The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Poll: What Democrat should be President?
Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.
Poll Options
What Democrat should be President?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2014, 02:30 AM   #1
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default What Dem should be President?

Poll to follow
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-15-2014, 02:39 AM   #2
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

I was a Biden Guy in 2008 then he dropped out and I became a Hillary supporter than on to Obama. 2012 I would love Warren as most Liberals would but I don't think she has the experience yet and she really isn't a great public speaker. She would make a better VP at this point. We really can't be serious about Castro yet. He is the Mayor of San Antonio for chriminey sakes. Cuomo is not liberal enough so my choice would be between Kristen Gillibrand and Martin O'Malley.

OK I vote for LABF!!!

My rising stars for 2024 after another 8 years of Dem rule is Gavin Newsome and Elizabeth Warren. They will be a power couple.
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 02:59 AM   #3
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guess Who View Post
I was a Biden Guy in 2008 then he dropped out and I became a Hillary supporter than on to Obama. 2012 I would love Warren as most Liberals would but I don't think she has the experience yet and she really isn't a great public speaker. She would make a better VP at this point. We really can't be serious about Castro yet. He is the Mayor of San Antonio for chriminey sakes. Cuomo is not liberal enough so my choice would be between Kristen Gillibrand and Martin O'Malley.

OK I vote for LABF!!!

My rising stars for 2024 after another 8 years of Dem rule is Gavin Newsome and Elizabeth Warren. They will be a power couple.
A brown/sanders ticket would be perfect but I believe everyone knows who will be president if she runs.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 03:40 AM   #4
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
A brown/sanders ticket would be perfect but I believe everyone knows who will be president if she runs.
Bernie would be my top choice but I just think he is too old now (72)

WOW.. Holy crap.... did anyone know that Elizabeth Warren is 64 years-old I thought she was 50 or something like that.




Elizabeth Warren

United States Senator
Elizabeth Ann Warren is an American academic and politician, who is the senior United States Senator from Massachusetts and a member of the Democratic Party. She was previously a Harvard Law School professor specializing in bankruptcy law. Wikipedia

Born: June 22, 1949 (age 64), Oklahoma City, OK
Office: Senator (D-MA) since 2013
Previous office: Special Advisor for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2010–2011)
Books: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, More
Spouse: Bruce Mann (m. 1980), Jim Warren (m. 1968–1978)
Children: Amelia Warren Tyagi, Alexander Warren


Must be the Indian blood in her.

Last edited by Guess Who; 05-15-2014 at 03:42 AM..
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 07:15 AM   #5
BroncoBeavis
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoBeavis's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,216

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guess Who View Post
Bernie would be my top choice but I just think he is too old now (72)

WOW.. Holy crap.... did anyone know that Elizabeth Warren is 64 years-old I thought she was 50 or something like that.




Elizabeth Warren

United States Senator
Elizabeth Ann Warren is an American academic and politician, who is the senior United States Senator from Massachusetts and a member of the Democratic Party. She was previously a Harvard Law School professor specializing in bankruptcy law. Wikipedia

Born: June 22, 1949 (age 64), Oklahoma City, OK
Office: Senator (D-MA) since 2013
Previous office: Special Advisor for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2010–2011)
Books: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke, More
Spouse: Bruce Mann (m. 1980), Jim Warren (m. 1968–1978)
Children: Amelia Warren Tyagi, Alexander Warren


Must be the Indian blood in her.
Bankruptcy law, eh? Well at least she'll have one useful skill to help us hedge against the Chinese Century.
BroncoBeavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 03:44 AM   #6
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
A brown/sanders ticket would be perfect but I believe everyone knows who will be president if she runs.
You are talking about Sherrod Brown and not Jerry Brown right? haha Jerry has had his time running for President. I like S. Brown he is a little conservative but he would be good with a Warren or Sanders. I think there is a good Chance Hillary will pick him as VP.

I think she needs to go all in and Choose Warren or Gillibrand as her VP. All female ticket would kick ass.

Last edited by Guess Who; 05-15-2014 at 03:46 AM..
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 12:55 AM   #7
Taco John
24/7 Broncos
 
Taco John's Avatar
 
All Hail King Midas

Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 50,490

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Peyton Manning
Default

I'm always amused that there are so many people who think Hillary can win this thing. She was much stronger in 2012 when she lost to a charismatic nobody who came out of nowhere. She's incredibly weak as a candidate, espeically for an idealistic base of voters. I don't even know if Hillary can win the Democrat nomination, let alone the presidency.
Taco John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 02:35 AM   #8
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
I'm always amused that there are so many people who think Hillary can win this thing. She was much stronger in 2012 when she lost to a charismatic nobody who came out of nowhere. She's incredibly weak as a candidate, espeically for an idealistic base of voters. I don't even know if Hillary can win the Democrat nomination, let alone the presidency.
I hope you don't lose your **** when she's elected president. You're living in some kind of republican fantasyland if you think this.


You don't even have a viable candidate to run against her.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 06:26 AM   #9
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco John View Post
I'm always amused that there are so many people who think Hillary can win this thing. She was much stronger in 2012 when she lost to a charismatic nobody who came out of nowhere. She's incredibly weak as a candidate, espeically for an idealistic base of voters. I don't even know if Hillary can win the Democrat nomination, let alone the presidency.
Only way she will get beat is by another Democrat. Look at the Electoral Map. No Republican will have a chance to win it. Every 4 years Dems are putting more states in play. In 2016 Repub strongholds West VA, Georgia and Arizona will be in play for the Dems. in 2008 and 2012 former Repub states Virginia, NC and SC were in play for the Dems.

She is not as charismatic as Bill obviously, but she is a good Candidate and probable the most qualified presidential candidate in history. It is possible for someone on her left to come out like Obama did but she will not have any problems in general and win by at least 5% points.
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 01:28 PM   #10
Garcia Bronco
Hokie since 1993
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 46,919

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Tom Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guess Who View Post
I was a Biden Guy in 2008 then he dropped out and I became a Hillary supporter than on to Obama. 2012 I would love Warren as most Liberals would but I don't think she has the experience yet and she really isn't a great public speaker. She would make a better VP at this point. We really can't be serious about Castro yet. He is the Mayor of San Antonio for chriminey sakes. Cuomo is not liberal enough so my choice would be between Kristen Gillibrand and Martin O'Malley.

OK I vote for LABF!!!

My rising stars for 2024 after another 8 years of Dem rule is Gavin Newsome and Elizabeth Warren. They will be a power couple.
Elizabeth Warren is an idiot. She runs her mouth on things she clearly doesn't know or understand. starting with her stance on Student loans. The only person I would vote for on this list is Andrew.
Garcia Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 01:39 PM   #11
BroncoBeavis
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoBeavis's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,216

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco View Post
Elizabeth Warren is an idiot. She runs her mouth on things she clearly doesn't know or understand. starting with her stance on Student loans. The only person I would vote for on this list is Andrew.
So far Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders lead the pack. And these kids like to call most conservatives fringe lunatics.
BroncoBeavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 01:56 PM   #12
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
All hail Hercules!

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,981

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
So far Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders lead the pack. And these kids like to call most conservatives fringe lunatics.
They are both right in the center of the the FDR/JFK progressive tradition. The fact you righties consider them "fringe" just shows how extremist the Right has become.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2014, 08:29 AM   #13
BroncoBeavis
Ring of Famer
 
BroncoBeavis's Avatar
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,216

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
They are both right in the center of the the FDR/JFK progressive tradition. The fact you righties consider them "fringe" just shows how extremist the Right has become.
?
BroncoBeavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 06:37 AM   #14
Pony Boy
"Whoa Nellie"
 
Pony Boy's Avatar
 
Omaha !!!

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,649

Adopt-a-Bronco:
mellon head
Default

Why the debate, isn't a 69 year old with double vision good enough for the democrats ...... She will only be 75 when she starts her second term.

According to the New York Daily News, Director of Fromer Eye Centers Dr. Mark Fromer noticed in closeup pictures of Clinton, it appears she is wearing an addition to her glasses called a Fresnel prism.

“If she’s wearing a Fresnel prism, then she has double vision without it,” Fromer told the Daily News.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...ss-may-reveal/
Attached Images
File Type: jpg GL.jpg (176.0 KB, 81 views)

Last edited by Pony Boy; 05-15-2014 at 06:50 AM..
Pony Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 08:21 AM   #15
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony Boy View Post
Why the debate, isn't a 69 year old with double vision good enough for the democrats ...... She will only be 75 when she starts her second term.

According to the New York Daily News, Director of Fromer Eye Centers Dr. Mark Fromer noticed in closeup pictures of Clinton, it appears she is wearing an addition to her glasses called a Fresnel prism.

“If she’s wearing a Fresnel prism, then she has double vision without it,” Fromer told the Daily News.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...ss-may-reveal/

Your hero Ronald Reagon was 70 when he started his first term.

BTW, glasses for dbl vision are not uncommon to be given after a concussion. Also they are only worn temporarily.

Gotta love how a BOGUS RIGHT-WING WEBSITE will make stuff up

Last edited by peacepipe; 05-15-2014 at 08:25 AM..
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 03:01 PM   #16
Arkie
Ring of Famer
 
Arkie's Avatar
 
The f--- y'all motherf-ckas want?

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
Your hero Ronald Reagon was 70 when he started his first term.

BTW, glasses for dbl vision are not uncommon to be given after a concussion. Also they are only worn temporarily.

Gotta love how a BOGUS RIGHT-WING WEBSITE will make stuff up
Age was an issue for Reagan, Dole, and McCain. It will be an issue for Hillary too.
Arkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 03:49 PM   #17
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkie View Post
Age was an issue for Reagan, Dole, and McCain. It will be an issue for Hillary too.
I'm not saying it won't be an issue,but age wasn't the downfall of dole and McCain in their campaigns. It obviously wasn't with Reagan.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 09:14 AM   #18
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony Boy View Post
Why the debate, isn't a 69 year old with double vision good enough for the democrats ...... She will only be 75 when she starts her second term.

According to the New York Daily News, Director of Fromer Eye Centers Dr. Mark Fromer noticed in closeup pictures of Clinton, it appears she is wearing an addition to her glasses called a Fresnel prism.

“If she’s wearing a Fresnel prism, then she has double vision without it,” Fromer told the Daily News.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...ss-may-reveal/
Ok Carl Rove, you know she doesn't wear those glasses anymore. She admitted (AT THE TIME) she wore them after her fall because of double vision from her concussion...lol... Rove says jump and the yahooos don't even bother to say "how high??" They just start jumping.


Last edited by Guess Who; 05-15-2014 at 10:53 AM..
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 07:22 AM   #19
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
All hail Hercules!

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,981

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

If Hillary Clinton had to follow NASCAR rules, she'd be covered in Goldman Sachs and Citigroup patches.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 08:15 AM   #20
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
If Hillary Clinton had to follow NASCAR rules, she'd be covered in Goldman Sachs and Citigroup patches.
Maybe so,what other option is there? I'm not voting for anyone on the right.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 10:44 AM   #21
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
All hail Hercules!

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,981

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
Maybe so,what other option is there? I'm not voting for anyone on the right.
I'm going to support Bernie or Elizabeth. They are two of the very few people who realize the number one issue in the U.S. is to take on the banksters, Wall Street and campaign finance reform. If not them, I don't vote. Basically, I believe this country is no better than any other banana republic at this point. The SCOTUS is embarrassingly ideological, the legislature passes bills written by banks, the president takes orders from Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, and crony capitalism controls every issue. And on the Right you have nothing more substantive than ideological hysteria. What's the point? There is literally no difference between Clinton and Bush. Ask Wall Street. They've already said as much. They're perfectly happy with either. The ship sailed on this republic some time ago. We're just waiting for our Augustus.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 10:54 AM   #22
Guess Who
Rookie
 
Guess Who's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
PMFM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
I'm going to support Bernie or Elizabeth. They are two of the very few people who realize the number one issue in the U.S. is to take on the banksters, Wall Street and campaign finance reform. If not them, I don't vote. Basically, I believe this country is no better than any other banana republic at this point. The SCOTUS is embarrassingly ideological, the legislature passes bills written by banks, the president takes orders from Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, and crony capitalism controls every issue. And on the Right you have nothing more substantive than ideological hysteria. What's the point? There is literally no difference between Clinton and Bush. Ask Wall Street. They've already said as much. They're perfectly happy with either. The ship sailed on this republic some time ago. We're just waiting for our Augustus.
Do you think America is ready for Elizabeth Warren?
Guess Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:17 AM   #23
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
All hail Hercules!

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,981

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guess Who View Post
Do you think America is ready for Elizabeth Warren?
I doubt the majority of Americans have the slightest idea what is going on. So, no.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 11:50 AM   #24
peacepipe
Ring of Famer
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,042

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
I'm going to support Bernie or Elizabeth. They are two of the very few people who realize the number one issue in the U.S. is to take on the banksters, Wall Street and campaign finance reform. If not them, I don't vote. Basically, I believe this country is no better than any other banana republic at this point. The SCOTUS is embarrassingly ideological, the legislature passes bills written by banks, the president takes orders from Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, and crony capitalism controls every issue. And on the Right you have nothing more substantive than ideological hysteria. What's the point? There is literally no difference between Clinton and Bush. Ask Wall Street. They've already said as much. They're perfectly happy with either. The ship sailed on this republic some time ago. We're just waiting for our Augustus.
I'm a big supporter of warren and sanders,but unless they/one of them run and gets the nod I'm going to vote HC.
peacepipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 12:10 PM   #25
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 
All hail Hercules!

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 54,981

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacepipe View Post
I'm a big supporter of warren and sanders,but unless they/one of them run and gets the nod I'm going to vote HC.
I wouldn't vote for another Clinton if you paid me.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Denver Broncos