o'reilly tears m.moore a new one!! - The Orange Mane

SteveTensi13 · 07-27-2004, 05:54 PM

Just finished watching the Bill O'Reily interview of Michael Moore. It was like watching a college professor trying to instruct a 6 year old. Michael Moore has revealed himself as not just a Bush-hater but also an anti-American buffoon. His twisted "logic" and wishful thinking were beyond comprehension. Michael Moore democrats are a dangerous breed, a fifth column waiting for the opportunity to pounce.

My hats off to Bill O' Reilly for exposing Michael Moore for what he is, an illiterate "don't confuse me with the facts" a**hole.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 05:59 PM

This is a duplicate thread.

o'reilly tears m.moore a new one

...just before he woke up.

"Atta boy, Bill! Don't let that Moore guy get away with telling the truth about our meal ticket Dubya!"

SteveTensi13 · 07-27-2004, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN

This is a duplicate thread.

o'reilly tears m.moore a new one

...just before he woke up.

"Atta boy, Bill! Don't let that Moore guy get away with telling the truth about our meal ticket Dubya!"

!!!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 06:09 PM

watermock · 07-27-2004, 06:13 PM

O'Reilly was played.

Mock would of made Moore into a sniveling wimp.

Moore played the classic deflection game, either responding to a question with question, or making assertions, which O'Reilly did a poor job controling the real issues.

Moore is slick and knows that a 10 minute interview while he throws assertions around wouldn't be enough to pin him down.

First, the baby killers are in Iraq. Saddam was using schools for weapons armories. His regime killed god knows how many children. So Mr. Moore, how many children did they kill on 9/11 and continue to kill Mayors, Senior Officials and Representatives striving for a free Iraq?

The Democratic Answer? It's the Osterich report. Wait till you see the platform they prance out in disbelief!

Second, intelligence was not only from Britan, Germany, France and Russia about WMD, but that...

THE CIA INTELLIGENCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION.

Bush had allready begun revamping the CIA when the WTC attacks happened. Of course, they were not WMD were they, nor the Cole, or the Embassy Bombings, all under Clintons watch. All the cells were in place and preparing while Clinton's Tenet of the CIA was running the show.

Blueflame · 07-27-2004, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

O'Reilly was played.

Mock would of made Moore into a sniveling wimp.

Moore played the classic deflection game, either responding to a question with question, or making assertions, which O'Reilly did a poor job controling the real issues.

Moore is slick and knows that a 10 minute interview while he throws assertions around wouldn't be enough to pin him down.

First, the baby killers are in Iraq. Saddam was using schools for weapons armories. His regime killed god knows how many children. So Mr. Moore, how many children did they kill on 9/11 and continue to kill Mayors, Senior Officials and Representatives striving for a free Iraq?

The Democratic Answer? It's the Osterich report. Wait till you see the platform they prance out in disbelief!

Second, intelligence was not only from Britan, Germany, France and Russia about WMD, but that...

THE CIA INTELLIGENCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION.

Bush had allready begun revamping the CIA when the WTC attacks happened. Of course, they were not WMD were they, nor the Cole, or the Embassy Bombings, all under Clintons watch. All the cells were in place and preparing while Clinton's Tenet of the CIA was running the show.

Inquiring minds want to know if you would have called him "idiot" first or opted for "dimwit" instead...

watermock · 07-27-2004, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blueflame

Inquiring minds want to know if you would have called him "idiot" first or opted for "dimwit" instead...

I will say again that if he made an argument and didn't paste I wouldn't call him a dimwit.

Your point? It doesn't matter and this is a running battle. What is your point?

Does it matter? He's an idiot cut and paste master that brought in two other dimwits in Riggs and Paste and Run.

What is your point?

Blueflame · 07-27-2004, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

I will say again that if he made an argument and didn't paste I wouldn't call him a dimwit.

Your point? It doesn't matter and this is a running battle. What is your point?

Does it matter? He's an idiot cut and paste master that brought in two other dimwits in Riggs and Paste and Run.

What is your point?

The point is that your debating style of late has tended to include at least one... and sometimes a combination of both of those terms. (But if you check out the

smiley, you might realize I was kidding you about it.)

watermock · 07-27-2004, 06:16 PM

Finally, and I have repeated this and it's a fundamental error, there was no reason to claim Iraq was behind 9/11. That was just a ploy. Bin Laden was in Afganistan, and now in Pakistan, and we can't go in there without another freak show.

The point was that Saddam committed war crimes, had or has hidden WMD. It's classic deflection.

SteveTensi13 · 07-27-2004, 06:19 PM

Careful Watermock, the cartoon network (LABF) is hard at work. Don't confuse him/her with the facts, his keyboard might melt down!!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 06:20 PM

Mock would of made Moore into a sniveling wimp

"You tell 'em, little buddy! These liberals don't seem to understand that if you're not on your knees for Bush/Halliburton then you're helping the terrorists!"

watermock · 07-27-2004, 06:34 PM

Nice cartoon. Your so lost I honestly feel sorry for you.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 06:39 PM

"You tell 'em Mock! If he doesn't unconditionally smooch BushCo a$$ like you and me then he's with the terrorists!"

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 06:42 PM

Inquiring minds want to know if you would have called him "idiot" first or opted for "dimwit" instead...

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 06:54 PM

"Yes, I whooped that Michael Moore just like I whooped that Al Franken guy when he exposed me as a liar."

watermock · 07-27-2004, 07:02 PM

Now they can prance the ballet dancer around as the headline speaker in Ron Reagan?

Taco John · 07-27-2004, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PATRIOT

Just finished watching the Bill O'Reily interview of Michael Moore. It was like watching a college professor trying to instruct a 6 year old. Michael Moore has revealed himself as not just a Bush-hater but also an anti-American buffoon. His twisted "logic" and wishful thinking were beyond comprehension. Michael Moore democrats are a dangerous breed, a fifth column waiting for the opportunity to pounce.

My hats off to Bill O' Reilly for exposing Michael Moore for what he is, an illiterate "don't confuse me with the facts" a**hole.

Huh... I was pretty unimpressed. I thought they both looked like a couple of morons.

watermock · 07-27-2004, 07:07 PM

Whatever.

O'Reilly dropped the ball.

Repeatedly Cut and Pasting the President in drag deserves it.

Blueflame · 07-27-2004, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watermock

Whatever.

O'Reilly dropped the ball.

Repeatedly Cut and Pasting the President in drag deserves it.

In which case, I apologize... I apparently misunderestimated the thickness of your skin.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN · 07-27-2004, 07:17 PM

Jeez, the wingers added Moore's name to their official list of "morons" (right next to Richard Clarke and David Kay and Scott Ritter and Hans Blix, et al) a long time ago.

This is SO not news.

orinjkrush · 07-27-2004, 07:41 PM

i get the impression that O Reilly is more self serving than anything else. Moore is harder to explain, except that he seems to have no allegiance to the truth whatsover. Bowling anyone? Whether he believes his "connect the dots" game is questionable. $100M will make a believer out of anybody. But there is one dot Moore didn't connect. And I know this for a fact....There was a bush on a grassy knoll in Dallas, lo these many years ago.

But to imply that all Presidents are self serving and money hungry sociopaths....well, hmmm I can believe that.

Taco John · 07-27-2004, 09:09 PM

Moore's problem is that he's trying to force the pieces. He wants to call Bush a liar, and try to play gotcha with the Republicans who wasted our time with Monica. But he's not going to get Bush on lying because of the evidence that is out there that he was actually misled...

Which to me is a more important issue. Can anyone tell me when the Soviets became our friends, because as far as I know, these are the bastards that were breaking the UN conventions and shipping banned military items to Iraq. What in the hell would we listen to their intelligence for? When someone says, "well Putin said that there were WMDs," I just want to smack them upside the head and ask them just how stupid they are. This flimsy idea that Putin is our friend has got to go. Using his intelligence as any sort of basis of truth is like Bush taking cues from Ted Kennedy on how to approach California.

Personally, my whole deal with Bush is that I don't think the guy has got the noggin for the job. It's undisputable that the guy can't think on his feet. For the life of me, I can't understand how he rose to the position to where he is. No doubt, it took a lot of "adults" around him to do it. But thanks to those adults, Bush has become accustomed to being manipulated. That seems to be what happened here.

If Moore wanted to nab Bush, instead of going after so called lies, he should go after how easily this guy is manipulated thanks to his inability to think in the moment.

watermock · 07-27-2004, 09:19 PM

That is why the corrupt oil for terrorism band had to be broken, and why they whined.

Of course they didn't like it. It was a cash cow. The Europeans have never had a concept of ultimate consequence.

07-27-2004, 05:54 PM	#1
SteveTensi13 GIVE ME SOME MORE ORANGE OLD SCHOOL BRONCO Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Helmand province, Afghanistan Posts: 1,830 Adopt-a-Bronco: Brandon Stokley	o'reilly tears m.moore a new one!! Just finished watching the Bill O'Reily interview of Michael Moore. It was like watching a college professor trying to instruct a 6 year old. Michael Moore has revealed himself as not just a Bush-hater but also an anti-American buffoon. His twisted "logic" and wishful thinking were beyond comprehension. Michael Moore democrats are a dangerous breed, a fifth column waiting for the opportunity to pounce. My hats off to Bill O' Reilly for exposing Michael Moore for what he is, an illiterate "don't confuse me with the facts" a**hole.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-27-2004, 05:59 PM	#2
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	This is a duplicate thread. o'reilly tears m.moore a new one ...just before he woke up. "Atta boy, Bill! Don't let that Moore guy get away with telling the truth about our meal ticket Dubya!"

07-27-2004, 06:09 PM	#4
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697

07-27-2004, 06:13 PM	#5
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	O'Reilly was played. Mock would of made Moore into a sniveling wimp. Moore played the classic deflection game, either responding to a question with question, or making assertions, which O'Reilly did a poor job controling the real issues. Moore is slick and knows that a 10 minute interview while he throws assertions around wouldn't be enough to pin him down. First, the baby killers are in Iraq. Saddam was using schools for weapons armories. His regime killed god knows how many children. So Mr. Moore, how many children did they kill on 9/11 and continue to kill Mayors, Senior Officials and Representatives striving for a free Iraq? The Democratic Answer? It's the Osterich report. Wait till you see the platform they prance out in disbelief! Second, intelligence was not only from Britan, Germany, France and Russia about WMD, but that... THE CIA INTELLIGENCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION. Bush had allready begun revamping the CIA when the WTC attacks happened. Of course, they were not WMD were they, nor the Cole, or the Embassy Bombings, all under Clintons watch. All the cells were in place and preparing while Clinton's Tenet of the CIA was running the show.

07-27-2004, 06:16 PM	#9
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Finally, and I have repeated this and it's a fundamental error, there was no reason to claim Iraq was behind 9/11. That was just a ploy. Bin Laden was in Afganistan, and now in Pakistan, and we can't go in there without another freak show. The point was that Saddam committed war crimes, had or has hidden WMD. It's classic deflection.

07-27-2004, 06:19 PM	#10
SteveTensi13 GIVE ME SOME MORE ORANGE OLD SCHOOL BRONCO Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Helmand province, Afghanistan Posts: 1,830 Adopt-a-Bronco: Brandon Stokley	Careful Watermock, the cartoon network (LABF) is hard at work. Don't confuse him/her with the facts, his keyboard might melt down!!

07-27-2004, 06:20 PM	#11
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	Mock would of made Moore into a sniveling wimp "You tell 'em, little buddy! These liberals don't seem to understand that if you're not on your knees for Bush/Halliburton then you're helping the terrorists!"

07-27-2004, 06:34 PM	#12
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Nice cartoon. Your so lost I honestly feel sorry for you.

07-27-2004, 06:39 PM	#13
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	"You tell 'em Mock! If he doesn't unconditionally smooch BushCo a$$ like you and me then he's with the terrorists!"

07-27-2004, 06:42 PM	#14
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	Inquiring minds want to know if you would have called him "idiot" first or opted for "dimwit" instead...

07-27-2004, 06:54 PM	#15
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	"Yes, I whooped that Michael Moore just like I whooped that Al Franken guy when he exposed me as a liar."

07-27-2004, 07:02 PM	#16
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Now they can prance the ballet dancer around as the headline speaker in Ron Reagan?

07-27-2004, 07:07 PM	#18
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	Whatever. O'Reilly dropped the ball. Repeatedly Cut and Pasting the President in drag deserves it.

07-27-2004, 07:17 PM	#20
L.A. BRONCOS FAN Mo' holla fo' yo' dolla! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: In a bunker in an undisclosed location Posts: 52,697	Jeez, the wingers added Moore's name to their official list of "morons" (right next to Richard Clarke and David Kay and Scott Ritter and Hans Blix, et al) a long time ago. This is SO not news.

07-27-2004, 07:41 PM	#21
orinjkrush ... Prospects for the future... Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DistrictOfCorruption Posts: 4,918 Adopt-a-Bronco: Ben Garland	i get the impression that O Reilly is more self serving than anything else. Moore is harder to explain, except that he seems to have no allegiance to the truth whatsover. Bowling anyone? Whether he believes his "connect the dots" game is questionable. $100M will make a believer out of anybody. But there is one dot Moore didn't connect. And I know this for a fact....There was a bush on a grassy knoll in Dallas, lo these many years ago. But to imply that all Presidents are self serving and money hungry sociopaths....well, hmmm I can believe that.

07-27-2004, 09:09 PM	#22
Taco John 24/7 Broncos In Elway I Trust Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 49,742 Adopt-a-Bronco: Peyton Manning	Moore's problem is that he's trying to force the pieces. He wants to call Bush a liar, and try to play gotcha with the Republicans who wasted our time with Monica. But he's not going to get Bush on lying because of the evidence that is out there that he was actually misled... Which to me is a more important issue. Can anyone tell me when the Soviets became our friends, because as far as I know, these are the bastards that were breaking the UN conventions and shipping banned military items to Iraq. What in the hell would we listen to their intelligence for? When someone says, "well Putin said that there were WMDs," I just want to smack them upside the head and ask them just how stupid they are. This flimsy idea that Putin is our friend has got to go. Using his intelligence as any sort of basis of truth is like Bush taking cues from Ted Kennedy on how to approach California. Personally, my whole deal with Bush is that I don't think the guy has got the noggin for the job. It's undisputable that the guy can't think on his feet. For the life of me, I can't understand how he rose to the position to where he is. No doubt, it took a lot of "adults" around him to do it. But thanks to those adults, Bush has become accustomed to being manipulated. That seems to be what happened here. If Moore wanted to nab Bush, instead of going after so called lies, he should go after how easily this guy is manipulated thanks to his inability to think in the moment.

07-27-2004, 09:19 PM	#23
watermock "Hoodie Jr" "Hug me!" Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Hot Springs, Ouachitah Posts: 77,090	That is why the corrupt oil for terrorism band had to be broken, and why they whined. Of course they didn't like it. It was a cash cow. The Europeans have never had a concept of ultimate consequence.