The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Jibba Jabba > War, Religion and Politics Thread
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2013, 02:10 PM   #1
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default I thought that only "right tards" were fearful of Science...

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...53.html?hp=r17

“IQ is a metric of such dubiousness that almost no serious educational researcher uses it anymore,” the Guardian’s Ana Marie Cox wrote back in May. It was a breathtakingly ignorant statement. Psychologist Jelte Wicherts noted in response that a search for “IQ test” in Google’s academic database yielded more than 10,000 hits — just for the year 2013.

But Cox’s assertion is all too common. There is a large discrepancy between what educated laypeople believe about cognitive science and what experts actually know. Journalists are steeped in the lay wisdom, so they are repeatedly surprised when someone forthrightly discusses the real science of mental ability.

If that science happens to deal with group differences in average IQ, the journalists’ surprise turns into shock and disdain. Experts who speak publicly about IQ differences end up portrayed as weird contrarians at best, and peddlers of racist pseudoscience at worst.

I’m speaking from experience. My Harvard Ph.D. dissertation contains some scientifically unremarkable statements about ethnic differences in average IQ, including the IQ difference between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites. For four years, the dissertation did what almost every other dissertation does — collected dust in the university library. But when it was unearthed in the midst of the immigration debate, I experienced the vilification firsthand.

For people who have studied mental ability, what’s truly frustrating is the déjà vu they feel each time a media firestorm like this one erupts. Attempts by experts in the field to defend the embattled messenger inevitably fall on deaf ears. When the firestorm is over, the media’s mindset always resets to a state of comfortable ignorance, ready to be shocked all over again when the next messenger comes along.

At stake here, incidentally, is not just knowledge for the sake of knowledge, but also how science informs public policy. The U.S. education system, for example, is suffused with mental testing, yet few in the political classes understand cognitive ability research. Angry and repeated condemnations of the science will not help.


THE PLAIN TRUTH? BOTH PARTIES AND THEIR LACKEYS WILL ONLY SUPPORT SCIENCE IF IT SUPPORTS THEIR ALREADY FORMED NOTIONS


txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-11-2013, 02:18 PM   #2
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default Here's more liberal hypocrisy....

Liberals think that IQ is largely irrelevant...... Until it's time to get a minority murderer off of death row.
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 02:58 PM   #3
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Man! Is that guy naive, or what? Has he spent his entire life in the ivory tower? The danger does not come from the science. It comes from what some people might do with the science. Look at his last paragraph:

This is not just about academic freedom or any one scholar’s reputation. Cognitive differences can inform our understanding of a number of policy issues — everything from education, to military recruitment, to employment discrimination to, yes, immigration. Start treating the science of mental ability seriously, and both political discourse and public policy will be better for it.

"Better for it?" I highly doubt that. This is the kind of foundational criteria the Nazis used to select people for euthanasia.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 03:21 PM   #4
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Man! Is that guy naive, or what? Has he spent his entire life in the ivory tower? The danger does not come from the science. It comes from what some people might do with the science. Look at his last paragraph:

This is not just about academic freedom or any one scholar’s reputation. Cognitive differences can inform our understanding of a number of policy issues — everything from education, to military recruitment, to employment discrimination to, yes, immigration. Start treating the science of mental ability seriously, and both political discourse and public policy will be better for it.

"Better for it?" I highly doubt that. This is the kind of foundational criteria the Nazis used to select people for euthanasia.
Euthanasia? Reach much plastic man? Andwhat good is data if you're not willing to make INFORMED decisions based upon it? This is a football message board. Does the Broncos front office not have standards by which they measure and sort through potential members of our favorite football team? Admit it. It's science and it scares you.
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 04:14 PM   #5
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txtebow View Post
Euthanasia? Reach much plastic man? Andwhat good is data if you're not willing to make INFORMED decisions based upon it? This is a football message board. Does the Broncos front office not have standards by which they measure and sort through potential members of our favorite football team? Admit it. It's science and it scares you.
Do you think the Broncos judge players by what racial group they belong to, or by what individual skills they bring to the game?

How would you implement this science? A few examples?

Last edited by Rohirrim; 08-11-2013 at 04:16 PM..
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 04:50 PM   #6
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Do you think the Broncos judge players by what racial group they belong to, or by what individual skills they bring to the game?

How would you implement this science? A few examples?
I would do away with all race based initiatives and quotas in schools and in the work force. Let the cards fall where they may regarding achievement which if juxtaposed to America's current policies of explaining away in-congruencies in wealth and accomplishment as "White privilege" and therefore implementing programs designed to award unworthy candidates opportunity that they don't deserve based upon their own merits.

It's like keeping a roster spot on the Broncos for a 5.5 40 time WR solely because he fits a quota.......but that's our nation's policy in opportunity in education and business...
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 08:39 PM   #7
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txtebow View Post
I would do away with all race based initiatives and quotas in schools and in the work force. Let the cards fall where they may regarding achievement which if juxtaposed to America's current policies of explaining away in-congruencies in wealth and accomplishment as "White privilege" and therefore implementing programs designed to award unworthy candidates opportunity that they don't deserve based upon their own merits.

It's like keeping a roster spot on the Broncos for a 5.5 40 time WR solely because he fits a quota.......but that's our nation's policy in opportunity in education and business...
It would make sense to give those who score less on the tests more help, wouldn't you think? Perhaps the best thing to do would be to segregate schools by race? Asians in one school, whites in another, etc. What do you do with mixed race kids?

And then there's immigration. Do we only allow asians and whites to emigrate to America? Or perhaps put quotas on the "lesser" races?

What group do Jews fit in with? Are they white?

You also seem to be implying with the above post that selective breeding might be a consideration. Should we simply make sure that whites only breed with whites, or should we test for the best of the whites and only allow them to breed? Is it okay for whites to breed with Asians? What if Asians decide that they shouldn't breed with whites?

And what do we do about hispanic breeding. They're outbreeding us whites. What should we do about it?

So many questions...
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 03:26 PM   #8
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,061
Default

Group differences are allowed to persecute specific individuals. That's what txtebow wants.

Never mind that the range of individual ability swamps the inter-group differences. txtebow and his ilk deliberately ignore that so they can engage in their collectivist bigotry.

Last edited by W*GS; 08-11-2013 at 03:35 PM..
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 04:51 PM   #9
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
Group differences are allowed to persecute specific individuals. That's what txtebow wants.

Never mind that the range of individual ability swamps the inter-group differences. txtebow and his ilk deliberately ignore that so they can engage in their collectivist bigotry.
IQ Group differences in a civilized, western based society explain why White Privilege is a liberal MYTH.
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 05:01 PM   #10
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

The emotional mind cannot be moved by reason. Liberals are very emotional and even anti-reason, much to the same extent as the "creationist" Right wing morons are. It's yet another example of actually becoming that which you espouse to be steadfastly against:

1) I'm not racist, but I refuse to acknowledge racist practices of blacks towards whites.

2) "right-tards" are anti science! but I refuse to acknowledge that IQ and genetics play a role in accomplishment in a western civilized society despite Science baring that out....
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 05:16 PM   #11
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

But go ahead and criticize SCIENCE you hypocrites.
The reality is that psychometric outcomes are correlated with various academic and socio-economicoutcomes. Far more so than any other variable in psychology. Hence the use of things such as SAT's and psychometric tests in organizations and the military. 



University of Delaware Professor Linda Gottfredson has noted that this has implications in diverse societies where there are different group averages. 



Gottfredson, L. S. (2005).
Implications of cognitive differences for schooling within diverse societies. Pages 517-554 in C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Comprehensive
Handbook of Multicultural School Psychology. New York: Wiley. 





It is also extraordinary that people who claim to believe in evolution are so surprised at the suggestion that groups differ. Consider:

1. Behavioural traits, including cognitive ability, are heritable.

2. Different environments and cultures may favor different traits (greater re-productive success).

3. There is evidence of 1 standard deviation shifts in population average occurring over a 1000 year period. Groups were separated for 50,000 years, why wouldn't you expect to see population differences?

As Jonathan Haidt writes, it's only a matter of time before genomics reveals the basis for these differences.

"But the writing is on the wall. Russian scientists showed in the 1990s that a strong selection pressure (picking out and breeding only the tamest fox pups in each generation) created what was — in behavior as well as body — essentially a new species in just 30 generations. That would correspond to about 750 years for humans. Humans may never have experienced such a strong selection pressure for such a long period, but they surely experienced many weaker selection pressures that lasted far longer, and for which some heritable personality traits were more adaptive than others. It stands to reason that local populations (not continent-wide "races") adapted to local circumstances by a process known as "co-evolution" in which genes and cultural elements change over time and mutually influence each other. ..

Recent "sweeps" of the genome across human populations show that hundreds of genes have been changing during the last 5-10 millennia in response to local selection pressures. (See papers (See papers by Benjamin Voight, Scott Williamson, and Bruce Lahn).

http://www.edge.org/response-d...

Also, see Rindermann et al 'Haplogroups as evolutionary markers of cognitive ability' Intelligence Volume 40, Issue 4, July–August 2012, Pages 362–375. The authors conclude:

"Based on their evolutionary meaning and correlation with cognitive ability these haplogroups were grouped into two sets. Combined, they accounted in a regression and path analyses for 32–51% of the variance in national intelligence relative to the developmental indicator (35–58%). This pattern was replicated internationally with further controls (e.g. latitude, spatial autocorrelation etc.) and at the regional level in two independent samples (within Italy and Spain). These findings, using a conservative estimate of evolutionary influences, provide support for a mixed influence on national cognitive ability stemming from both current environmental and past environmental (evolutionary) factors."


Go spend $31.50 and enlighten yourselves.....http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...60289612000529
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 06:47 PM   #12
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,061
Default

Yep - txtebow is playing the "whites are superior to blacks" canard.

As expected.

Never mind that he drags down the collective IQ of humanity...
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 07:03 PM   #13
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W*GS View Post
Yep - txtebow is playing the "whites are superior to blacks" canard.

As expected.

Never mind that he drags down the collective IQ of humanity...
I'm simply pointing out the absolute hypocrisy of the leftist swine like you when it comes to critiquing the right wing about their aversion to science. You are no different. This thread is a prime example of that. What makes you worse than the right wing idiots? You pick and choose which science you choose to characterize as legitimate to suit your fallacies. leftists are not just disingenuous but cowardly as well...
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 07:25 PM   #14
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txtebow View Post
I'm simply pointing out the absolute hypocrisy of the leftist swine like you when it comes to critiquing the right wing about their aversion to science. You are no different. This thread is a prime example of that. What makes you worse than the right wing idiots? You pick and choose which science you choose to characterize as legitimate to suit your fallacies. leftists are not just disingenuous but cowardly as well...
Thanks for posting just about what I thought you would...

Your favorite, eh?

W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2013, 09:37 PM   #15
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,061
Default

txtebow thinks blacks are inherently inferior, stupid, and violent.

Nothing he's written is evidence against that interpretation.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 08:31 AM   #16
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Here's the funny thing about this "science." The guy is a graduate student sponsored by the Koch Bros. American Enterprise Institute, who then moves on to the Heritage Foundation. They use his "science" to back up their anti-immigration policy. So, obviously they are big believers in science.

Oh, I mean except for when the science overwhelmingly supports the idea of man-made global warming. Then they're not such big believers.
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 08:49 AM   #17
houghtam
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,396
Default

I suppose the "science" used to defend the tobacco industry (paid for by the tobacco industry) was real "science" too.

txtebow is a ****ing tool.
houghtam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 11:23 AM   #18
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Here's the funny thing about this "science." The guy is a graduate student sponsored by the Koch Bros. American Enterprise Institute, who then moves on to the Heritage Foundation. They use his "science" to back up their anti-immigration policy. So, obviously they are big believers in science.

Oh, I mean except for when the science overwhelmingly supports the idea of man-made global warming. Then they're not such big believers.
IQ studies have been going on for years with largely the same differentiation and score stratification. Again, another case of Liberals choosing to believe in Science when it suits them.....which makes you more vile than the right wing nut jobs who are simply ignorant. Your type is deceitful...
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 11:41 AM   #19
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txtebow View Post
IQ studies have been going on for years with largely the same differentiation and score stratification. Again, another case of Liberals choosing to believe in Science when it suits them.....which makes you more vile than the right wing nut jobs who are simply ignorant. Your type is deceitful...
Okay. You like science? Let's try the largest single study into human cognition testing 100,000 people. And this one was conducted by the Canada Excellence Research Chair in Cognitive Neuroscience and Imaging, not a grad student working for the Heritage Foundation to support their immigration racism.

“For a century or more many people have thought that we can distinguish between people, or indeed populations, based on the idea of general intelligence which is often talked about in terms of a single number: IQ. We have shown here that’s just wrong,” he said.

Studies over the past 50 years based on IQ tests have suggested that there could be inherent differences in intelligence between racial groups, social classes and between men and women, but these conclusions are undermined by the latest findings, Dr Highfield said.

“We already know that, from a scientific point of view, the notion of race is meaningless. Genetic differences do not map on to traditional measurements of skin colour, hair type, body proportions and skull measurements. Now we have shown that IQ is meaningless too,” Dr Highfield said.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...s-8425911.html

Like the organizations and ideas you shill for, you use selective science.

Why don't you have the guts to state clearly what you are really trying to sell here instead of constantly masking it in bull****?

The scientists found that no single component, or IQ, could explain all the variations revealed by the tests. The researcher then analysed the brain circuitry of 16 participants with a hospital MRI scanner and found that the three separate components corresponded to three distinct patterns of neural activity in the brain.

“It has always seemed to be odd that we like to call the human brain the most complex known object in the Universe, yet many of us are still prepared to accept that we can measure brain function by doing a few so-called IQ tests,” Dr Highfield said.


Another report on the same study: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1219133334.htm

Last edited by Rohirrim; 08-12-2013 at 11:59 AM..
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 01:31 PM   #20
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,549

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Okay. You like science? Let's try the largest single study into human cognition testing 100,000 people. And this one was conducted by the Canada Excellence Research Chair in Cognitive Neuroscience and Imaging, not a grad student working for the Heritage Foundation to support their immigration racism.

“For a century or more many people have thought that we can distinguish between people, or indeed populations, based on the idea of general intelligence which is often talked about in terms of a single number: IQ. We have shown here that’s just wrong,” he said.

Studies over the past 50 years based on IQ tests have suggested that there could be inherent differences in intelligence between racial groups, social classes and between men and women, but these conclusions are undermined by the latest findings, Dr Highfield said.

“We already know that, from a scientific point of view, the notion of race is meaningless. Genetic differences do not map on to traditional measurements of skin colour, hair type, body proportions and skull measurements. Now we have shown that IQ is meaningless too,” Dr Highfield said.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...s-8425911.html

Like the organizations and ideas you shill for, you use selective science.

Why don't you have the guts to state clearly what you are really trying to sell here instead of constantly masking it in bull****?

The scientists found that no single component, or IQ, could explain all the variations revealed by the tests. The researcher then analysed the brain circuitry of 16 participants with a hospital MRI scanner and found that the three separate components corresponded to three distinct patterns of neural activity in the brain.

“It has always seemed to be odd that we like to call the human brain the most complex known object in the Universe, yet many of us are still prepared to accept that we can measure brain function by doing a few so-called IQ tests,” Dr Highfield said.


Another report on the same study: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1219133334.htm
Interestingly, that study received a lot of coverage. Apparently our resident 'race' expert didn't like its findings.

IQ tests 'do not reflect intelligence'

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence,
according to a study which found that a minimum of three
different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...elligence.html
DenverBrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 02:02 PM   #21
txtebow
WARRIOR
 
Crash the plane HOGAN!!!

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Big D
Posts: 1,883

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Requiem
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
Interestingly, that study received a lot of coverage. Apparently our resident 'race' expert didn't like its findings.

IQ tests 'do not reflect intelligence'

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence,
according to a study which found that a minimum of three
different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...elligence.html
Right. IQ doesn't matter. It's pure coincidence that those who tend to score highest have split the atom, flown a man to the moon and developed life span altering vaccines. Nothing to see here.....
txtebow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2013, 02:11 PM   #22
nyuk nyuk
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
Interestingly, that study received a lot of coverage. Apparently our resident 'race' expert didn't like its findings.

IQ tests 'do not reflect intelligence'

IQ tests are misleading because they do not accurately reflect intelligence,
according to a study which found that a minimum of three
different exams are needed to measure someone's brainpower.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...elligence.html
Who needs years of valid psychological testing in intelligence and its heritability when you have the news media and their version of science?

Hint: "A study." Not the overall consensus which is that IQ testing is valid and due to that is in frequent use.

Though as txtebow already stated in this thread, with the left, IQ never matters until its time to invoke low IQ as a reason to not execute a murderer.

Funny how that works.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 08:32 PM   #23
nyuk nyuk
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Now we have shown that IQ is meaningless too,” Dr Highfield said.
He's at odds with the establishment of psychology as well as decades of IQ studies which have shown it to be proven valid. That's pretty wild. I'd suggest his politics are somewhere to the left.

Let's face it though, this wouldn't be an issue if these IQ tests were slathered in equals signs. It's that they aren't is why people become hostile and defensive and try to dismiss them, much like some Christians have been known to do with whatever contradicts their faith as well.

The problem here is that you are talking about "a study," when these IQ studies are compiled studies by many different people over decades. See the problem?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 09:42 AM   #24
Rohirrim
Partisan
 
Rohirrim's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Twixt Hell & Highwater
Posts: 55,393

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Malik Jackson
Default

If we are going to start making policy decisions based on the tested out intelligence of people, I say we start with testing this guy:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3743390.html
Rohirrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2013, 12:39 PM   #25
W*GS
Ring of Famer
 
W*GS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
If we are going to start making policy decisions based on the tested out intelligence of people, I say we start with testing this guy:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3743390.html
One of the biggest fookheads in Congress.
W*GS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Denver Broncos