin27 · 11-09-2006, 08:15 AM

Chiefs get the nod at qb depth mainly because of unknowns. Jay Cut is an unknown commodity but may be better than Huard, Plummer and/or Green. Green is damaged goods and the lingering effects of his brain mushifying is unknown and makes his quality as a starter and/or backup unknown. I take Plummer over Huard every day of the week and twice on Sundays. If Huard was so good, he'd have more time as a starter and less as a clipboard holder.

Taco John · 11-09-2006, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

That's what you folks always say. The question is legit.

No it's not. It's a stupid question. You're just trolling. Badly I might add.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fontaine

Does it hurt when you try to think?

Why?

Master___Pain · 11-09-2006, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

That's what you folks always say. The question is legit. Is there a point in my arguement that you disagree with?

It is bait in that it's used to solicit a response. Yours is a strong indicator that though you don't have the knowledge to dispute the thread, you let everyone know it by posting an empty response on said thread.

Nice work.

Don't be afraid.

It's just a football question.

Oh, sorry I misunderstood that you actually wanted to talk football rather than try and start a thread that you already tried to start two weeks ago.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

You're just trolling.

In what way is it trolling?

Taco John · 11-09-2006, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

Why?

Because it hurts everybody else when you try to think... It's almost like you drain brainpower from the collective consciousness to form thoughs, making us all a little stupider the closer to proximity we are to you. Luckily, I'm on the fringe near the Pacific Coastline... But I'm starting to understand a little bit about why KC fans seem so lost.

azbroncfan · 11-09-2006, 08:19 AM

chiefs, huard has a hot hand now but he could cool off at anytime.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master___Pain

Oh, sorry I misunderstood that you actually wanted to talk football rather than try and start a thread that you already tried to start two weeks ago.

Yeah, I got the same "deer in the headlights" type of response then too.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

Because it hurts everybody else when you try to think... It's almost like you drain brainpower from the collective consciousness to form thoughs, making us all a little stupider the closer to proximity we are to you. Luckily, I'm on the fringe near the Pacific Coastline... But I'm starting to understand a little bit about why KC fans seem so lost.

You're obviously close enough that I have made you retarded.

Taco John · 11-09-2006, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

In what way is it trolling?

It's unbelievable to me how stupid you act. I'm giving you the benefit of a doubt that you're just playing stupid, and know full and well what you're doing. No way could you be genuinely this stupid.

We have two freaking quarterbacks on our roster you moron. You have three, plus Printers lurking around somewhere. Let's find out just how stupid you really are:

Which is the bigger number: 2 or 3

fontaine · 11-09-2006, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

Would you say the Chiefs have better depth?

Or would you say the Broncos have more depth at QB?
.

This troll posted the same type of thread just a few days ago. I really hope there aren't any more fools on this board that are going to actually entertain this idiot:

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=48571

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazyhorse

Is it Kansas City with Damon Huard

Or is it Jake Plummer?

So please, end of discussion.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fontaine

This troll posted the same type of thread just a few days ago. I really hope there aren't any more fools on this board that actually entertain this idiot:

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=48571

Like there is an arguement against it.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

It's unbelievable to me how stupid you act. I'm giving you the benefit of a doubt that you're just playing stupid, and know full and well what you're doing. No way could you be genuinely this stupid.

We have two freaking quarterbacks on our roster you moron. You have three, plus Printers lurking around somewhere. Let's find out just how stupid you really are:

Which is the bigger number: 2 or 3

I was just refering to the #1 and 2 QBs on either team.

In reference to your test question, the answer is 3.

Taco John · 11-09-2006, 08:29 AM

I'm going to go ahead and comment. 3 is a bigger number than 2.

Taco John · 11-09-2006, 08:32 AM

I wonder how they'd react at the Planet if someone started a thread that asked, "Who has more quality wins?"

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I'm going to go ahead and comment. 3 is a bigger number than 2.

Generally when you can't defend yourself you move my threads to the horses butt. This time you have simply changed the thread title. Given the recent softening of your aggression, does this mean you're beginning to like me?

I've always thought highly of you.

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:35 AM

Ah yes. There we go.

Crazyhorse 3
Taco 0

crazyhorse · 11-09-2006, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I wonder how they'd react at the Planet if someone started a thread that asked, "Who has more quality wins?"

Well I think it's pretty clear. How were you treated?

Orange_Beard · 11-09-2006, 09:03 AM

Who cares.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-09-2006, 08:01 AM	#1
crazyhorse All Motor!! You can only hope to contain me Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 7,338	Depth at QB - Help me figgur owt wich is a biggur nomber? 2 or 3? Would you say the Chiefs have better depth? Or would you say the Broncos have more depth at QB? Personally, I'm not sure Jake Plummer would count as a starter. Jay Cutler has the potential to be the starter (so I hear), but has yet to beat out Plummer. That said, it would be difficult to pose a logical arguement that the Chiefs aren't in better shape at the QB position than the Broncos. Without a doubt, the Chiefs can plug either of thier two QBs in and win.

11-09-2006, 08:07 AM	#2
Master___Pain Ring of Famer Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: The Springs Posts: 4,605 Adopt-a-Bronco: Rock Hoover	Nanananananana..........Fishing!!!

11-09-2006, 08:15 AM	#6
Smiling Assassin27 STOP! KIPER TIME! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a van down by the river Posts: 10,983 Adopt-a-Bronco: Von Miller	Chiefs get the nod at qb depth mainly because of unknowns. Jay Cut is an unknown commodity but may be better than Huard, Plummer and/or Green. Green is damaged goods and the lingering effects of his brain mushifying is unknown and makes his quality as a starter and/or backup unknown. I take Plummer over Huard every day of the week and twice on Sundays. If Huard was so good, he'd have more time as a starter and less as a clipboard holder.

11-09-2006, 08:19 AM	#12
azbroncfan Ring of Famer Angry guntoting,meateating AMERICAN Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Scottsdale Posts: 8,669 Adopt-a-Bronco: TEBOW	chiefs, huard has a hot hand now but he could cool off at anytime.

11-09-2006, 08:29 AM	#19
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,708 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	I'm going to go ahead and comment. 3 is a bigger number than 2.

11-09-2006, 08:32 AM	#20
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,708 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	I wonder how they'd react at the Planet if someone started a thread that asked, "Who has more quality wins?"

11-09-2006, 08:35 AM	#22
crazyhorse All Motor!! You can only hope to contain me Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 7,338	Ah yes. There we go. Crazyhorse 3 Taco 0

11-09-2006, 09:03 AM	#24
Orange_Beard Over Jay Cutler Todd Snider Rules! Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Leucadia, CA Posts: 7,836 Adopt-a-Bronco: Tony Scheffler	Who cares.