critical thinking about September 11, 2001

[mhgaffney]

Richard Gage presents a 10-minute primer on 9/11

that will change the way you think about the issue.

Not to be missed...

http://youtu.be/vZAHp_zSGd8

[DenverBrit]

It's pathetic that you continue to use that debunked con man and pseudo 'architect' then run over here expecting to be taken seriously.

Here's his 'masterpiece' of stupid.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

It's pathetic that you continue to use that debunked con man and pseudo 'architect' then run over here expecting to be taken seriously.

Here's his 'masterpiece' of stupid.

Debunked?

I'd like to see a shot of Brit early in the morning -- before he's put in his false teeth.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Debunked?

I'd like to see a shot of Brit early in the morning -- before he's put in his false teeth.

Was that why Gage acted like a clown with little boxes, it was early and his teeth were still in a jar by the door??

Ok, that explains everything.

[defilade]

Holy ****!! Nope, can't believe anymore that the cave men did it. That's a freakin Fairy tale!

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Was that why Gage acted like a clown with little boxes, it was early and his teeth were still in a jar by the door??

Ok, that explains everything.

The principle of physics he is explaining is valid. Try using your pea sized brain to understand what he is saying.

The upper floors of the WTC disintegrated before our eyes -- turned to dust -- and therefor cannot provide the mass which (we are told) caused the "classical collapse"

Of course, there is no such thing as a "classical collapse" when it comes to high rise steel buildings. Not a one had ever failed before 9/11 -- nor has any since - though three (count them, 1,2,3) failed on that one day.

Nor have the collapses been explained satisfactorily (except by us conspiracy theorists). 1700 architects and engineers now agree.

MHG

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

The principle of physics he is explaining is valid.

How the **** would you know, moron?

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Try using your pea sized brain to understand what he is saying.

You're the expert on peabrains.

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

The upper floors of the WTC disintegrated before our eyes -- turned to dust -- and therefor cannot provide the mass which (we are told) caused the "classical collapse"

No.

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Nor have the collapses been explained satisfactorily (except by us conspiracy theorists). 1700 architects and engineers now agree.

No.

Whatever happened to red-mercury-powered pure-fusion mini-nukes, boy?

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

The principle of physics he is explaining is valid. Try using your pea sized brain to understand what he is saying.

The upper floors of the WTC disintegrated before our eyes -- turned to dust -- and therefor cannot provide the mass which (we are told) caused the "classical collapse"

Of course, there is no such thing as a "classical collapse" when it comes to high rise steel buildings. Not a one had ever failed before 9/11 -- nor has any since - though three (count them, 1,2,3) failed on that one day.

Nor have the collapses been explained satisfactorily (except by us conspiracy theorists). 1700 architects and engineers now agree.

MHG

Absolute nonsense, but believing that bs is crucial for the troofers and their wacky conspiracy theories.
Without that lie, they have NOTHING but money grubbing schemes to fleece the gullible.

Gaffeny, this crap was put to bed years ago. Get a ****ing life!

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

[defilade]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

It's pathetic that you continue to use that debunked con man and pseudo 'architect' then run over here expecting to be taken seriously.

Here's his 'masterpiece' of stupid.

Wow, Your kinda on the retarded side of things aren't ya! Here is a simple video for ya, Thought all the shock wore off people by now but I see some people are still clinging to the "Cavemen did it theory."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by defilade

Wow, Your kinda on the retarded side of things aren't ya! Here is a simple video for ya, Thought all the shock wore off people by now but I see some people are still clinging to the "Cavemen did it theory."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

Another 'Troofer'.

So tell us YOUR version of the 'Troof' and explain why the peer reviewed paper is wrong. Assuming you're not Gaffney in drag.

[mhgaffney]

How a high school science prof upstaged and embarrassed the US government

In post # 24 I gave you the link to the final report about WTC-7 -- by the official government agency that did the investigation -- NIST.

I gave you the page number -- and the actual verbatim text -- the passage -- where NIST admits in its final report that building seven fell at free fall for 2+ seconds.

Thus, NIST itself supports the video by R Gage at the top of this thread.

It is curious that in its draft report on WTC-7 NIST denied that free fall had occurred. In the draft report NIST also stated that IF a free fall had occurred it would have been the tell-tale indicator for use of explosives.

The draft report was made public in August 2008. That same month NIST sponsored a public hearing for its draft report. A high school physics and math teacher named David Chandler showed up at the hearing and confronted the NIST scientists with his own mathematical analysis of the collapse of WTC-7 based on the videos of the collapse. His analysis concluded that free fall had occurred.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpAp8eCEqNA

As a result of that presentation, NIST was forced to change its analysis - and this is reflected in the final report released a couple of months later. NIST conceded in its final report that Chandler was right - -that free fall did occur.

Curiously -- NIST dropped the passage where it stated that free fall is the tell tale sign of a demolition.

A high school science teacher embarrassed a gov't agency staffed with hundreds of scientists and funded with a nearly endless budget. This is one of the great stories about 9/11. This story should have been front pages news -- and rated a headline in the NY Times (i.e., NIST UPSTAGED BY HS SCIENCE PROF) But as we know --the US media never so much as mentioned it.

This is the state of affairs in America today. It's why I titled my latest book Black 9/11 --

Darkness has descended upon the nation. Fools chase their tails and call it normal.

The blind lead the blind.

Meanwhile we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.

MHG

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

How a high school science prof upstaged and embarrassed the US government

This bull**** claim was covered over two years ago.

gaffe, you're constantly dredging up old debunked **** and presenting as new.

WTF is your problem?

You're as bad as the climate change deniers who state that the satellite record shows cooling - which was fixed back in 2006.

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

The blind lead the blind.

And you're making money from the corpses of dead innocents. Truly a darkness.

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Meanwhile we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.

That makes you orgasm, doesn't it?

[defilade]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Another 'Troofer'.

So tell us YOUR version of the 'Troof' and explain why the peer reviewed paper is wrong. Assuming you're not Gaffney in drag.

Yep, building 7 came down due to normal office fires according to nist. Wow, just wow. Do you know how to butter bread?

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by defilade

Yep, building 7 came down due to normal office fires according to nist. Wow, just wow. Do you know how to butter bread?

The cause is well documented, it's only the Troofer wackos who ignore the facts and dream up looney conspiracy theories. So what have you got, other than sophomoric responses to real questions??

There was no mystery to those who fought the fires on the ground. But you know what they don't, right??

[Fedaykin]

Originally Posted by defilade

Wow, Your kinda on the retarded side of things aren't ya! Here is a simple video for ya, Thought all the shock wore off people by now but I see some people are still clinging to the "Cavemen did it theory."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

Idiotic video that ignores the good engineering practices that go into building high rises.

Hint: High rises are designed to fail as gracefully as possible. If the WTC buildings had not been well designed, they might well have toppled over like dominoes instead of failing relatively gracefully as they did.

[myMind]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

Here's his 'masterpiece' of stupid.

My god that man is an idiot.

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by myMind

My god that man is an idiot.

And he's the troofers structural engineering expert.

You should see their demolition expert, stumpy.

[defilade]

Originally Posted by DenverBrit

And he's the troofers structural engineering expert.

You should see their demolition expert, stumpy.

Aha, I think Gage has thousands on his side that are Experts... some won major awards there fruitloop...

[DenverBrit]

Originally Posted by defilade

Aha, I think Gage has thousands on his side that are Experts... some won major awards there fruitloop...

[W*GS]

Thanks for the most ironic thread title in quite some time, gaffe.

BTW, what's Venus?

When was America at its best, and what are your reasons?

See if you can herald the new year with some balls.

[mhgaffney]

Originally Posted by W*GS

Thanks for the most ironic thread title in quite some time, gaffe.

BTW, what's Venus?

When was America at its best, and what are your reasons?

See if you can herald the new year with some balls.

You are scamming the board again with your off topic posts. Either address the topic or get the **** out of here.

MHG

[W*GS]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

You are scamming the board again with your off topic posts. Either address the topic or get the **** out of here.

Chicken. We all know that asking you about the nature of Venus is a Zionist trick.

PS - That's you on the platter, son. Cooked to crispy deliciousness.

[Fedaykin]

Originally Posted by mhgaffney

Richard Gage presents a 10-minute primer on 9/11

that will change the way you think about the issue.

Not to be missed...

http://youtu.be/vZAHp_zSGd8

Coming from the person on this board with perhaps the worst critical thinking skills, this is... cute.

[W*GS]

Book sales musta dipped a bit - time for gaffe to do a sales pitch again.

red-mercury-powered-pure-fusion-mini-nukes, eh?

[W*GS]

Evidence for Nuclear Fission at the WTC

One of gaffe's past loads o' bilge...

The **** just flows fast and furious from that peabrain of his.